SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600K

48,618 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

178,050 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-14600K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

This pairing combines Intel's 14-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA's flagship Ada Lovelace GPU, positioning the build at the 94th combined percentile across all CPU-GPU configurations. The CPU holds the 90th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits in the 98th percentile among all graphics cards, creating a system where the graphics subsystem is the dominant performance tier. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK — all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as projections rather than verified results.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600K is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture using Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It operates with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, drawing up to 125 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 through a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory supported. The CPU integrates UHD Graphics 770 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, it scores 24,491 points multi-core and 2,064 points single-core. The R20 run yields 13,709 multi-core and 1,935 single-core. Geekbench reports 16,673 multi-core and 2,491 single-core. PassMark results break down specialized tasks: integer math at 125,737, floating-point math at 92,794, extended instructions at 28,546, and data encryption at 27,533. Data compression hits 482,020 in PassMark, while random string sorting reaches 51,949. Prime number finding scores 162, and physics processing lands at 2,473. The multithread PassMark score is 38,682, with a single-thread score of 4,270.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the i5-14600K sits within a tight competitive band. It trails the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H by 0.2% and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 by 0.8%, while leading the AMD EPYC 4345P by 0.3% and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX by 0.7%. This places the CPU in a performance envelope where workload-specific differences matter more than raw aggregate scores — the Xeon and EPYC are server-class parts, yet the desktop i5 matches or exceeds their average benchmark scores. For real workloads, the 14-core/20-thread configuration handles parallel compilation, rendering, and encoding tasks with a substantial core count, while the 5.30 GHz boost clock drives single-thread responsiveness in applications that scale on one or two cores.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 48,618, with a 90th-percentile standing across all processors. The GPU's average benchmark score is 178,050, placing it in the 98th percentile among all GPUs. Combined, this build ranks in the 94th percentile of all CPU-GPU pairs. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H, posts an average score of 48,698 — a 0.2% gap that is statistically negligible, meaning the i5-14600K competes directly with enterprise silicon in aggregate compute throughput.

For the GPU, the RTX 4090 D delivers 8,587 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 278,621 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 246,941 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its nearest rivals are all professional or data-center parts: the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is 2.2% faster, the A100 SXM4 80 GB is 3.1% faster, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 3.6% faster, and the A100 SXM4 40 GB is 4.9% faster. This means the 4090 D sits just below the absolute top tier of GPU compute, but it does so against accelerators designed for scientific and professional workloads rather than consumer gaming.

The combined picture shows a system with a clear performance hierarchy: the GPU operates at the 98th percentile, the CPU at the 90th, and the overall build at the 94th. This suggests the GPU is the stronger component relative to its market, while the CPU remains a high-end desktop part that does not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios. The benchmark scores indicate a machine capable of both demanding compute tasks and high-end graphics workloads, with the GPU carrying more of the system's performance weight.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance statements are therefore estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8,587 and its 98th-percentile ranking indicate exceptional rasterization performance, while the CPU's 90th-percentile standing and 5.30 GHz boost clock provide strong single-thread headroom for game logic and physics. The CPU's PassMark physics score of 2,473 supports this interpretation, as physics workloads in games rely heavily on processor throughput.

At 1080p, the CPU becomes more relevant because the GPU can render frames faster than many game engines can submit draw calls. The i5-14600K's single-thread score of 4,270 in PassMark and 2,064 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicate it can sustain high frame rates without becoming the limiting factor. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth ensure that texture streaming and memory bandwidth rarely constrain performance. The GPU's 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 1,149.1 GTexel/s texture rate suggest it can handle ultra settings at high resolutions, though the exact frame rates depend on the specific game engine and optimization. Since this is an estimate, users should expect the GPU to be the primary driver of gaming performance at higher resolutions, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom to avoid severe frame pacing issues.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need top-tier graphics performance with a capable desktop CPU. The GPU's 98th-percentile ranking makes it suitable for gamers running at 4K or high-refresh 1440p, where the 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth support high-resolution textures and demanding post-processing. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the GPU's 278,621 OpenCL and 246,941 Vulkan Geekbench scores, which indicate strong compute acceleration for GPU-rendered workflows. The CPU's 24,491 Cinebench R23 multi-core score supports CPU-based rendering tasks, making the system viable for hybrid CPU/GPU pipelines.

Software developers compiling large codebases will use the 14 cores and 20 threads effectively, while the 125,737 PassMark integer math score suggests strong performance in integer-heavy workloads common in compilers and data processing. Students in computer science or engineering programs can run virtual machines and simulation tools, though the 125 W TDP and triple-slot GPU require a substantial chassis. Small business workstations handling data analysis, encryption, or database workloads will find the 27,533 PassMark encryption score and 482,020 data compression score competitive, though the system's power requirements suggest it is better suited to performance-critical roles rather than always-on office tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates the GPU is the stronger component relative to its market: 98th percentile versus the CPU's 90th. This creates a system where the GPU can outpace the CPU in certain workloads, particularly at lower resolutions where the CPU's frame generation rate becomes the constraint. The CPU's 0.2% gap to the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H shows it competes with server parts, but the GPU's 2.2% deficit to the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell places it just below professional accelerators — meaning the GPU is closer to the absolute top of its market than the CPU is to the top of its own.

In gaming, the bottleneck shifts with resolution. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (4,270 PassMark) and physics score (2,473) become the limiting factors because the GPU can render frames faster than the CPU can process game logic. At 4K, the GPU's raw throughput (73.54 TFLOPS) dominates, and the CPU's role diminishes. In productivity, the balance depends on the application: CPU-bound tasks like compilation or data encryption (27,533 PassMark) will stress the i5-14600K, while GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering or OpenCL compute will leverage the 4090 D's 14592 shading units. The combined 94th percentile indicates no severe mismatch, but users targeting maximum frame rates at 1080p should expect the CPU to be the limiting factor.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D is built on the AD102 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. It operates at a base clock of 2280 MHz and a boost clock of 2520 MHz, with memory running at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem comprises 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s bandwidth. The GPU features 14,592 shading units, 456 texture mapping units, and 176 raster output units. Ray tracing hardware includes 114 RT cores, and AI acceleration is handled by 456 tensor cores. Pixel rate reaches 443.5 GPixel/s, texture rate is 1,149.1 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute is 73.54 TFLOPS with FP16 at the same rate (1:1).

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8,587 places the GPU in the 98th percentile, with nearest rivals being the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (2.2% faster), A100 SXM4 80 GB (3.1% faster), RTX 5000 Ada Generation (3.6% faster), and A100 SXM4 40 GB (4.9% faster). This indicates the 4090 D is within 5% of the fastest professional GPUs in the database, despite being marketed as a consumer part. For rendering workloads, the 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 throughput supports real-time viewport rendering and GPU-accelerated ray tracing. The 456 tensor cores enable DLSS and AI-based features, while the 24 GB VRAM accommodates large scenes and high-resolution textures. The 1.01 TB/s bandwidth ensures data movement keeps pace with compute, and the 443.5 GPixel/s pixel rate handles high-resolution displays with multiple monitors. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering modern graphics APIs.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 98th-percentile ranking and 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggest it can drive high frame rates at 1440p or 4K, while the CPU's 5.30 GHz boost clock and 4,270 PassMark single-thread score prevent major frame pacing issues. The 24 GB VRAM supports high-resolution texture packs without memory swapping.

Streaming: The 456 tensor cores can accelerate encoder workloads, and the CPU's 14 cores handle concurrent game and stream processing. The 125,737 PassMark integer math score indicates strong throughput for encoding tasks that rely on integer operations, though streaming software typically uses dedicated hardware encoders.

Video editing: The GPU's 278,621 OpenCL score accelerates effects and color grading, while the CPU's 24,491 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles timeline processing and export. The 1.01 TB/s bandwidth moves large video files efficiently, and the 24 GB VRAM caches preview renders.

3D rendering: GPU-based renderers will leverage the 14,592 shading units and 73.54 TFLOPS, while CPU-based renderers use the 14 cores and 20 threads. The GPU's 8,587 Steel Nomad score indicates strong DX12 performance for real-time engines, and the CPU's 92,794 floating-point math score supports physics simulations.

Software development: The 14 cores compile parallel projects, and the 125,737 integer math score accelerates build tools. The 20 threads handle multiple containerized or virtualized environments, and the 24 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency in large codebases.

Student and office work: This is overkill for typical productivity, but the CPU's 2,491 Geekbench single-core score ensures responsive application usage. The GPU's power draw (425 W TDP) and triple-slot form factor make this an impractical choice for compact or energy-conscious student setups, though the CPU's ECC memory support could benefit data-intensive coursework.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 with the Raptor Lake architecture, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The 125 W TDP gives headroom for CPU upgrades within the same socket generation, though the socket is tied to the 14th Gen series. The GPU requires an 800 W suggested PSU — the system's TDP is 125 W for the CPU plus 425 W for the GPU, leaving room for drives, fans, and peripherals. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector and occupies a triple-slot width, so the chassis must accommodate 304 mm length and 61 mm width. Memory upgrade options depend on the motherboard's DDR4 or DDR5 support, and ECC memory is supported by the CPU but requires a compatible motherboard. A sensible next upgrade would be increasing memory capacity or speed, as the CPU and GPU are already at high percentiles. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives are possible, and the platform's 16 CPU PCIe lanes can be allocated to additional expansion cards, though the GPU's triple-slot design limits available slots.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600K has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What are the CPU's Cinebench R23 scores?

A: The CPU scores 24,491 in multi-core and 2,064 in single-core Cinebench R23 tests.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 4090 D is 2.2% slower than the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell in average benchmark score, with a 98th-percentile ranking.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The CPU+GPU combination ranks in the 94th percentile across all builds, with the CPU at the 90th and GPU at the 98th percentile individually.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i5-14600K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 through a dual-channel memory bus, with ECC memory supported.

Q: What is the GPU's power requirement?

A: The GPU has a 425 W TDP, and the suggested PSU rating for the system is 800 W, with the GPU drawing power through a single 16-pin connector.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-14600K with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D in a desktop configuration. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake part at the 90th percentile, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace flagship at the 98th percentile. The combined system ranks at the 94th percentile, indicating a high-tier desktop that leans more heavily on graphics performance than CPU compute. The GPU's 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth make it suitable for 4K gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering, while the CPU's 24,491 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles parallel productivity tasks. The system sits just below the very top of the GPU hierarchy — within 5% of professional accelerators like the A100 SXM4 — while the CPU competes directly with server-class Xeon and EPYC parts. This is a desktop workstation-class build with consumer-grade accessibility, where the GPU is the dominant performance component and the CPU provides sufficient headroom for most workloads without becoming a significant bottleneck.