SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600KF

49,394 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6700

30,433 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600KF and AMD Radeon RX 6700 form a desktop pairing that targets high-performance computing and high-refresh-rate gaming. This analysis relies exclusively on synthetic benchmark data, as no measured frame-rate data exists for this specific combination. The CPU holds a 90th percentile rank among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 75th percentile, yielding a combined percentile of 83. These figures indicate a system that excels in multi-threaded productivity tasks and delivers strong, though not flagship, rasterization performance.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, utilizing the Navi 22 chip fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The GPU features 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It operates with a base clock of 1941 MHz, a game clock of 2174 MHz, and a boost clock of 2450 MHz. Memory is a 10 GB GDDR6 configuration on a 160-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s with an effective speed of 16 Gbps. The card is a dual-slot design with a 1x 8-pin power connector, a total board power of 175 W, and a suggested power supply of 450 W. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Rendering performance is quantified by a PassMark G3D score of 18931 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2014. These results place the GPU at the 75th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival comparisons show the RX 6700 is essentially level with the NVIDIA CMP 70HX, which scores 30476 in the average benchmark, a delta of -0.1%. It is also within a 0.2% delta of the NVIDIA Tesla M60, which scores 30490. Notably, it slightly outperforms the AMD Radeon RX 6800 by 1.1% (scores 30095) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti by 1.6% (scores 29945) in the aggregate benchmark average. The GPU’s compute potential is reflected in a PassMark GPU Compute score of 8240, with Geekbench OpenCL scoring 97841, Vulkan scoring 83974, and Metal scoring 122223. For hardware-accelerated ray tracing, the RDNA 2.0 architecture includes 36 ray accelerators, though the synthetic data does not isolate RT performance from traditional rasterization workloads. The 10 GB frame buffer and 320 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for high-resolution textures, but the 160-bit bus may constrain performance in memory-heavy scenes compared to wider-memory rivals.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU and GPU each deliver distinct benchmark profiles. The Core i5-14600KF achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544 and a single-core score of 4594. In Geekbench, it scores 17085 multi-core and 2445 single-core. PassMark results include a multi-thread score of 38697, a single-thread score of 4273, integer math at 125982, floating-point math at 93048, and extended instructions at 28785. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 49394, placing it at the 90th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (score 49228, delta 0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (score 49196, delta 0.4%), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (score 48995, delta 0.8%). The only rival slightly ahead is the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388, scoring 49796, a delta of -0.8% from the i5.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 30433, placing it at the 75th percentile. Its rival deltas are tight: the NVIDIA CMP 70HX is -0.1%, the Tesla M60 is -0.2%, the RX 6800 is +1.1%, and the RTX 3070 Ti is +1.6%. The combined percentile for this pairing is 83, indicating a system that sits comfortably above the median but below the top-tier enthusiast segment. The data shows a significant delta between CPU and GPU percentiles—90 versus 75—which suggests the processor has more headroom than the graphics card in this configuration. The combined picture is one where the CPU can feed the GPU without bottlenecking in most scenarios, but the GPU will likely be the limiting factor in graphically intensive workloads.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 75th percentile rank and rival-level performance with the RTX 3070 Ti suggest it can drive high refresh rates at 1080p and 1440p in esports and moderately demanding titles. The CPU’s single-core score of 4594 in Cinebench R23 ensures high frame pacing, though exact FPS figures are not available for this pairing.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 threads and multi-core score of 32544 in Cinebench R23 provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes features beneficial for modern streaming pipelines, but the lack of dedicated tensor cores means hardware encoding falls to the CPU or the GPU’s fixed-function blocks.

Video editing: The i5-14600KF’s PassMark multi-thread score of 38697 and data compression score of 485140 indicate strong performance in export rendering and timeline scrubbing. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 97841 accelerates effects and color grading, though the 10 GB VRAM may limit very long 4K timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench scores are the standout here—32544 multi-core in R23—which directly translates to faster CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or V-Ray. The GPU’s 11.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 36 ray accelerators provide acceleration for GPU-based renderers, but the 10 GB memory ceiling is a constraint for large scenes.

Software development: The CPU’s data encryption score of 27608 and integer math score of 125982 indicate strong compilation and cryptographic workloads. The 14 cores and 20 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, while the GPU is largely idle in this scenario.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4273 in PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness in productivity suites. The GPU’s G2D score of 936 handles 2D desktop compositing, and the overall 83rd combined percentile means this system is overkill for basic tasks but provides future-proofing.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

The target user for this build is a desktop enthusiast who prioritizes multi-core CPU performance for productivity while maintaining solid 1440p gaming capability. The CPU’s 90th percentile rank and 0.3% delta ahead of the Ryzen 9 7900 make it suitable for content creators who rely on Cinebench-heavy workloads, such as 3D modelers and video editors. The GPU’s 75th percentile and 1.6% lead over the RTX 3070 Ti in average benchmark scores make it a fit for gamers who play at high settings on 1080p or 1440p monitors, though not for 4K ultra enthusiasts. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 20 threads and 125982 integer math score. Small business workstations running database or virtualization workloads can leverage the CPU’s 38697 PassMark multi-thread score and ECC memory support. Students in engineering or computer science fields will find the CPU’s 2445 Geekbench single-core score adequate for daily tasks and research simulations. The GPU’s end-of-life production status suggests this build is for users who want a proven, stable platform rather than the latest hardware.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 83, based on the CPU’s 90th percentile and GPU’s 75th percentile.

Q: How does the Core i5-14600KF compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 in average benchmark score?

A: The i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49394, which is 0.3% higher than the Ryzen 9 7900’s score of 49228.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Radeon RX 6700?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s, using 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus.

Q: Does the Radeon RX 6700 support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, it features 36 ray accelerators as part of the RDNA 2.0 architecture, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate.

Q: What is the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The Core i5-14600KF scores 32544 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 4594 in single-core.

Q: What power supply is suggested for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 450 W, with the GPU’s total board power rated at 175 W.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and memory support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core i5-14600KF and AMD Radeon RX 6700 combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries for any game or resolution. Therefore, all frame-rate expectations are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 18931 and its 1.6% delta ahead of the RTX 3070 Ti suggest this pairing can achieve high frame rates in competitive titles at 1080p and 1440p with ultra settings. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4594 ensures minimal CPU-side frame drops in CPU-bound scenarios. For demanding AAA titles, the 10 GB VRAM and 320 GB/s bandwidth may require lowering texture quality at 4K, but at 1440p the system should maintain playable frame rates. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2014 indicates strong DirectX 12 performance, which is relevant for modern game engines. These are estimates only, and actual frame rates will vary by title and driver optimization.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-14600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The chip is fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². Cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with ECC memory support enabled. It provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU and has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The launch MSRP is $294.

Benchmark scores illustrate the CPU’s strengths. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544 is 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, indicating it is a top-tier productivity chip. The single-core score of 4594 ensures responsiveness in lightly threaded applications. PassMark integer math at 125982 and floating-point math at 93048 show strong general-purpose computing. The data encryption score of 27608 is relevant for security workloads, while the find prime numbers score of 161 suggests weaker performance in that specific niche. The average benchmark score of 49394 places it at the 90th percentile, meaning it outperforms 90% of all CPUs in the database. For real workloads, this translates to fast video encoding, quick code compilation, and smooth multitasking with many applications open.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build featuring the Intel Core i5-14600KF and AMD Radeon RX 6700. The CPU and GPU together achieve a combined percentile of 83, placing the system in the upper-middle tier of benchmarked configurations. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread processor with a 5.30 GHz boost clock, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with DDR4/DDR5 support. The GPU is an RDNA 2.0-based card with 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 320 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU’s 90th percentile rank is significantly higher than the GPU’s 75th percentile, indicating a processor-heavy configuration. This pairing is best described as a productivity-first desktop that also handles gaming well, given the CPU’s top-tier multi-core performance and the GPU’s solid mid-range rasterization capabilities. The GPU is end-of-life, which may affect long-term driver support, but the CPU remains an active production part.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data shows a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s 90th percentile versus the GPU’s 75th percentile indicates that in gaming and graphics-intensive workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU’s single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 4594, is sufficient to feed the GPU in most titles, but the GPU’s average benchmark score of 30433 is only 1.6% above the RTX 3070 Ti, suggesting a hard ceiling on frame rates. In CPU-bound workloads like video rendering or software compilation, the GPU is nearly idle, and the CPU’s 32544 multi-core score drives performance. The combined percentile of 83, which is lower than the CPU’s 90th percentile, confirms that the GPU drags the overall system tier down. For users seeking balanced performance, the GPU would need to be upgraded to a higher-percentile card, such as one that matches the CPU’s 90th percentile, to eliminate the bottleneck in gaming. Conversely, for productivity tasks, the GPU is not a bottleneck, and the CPU’s 0.3% lead over the Ryzen 9 7900 shows it is already at the top of its class.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing users to choose between the two standards based on existing hardware or budget. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is future-proof for next-generation storage and GPUs. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 slot, though it will operate at Gen 4 speeds. The CPU’s TDP is 125 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 175 W, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. This leaves significant headroom for overclocking or adding peripherals, as the combined TDP is 300 W. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector, which is standard for most power supplies.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a higher-tier model, as the CPU has substantial headroom (90th percentile vs. 75th). The RX 6700’s end-of-life status means users may consider a newer RDNA 3 or competitor card, but the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is not a bottleneck for current GPUs. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier and 125 W TDP allow for overclocking to extract more performance, and the DDR5 memory support provides a path for higher bandwidth. For storage, the CPU’s 16 Gen 5 lanes can support a fast NVMe SSD, though the GPU uses 16 lanes, so users should check lane allocation. Overall, the platform is mature and stable, with the CPU being the long-term component and the GPU being the primary upgrade target.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6700

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600KF

AMD Radeon RX 6700

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds