SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600T

32,707 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-14600T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080: A Desktop Pairing Analysis

This build combines a 14-core Intel Core i5-14600T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, creating a desktop system that sits at the 76th percentile overall among all CPU-GPU pairings. The processor is a low-power variant of the Raptor Lake refresh family, while the GPU is an Ampere-generation flagship that has since reached end-of-life status. The data indicates a pairing where the CPU delivers strong multi-threaded throughput for its 35-watt TDP class, while the GPU provides substantial rasterization and ray-tracing capabilities that dominate the performance picture in graphics-bound workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which places it in the LGA 1700 ecosystem that supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. This flexibility is notable for builders seeking to reuse existing DDR4 modules or move to newer DDR5 kits. The platform also supports ECC memory, a feature more commonly associated with workstation-class systems, which broadens the CPU's applicability beyond consumer gaming into reliability-focused small business or data-processing roles. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only), enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for modern storage devices and expansion cards.

The RTX 3080, by contrast, uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface and has a 320-watt TDP. The suggested PSU requirement for the GPU alone is 700 watts, which means any system built around this pairing must account for substantial power delivery headroom. The CPU's 35-watt TDP is remarkably low, but the GPU's power appetite dominates the system-level requirement. A sensible next upgrade path would involve addressing the GPU first, as the CPU's socket and memory flexibility leave room for a future processor swap within the LGA 1700 family, assuming a compatible chipset. However, the RTX 3080's end-of-life production status suggests that future upgrades would likely replace the GPU entirely rather than augment it, and the 700-watt PSU recommendation provides sufficient headroom for a range of alternative graphics cards in the same performance tier.

The platform's DDR4/DDR5 dual support is a practical advantage for incremental upgrades. A user moving from an older DDR4-based system can retain memory modules, reducing the cost of a platform transition. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache and per-core L2 cache design indicate a well-balanced memory hierarchy that should scale with faster memory kits, though the data does not specify measured bandwidth figures. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU also future-proof storage and GPU connectivity, even if the current RTX 3080 only uses PCIe 4.0.

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark results indicate that the RTX 3080 is the dominant component in this pairing, but the CPU's performance profile creates a nuanced bottleneck picture. The i5-14600T scores 22,447 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3,169 in single-core, placing it at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. Its avg benchmark score of 32,707 is nearly identical to the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32,697, 0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F (32,750, -0.1% delta), indicating that it trades blows with upper-mid-range mobile and desktop processors.

The RTX 3080, meanwhile, scores 25,086 in Passmark G3D and 14,397 in GPU compute, with an avg benchmark score of 23,172 that places it at the 68th percentile among all GPUs. The GPU's percentile ranking is lower than the CPU's, suggesting that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU's performance ceiling is the limiting factor for overall system throughput in graphics-heavy workloads. In CPU-bound tasks like data compression (301,827 in Passmark), the i5-14600T's 20 threads provide ample headroom, meaning the GPU would sit idle while the CPU churns through compute workloads. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like 4K gaming or ray-traced rendering, the CPU's single-core score of 3,169 ensures it can keep up with frame generation demands.

The percentile gap — CPU at 83rd, GPU at 68th — implies that the CPU has more relative headroom than the GPU. This means that in balanced workloads, the RTX 3080 will hit its limits first, and the i5-14600T will have spare capacity. For gaming at lower resolutions, however, the CPU's single-thread performance becomes more critical, and the data suggests it is adequate but not exceptional when compared to higher-clocked desktop parts. The base clock of 1.80 GHz is low, but the 5.10 GHz boost clock compensates in bursty single-threaded scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600T is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh variant. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The core configuration breaks down into a mix of performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact P-core/E-core split. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, has a dual-channel memory bus, and includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics.

The benchmark data paints a picture of a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads relative to its 35-watt TDP. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,447 is strong for a low-power part, and the Geekbench multi-core score of 12,840 reinforces this. Single-thread performance is respectable, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,169 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2,559. Passmark results show significant throughput in integer math (95,112), floating-point math (64,726), and extended instructions (16,985), indicating solid compute capabilities for scientific or engineering workloads.

The 14-core, 20-thread configuration means the CPU can handle heavily parallelized tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation efficiently. The 24 MB L3 cache is generous for a mid-range part, aiding in workloads with large working sets. Data encryption (18,226 in Passmark) and random string sorting (34,310) scores suggest competent performance for database and compression tasks. The low 35-watt TDP is a defining characteristic, making this CPU suitable for compact builds or systems where thermal output is a concern, though the boost clock of 5.10 GHz indicates it can burst to high frequencies for short-duration tasks.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i5-14600T is essentially performance-equivalent to the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0% delta), AMD Ryzen 5 7400F (-0.1% delta), AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (0.1% delta), and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (-0.3% delta) in average benchmark score. This places it firmly in the upper-mid-range tier, with performance that rivals both mobile and desktop parts from competing architectures.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize GPU-intensive workloads but still need a capable CPU for multi-threaded productivity. The RTX 3080's 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth make it suitable for 1440p and 4K gaming, though the data does not include measured FPS figures for this exact combination. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking means it can handle content creation tasks like video editing and 3D rendering without becoming a bottleneck, while the GPU's 68th percentile ranking provides strong graphics acceleration.

Specific target users include gamers at 1440p or 4K resolution who want high detail settings and ray tracing enabled. The RTX 3080's 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray-traced lighting and DLSS upscaling, respectively. Content creators working with video editing software that leverages GPU acceleration will benefit from the 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 performance. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache. Students and small business workstations that run a mix of office applications and occasional GPU-accelerated tasks would find the power efficiency of the 35-watt CPU appealing, though the GPU's 320-watt TDP offsets some of that efficiency in practice.

The build is less suited for users who need maximum CPU performance in single-threaded applications, as the 1.80 GHz base clock may cause latency in lightly-threaded workloads that do not boost properly. It is also not ideal for ultra-budget builds, given the GPU's launch MSRP of 699 USD, though the data does not reflect current market pricing.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 32,707, ranking it at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.3% of its score, indicating a tightly contested performance tier. The GPU's average benchmark score is 23,172, placing it at the 68th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA P106-100 (-0.3% delta), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 (-0.3% delta), AMD Radeon RX 6600M (-0.4% delta), and AMD Radeon R9 M290X (-0.4% delta), which are all substantially older or lower-tier parts.

The combined system percentile is 76, indicating that this pairing outperforms roughly three-quarters of all recorded CPU-GPU combinations. The CPU's individual percentile (83) is higher than the GPU's (68), which means the GPU drags the combined score down slightly. In practical terms, the system is well-balanced but leans toward CPU capability. The RTX 3080's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,407 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 152,423 demonstrate strong graphics compute performance, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,447 shows it can feed the GPU in gaming scenarios without stalling.

The Passmark GPU compute score of 14,397 is notably lower than the G3D score of 25,086, suggesting that the GPU excels in rasterization but is comparatively less optimized for pure compute workloads. This aligns with the RTX 3080's gaming-focused design, where the 68 RT cores handle ray tracing but general compute tasks may not scale as well.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3080's 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 760.3 GB/s memory bandwidth are well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p. The CPU's single-core score of 3,169 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame generation is not CPU-limited in most titles, though the 35-watt TDP may cause sustained multi-core loads to throttle. The GPU's 68th percentile ranking suggests it can handle competitive titles at high frame rates, but the lack of measured FPS data means exact figures are estimates.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and the GPU's 272 tensor cores provide a solid foundation for streaming workloads. The NVENC encoder on the RTX 3080, while not explicitly listed, is a standard feature of this generation, and the CPU's multi-threaded performance can handle encoding alongside gaming. The Passmark data encryption score of 18,226 indicates adequate throughput for stream encryption overhead.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,447 and the GPU's 14,397 Passmark GPU compute score combine for efficient video editing. Timeline scrubbing and effects rendering will leverage the CPU's 14 cores, while the GPU accelerates export encoding. The 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K timelines with color grading, though very long projects may hit memory limits.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-core performance (22,447 in Cinebench R23) handles CPU-based renderers, while the GPU's 68 RT cores accelerate ray-traced rendering in compatible applications. The FP32 throughput of 29.77 TFLOPS supports GPU renderers like Blender Cycles or V-Ray GPU. The 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU ensure high-bandwidth communication with the GPU for data-heavy scenes.

Software development: The 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache are ideal for compiling large codebases. The Passmark integer math score of 95,112 indicates strong performance for CPU-bound build processes. The ECC memory support is an added benefit for developers working on reliability-critical systems.

Student and office work: The CPU's 35-watt TDP makes this an efficient choice for daily productivity tasks, and the UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a fallback for basic display output. The Passmark single-thread score of 3,744 ensures responsive application performance for word processing and web browsing, though the RTX 3080 is overkill for such tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this pairing. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 68th percentile ranking suggest that the system is capable of playing modern titles at high settings, but exact frame rates cannot be stated with certainty.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,407 and the CPU's single-core performance, the estimated gaming behavior would see the RTX 3080 as the primary determinant of frame rates at higher resolutions, while the CPU would matter more at 1080p with lower graphics settings. The 10 GB GDDR6X memory is adequate for 1440p ultra settings in most games, though some titles with high-resolution texture packs may exceed this capacity. The 760.3 GB/s memory bandwidth supports high fill rates, and the 96 ROPs provide strong pixel throughput. The GPU's Passmark DirectX 12 score of 100 and DirectX 11 score of 207 indicate good API compatibility, though these relative scores suggest the GPU performs better in older APIs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining a low-power 14-core Intel processor with a high-performance Ampere-generation GPU. The CPU is a 10 nm Raptor Lake refresh part with a 35-watt TDP, and the GPU is an 8 nm Samsung-fabricated GA102 chip with a 320-watt TDP. The combined system percentile of 76 places it in the upper tier of recorded builds, with the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking being notably higher than the GPU's 68th percentile.

The pairing represents an interesting balance: the CPU is designed for energy efficiency, while the GPU is designed for maximum performance. This creates a system that is well-suited for users who need multi-threaded CPU performance without high power draw, but who also require substantial GPU horsepower for gaming or rendering. The RTX 3080's end-of-life production status means it is no longer in active production, but its benchmark scores remain competitive.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined system percentile is 76, meaning it outperforms 76% of all recorded CPU-GPU pairings in the database.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-core performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-14600T scores 22,447 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and has an average benchmark score of 32,707, which is within 0.3% of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, AMD Ryzen 5 7400F, AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H.

Q: Does this system support DDR4 or DDR5 memory?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in memory choice.

Q: What is the suggested power supply requirement for the RTX 3080?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 3080 is 700 watts, based on the GPU's 320-watt TDP.

Q: Are there measured gaming FPS figures for this exact build?

A: No, the data does not include measured FPS rows for this combination. All gaming performance discussion is estimated from the component benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 3080 has 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s and a memory clock of 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the i5-14600T includes UHD Graphics 770, which provides a fallback display output and basic graphics capability.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is an Ampere-architecture GPU built on Samsung's 8 nm process node, with a GA102 chip containing 28,300 million transistors across a 628 mm² die. The transistor density of 45.1M per mm² indicates a moderately dense design for its generation. The GPU has 8,704 shading units, 272 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, providing a strong foundation for rasterized rendering. The 68 RT cores handle ray-traced workloads, while the 272 tensor cores accelerate AI-based features like DLSS.

Memory bandwidth is a standout feature: 10 GB of GDDR6X on a 320-bit bus delivers 760.3 GB/s, which is substantial for handling high-resolution textures and large datasets. The base clock is 1440 MHz with a boost clock of 1710 MHz, and the memory operates at 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The GPU's FP32 throughput of 29.77 TFLOPS (with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio of 29.77 TFLOPS) indicates strong compute performance for both gaming and content creation. Pixel rate is 164.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 465.1 GTexel/s, enabling high-fill-rate scenarios.

Benchmark results show the GPU achieving a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,407 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 152,423. The Passmark G3D score of 25,086 places the GPU at the 68th percentile overall, while the GPU compute score of 14,397 is lower, suggesting the GPU is optimized for graphics rather than general compute. The Passmark DirectX scores (170 for DX10, 207 for DX11, 100 for DX12, 258 for DX9) indicate variable API performance, with the relative scores suggesting stronger legacy API performance. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

The physical design is a dual-slot card measuring 285 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. It uses a single 12-pin power connector and has display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The 320-watt TDP and 700-watt suggested PSU requirement make it a power-hungry component, but the performance metrics justify the power draw for users who need high frame rates or GPU-accelerated rendering. The GPU's end-of-life production status means it is no longer manufactured, but its benchmark scores remain competitive enough to position it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs.