SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
86%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600KF

49,394 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with an Intel Arc A380 is a desktop configuration with a stark performance imbalance. The CPU is a high-end 14-core processor, while the GPU is a low-power entry-level graphics card. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions in this analysis are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components, not from direct testing.

Gaming Performance

Because the FACT PACK provides no measured FPS rows for this CPU-GPU pairing, the data is not based on empirical game testing. All gaming performance figures here are estimates extrapolated from the benchmark scores of the Intel Arc A380. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 8558, placing it in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. This score is nearly identical to that of the AMD FirePro W5170M, which has an average score of 8595, a delta of -0.4%. It is also closely matched with the NVIDIA GeForce MX330, which has an average score of 8458, a delta of 1.2%. These rivals are all older or lower-tier mobile and desktop parts, indicating that the Arc A380 is positioned at the entry-level segment of the graphics market. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 6252 and its DirectX 12 score of 35 reinforce this assessment, suggesting it is capable of running modern titles at lower settings.

For 1080p gaming, the A380’s performance profile suggests it can handle esports titles and older games at medium settings with playable frame rates. The GPU’s 6 GB of GDDR6 memory and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for textures at this resolution, but the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 compute performance will limit the graphics settings in more demanding AAA titles. At 1440p, the A380 would likely struggle to maintain consistent frame rates in modern games, as the 96-bit memory bus and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth become bottlenecks for higher resolution textures. For 4K gaming, the data suggests this configuration is not viable, as the GPU’s pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and 32 ROPs are far too low for the pixel throughput required at that resolution. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 is a low figure, confirming that the GPU is not suited for high-resolution or high-fidelity gaming workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU and GPU in this configuration represent opposite ends of the performance spectrum. The Intel Core i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49394, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. This places it in direct competition with the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, which has a score of 49228, a delta of only 0.3%. The i5-14600KF is also 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G. The combined percentile for this build is 67, reflecting the significant gap between the high-performing CPU and the low-performing GPU. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32544 is a strong result for a 14-core processor, while the single-core score of 4594 indicates excellent performance for lightly-threaded tasks. The Geekbench multicore score of 17085 and single-core score of 2445 corroborate this strong showing.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are far less impressive. The Arc A380’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 38224 and Vulkan score of 36736 are moderate, but its PassMark G3D score of 6252 is the more telling figure for gaming. The GPU is in the 44th percentile, and its average benchmark score of 8558 is 1.4% higher than the AMD Radeon 880M, which has a score of 8436. This indicates that the A380 is only marginally better than an integrated graphics solution found in some modern APUs. The combined picture is clear: the CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is an entry-level component, making this a severely unbalanced build for any graphics-intensive application.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The processor is built on Intel’s 10 nm process node and has a die size of 257 mm². It features 24 MB of shared L3 cache, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 80 KB of L1 cache per core. This cache configuration, combined with the high boost clock, results in excellent single-threaded performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4594 and the Geekbench single-core score of 2445.

The benchmark scores indicate that this CPU is a beast for multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32544 is a strong result that puts it in the top 10% of all CPUs. The PassMark multithread score of 38697 and the PassMark integer math score of 125982 further demonstrate its prowess in parallel processing tasks. The CPU also excels in specific workloads: the PassMark data compression score of 485140 is notably high, and the data encryption score of 27608 shows strong cryptographic performance. The floating-point math score of 93048 is also impressive, making it suitable for scientific computing and financial modeling. The CPU’s performance relative to rivals is extremely tight, with the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 being the closest competitor at a 0.3% delta, meaning the i5-14600KF is effectively at parity with that 12-core part in average benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is primarily suited for users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks over gaming. The i5-14600KF’s 90th percentile CPU ranking makes it an excellent choice for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32544 and the PassMark multithread score of 38697 indicate that this CPU can handle heavy multi-threaded workloads with ease. For software developers, the PassMark extended instructions score of 28785 and the data encryption score of 27608 suggest it is capable of handling code compilation and encryption tasks efficiently. The CPU’s high single-core performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2445, also makes it responsive for everyday tasks and application loading.

For gamers, this build is less appropriate. The Arc A380’s 44th percentile GPU ranking means it will struggle with modern AAA titles at high settings. It is more suited for esports gaming at 1080p with medium-to-low settings. Students and small business users who need a fast, responsive workstation for document processing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing would benefit from the CPU’s performance, but they would not gain any advantage from the GPU in those tasks. The data suggests that this build is a workstation-class CPU paired with a basic display adapter, making it ideal for users who need maximum CPU performance without a need for high-end graphics. It is not a balanced gaming PC.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform with the Raptor Lake architecture. The motherboard must support this socket and be compatible with the 14th generation Core series. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory based on their budget and performance needs. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is a significant advantage for future expansion, as it allows for the installation of the fastest available NVMe SSDs and graphics cards. This platform is a mature one, and the socket is not expected to support future processor generations, meaning the upgrade path for the CPU is limited to other 14th generation parts. However, the current CPU is already so powerful that a CPU upgrade would be unnecessary for most users.

The primary upgrade path for this build is the graphics card. The Intel Arc A380 has a TDP of 75 W and the system’s suggested PSU is 250 W, which is very low. This means there is substantial headroom for a more powerful GPU. The motherboard’s PCIe Gen 5 x16 slot is more than capable of handling any modern graphics card. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the A380 with a mid-range GPU that offers significantly higher performance, such as an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 or an AMD Radeon RX 7600, which would balance the system’s overall performance. The CPU’s 125 W TDP and the low-power GPU mean that the existing power supply would likely need to be upgraded when installing a more powerful GPU, but the platform itself is ready for it. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 is also a point of flexibility, though the high CPU performance suggests that DDR5 would be the better choice to avoid memory bandwidth bottlenecks.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380 is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation, and is built on TSMC’s 6 nm process node. It has 7,200 million transistors on a die size of 157 mm². The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, along with 8 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 2000 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz. It has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, offering a memory bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1937 MHz, which translates to 15.5 Gbps effective. The GPU’s FP32 compute performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, and its FP16 performance is 8.397 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio.

The benchmark scores for the A380 are modest. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 is low, indicating that the GPU is not designed for high-end gaming. The PassMark G3D score of 6252 and the DirectX 11 score of 38 confirm this. The GPU’s pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s are adequate for entry-level 1080p gaming at low-to-medium settings. The 8 ray tracing cores are present, but the low compute performance means ray tracing will likely be a feature that is used sparingly in games. The GPU has a TDP of 75 W, a dual-slot design, and requires a single 8-pin power connector. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and has display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with its predecessor being Xe Graphics and its successor being Battlemage. For rendering and compute workloads, the GPU’s PassMark GPU compute score of 2762 is low, meaning it is not suitable for tasks like 3D rendering or machine learning, which would be better handled by the CPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The data does not support this scenario for the Arc A380. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 8558 is in the 44th percentile, and its direct rivals are low-end mobile parts like the NVIDIA GeForce MX330. Achieving high frame rates at 1080p would only be possible in less demanding esports titles, and even then, the GPU’s 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance would likely be a limiting factor. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 suggests that modern AAA titles would need significant graphical compromises.

Streaming: The Intel Core i5-14600KF is well-suited for streaming, as its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32544 provides plenty of headroom for encoding video while gaming. The CPU’s high multi-thread performance can handle the x264 encoding workload, though the GPU’s low performance means the game itself would have to run at lower settings. The PassMark multithread score of 38697 reinforces the CPU’s ability to handle simultaneous gaming and streaming workloads.

Video editing: This scenario is heavily favored by the CPU. The i5-14600KF’s PassMark data compression score of 485140 and floating-point math score of 93048 are strong indicators of its ability to handle video codecs and effects. The CPU can handle 4K video editing with ease, though the GPU’s 6 GB of VRAM and low compute performance will not be of much help in GPU-accelerated rendering. The system would rely on the CPU for most of the heavy lifting.

3D rendering: The CPU is the clear workhorse here. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32544 is excellent for CPU-based rendering. However, the Arc A380’s PassMark GPU compute score of 2762 is very low, meaning GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender would be slow. This configuration is best suited for CPU-based renderers, where the i5-14600KF can shine.

Software development: The CPU’s performance is a major asset for developers. The PassMark extended instructions score of 28785 and the data encryption score of 27608 indicate strong performance in code compilation and security-related tasks. The 14 cores and 20 threads allow for fast parallel builds, and the high single-core score of 2445 ensures responsive IDE performance.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for standard office tasks, but it will be extremely responsive. The CPU’s high single-core performance ensures quick application loading and smooth multitasking. The GPU is more than sufficient for 2D desktop work and web browsing. The low power consumption of the GPU (75 W TDP) and the CPU’s 125 W TDP mean that the system will be relatively efficient for this type of workload.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop configuration is 67, reflecting the strong CPU performance and weak GPU performance.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14600KF compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900?

A: The i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49394, which is 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900’s score of 49228.

Q: What is the Intel Arc A380’s average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The Arc A380 has an average benchmark score of 8558 and is in the 44th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the suggested PSU for this system?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF has a TDP of 125 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 250 W.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14600KF support DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the boost clock of the Intel Arc A380?

A: The Intel Arc A380 has a boost clock of 2050 MHz.

Q: How many ray tracing cores does the Arc A380 have?

A: The Intel Arc A380 has 8 ray tracing cores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data in the FACT PACK presents a clear case of severe bottlenecking. The CPU is in the 90th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 49394, while the GPU is in the 44th percentile, with an average score of 8558. This is a massive disparity in performance. In gaming workloads, the GPU will be the ultimate limiting factor. The CPU can produce frames far faster than the GPU can render them, meaning that in most gaming scenarios, the Arc A380 will be at 100% utilization while the i5-14600KF sits idle waiting for work. The GPU’s low PassMark G3D score of 6252 and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 indicate that it is the primary bottleneck for any graphics-intensive task.

However, the bottleneck shifts entirely in CPU-bound workloads. For tasks like 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation, the GPU is almost irrelevant. The GPU’s PassMark GPU compute score of 2762 is so low that it will not accelerate these tasks, so the CPU will be the sole engine driving performance. In this scenario, the i5-14600KF’s 90th percentile ranking means there is no bottleneck; it is a high-performance part that will complete these tasks quickly. The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, points to the same conclusion: a more balanced GPU would be required to take advantage of the CPU’s capabilities in gaming. The 44th percentile GPU ranking versus the 90th percentile CPU ranking shows that any game running at high settings will be entirely GPU-limited, and the CPU’s performance headroom will go unused. This is a configuration where the component choice defines the workload: it is a CPU-centric workstation with a basic display adapter, not a gaming machine.