SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600T + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600T

32,707 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

58,392 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600T and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT form a desktop pairing that targets high-performance computing and demanding graphics workloads. The CPU, a 14-core Raptor Lake Refresh part, delivers strong multi-threaded throughput for its 35W TDP, while the GPU is a previous-generation flagship with 16GB of VRAM and substantial compute resources. Benchmark data indicates this combination sits at the 86th percentile overall, suggesting a system that excels in both productivity and gaming scenarios, though it is important to note that no measured FPS data exists for this specific combination; all performance discussions are estimated from the synthetic benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is a high-end graphics card built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, utilizing the Navi 21 chip fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It features 5120 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units, providing substantial raw compute power. The card’s FP32 performance is rated at 23.65 TFLOPS, with FP16 reaching 47.31 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), which directly translates to fast vertex processing and pixel shading in games and 3D applications.

Memory configuration is a cornerstone of this GPU’s capability. It comes equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. This high capacity and bandwidth allow the card to handle large textures and complex scenes at high resolutions without hitting memory bottlenecks, a common issue for cards with smaller VRAM pools in modern titles. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, with an effective data rate of 18 Gbps, ensuring that the 256-bit interface is fully utilized.

Clock speeds are set aggressively, with a base clock of 1860 MHz, a game clock of 2100 MHz, and a boost clock of 2310 MHz. These high frequencies, combined with the large number of shading units, explain the card’s strong raw performance metrics. The GPU includes 80 ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing effects in supported games, although the RDNA 2.0 implementation is generally considered less performant than the competing solutions of the same era. There are no tensor cores listed, so AI-accelerated tasks like DLSS-style upscaling are not available; however, the card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad API compatibility.

Benchmark scores reinforce the GPU’s high-end status. The card achieves a Passmark G3D score of 28070, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of graphics cards. Its average benchmark score is 58392. In compute-focused tests, it scores 14199 in Passmark GPU Compute, 222653 in Geekbench Metal, and 205998 in Geekbench OpenCL, while its Vulkan score is 165212. These numbers suggest excellent performance in both gaming and general-purpose compute workloads. For rendering, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4235 indicates strong DirectX 12 performance, which is crucial for modern game engines and DXR-based applications. The nearest rivals show a tight grouping: the NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58528 (0.2% higher), the Intel Arc A570M scores 58239 (0.3% lower), the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58657 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58085 (0.5% lower). This indicates that the RX 6950 XT sits in a competitive performance bracket, with deltas of less than one percent against its closest peers, making it a formidable choice for high-refresh gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering tasks.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the processor’s core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600T has 14 cores and 20 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture. It features a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: How much video memory does the GPU have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The memory operates at 2250 MHz, with an effective data rate of 18 Gbps.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and what power supply is recommended for the GPU?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600T has a TDP of 35 W, making it a low-power processor. In contrast, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT has a TDP of 335 W, and the suggested power supply for the system is 700 W.

Q: What is the CPU’s cache hierarchy?

A: The CPU features an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, an L2 cache of 2 MB per core, and a shared L3 cache of 24 MB. This hierarchy is designed to reduce latency and improve data access speeds for frequently used instructions.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT includes 80 ray tracing cores, which enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing. It also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which is a requirement for advanced ray tracing and mesh shaders in modern games.

Q: What is the CPU’s memory support and PCIe configuration?

A: The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types in a dual-channel configuration. It also provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), which allows for high-bandwidth connectivity to compatible graphics cards and NVMe SSDs.

Q: What is the GPU’s average benchmark score and its percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT has an average benchmark score of 58392, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. This indicates it performs better than 88% of graphics cards in the database.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-14600T is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The CPU has a base clock of 1.80 GHz, which is conservative for power efficiency, but it can boost up to 5.10 GHz under load, providing significant single-thread performance when needed. The unlocked boost behavior is crucial for tasks that require high frequency, such as gaming and lightly-threaded applications.

The cache layout is substantial: each core has 80 KB of L1 cache and 2 MB of L2 cache, while the entire chip shares a 24 MB L3 cache. This large cache pool helps keep frequently used data close to the cores, reducing memory latency and improving overall throughput in multi-threaded workloads. The processor supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for workstation and small business applications where data integrity is critical. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, offering flexibility in platform choices, though the maximum memory bandwidth is not specified in the data.

Benchmark results indicate strong multi-core performance relative to its power envelope. The CPU scores 22447 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 9427 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, while its single-core scores are 3169 and 1330, respectively. In Geekbench, it scores 12840 multi-core and 2559 single-core. These figures suggest a processor that handles heavily threaded tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering well, while also delivering responsive single-thread performance for everyday use. The Passmark scores are equally telling: a multi-thread score of 26409, a single-thread score of 3744, and strong results in specific workloads like floating-point math (64726) and integer math (95112). Data compression scores 301827, while encryption scores 18226, indicating robust performance in security-related tasks.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32707, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H has an average score of 32697 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32750 (-0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662 (0.1% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812 (-0.3% delta). This indicates that the i5-14600T is essentially performance-equivalent to these competitors, with deltas of less than one percent. For real-world workloads, this means the CPU is a balanced performer: it can handle software compilation, office multitasking, and moderate content creation without breaking a sweat, while its low 35W TDP makes it ideal for systems where thermal output and power draw are concerns, such as small form factor builds or always-on workstations.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

In this pairing, the balance between the CPU and GPU is heavily skewed toward the graphics card. The GPU sits in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU is in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. This difference suggests that in most gaming scenarios, the RX 6950 XT will be the primary driver of performance, with the CPU rarely becoming the limiting factor unless the game is extremely CPU-bound. The combined system percentile is 86, which is higher than either component individually, indicating that the pairing works well together to boost overall performance.

For gaming at high resolutions, the GPU is almost certainly the bottleneck. The RX 6950 XT’s high memory bandwidth (576.0 GB/s) and large VRAM pool (16 GB) allow it to handle 4K textures and heavy shading loads, but its raw compute output (23.65 TFLOPS FP32) is what determines frame rates in graphically intense scenes. The CPU’s boost clock of 5.10 GHz and strong single-core performance (3169 in Cinebench R23 single-core) are sufficient to feed the GPU in most titles, but in scenarios with heavy AI or physics simulations, the 14-core processor might struggle to keep up with the GPU’s output. However, the data shows that the CPU’s performance is within 0.3% of its closest rivals, meaning it is not a weak link.

In productivity workloads, the CPU becomes more of a factor. The i5-14600T’s multi-core score of 22447 in Cinebench R23 indicates it can handle rendering tasks, but the GPU’s compute capabilities (Passmark GPU Compute score of 14199) can offload some of this work in applications that support GPU acceleration. For tasks like video editing, the balance shifts depending on the software: if the encoder uses the GPU, the RX 6950 XT will dominate; if it uses the CPU, the i5-14600T’s 20 threads will be the limiting factor. The Passmark data compression score of 301827 suggests the CPU is fast at data-heavy tasks, but the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is more critical for large datasets in 3D rendering.

The FPS scaling is not measured for this exact combination, so estimates must be derived from the benchmark scores. Given the GPU’s 88th percentile ranking and the CPU’s 83rd percentile, the system is likely to be GPU-limited in most modern games at 1440p and 4K resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance becomes more relevant, and the 5.10 GHz boost clock should be sufficient to avoid major bottlenecks. The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates, but the percentile gap suggests that upgrading the CPU would yield diminishing returns for gaming at high resolutions, while upgrading the GPU would provide a more noticeable boost in frame rates.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. This socket is compatible with a range of 12th, 13th, and 14th Gen Intel processors, providing a clear upgrade path. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, so users can choose their memory type based on motherboard and budget. The PCIe configuration is Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), which is forward-compatible with the latest GPUs and NVMe drives, though the RX 6950 XT itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The CPU’s TDP is 35 W, which is exceptionally low for a desktop processor, meaning it can be cooled by a capable air cooler and run in compact cases with minimal airflow. The GPU, however, has a TDP of 335 W and requires two 8-pin power connectors, along with a suggested power supply of 700 W. This creates a significant PSU headroom requirement: the system’s total power draw will be dominated by the GPU, so a 700 W PSU is recommended to handle transient spikes and overclocking headroom.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-tier CPU within the same socket, such as an i7 or i9 from the 14th Gen series, to better match the GPU’s performance ceiling in CPU-bound scenarios. This would require a motherboard with a robust VRM design to handle the higher TDP. Alternatively, the GPU could be upgraded to a newer generation card, but the RX 6950 XT’s 88th percentile ranking means it will remain competitive for several years. Memory is another upgrade path: moving from DDR4 to DDR5 or increasing capacity to 32 GB or more would benefit memory-intensive workloads, though the exact bandwidth figures are not listed. The platform supports ECC memory, which is a bonus for workstation reliability.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is suited for users who need high-end graphics performance without sacrificing CPU efficiency. The RX 6950 XT’s 88th percentile ranking makes it ideal for gamers who play at 1440p or 4K resolutions with high refresh rates, as the 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle the most demanding textures. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking ensures that it won’t hold back the GPU in most gaming scenarios, making this a balanced system for enthusiasts.

Content creators and 3D artists will benefit from the combination of the CPU’s 20 threads and the GPU’s compute power. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22447 handles CPU-based rendering, while the GPU’s 23.65 TFLOPS FP32 and 14199 Passmark GPU Compute score accelerate GPU-accelerated workloads like Blender or Adobe Premiere. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is particularly useful for large 3D scenes and high-resolution video editing.

Software developers and students will find the CPU’s Passmark data compression score of 301827 useful for build times and data processing. The low 35W TDP makes this build energy-efficient for always-on workstations or lab environments. Small business workstations that run virtualization or database tasks will appreciate the ECC memory support and the CPU’s multithreaded performance. However, the GPU’s end-of-life status means it is not ideal for those who require the latest AI features, as there are no tensor cores available.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU’s benchmark performance is anchored by its Cinebench scores: 22447 in R23 multi-core and 3169 in R23 single-core. In Geekbench, it scores 12840 multi-core and 2559 single-core. Its Passmark multi-thread score is 26409, with a single-thread score of 3744. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32707, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, scores 32697 with a 0% delta, meaning the two are statistically identical in performance.

The GPU’s benchmark results are led by a Passmark G3D score of 28070 and a Passmark GPU Compute score of 14199. In Geekbench, it achieves 222653 in Metal and 205998 in OpenCL, with a Vulkan score of 165212. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 4235. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 58392, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The closest rival is the NVIDIA P102-100 with an average score of 58528, a delta of -0.2%, indicating the RX 6950 XT is slightly ahead.

The combined picture is one of high-end performance. The system’s combined percentile is 86, which is higher than either component’s individual percentile. This suggests that the pairing synergizes well, with the CPU providing enough bandwidth and responsiveness to allow the GPU to reach its full potential. The lack of measured FPS data means that exact gaming performance cannot be stated, but the synthetic scores indicate that this system would perform exceptionally well in both gaming and productivity tasks, likely outperforming the vast majority of desktop systems in the database.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build consisting of the Intel Core i5-14600T and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, designed for mainstream desktop use with a focus on power efficiency, given its 35W TDP. The GPU is a high-end Radeon RX 6000 series card with 5120 shading units and 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, targeting enthusiast gaming and professional rendering workloads.

The pairing represents a high-performance tier in the benchmark database. The CPU’s 83rd percentile and the GPU’s 88th percentile combine to produce a system percentile of 86, indicating that this build outperforms 86% of all recorded system configurations. This places it in the upper echelon of desktop PCs, suitable for demanding applications. The GPU’s end-of-life status and the CPU’s active production status suggest that this is a mature platform, but the performance metrics show it is still highly competitive. The build is not a budget option—the GPU’s launch MSRP was 1,099 USD—but it delivers flagship-level graphics performance. The CPU’s launch MSRP was $255, indicating a mid-range processor that punches above its weight class when paired with a top-tier GPU.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming: The RX 6950 XT’s Passmark G3D score of 28070 and 16 GB VRAM make it capable of driving high-refresh monitors at 1440p and 4K. The CPU’s 5.10 GHz boost clock and 3169 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensure that frame rates are not CPU-limited in most titles. However, the lack of measured FPS data means exact refresh rates cannot be stated.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 threads and Passmark data encryption score of 18226 provide enough headroom for software encoding, while the GPU’s 14199 Passmark GPU Compute score can handle hardware encoding tasks. The system’s 86th percentile ranking suggests it can handle the simultaneous load of gaming and streaming without major frame drops.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22447 accelerates timeline rendering, while the GPU’s 23.65 TFLOPS FP32 and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth speed up effects and color grading. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for high-resolution video previews.

3D rendering: The GPU’s Passmark GPU Compute score of 14199 and 80 ray tracing cores provide strong performance for GPU-accelerated renderers. The CPU’s 22447 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles CPU-based rendering tasks, making this a versatile system for artists.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 95112 and data compression score of 301827 indicate fast code compilation and data processing. The 20 threads allow for parallel builds, and the ECC memory support ensures data integrity for critical work.

Student and office work: The CPU’s low 35W TDP makes this an energy-efficient system for daily tasks, while its single-thread score of 3744 in Passmark ensures snappy application responsiveness. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is overkill for office work but provides future-proofing for any graphics-intensive coursework.