SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600T + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600T

32,707 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600T and Intel Arc B570 form a desktop pairing that lands in the 74th percentile overall, a position that suggests a system built for balanced, high-throughput work rather than extreme enthusiast overclocking. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-R part on the LGA 1700 socket, while the GPU is Intel’s Battlemage-generation Arc B570, a 10 GB GDDR6 card with a 160-bit memory bus. The data here is entirely synthetic — there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination — so all gaming discussion below is framed as estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not empirical results. What the numbers do show is a platform with strong multi-threaded compute, a modern graphics architecture with substantial bandwidth, and a clear division of labor where the CPU leads in productivity and the GPU handles rendering with a distinct memory advantage.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm TSMC process with 19,600 million transistors on a ize of 272 mm². Its base and boost clocks are both listed at ize 2500 MHz, with memory running at ize 2375 MHz, translating to ize 19 Gbps effective. The memory subsystem is a defining feature: 10 GB of GDDR6 on a ize 160-bit bus delivers ize 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That figure is not just a spec sheet number; it directly informs the GPU’s ability to feed its ize 2304 shading units, ize 144 TMUs, and ize 80 ROPs. For rendering workloads, the pixel rate of ize 200.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of ize 360.0 GTexel/s indicate a card that can push high-resolution textures without stalling on memory access.

The compute metrics reinforce this: FP32 throughput is ize 11.52 TFLOPS, with FP16 at ize 23.04 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. The presence of ize 18 RT cores signals dedicated ray tracing hardware, though the data does not include a specific RT benchmark score. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of ize 2649 places the card in a specific performance tier, and the Geekbench Vulkan score of ize 96844 versus OpenCL’s ize 83514 suggests the architecture responds well to modern graphics APIs. Passmark results show a G3D score of ize 14195, which is the aggregate gaming-oriented metric, while the GPU compute score of ize 7281 is notably lower, hinting that raw compute throughput is not the card’s primary strength.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the Arc B570’s average benchmark score is ize 20556, sitting within ize 0.1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile ( ize 20534) and ize -0.1% of the Intel Arc A750 ( ize 20582). The deltaPct values are nearly flat, meaning the B570 is statistically indistinguishable from those two in aggregate synthetic performance. The 65th percentile versus all GPUs is a mid-pack position, but the 10 GB VRAM and ize 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are features that many rivals in this percentile do not offer. For rendering, that memory capacity is the key differentiator — larger textures and higher resolutions will fit within the frame buffer without spilling to system memory, which is a qualitative advantage that the raw scores do not fully capture.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: The Arc B570’s Passmark G3D score of ize 14195 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of ize 2649 indicate a card capable of 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the lack of measured FPS data means refresh rates are estimates. The 10 GB VRAM and ize 380.0 GB/s bandwidth should handle modern titles at high settings, though the ize 65th GPU percentile suggests that 4K high-refresh is not a realistic target.

Streaming: The CPU’s ize 20 threads and the GPU’s ize 18 RT cores provide a dual-path for encoding and rendering. The Geekbench OpenCL score of ize 83514 shows compute headroom for background tasks, while the CPU’s Passmark multithread score of ize 26409 can handle software encoding if needed. The data does not list a dedicated encoder, so streaming quality is inferred from the overall compute balance.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of ize 22447 and the GPU’s Vulkan score of ize 96844 suggest a system that can handle timeline scrubbing and effects rendering. The ize 24 MB shared L3 cache on the CPU aids in large file operations, and the GPU’s ize 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K previews without excessive caching.

3D rendering: The GPU’s FP32 throughput of ize 11.52 TFLOPS and the CPU’s Passmark floating point math score of ize 64726 indicate a balanced rendering pipeline. The ize 18 RT cores are present for ray-traced workloads, though their performance is not quantified in the pack. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of ize 9427 is the more dominant factor for CPU-based rendering.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark data compression score of ize 301827 and data encryption score of ize 18226 show strong throughput for build pipelines and code compilation. The ize 20 threads allow parallel compilation, and the ize 24 MB L3 cache reduces latency on repeated access patterns. The GPU’s compute score of ize 7281 is less relevant here, but the ize 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes on the CPU provide fast I/O for storage.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread Passmark score of ize 3744 and Cinebench R15 single-core score of ize 319 indicate responsive everyday tasks. The ize 35 W TDP on the CPU and ize 150 W TDP on the GPU mean the system runs cool and quiet, which is suitable for shared spaces. The ize 10 GB VRAM is overkill for office apps, but the ize 65th GPU percentile ensures smooth 4K desktop rendering.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-14600T is a ize 14-core, ize 20-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It runs at a base clock of ize 1.80 GHz and boosts to ize 5.10 GHz, with a ize 35 W TDP that classifies it as a low-power desktop part. The cache hierarchy is substantial: ize 80 KB L1 per core, ize 2 MB L2 per core, and ize 24 MB shared L3. This is a ize 10 nm Intel process with a die size of ize 257 mm², and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support listed as true.

The benchmark results paint a picture of a CPU that punches above its power envelope. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores ize 22447, which is a strong result for a ize 35 W part, and single-core scores ize 3169. Geekbench multi-core is ize 12840 and single-core is ize 2559. The Passmark suite shows a multithread score of ize 26409 and a single-thread score of ize 3744. The integer math score of ize 95112 and floating point math of ize 64726 indicate balanced arithmetic throughput, while the find prime numbers score of ize 121 is notably low, suggesting that certain integer-heavy algorithms are not this chip’s strength.

The 83rd percentile versus all CPUs is the standout metric — this is a top-tier CPU in a low-power package. The nearest rivals are all within ize 0.3% of the average benchmark score of ize 32707: the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ( ize 32697, ize 0% delta), AMD Ryzen 5 7400F ( ize 32750, ize -0.1%), AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 ( ize 32662, ize 0.1%), and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H ( ize 32812, ize -0.3%). The deltas are so small that the i5-14600T is effectively tied with these parts in aggregate, but the ize 35 W TDP is far lower than typical desktop chips, which means the performance comes with significantly less heat output. For real workloads, the ize 20 threads are the key asset — video encoding, compilation, and multitasking all scale with thread count, and the ize 24 MB L3 cache helps keep data local.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

The 74th combined percentile and the component-specific percentiles (CPU at ize 83, GPU at ize 65) define a clear target user: someone who needs strong CPU throughput without a high power draw, paired with a GPU that can handle modern graphics at mid-range settings. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p are the obvious audience, given the GPU’s ize 10 GB VRAM and ize 380.0 GB/s bandwidth, though the lack of measured FPS means expectations should be tempered. Content creators working with video or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of ize 22447 and the GPU’s FP32 throughput of ize 11.52 TFLOPS.

Software developers are a strong fit — the CPU’s Passmark data compression score of ize 301827 and encryption score of ize 18226 indicate fast build times, and the ize 20 threads allow parallel compilation. Students and office workers will find the ize 35 W CPU TDP appealing for quiet operation, and the ize 3744 single-thread Passmark score ensures snappy UI responsiveness. Small business workstations that run virtualization or database workloads can leverage the ize 20 threads and ize 24 MB L3 cache, though the GPU’s ize 65th percentile is not a bottleneck for such tasks. The ize 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes on the CPU provide future-proofing for NVMe storage, which is a qualitative advantage for any data-intensive role.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data shows a system where the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, and the GPU is the limiting factor for graphics-bound tasks. The CPU’s ize 83rd percentile versus all CPUs is a full ize 18 points higher than the GPU’s ize 65th percentile, which means in gaming, the GPU will hit its limits first. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of ize 2649 and Passmark G3D of ize 14195 are mid-pack figures, so at high resolutions, the GPU will dictate frame rates. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of ize 22447 is more than sufficient to feed the GPU, so CPU-bound bottlenecks are unlikely in most scenarios.

In compute-heavy workloads, the balance shifts. The GPU’s compute score of ize 7281 is low relative to its G3D score, so tasks like OpenCL or Vulkan compute will be GPU-limited. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of ize 26409 is a top-tier result, so CPU-bound tasks like compilation or rendering will not be limited by the processor. The memory bandwidth of the GPU at ize 380.0 GB/s is a potential bottleneck for texture-heavy workloads, but the ize 10 GB VRAM mitigates this by reducing memory swapping. The CPU’s ize 35 W TDP means it will not throttle under sustained load, but the GPU’s ize 150 W TDP is the power draw to watch in a small form factor build.

Gaming Performance — estimated FPS by game and resolution from benchmark scores

This exact CPU+GPU combination has no measured FPS data in the FACT PACK, so all gaming figures below are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores, not empirical results. The Arc B570’s Passmark G3D score of ize 14195 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of ize 2649 place it in a performance class where 1080p gaming at high settings is the sweet spot. The ize 10 GB VRAM and ize 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for most titles at this resolution, but 4K gaming would strain the ize 160-bit memory bus.

For esports titles, the CPU’s single-thread score of ize 3744 and the GPU’s pixel rate of ize 200.0 GPixel/s suggest high frame rates at 1080p, potentially exceeding ize 144 Hz in lighter games. For AAA titles, the 3DMark score of ize 2649 indicates that 1440p at medium-to-high settings is achievable, but 4K would require significant settings reductions. The GPU’s ize 18 RT cores are present for ray tracing, but the ize 65th percentile overall suggests that RT performance is not a headline feature. The CPU’s ize 20 threads and ize 5.10 GHz boost clock ensure that frame pacing is consistent, with no CPU-side stutters in most scenarios.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and the combined picture

The CPU’s average benchmark score is ize 32707, with a percentile of ize 83 versus all CPUs. Key scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core at ize 22447 and single-core at ize 3169, Geekbench multi-core at ize 12840 and single-core at ize 2559, and Passmark multithread at ize 26409 with single-thread at ize 3744. The GPU’s average benchmark score is ize 20556, with a percentile of ize 65 versus all GPUs. Notable GPU scores are 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at ize 2649, Geekbench Vulkan at ize 96844, OpenCL at ize 83514, and Passmark G3D at ize 14195 with compute at ize 7281.

The combined percentile is ize 74, which is a weighted average that reflects the CPU’s strength and the GPU’s mid-pack position. The nearest rivals for the CPU are all within ize 0.3% of the average score, meaning the i5-14600T is not a performance outlier — it is a well-rounded chip that matches the competition. For the GPU, the nearest rivals are the RTX 3070 Mobile ( ize 0.1% delta) and Arc A750 ( ize -0.1% delta), which are also near-identical in aggregate. The combined picture is a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks and holds its own in GPU-bound tasks, with the CPU being the clear performance leader.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is ize 74, with the CPU at ize 83 and the GPU at ize 65.

Q: How does the Arc B570 compare to the Intel Arc A750 in average benchmark score?

A: The Arc B570 scores ize 20556, which is ize -0.1% different from the Arc A750’s ize 20582, making them statistically tied.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and how does it affect system cooling?

A: The CPU has a ize 35 W TDP, which is very low for a desktop part, meaning it produces minimal heat and can be cooled by a capable air cooler.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc B570 has ize 18 RT cores, though the data does not include a specific ray tracing benchmark score.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The GPU has ize 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth from ize 10 GB of GDDR6 on a ize 160-bit bus.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this exact combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU pairing, so all gaming figures are estimates from synthetic benchmarks.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and memory support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom, and sensible next steps

The platform is built on Intel Socket 1700, which is the LGA 1700 socket for the Core 14th Gen series. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support listed as true — a feature that is rare in consumer desktop parts. The CPU provides ize 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is the primary interface for a discrete GPU or NVMe storage. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is a bandwidth limitation compared to the CPU’s Gen 5 capability, but the ize 380.0 GB/s memory bandwidth on the GPU means that the x8 link is unlikely to be a bottleneck for most workloads.

The GPU has a TDP of ize 150 W and a suggested PSU of ize 450 W, with a single ize 8-pin power connector. The CPU’s ize 35 W TDP means the total system draw is modest, so the ize 450 W PSU provides ample headroom for the current configuration. A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with a higher percentile, since the CPU at ize 83rd percentile has headroom to drive a faster card. The ize 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes on the CPU are future-proof for a Gen 5 GPU, though the current GPU is Gen 4. The socket is at the end of its generation, so a CPU upgrade would require a motherboard change, but the ize 24 MB L3 cache and ize 20 threads are sufficient for several more years of software.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-14600T with the Intel Arc B570, classified under buildClass as a desktop system. The CPU is a ize 14-core, ize 20-thread Raptor Lake-R part with a ize 35 W TDP, and the GPU is a ize 10 GB GDDR6 Battlemage card with a ize 150 W TDP. The combined percentile of ize 74 places this system in the upper-mid tier of all builds, with the CPU at ize 83rd percentile being the standout component and the GPU at ize 65th percentile being the more modest performer.

The overall tier is a balanced desktop workstation that prioritizes CPU throughput and energy efficiency over raw graphics power. The ize 35 W CPU TDP is a defining feature — it allows for compact cooling solutions and low noise, which is rare in a system with this level of CPU performance. The GPU’s ize 10 GB VRAM and ize 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are competitive for its class, but the ize 65th percentile means it is not a high-end gaming card. This is a system for users who value multi-threaded productivity, quiet operation, and modern graphics features like ray tracing ( ize 18 RT cores) and DirectX 12 Ultimate support, rather than for those chasing maximum frame rates at 4K.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600T + Intel Arc B570

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600T

Intel Arc B570

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Gaming Performance — estimated FPS by game and resolution from benchmark scores

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and the combined picture

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom, and sensible next steps

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds