SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
85%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600K

48,618 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-14600K + Intel Arc A310

This pairing combines a high-end 14-core desktop processor with a low-profile entry-level graphics card, creating a system where the CPU vastly outperforms the GPU in raw compute capability. The Intel Core i5-14600K sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Arc A310 languishes at the 40th percentile among GPUs, producing a combined system percentile of 65. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than observed gameplay data.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600K is a Raptor Lake Refresh part built on Intel's 10 nm process node, featuring 14 cores and 20 threads. This hybrid configuration includes performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, and it includes ECC memory support, which is notable for workstation reliability. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB L2 cache per core provide substantial on-die storage for frequently accessed data, while the 80 KB L1 cache per core handles immediate working sets.

Benchmark results reveal a processor with exceptional multi-threaded throughput. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 24,491 multi-core and 2,064 single-core, indicating strong scaling across its 20 threads. The Geekbench scores of 16,673 multi-core and 2,491 single-core corroborate this balance. PassMark results show 125,737 in integer math and 92,794 in floating-point math, with a multithread score of 38,682 and a single-thread score of 4,270. The data compression score of 482,020 and encryption score of 27,533 suggest the chip handles data-heavy workloads efficiently, while the extended instructions score of 28,546 indicates robust SIMD performance for vectorized code.

The average benchmark score of 48,618 places the i5-14600K at the 90th percentile of all CPUs, making it a top-decile performer. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H, which scores 48,698 (only 0.2% higher), the AMD EPYC 4345P at 48,470 (0.3% lower), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX at 48,287 (0.7% lower), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 at 48,995 (0.8% higher). These narrow deltas show the i5-14600K trades blows with server-class and newer desktop parts, meaning real-world differences between these CPUs would be negligible in most workloads.

For real workloads, the data suggests this CPU excels at multi-threaded rendering, video encoding, and compilation tasks where all 20 threads can be utilized. The single-core performance, reflected in the 2,064 Cinebench R23 single-core score, ensures responsive everyday use and strong performance in lightly-threaded applications. The 125 W TDP indicates this is a power-hungry desktop chip that requires adequate cooling, but the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking for users seeking additional performance headroom.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance disparity between the CPU and GPU in this pairing is stark. The i5-14600K achieves an average benchmark score of 48,618, while the Arc A310 manages just 7,550. This means the CPU is roughly 6.4 times more powerful in aggregate benchmark terms, creating a system where the GPU is the definitive bottleneck in graphics-intensive tasks. The combined percentile of 65 reflects this imbalance, dragged down by the GPU's 40th percentile position.

In gaming scenarios, the Arc A310's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will limit frame rates far below what the CPU can feed. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 5,433 and DirectX 12 score of 29 indicate entry-level DirectX performance, so at 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU will saturate well before the CPU reaches 50% utilization. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like data compression, encryption, or multi-threaded rendering, the i5-14600K will operate near its full potential while the GPU remains idle.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, points to a system where resolution increases will not meaningfully change the CPU's headroom. At 4K, the GPU becomes even more of a limiting factor, while at 720p or 1080p with low settings, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (4,270 PassMark single-thread) could push frame rates higher, but the GPU's modest 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will cap performance. For productivity workloads, the bottleneck shifts entirely to the CPU, which is fortunate given its top-decile ranking; the GPU's compute score of 2,157 in PassMark is adequate for basic acceleration but will not accelerate rendering or machine learning tasks meaningfully.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is an Alchemist-generation part built on TSMC's 6 nm process, featuring the DG2-128 chip with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates at a fixed 1750 MHz base and boost clock, with memory running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The 4 GB GDDR6 memory sits on a 64-bit bus, yielding 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that will constrain performance in texture-heavy scenes and higher resolutions.

The GPU's architectural resources include 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units. It has 6 ray tracing cores, providing hardware-accelerated RT support that is rare at this performance tier. The pixel rate of 28.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 56.00 GTexel/s indicate modest fill rates. Compute capabilities are rated at 2.688 TFLOPS for FP32 and 5.376 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio), which places this card firmly in the entry-level segment for compute tasks.

Benchmark results confirm the GPU's modest standing. Geekbench OpenCL scores 30,607, while Vulkan scores 28,964, showing some compute capability. However, PassMark scores are more revealing: DirectX 9 at 69, DirectX 10 at 31, DirectX 11 at 33, and DirectX 12 at 29. These low DirectX scores indicate the card struggles with modern graphics APIs, while the G2D score of 625 and G3D score of 5,433 place it at the 40th percentile of all GPUs. The GPU compute score of 2,157 further underscores its limitations for general-purpose compute.

The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R7 250 (7,557, just 0.1% higher), AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (7,580, 0.4% higher), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (7,472, 1.0% lower), and AMD Radeon HD 8850M (7,447, 1.4% lower). These tiny deltas mean the Arc A310 performs within 1.4% of aging entry-level GPUs, some of which are over a decade old. The 30 W TDP and single-slot design with no power connectors make this an extremely low-power card, but the performance ceiling is correspondingly low. The 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support modern displays, and the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides adequate bandwidth for this card's needs.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is someone who needs exceptional CPU performance for productivity but only requires basic graphics output. Gamers at 1080p with low-to-medium settings on esports titles would find the Arc A310 sufficient, though the estimated FPS from the benchmark scores suggests frame rates will be modest. Content creators working with video encoding, where the i5-14600K's 20 threads and 24,491 Cinebench R23 multi-core score shine, would benefit from the CPU power while using the GPU only for display output.

Software developers compiling large codebases would see substantial benefit from the CPU's 125,737 PassMark integer math score and 38,682 multithread score, making build times significantly shorter than on lower-end processors. Students and small business workstations that primarily run office applications, web browsing, and light productivity suites would find the system responsive due to the CPU's 4,270 single-thread score, while the GPU handles 2D desktop workloads with ease given its 625 G2D score. The ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation use cases where data integrity is critical.

The Arc A310's 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth make it unsuitable for modern AAA gaming at high settings, but its 6 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support mean ray-traced effects are technically possible, albeit at very low frame rates. Users who prioritize CPU-bound workloads like data analysis, scientific computing, or server-style tasks in a desktop form factor would find this pairing acceptable, though the GPU offers little beyond basic display output and light acceleration.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i5-14600K compare to its nearest rivals in multi-core performance?

A: The i5-14600K scores 48,618 on average, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48,698) and 0.3% higher than the AMD EPYC 4345P (48,470). It trails the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 by 0.8% but leads the Core Ultra 5 245HX by 0.7%.

Q: What is the Arc A310's performance tier relative to other GPUs?

A: The Arc A310 sits at the 40th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 7,550. It performs within 1.4% of the AMD Radeon R7 250, AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, and AMD Radeon HD 8850M, making it comparable to entry-level cards from several generations ago.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14600K has ECC memory support, which is unusual for a consumer desktop processor. This makes it suitable for workstation builds where error-correcting memory is important for data integrity.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Arc A310 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1937 MHz, which translates to 15.5 Gbps effective.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread performance?

A: The CPU scores 4,270 in PassMark single-thread and 38,682 in multithread, a ratio of roughly 1:9. In Cinebench R23, it scores 2,064 single-core and 24,491 multi-core, showing strong scaling across its 20 threads.

Q: What is the system's combined performance percentile?

A: The combined CPU and GPU pairing achieves the 65th percentile among all systems, reflecting the strong CPU performance tempered by the weak GPU performance.

Q: Is the GPU suitable for DirectX 12 workloads?

A: The Arc A310 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), but its PassMark DirectX 12 score is only 29, indicating very limited real-world DirectX 12 performance. The card is technically capable but practically constrained by its hardware resources.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A310's 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 5433 G3D score will not sustain high frame rates at modern resolutions. Estimated FPS at 1080p ultra settings would be low, likely below 30 FPS in demanding titles, making this unsuitable for high-refresh monitors beyond esports games at reduced settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and 24,491 Cinebench R23 multi-core score can handle software encoding, but the GPU lacks dedicated encoding hardware data in the FACT PACK. The system would rely on the CPU for encoding, which is feasible given its compute headroom, but the GPU's low performance limits gaming quality during streams.

Video editing: The i5-14600K excels here, with 92,794 PassMark floating-point math and 125,737 integer math scores accelerating rendering and effects. The GPU's 2,157 compute score provides minimal acceleration, so most work falls to the CPU, which is a top-decile performer.

3D rendering: Multi-threaded rendering workloads will see strong CPU performance, with the 24,491 Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicating quick render times. The GPU's 6 RT cores offer ray tracing capability, but its low compute scores mean GPU rendering will be slow.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the CPU's 38,682 PassMark multithread score and 20 threads, significantly reducing build times. The data compression score of 482,020 indicates fast archive operations, and the ECC memory support adds stability for long compile sessions.

Student and office work: The CPU's 4,270 single-thread score ensures snappy application launches and responsive multitasking, while the GPU's 625 G2D score handles desktop rendering adequately. The 125 W TDP requires adequate cooling but the system's low GPU power draw keeps overall energy consumption reasonable.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Arc A310's PassMark G3D score of 5,433 and DirectX 12 score of 29 suggest it performs at the level of entry-level GPUs from several generations past. With 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth, the card will struggle with modern textures and high resolutions.

At 1080p ultra settings, estimated frame rates in AAA titles would likely fall below 30 FPS, with less demanding esports titles potentially reaching 60 FPS at medium settings. At 1440p, the GPU's limited VRAM and bandwidth would cause significant stuttering and reduced texture quality, likely pushing frame rates below playable thresholds in most games. At 4K, the card is effectively unusable for gaming, as the 64-bit memory bus and 4 GB capacity cannot sustain the bandwidth or capacity required. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4,270 would not be the limiting factor at any resolution — the GPU's 2.688 TFLOPS compute ceiling dominates the gaming experience.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining Intel's Core 14th Gen Raptor Lake processor with Intel's Arc Alchemist entry-level GPU. The i5-14600K represents a top-tier CPU choice, sitting at the 90th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 48,618. In contrast, the Arc A310 is an end-of-life product at the 40th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 7,550. The combined system percentile of 65 reflects a build that is CPU-dominant, with the processor providing exceptional compute capability while the GPU serves primarily as a display output device with light 3D acceleration.

This pairing makes sense for users who need maximum CPU throughput for productivity tasks but have minimal graphics demands. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads handle multi-threaded workloads with ease, while the GPU's 30 W TDP and single-slot design keep power consumption and physical footprint minimal. The system is not balanced for gaming or GPU-accelerated compute, but for CPU-centric workloads, it offers top-decile performance in a desktop form factor.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-14600K achieves an average benchmark score of 48,618, placing it at the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H, scores 48,698 (0.2% higher), while the AMD EPYC 4345P scores 48,470 (0.3% lower). The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX scores 48,287 (0.7% lower) and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48,995 (0.8% higher). These margins are within 1%, indicating the i5-14600K delivers performance on par with newer and server-class alternatives.

The Intel Arc A310 achieves an average benchmark score of 7,550, placing it at the 40th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R7 250 at 7,557 (0.1% higher), AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 at 7,580 (0.4% higher), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 at 7,472 (1.0% lower), and AMD Radeon HD 8850M at 7,447 (1.4% lower). The combined picture shows a system where the CPU outperforms the GPU by a factor of approximately 6.4 in average benchmark scores, creating a heavily CPU-bound configuration that excels in processor-intensive tasks but falls short in graphics workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor, offering ample bandwidth for modern storage and expansion cards. The 125 W TDP requires a capable cooling solution, and the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking for users seeking additional performance.

The Intel Arc A310 has a 30 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 200 W, meaning the current power supply requirements are minimal. This leaves substantial headroom for a GPU upgrade — the system could accommodate a significantly more powerful graphics card without requiring a new power supply, assuming a typical 500-650 W PSU is installed. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, so any modern GPU will be compatible with the motherboard's PCIe slots.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Arc A310 with a higher-tier GPU to balance the system. The CPU's 90th percentile performance can drive frame rates far beyond what the current GPU can deliver, so a mid-range or high-end graphics card would unlock the system's true gaming potential. The 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth of the current GPU are the primary bottlenecks, and upgrading to a card with 8 GB or more VRAM and wider memory bus would dramatically improve gaming and GPU compute performance. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures future GPUs will not be bandwidth-limited, and the CPU's 20 threads will remain relevant for years to come.