SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600KF

49,394 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

24,442 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600KF and AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT form a desktop pairing that occupies a distinct position in the performance hierarchy. The CPU, a Raptor Lake Refresh part on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, delivers a 90th percentile ranking among all processors, while the GPU, based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, sits at the 70th percentile among all graphics cards. This combination results in an 80th combined percentile, indicating a system that is strong in compute-heavy tasks but more modest in raw graphical throughput, a dynamic that shapes its suitability for different workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R generation. Its base clock is 3.50 GHz, with a boost clock reaching 5.30 GHz, and it is manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel. The core configuration is a hybrid design, though the fact pack does not specify the performance/efficiency core split; it simply lists 14 cores and 20 threads. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a 24 MB shared L3 cache. This memory layout is substantial for a mid-range enthusiast chip, and benchmark results confirm its strength.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 32544 in multi-core and 4594 in single-core. The multi-core figure is indicative of heavy parallel workloads, while the single-core score is crucial for lightly-threaded tasks. The Geekbench scores of 17085 multi-core and 2445 single-core reinforce this profile. The PassMark multithread score is 38697, with a single-thread score of 4273. The data reveals a processor that is exceptionally strong in multi-threaded scenarios; for instance, its PassMark integer math score of 125982 and floating-point math score of 93048 are massive numbers, suggesting high throughput for number-crunching. The PassMark data compression score of 485140 and encryption score of 27608 further indicate strong performance in data-heavy tasks.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i5-14600KF holds a marginal edge. It is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G. It also leads the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 by 0.8%, but trails the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 by 0.8%. These deltas are tiny, meaning the i5-14600KF is statistically tied with these competitors in aggregate benchmark scores. The practical implication is that the CPU is not a bottleneck in most gaming or productivity tasks, as its single-core performance is top-tier and its multi-core performance is comparable to higher-tier rivals. The unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, but the stock performance is already near the top of the 90th percentile.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is based on actual testing (dataIsMeasured is true), provides a clear picture of the RX 6600 XT's capabilities at ultra settings. At 1080p, the GPU handles esports titles with ease, delivering 355.8 FPS in Valorant, 341.9 FPS in CS:GO, and 186 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege X. These figures are far beyond the refresh rates of most monitors. For triple-A games, 1080p performance is solid but not extreme: Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 165.9 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 156.4 FPS, and Minecraft at 153 FPS. More demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 46 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 43 FPS, indicating that ultra settings in the heaviest games will require compromises.

At 1440p, the frame rates scale down predictably. Valorant still hits 304 FPS, and Warzone maintains 150.2 FPS. However, Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 34.3 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 30.9 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target for smooth play. The 4K results are generally not playable for modern AAA titles, with Cyberpunk at 22.1 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 19.5 FPS. The data shows that this GPU is best suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming, and it can handle 1440p for competitive or less demanding games, but 4K ultra is out of reach. The pair's average FPS across all tested games is 104, and its rank is 2536 out of 3732 pairs, placing it in the lower half of combinations.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 49394, which places it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 24442, placing it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for the system is 80. The CPU's nearest rivals all have average scores within 1% of it, confirming its position as a top-tier mid-range processor. The GPU's nearest rivals are interesting; it is 0.7% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630, 0.8% ahead of the GTX 780 Ti, and 1.1% ahead of the RTX 2080 SUPER, but 0.8% behind the Intel Arc A350M. This indicates that the RX 6600 XT's raw compute performance is comparable to much older high-end cards like the RTX 2080 SUPER, but its modern feature set and efficiency are different.

In specific synthetic tests, the GPU scores 1804 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, and 16461 in PassMark G3D. Its compute scores are 7520 in PassMark GPU Compute, and 80503 in Geekbench OpenCL, with 72417 in Vulkan. These numbers suggest a capable compute unit, but not a powerhouse. The CPU's PassMark physics score of 2449 is notably low, which could indicate a bottleneck in physics-heavy simulations, but the overall multithread score of 38697 is strong. The combined picture is a system where the CPU is the dominant component in terms of percentile, and the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-bound workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. This gives builders flexibility, but the platform is a mature one, and future CPU upgrades would require a new motherboard. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is forward-looking for storage and GPUs. The GPU, however, uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is half the lanes of a typical x16 slot, but the bandwidth is sufficient for this class of card. The CPU's TDP is 125 W, and the GPU's TDP is 160 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 450 W, which is a modest requirement, implying that a standard mid-range power supply is sufficient.

The GPU has a dual-slot design, is 190 mm in length, and requires a single 8-pin power connector. This makes it physically compatible with most cases. The platform's memory support is flexible, and the CPU's ECC memory support is a feature that could appeal to workstation users, though it requires a compatible motherboard. A sensible next upgrade path would be to replace the GPU with a higher-tier card, as the CPU has headroom in its 90th percentile ranking. The CPU's 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure that a future GPU will not be bandwidth-limited. The RX 6600 XT is end-of-life, so upgrades are the logical next step.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is the primary strength. At 1080p, the system delivers over 150 FPS in esports titles like Valorant and CS:GO, and over 75 FPS in most AAA games. The CPU's strong single-core performance ensures no bottlenecks in these scenarios. For 1440p, it is still viable for competitive games, but AAA titles will need settings reduced.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and high multi-core scores (32544 in Cinebench R23) are well-suited for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 38697 suggests there is ample headroom for simultaneous game and stream encoding, though the GPU lacks a dedicated hardware encoder with the same branding as NVIDIA's NVENC.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core performance is excellent for rendering timelines, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle 1080p and some 1440p editing, but the 4K results are poor, and the GPU's 70th percentile means it will be the limiting factor in effects-heavy workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU's 20 threads and 24 MB of L3 cache are beneficial for CPU-based rendering, as seen in the PassMark floating-point math score of 93048. The GPU's 10.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, making it suitable for light GPU rendering, but not for professional-grade workloads.

Software development: The CPU's high single-core score of 4594 in Cinebench R23 ensures fast compilation times for single-threaded tasks, while the multi-core score accelerates parallel builds. The 14 cores are well-suited for modern build systems. The GPU is adequate for general development, but not for heavy GPU compute.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for basic tasks. The CPU and GPU combination provides fast response times in applications, but the power draw and cost are unnecessary for word processing or spreadsheets. The system would excel in data analysis or simulation tasks, given the CPU's high integer math score of 125982.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is based on the Navi 23 chip, manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC, with 11,060 million transistors. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. Its clocks are a base of 1968 MHz, a game clock of 2359 MHz, and a boost clock of 2589 MHz. The memory runs at 2000 MHz, or 16 Gbps effective. It includes 32 RT cores for ray tracing, but no tensor cores, meaning its AI acceleration is limited.

The GPU's FP32 performance is 10.60 TFLOPS, and its FP16 performance is 21.21 TFLOPS (2:1). The pixel rate is 165.7 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 331.4 GTexel/s. In benchmark terms, its PassMark G3D score of 16461 is decent, but its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1804 is low, indicating poor performance in modern DX12 workloads. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 72417 is better, suggesting it handles Vulkan more efficiently. The GPU's 70th percentile ranking is consistent with its position as a mid-range card. The 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for 4K textures, as seen in the 4K FPS drops in games like Cyberpunk 2077 (22.1 FPS). The RT cores exist, but the performance in ray-traced titles would be poor, though the fact pack does not provide specific RT benchmarks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system's balance is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The CPU's 90th percentile versus the GPU's 70th percentile indicates that the GPU is the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. Evidence from the FPS data supports this. In games like Valorant, the 1080p FPS of 355.8 is so high that it is likely CPU-limited, but as resolution increases to 1440p (304 FPS) and 4K (237.9 FPS), the GPU takes over. In contrast, in Cyberpunk 2077, the 1080p FPS is 46, which is GPU-limited, and it drops to 22.1 at 4K. The CPU has significant headroom; its average benchmark score of 49394 is far above what the GPU can feed in most titles.

The PassMark physics score of 2449 is an outlier, being low relative to other CPU scores, which could indicate a bottleneck in physics simulations. However, the overall average FPS of 104 across games suggests the pair is not severely imbalanced for general gaming. The GPU's 128-bit memory bus and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p, but at 4K, the limited bandwidth and VRAM cause a steep performance drop. Upgrading the GPU would yield the largest gaming performance gain, as the CPU is unlikely to be a limiting factor until a much faster GPU is installed.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's position among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF is in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49394.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is 1.1% ahead of the RTX 2080 SUPER in average benchmark score, despite being a newer, lower-tier card.

Q: What is the maximum playable framerate at 1080p for esports titles?

A: In measured ultra settings, the system achieves 355.8 FPS in Valorant and 341.9 FPS in CS:GO at 1920x1080.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: Generally no. At 3840x2160, most AAA games run below 30 FPS, such as Cyberpunk 2077 at 22.1 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 19.5 FPS.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, and the CPU has a boost clock of 5.30 GHz.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is 450 W.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, using 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who prioritize 1080p resolution and high refresh rates. The measured FPS in esports titles like Valorant (355.8 FPS), CS:GO (341.9 FPS), and Rainbow Six Siege X (186 FPS) at 1080p makes it an excellent choice for competitive play. It is also suitable for gamers who play AAA titles at 1440p with moderate settings, as the CPU can keep up with the GPU's output. Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering, such as video editors using multi-threaded software, will benefit from the CPU's 32544 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. Software developers will appreciate the fast compilation times from the 14 cores and 20 threads, especially in parallel build environments.

Students and office workers would find this system overpowered for basic tasks, but it is a capable workstation for data analysis, given the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 125982. Small business workstations that run simulation or financial modeling software would also benefit. However, those seeking 4K gaming or heavy GPU-accelerated rendering should look elsewhere, as the RX 6600 XT's 8 GB VRAM and 70th percentile ranking are the limiting factors. The system is also a good fit for users who want a future upgrade path, as the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support leaves room for a faster GPU.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-14600KF and the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT. The CPU is a high-end mainstream processor in the 90th percentile, while the GPU is a mid-range card in the 70th percentile. The system's combined percentile is 80, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all possible pairings. The CPU's 20 threads and high single-core performance make it a strong foundation, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and modest compute power limit the system to 1080p and light 1440p gaming. The pair's overall rank by FPS is 2536 out of 3732, with an average FPS of 104, indicating that it is a balanced but not top-tier gaming machine. It is a system where the CPU clearly outclasses the GPU, making it a prime candidate for a future GPU upgrade.