SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600K

48,618 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600K paired with the Intel Arc A350 is a desktop configuration that combines a high-performance 14th Gen CPU with an entry-level discrete GPU. The benchmark data shows a stark contrast in capability between the two components, with the processor ranking in the 90th percentile among all CPUs while the graphics card sits at the 50th percentile for GPUs. This pairing produces a system where the CPU is overwhelmingly dominant, making the Arc A350 the primary constraint in graphics-intensive tasks. Because the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, all frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores and must be treated as projections rather than verified results.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Intel Core i5-14600K?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600K has 14 cores and 20 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A350?

A: The Arc A350 has a memory bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s, achieved with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14600K supports ECC memory, and it can use both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, while the GPU has a much lower TDP of 25 W.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 48618 is 0.2% lower than the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48698), making the two essentially neck-and-neck in performance.

Q: What is the production status of the Arc A350?

A: The Intel Arc A350 is marked as End-of-life, with its predecessor being Xe Graphics and its successor being Battlemage.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The Intel Arc A350 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a profound imbalance in this pairing. The CPU's average benchmark score is 48618, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU's average benchmark score is 0, with a 50th percentile standing among GPUs. In any workload that stresses the graphics subsystem, the Arc A350 will be the definitive bottleneck. The CPU is capable of far more than the GPU can feed or render. For example, in gaming scenarios, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (2064 in Cinebench R23 single-core) will easily outpace the GPU's ability to draw frames, meaning the frame rate ceiling is set entirely by the GPU. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like data compression or multi-threaded rendering, the CPU operates near its full potential, and the GPU remains mostly idle, making the GPU the irrelevant component in those scenarios. The combined percentile for this build is 70, reflecting that the overall system performance is dragged down significantly by the GPU. The 25 W TDP of the GPU versus the 125 W TDP of the CPU further illustrates the mismatch in their respective performance tiers.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600K is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This configuration is designed for heavy multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 24491 in multi-core and 2064 in single-core, demonstrating robust parallel processing capability alongside strong single-thread responsiveness. The Geekbench scores of 16673 multi-core and 2491 single-core corroborate this balance. The Passmark multi-thread score of 38682 and single-thread score of 4270 further confirm the CPU's strength. Data-intensive tasks show high output, with a Passmark data compression score of 482020 and data encryption score of 27533. The CPU's 90th percentile rank among all CPUs indicates that it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. Compared to its nearest rivals, the CPU is essentially tied with the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (deltaPct -0.2%), slightly ahead of the AMD EPYC 4345P (0.3%), and slightly behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (deltaPct -0.8%). This suggests the i5-14600K is a top-tier desktop processor for its generation, offering performance that rivals server-class chips in certain metrics. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache is significant for gaming and productivity, as it reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets a niche user: someone who needs extreme CPU processing power but has minimal GPU requirements. The primary audience is professionals and enthusiasts who run CPU-intensive applications that do not rely heavily on graphics acceleration. Software developers compiling large codebases would benefit from the 14 cores and 20 threads, as compilation tasks scale well with core counts. Similarly, data analysts working with large datasets for compression or encryption tasks would see strong performance, given the Passmark data compression score of 482020. Students in engineering or scientific fields who run simulations or mathematical computations, such as those involving floating-point math (Passmark score 92794), would find the CPU capable. Small business workstations that handle database management or virtualization can leverage the 20 threads. The 90th percentile CPU rank ensures that this processor will not be a limiting factor in any CPU-bound workload. However, for gamers or content creators who need GPU acceleration for rendering or encoding, this build is ill-suited due to the Arc A350's entry-level status. The system confirms CPU-focused computing, where the graphics card is an afterthought for basic display output rather than a performance component.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 48618, which places it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, a very strong showing. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H, scores 48698, a negligible 0.2% difference. The AMD EPYC 4345P is 0.3% behind, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is 0.8% ahead. This indicates the i5-14600K is a performance leader in its class. The GPU, however, has no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK, with an average benchmark score of 0 and a 50th percentile rank. This lack of data makes it difficult to quantify the GPU's absolute performance, but the percentile suggests it is an average, mid-range part. The combined build percentile is 70, which is a weighted average reflecting the CPU's high performance and the GPU's mediocre standing. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491 is particularly telling, as it shows the CPU can handle heavy rendering tasks, but the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is a fraction of what a high-end card would offer. The overall picture is a system that excels in computation but is severely limited in graphics throughput.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The Arc A350's specifications suggest entry-level 1080p gaming capability. With 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, the GPU can render basic scenes but will struggle with modern titles at high settings. The 4 GB of VRAM is a significant constraint, as many contemporary games require more memory for high-resolution textures. At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU would likely be the bottleneck, with frame rates below 30 FPS in demanding titles. The CPU's strong single-core performance (2064 in Cinebench R23) ensures that it will not be the limiting factor, but the GPU's 25 W TDP and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap performance. The GPU's pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s are modest figures that translate to limited fill rates. For esports titles with lower graphical requirements, the GPU might manage 60 FPS at 1080p with reduced settings, but the lack of measured data makes this speculative. The system is not designed for high-refresh gaming; it is more suited to light or older games where the CPU's power can be fully utilized without GPU constraint.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600K uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for 12th, 13th, and 14th Gen Intel processors. This socket supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility, though the CPU supports dual-channel memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is a modern interface for high-speed storage and graphics cards. The suggested PSU for the entire build is 200 W, which is quite low, reflecting the GPU's 25 W TDP. This leaves substantial headroom for a GPU upgrade. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Arc A350 with a more powerful graphics card, as the CPU has ample processing power to support a much faster GPU without bottlenecking. The 125 W CPU TDP means that even with a high-end GPU, the total system power draw would remain manageable with a 500-600 W PSU, but the 200 W suggested PSU indicates that the current configuration is power-efficient. The CPU's 24 MB L3 cache and 20 threads make it a future-proof platform for several years. The motherboard would need to be a Z-series chipset to unlock the CPU's multiplier for overclocking, as the multiplier is unlocked. The platform supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation environments.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a top-tier Intel Core i5-14600K CPU with an entry-level Intel Arc A350 GPU. The CPU is in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, indicating exceptional processing power, while the GPU is in the 50th percentile, indicating average graphical performance. The combined percentile of 70 reflects the overall system tier, which is dragged down by the GPU. The build is a desktop class system, not a laptop. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads are ideal for productivity, while the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus are minimal. This is not a balanced gaming rig; it is a workstation-oriented build where the GPU is a placeholder for basic display output. The CPU's launch MSRP is $319. The system is best described as a CPU-centric platform that sacrifices graphics capability for raw computational throughput. The GPU is end-of-life, which limits its longevity, but the CPU's active production status ensures ongoing support.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build is not suitable for high-refresh gaming. The GPU's estimated performance, based on its 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 4 GB VRAM, would likely cap frame rates well below 144 FPS at 1080p in most titles. The CPU's strong single-core score of 2064 in Cinebench R23 would not be the limiting factor, but the GPU's 25 W TDP and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth would constrain performance.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads can handle encoding workloads efficiently, as evidenced by its Passmark multi-thread score of 38682. However, the GPU lacks dedicated encoding hardware data in the FACT PACK, so streaming quality would depend on CPU-based encoding, which is feasible given the CPU's power.

Video editing: In CPU-bound tasks like applying effects or rendering timelines, the i5-14600K excels with its 24491 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. However, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM is insufficient for large 4K video projects, and its average percentile (50th) suggests it will struggle with GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads are excellent for CPU-based rendering, with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13709. The GPU's 768 shading units and 6 RT cores would provide some acceleration, but the 4 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for complex scenes.

Software development: Compilation and code analysis benefit from the CPU's high multi-thread performance. The Passmark integer math score of 125737 indicates strong performance in logical operations. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a solid choice.

Student and office work: For everyday tasks like document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, the CPU is overkill, but the system will be extremely responsive. The GPU is sufficient for basic display output and 2D applications. The low 200 W suggested PSU means the system is power-efficient for a lab or office environment.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350 is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It is an entry-level GPU with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1937 MHz, with an effective data rate of 15.5 Gbps. The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs. It includes 6 RT cores for ray tracing, but no tensor cores are listed. The base and boost clocks are both 2000 MHz. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The GPU has a TDP of 25 W, making it very power-efficient, and it is a single-slot card. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The GPU has no display outputs, which is a critical detail. The Arc A350 is end-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage. The GPU's 50th percentile rank among all GPUs indicates it is an average performer, but the lack of benchmark scores in the FACT PACK means its exact standing is unknown. For rendering, the 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is modest, and the 4 GB VRAM is the most severe limitation, as it will cause texture loading issues in modern games and applications. The 124.0 GB/s bandwidth is also low, which will impact performance in memory-intensive tasks. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs, but the hardware is not designed for high-end workloads. It is best suited for light productivity or as a display adapter, but the fact that it has no display outputs limits even that use case, suggesting it is intended for compute-only tasks in a server or secondary configuration.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + Intel Arc A350

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600K

Intel Arc A350

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds