SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
85%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600KF

49,394 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process node by Intel itself. It belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, and features a base clock of 3.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The chip is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and carries a 125 W TDP. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. The die size is 257 mm², and the processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support also listed.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, indicating strong overall performance. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 32,544 points and single-core score of 4,594 points demonstrate a balanced capability across heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The R20 scores of 13,668 (multi) and 1,929 (single) reinforce this pattern, as do the R15 scores of 3,280 (multi) and 462 (single). Geekbench scores of 17,085 (multi) and 2,445 (single) align with the Cinebench results, showing consistent performance across different benchmark suites.

The processor's average benchmark score of 49,394 places it in close competition with several notable rivals. It trails the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 by 0.8%, but leads the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 by 0.3%, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G by 0.4%, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 by 0.8%. This grouping suggests that the i5-14600KF sits at a performance parity point with these chips, with differences well within run-to-run variation. For real workloads, this means the i5-14600KF is competitive with upper-mid-range and some high-end processors from both AMD and Intel, making it suitable for demanding productivity tasks.

PassMark results provide additional insight into specific workload characteristics. The multithread score of 38,697 and single-thread score of 4,273 indicate strong performance in both parallel and sequential processing. The integer math score of 125,982 and floating-point math score of 93,048 show robust number-crunching ability, while the data encryption score of 27,608 and data compression score of 485,140 highlight efficiency in these specific operations. The extended instructions score of 28,785 suggests good SIMD performance, which benefits multimedia and scientific applications.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimated from the benchmark scores of both components, not from direct gameplay measurements. The data clearly indicates that this pairing is heavily unbalanced for gaming purposes.

The Intel Arc A310 GPU sits in the 40th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 7,550. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R7 250 (0.1% slower), AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (0.4% slower), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (1% faster), and AMD Radeon HD 8850M (1.4% slower). The GTX 1650 comparison is particularly telling, as that GPU is generally considered an entry-level 1080p gaming card from several generations ago. The Arc A310's PassMark G3D score of 5,433 and DirectX 12 score of 29 suggest that gaming performance will be modest at best.

In contrast, the i5-14600KF is a top-decile processor that would not bottleneck even high-end graphics cards. For gaming, the Arc A310 will be the limiting factor in virtually all scenarios. At 1080p with ultra settings, expect low FPS in modern titles, likely in the range of 20-40 FPS depending on the game's optimization and API usage. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will also constrain texture quality and resolution scaling. At 1440p or 4K, the situation becomes more severe, with playable frame rates only achievable in lighter or older titles.

The Arc A310's API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which means it can technically run modern games. However, the raw compute power of 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 and 16 ROPs will limit fill-rate-heavy scenes. The 6 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the overall performance level suggests ray tracing will be impractical at playable frame rates. The 768 shading units and 32 TMUs are entry-level specifications that place this GPU firmly in the budget segment.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not viable with this pairing. The Arc A310's 40th percentile GPU ranking and sub-GTX 1650 performance will struggle to hit even 60 FPS at 1080p in most modern titles, making 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitors largely wasted. The i5-14600KF could easily drive high frame rates, but the GPU cannot keep up.

Streaming: The CPU is well-suited for software encoding, with its 14 cores and 20 threads providing ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. However, the GPU's gaming performance is so limited that streaming gameplay will be constrained to less demanding titles or lower settings. The CPU's strong multicore scores (32,544 in R23) suggest it could handle encoding tasks while the GPU struggles through the game.

Video editing: The i5-14600KF excels here, with high multicore scores across Cinebench and Geekbench indicating strong rendering and export performance. The Arc A310's 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit GPU-accelerated effects and timeline performance, but the CPU can handle most editing workloads in software. The PassMark floating-point score of 93,048 reinforces the CPU's capability for video processing tasks.

3D rendering: The CPU's multicore performance (32,544 in R23) makes it a strong candidate for CPU-based rendering workloads. The Arc A310's compute score of 2,157 in PassMark GPU Compute is low, so GPU-accelerated rendering will be slow. For Blender or similar applications, expect the CPU to be the primary renderer, with the GPU providing minimal acceleration.

Software development: The i5-14600KF supports fast compilation times thanks to its high multicore scores and 20 threads. The single-core performance (4,594 in R23) is also strong for interactive development tasks. The GPU is irrelevant for most development work, making this a solid pairing for coding, testing, and running virtual machines.

Student and office work: The CPU provides excellent responsiveness for office applications, web browsing, and multitasking. The Arc A310 handles basic 2D graphics and video playback adequately, with a PassMark G2D score of 625. For document processing, spreadsheets, and presentation software, this system will feel snappy, though the GPU's modest performance means it is not suited for graphics-intensive design work.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This gives builders flexibility in choosing memory, though DDR5 offers higher bandwidth for the CPU's demanding workloads. The processor also supports ECC memory, which is valuable for workstation and server-adjacent use cases.

PCIe connectivity is provided via Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, allowing for high-bandwidth peripherals such as NVMe SSDs and graphics cards. The Arc A310 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is compatible with the platform's Gen 5 slots, though the GPU's bandwidth requirements are modest given its 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth.

The suggested PSU for this build is 200 W, which is remarkably low given the CPU's 125 W TDP. However, the Arc A310 has a 30 W TDP and requires no power connectors, making it one of the most power-efficient GPUs available. This means the system has enormous headroom for a GPU upgrade without changing the power supply. A sensible next step would be replacing the Arc A310 with a mid-range or high-end GPU, as the CPU's 90th percentile performance can support far more powerful graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck.

The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, and its boost clock of 5.30 GHz already provides strong single-thread performance. With adequate cooling, users could push clocks higher, though the 125 W TDP baseline suggests thermal headroom will depend on the cooler chosen. The platform's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means existing memory can be carried over, though a new build would likely opt for DDR5 to maximize CPU performance.

# Benchmark Performance

The i5-14600KF delivers exceptional CPU benchmark results, with an average score of 49,394 and a 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388, scores 49,796, which is 0.8% higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49,228) trails by 0.3%, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49,196) by 0.4%, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (48,995) by 0.8%. These margins are negligible, placing the i5-14600KF in a performance tier with these processors.

The Arc A310, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 7,550 and ranks in the 40th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are closely matched: the AMD Radeon R7 250 (7,557) is 0.1% faster, the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (7,580) is 0.4% faster, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (7,472) is 1% slower, and the AMD Radeon HD 8850M (7,447) is 1.4% slower. The GTX 1650 comparison is notable, as that card is several generations old and considered entry-level for gaming.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 65, which reflects the massive disparity between the two components. The CPU's 90th percentile performance is dragged down by the GPU's 40th percentile ranking. In terms of specific GPU benchmarks, the Arc A310 scores 30,607 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28,964 in Geekbench Vulkan, while PassMark results show 5,433 in G3D, 2,157 in GPU Compute, and 625 in G2D. These numbers collectively paint a picture of a GPU that is adequate for basic tasks but severely limited for demanding graphics work.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else and have minimal graphics requirements. For gamers at 1080p, the system will handle esports titles and older games adequately, but modern AAA games will run poorly. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck any GPU, so users planning to upgrade the graphics card later will find a solid foundation.

Content creators focused on CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation will benefit from the i5-14600KF's strong multicore scores. The Arc A310's limited compute capability means GPU-accelerated effects will be slow, but the CPU can handle most workflows in software. Developers compiling large codebases will see fast build times, and the 20 threads provide ample parallelism for multitasking.

Students and office workers will find this system responsive for everyday tasks, though the GPU is overkill for basic productivity. Small business workstations running spreadsheets, databases, and web applications will perform well, with the CPU's high single-thread scores (4,594 in R23) ensuring snappy interaction. However, anyone needing GPU acceleration for design, CAD, or machine learning should look elsewhere or plan a GPU upgrade.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, using TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It features 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, along with 6 RT cores for ray tracing. The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clocks run at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective), while the GPU core operates at a base and boost clock of 1750 MHz — notably, both clocks are identical, suggesting minimal dynamic frequency scaling.

Compute performance is rated at 2.688 TFLOPS for FP32 and 5.376 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 28.00 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 56.00 GTexel/s. The GPU supports PCIe 4.0 x8, has 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, and requires no power connectors, with a 30 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 200 W. It is a single-slot card, and its production status is listed as end-of-life, with Battlemage as its successor.

Benchmark results show the Arc A310 at the 40th percentile among all GPUs. Its DirectX scores range from 29 (DX12) to 69 (DX9), indicating that older API versions perform relatively better. The G3D score of 5,433 and GPU Compute score of 2,157 confirm its entry-level positioning. In Vulkan, it scores 28,964, which is close to its OpenCL score of 30,607. For rendering, the GPU's limited compute power means it will struggle with modern workloads, and its 4 GB VRAM is insufficient for high-resolution textures or complex scenes.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 65, reflecting the CPU's 90th percentile ranking and the GPU's 40th percentile ranking.

Q: How does the i5-14600KF compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900?

A: The i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49,394, which is 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900's score of 49,228.

Q: What is the Arc A310's nearest rival in performance?

A: The AMD Radeon R7 250 is the closest, with a score of 7,557, just 0.1% higher than the Arc A310's 7,550.

Q: Does the Arc A310 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 6 RT cores, but its low overall performance makes ray tracing impractical in most games.

Q: What memory types does the i5-14600KF support?

A: It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support.

Q: What is the TDP of the Arc A310, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The GPU has a 30 W TDP, and the suggested PSU is 200 W.

Q: Is the i5-14600KF overclockable?

A: Yes, it has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking beyond its 5.30 GHz boost clock.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance imbalance in this pairing is stark. The CPU operates at the 90th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 40th percentile, creating a situation where the GPU is the definitive bottleneck for any graphics-intensive workload. In gaming, the Arc A310's 40th percentile ranking and sub-GTX 1650 performance mean that the i5-14600KF's processing power will go largely unused, as the GPU cannot feed frames fast enough to stress the CPU.

For CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the balance is reversed: the CPU delivers strong performance (32,544 in R23 multicore), while the GPU's compute capabilities (2,157 in PassMark GPU Compute) contribute minimally. This means the system is well-balanced for tasks that rely on the CPU, but severely GPU-limited for graphics work.

The FPS scaling story is clear: even if the CPU could drive high frame rates, the GPU's 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 and 16 ROPs will cap performance well below what the CPU can support. The 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth further constrain resolution and texture settings. Upgrading the GPU would immediately unlock the CPU's potential, as the i5-14600KF can handle far more powerful graphics cards without bottlenecking.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-14600KF, a top-decile processor, with the Intel Arc A310, an entry-level GPU that has already reached end-of-life status. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake Refresh part with a 5.30 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a 30 W, 4 GB GDDR6 card based on the Xe-HPG architecture.

The combined percentile of 65 places this system in the mid-range overall, but the distribution is highly skewed. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking makes it competitive with processors like the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388, while the GPU's 40th percentile ranking puts it in the company of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD Radeon R7 250. This pairing is best suited for users who need maximum CPU performance for productivity tasks and plan to upgrade the GPU later, as the platform has ample headroom for a more capable graphics card without changing the power supply.