SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600KF

49,394 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

16,129 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti form a desktop pairing that sits in a specific performance tier: the CPU is a top-decile performer while the GPU is a solidly mid-range part. This combination creates an interesting dynamic where the processor’s headroom is significantly greater than what the graphics card can utilize, particularly at higher resolutions. The data shows a combined percentile of 75, indicating that this build performs better than roughly three-quarters of all tested CPU-GPU pairings in the database, with an average frame rate of 110.1 FPS across the measured game suite.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, featuring a 24 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB of L2 cache per core. This is an unlocked multiplier part, meaning the "KF" suffix indicates overclocking capability without integrated graphics. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and its 125 W TDP places it as a mainstream enthusiast chip. The processor uses the Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results for the 14600KF are strong across the board. In Cinebench R23, it scores 32,544 in multi-core and 4,594 in single-core, which translates to substantial throughput for both heavily threaded workloads and lightly threaded responsiveness. The Geekbench scores of 17,085 multi-core and 2,445 single-core reinforce this picture. The PassMark suite shows specific strengths: integer math scores 125,982, floating-point math hits 93,048, and extended instructions reach 28,785. Data compression scores a massive 485,140, indicating excellent archival and file-handling performance, while encryption scores 27,608.

The CPU's percentile ranking against all CPUs is 90, placing it in the top 10% of processors in the database. Its average benchmark score of 49,394 puts it in close competition with several AMD parts. The data shows the 14600KF is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, and 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245. It trails the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 by 0.8%. These deltas are all within a one-percent margin, meaning the 14600KF effectively trades blows with these rivals in aggregate scoring.

For real workloads, the multi-core score of 32,544 in Cinebench R23 suggests this CPU can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease. The single-core score of 4,594 is equally important for gaming and general application responsiveness, where per-thread performance often dictates smoothness. The high boost clock of 5.30 GHz is a key contributor here. The PassMark physics score of 2,449 and find prime numbers score of 161 provide additional context for scientific and simulation tasks, where the CPU's raw integer and floating-point throughput is leveraged heavily.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 75, meaning this build outperforms 75% of all tested CPU-GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14600KF compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900?

A: The 14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49,394, which is 0.3% higher than the Ryzen 9 7900's score of 49,228.

Q: What is the average frame rate across all measured games for this pairing?

A: The average FPS across the entire measured game suite is 110.1 frames per second.

Q: Does the RTX 3060 Ti support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU features 38 dedicated RT cores as part of its Ampere architecture.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The GPU has a 256-bit memory bus with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: How does the GPU's benchmark score compare to the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti has an average benchmark score of 16,129, which is 1.4% lower than the RX 5700 XT's score of 16,361.

Q: What is the CPU's launch MSRP?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF had a launch MSRP of $294.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance in this pairing. The CPU sits at the 90th percentile while the GPU sits at the 59th percentile. This 31-point gap indicates that the processor is significantly more capable than the graphics card in raw compute terms. The practical effect is that the GPU becomes the primary limiter in graphics-intensive workloads, especially at higher resolutions where pixel throughput demands more from the graphics card.

Examining the FPS scaling across resolutions for specific titles illustrates this bottleneck. In Cyberpunk 2077, the system runs at 47.1 FPS at 1920x1080, drops to 36.2 FPS at 2560x1440, and falls to 25.9 FPS at 3840x2160. The frame rate drops by 23% when moving from 1080p to 1440p, and by an additional 28% moving to 4K. This scaling pattern is typical of a GPU-bound scenario where the graphics card's rendering capacity is the constraining factor. Similarly, Red Dead Redemption 2 shows 43.0 FPS at 1080p, 29.7 FPS at 1440p, and 23.5 FPS at 4K, with the 4K figure representing a 45% reduction from 1080p.

However, the CPU is not entirely without influence. In esports titles with lower graphical demands, the processor's strength becomes evident. Valorant runs at 438 FPS at 1080p, 374 FPS at 1440p, and still maintains 299 FPS at 4K. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive achieves 346.1 FPS at 1080p and 137.3 FPS at 4K. These high frame rates, even at 4K, indicate that the CPU can feed frames fast enough to keep the GPU busy in less demanding scenarios. The CPU's single-core performance of 4,594 in Cinebench R23 is a major factor in these high-FPS results.

The bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. For CPU-intensive tasks like data compression, which scores 485,140 in PassMark, the processor is the star. For GPU-intensive rendering, the RTX 3060 Ti's 16.20 TFLOPS of FP32 performance defines the ceiling. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,626 confirms the GPU's mid-range positioning. In essence, the CPU provides headroom that the GPU cannot fully exploit in most gaming scenarios, meaning future GPU upgrades would likely yield significant FPS gains without a CPU change.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is suited for gamers targeting 1920x1080 or 2560x1440 resolutions who prioritize high frame rates over maximum visual fidelity at 4K. The measured data shows strong performance in competitive shooters like Valorant, where 438 FPS at 1080p and 374 FPS at 1440p exceed the refresh rates of most monitors. Call of Duty: Warzone also performs well at 164.9 FPS at 1080p and 147.6 FPS at 1440p, making this a viable option for fast-paced multiplayer gaming.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's multi-core strength. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,544 and Geekbench multi-core score of 17,085 indicate that rendering timelines and video exports will process quickly. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate resources for 1080p and 1440p editing timelines, though the 59th percentile GPU ranking means effects-heavy workflows may feel constrained.

Software developers and students compiling code or running virtual machines will find the 14-core, 20-thread configuration advantageous. The PassMark integer math score of 125,982 and multithread score of 38,697 suggest strong parallel processing capability for build tasks. The CPU's support for ECC memory is a notable feature for workstation-adjacent reliability, making this a reasonable choice for small business workstations that require data integrity. The 125 W TDP and lack of integrated graphics mean a discrete GPU is mandatory, which this pairing provides.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, indicated as measured with `dataIsMeasured: true`, provides a comprehensive view of gaming performance across 49 titles at three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system delivers excellent results in esports and lighter titles. Valorant leads with 438 FPS, followed by Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 346.1 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 227 FPS, Roblox hits 201.4 FPS, and Minecraft runs at 188 FPS. These numbers comfortably exceed 144 Hz refresh rate displays.

For AAA titles at 1080p, performance is good but not stellar. Doom runs at 145.2 FPS, Assetto Corsa at 91.1 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 157 FPS. However, more demanding games show the GPU's limits. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 47.1 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 43.0 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 21.5 FPS. The Medium struggles at 31.1 FPS, indicating that ray tracing-heavy titles will require settings adjustments.

At 2560x1440, the system remains capable for many titles. Valorant still delivers 374 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive maintains 237.9 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 147.6 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 149 FPS. But demanding titles drop below 60 FPS: Cyberpunk 2077 at 36.2 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 29.7 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 11.6 FPS. At 3840x2160, only esports titles remain playable at high refresh rates. Valorant hits 299 FPS, but Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 25.9 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 23.5 FPS. The pair's rank by FPS is 2,353 out of 3,861 pairs, placing it in the upper-middle tier of tested configurations.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture using Samsung's 8 nm process. The GA104 chip contains 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, with a transistor density of 44.4 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1410 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz. Memory runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed across a 256-bit bus, yielding 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM is a defining characteristic, sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming but potentially limiting at 4K with high-resolution textures.

The compute configuration includes 4,864 shading units, 152 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. More importantly for modern workloads, the GPU features 38 RT cores and 152 tensor cores. The FP32 performance is 16.20 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 16.20 TFLOPS due to a 1:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 253.1 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current and upcoming titles.

Benchmark scores place this GPU in context. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,626, while Geekbench OpenCL scores 78,927 and Vulkan scores 47,784. PassMark G3D scores 20,349, with GPU compute at 10,006. The percentile ranking against all GPUs is 59, meaning it outperforms 59% of the database's graphics cards. Its average benchmark score of 16,129 places it 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9060, 1.4% behind both the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and Radeon RX 5700 XT, and 1.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 370X. These tight margins show the RTX 3060 Ti sits in a crowded mid-range field.

For rendering workloads, the 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 152 tensor cores provide solid acceleration for AI-assisted features like DLSS. The RT cores deliver hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the 8 GB VRAM may constrain scenes with heavy geometry and lighting data. The 200 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU rating make it a manageable addition for most desktop builds. The dual-slot form factor and 242 mm length fit standard mid-tower cases.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system with a clear strength in CPU-bound tasks and adequate GPU performance for mainstream gaming. The CPU's average benchmark score of 49,394 places it at the 90th percentile, while the GPU's average score of 16,129 places it at the 59th percentile. This asymmetry produces a combined percentile of 75, reflecting the CPU's dominance in the pairing.

The CPU's performance is highlighted by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,544, which is a strong indicator of productivity capability. The single-core score of 4,594 ensures responsive application behavior. The PassMark multithread score of 38,697 and single-thread score of 4,273 further validate the processor's balance of parallel and serial performance. Data encryption at 27,608 and random string sorting at 52,056 show the CPU handles diverse algorithmic tasks efficiently.

The GPU's performance is defined by its 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and the resulting benchmark scores. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,626 is a modern DX12 test that places the card in the mid-range tier. The PassMark G3D score of 20,349 and DirectX 11 score of 163 indicate solid DirectX 11 performance, while the DirectX 12 score of 78 suggests more variance in newer APIs. The G2D score of 989 is low, but this is less relevant for gaming and more indicative of 2D desktop workloads.

The average FPS across all measured games is 110.1, which is a solid result for a system that pairs a top-decile CPU with a 59th-percentile GPU. The pair's rank of 2,353 out of 3,861 pairs means it outperforms approximately 39% of tested pairings, which is lower than the combined percentile might suggest due to the GPU bottleneck in many games. The data indicates that the CPU is not the limiting factor; the GPU's mid-range position is what holds back the overall average FPS.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs Intel's Core 14th Gen processor with NVIDIA's GeForce 30-series graphics card. The CPU is a high-end mainstream part with 14 cores and 20 threads, capable of boosting to 5.30 GHz, while the GPU is a mid-range card from the previous generation with 8 GB of VRAM. The combined percentile of 75 places this system in the upper quartile of all tested configurations in the database.

The class is desktop, and the tier is solidly mid-range to upper-mid-range. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking makes it a high-tier processor, suitable for demanding productivity workloads. The GPU's 59th percentile ranking makes it a respectable mid-tier graphics card, capable of handling most games at 1080p and 1440p with adjusted settings. The pairing results in a system where the CPU has substantial headroom, making it a candidate for future GPU upgrades without needing a processor change.

The launch MSRP for the CPU is $294, and the GPU had a launch MSRP of 399 USD. These figures, while not current, position this as a mid-range build in terms of component cost. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, which can extend its relevance, while the GPU is listed as end-of-life, indicating it is at the tail end of its production cycle. The system's strong average FPS of 110.1 across games makes it a capable 1080p gaming machine with room to spare in less demanding titles.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1920x1080, this system excels in competitive titles. Valorant hits 438 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 346.1 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 227 FPS. These frame rates fully utilize 240 Hz or even 360 Hz monitors, making this an ideal setup for esports enthusiasts who prioritize response time over visual fidelity.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and strong multi-core score of 32,544 in Cinebench R23 provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 38,697 supports simultaneous gameplay and stream encoding. The GPU's tensor cores can also assist with encoding tasks, though the 8 GB VRAM may require careful settings management when running a game and encoder concurrently.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,544 and Geekbench multi-core score of 17,085 indicate fast export times and smooth timeline scrubbing. The GPU's 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects rendering and color grading. The 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures adequate data throughput for 1080p and 1440p projects, though 4K multi-stream editing may strain the 8 GB VRAM.

3D rendering: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with a 24 MB L3 cache, provide strong performance for CPU-based renderers. The PassMark floating-point score of 93,048 is particularly relevant here. The GPU's 38 RT cores accelerate ray-traced rendering in supported applications, and the 152 tensor cores enable AI-accelerated denoising. However, the GPU's 59th percentile ranking means complex scenes will render slower than with higher-tier cards.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 125,982 and data encryption score of 27,608 demonstrate strong compilation and cryptographic performance. The 20 threads handle parallel build systems efficiently, and the 125 W TDP keeps power consumption manageable during long compile sessions. The CPU's support for ECC memory adds reliability for critical development work.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core score of 4,594 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy application launches and responsive multitasking. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,273 supports smooth web browsing and document editing. The GPU, while overkill for office tasks, provides 3D acceleration for any design or presentation software. The system's 125 W CPU TDP and 200 W GPU TDP result in a moderate power footprint suitable for a home office or dorm room.