SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600

44,889 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER form a desktop pairing that presents a stark contrast in benchmark performance. The CPU is a high-tier performer, sitting at the 89th percentile of all processors, while the GPU’s single benchmark places it at the 18th percentile, a figure that appears anomalously low for a next-generation graphics card. This analysis will dissect the component specifications and benchmark results to provide a neutral, data-driven overview of the system's capabilities and limitations.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600 is a Raptor Lake Refresh part built on Intel's 10 nm process. It features a hybrid architecture with 14 cores and 20 threads, capable of boosting up to 5.20 GHz from a base clock of 2.70 GHz. The chip has a 65 W TDP, a 24 MB shared L3 cache, and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This configuration is designed to handle high-throughput workloads with ease, a fact reflected in its benchmark scores.

The benchmark data shows a processor that excels in multi-threaded tasks. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 30464 points in the multi-core test, which is a strong result for a mainstream desktop part. This translates to tangible real-world benefits in video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where the 20 threads can be fully utilized. The single-core performance is equally impressive, with a Cinebench R23 score of 4300 points, indicating excellent responsiveness in everyday tasks and games that rely on fewer, faster cores.

Data from other benchmarks corroborates this strength. The Geekbench multicore score of 14680 and a Passmark multithread score of 35848 confirm the i5-14600's position as a high-end productivity chip. Its average benchmark score of 44889 places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Relative to its nearest rivals, the performance is tightly clustered. It sits just 0.5% below the Intel Core i9-12900KS and the AMD EPYC 4344P, while being 0.7% above the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and 1% above the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H. This indicates that the i5-14600 is trading blows with some of the best processors from previous generations, making it a highly capable foundation for any build. The Passmark scores also show specific strengths: a floating-point math score of 85759 and an integer math score of 117078 indicate strong scientific and general arithmetic capabilities, while a data encryption score of 25082 and a data compression score of 434620 suggest it can handle archival and security tasks efficiently.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is a GeForce 50-series card based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It is a substantial piece of hardware with 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2325 MHz and boosts up to 2512 MHz. It houses 6400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, 80 ROPs, 50 RT cores, and 200 tensor cores, making it a fully-featured modern graphics card. It supports PCIe 5.0 x16 and outputs video via 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Despite these modern specifications, the benchmark data presents an extreme anomaly. The only available benchmark, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, yields a score of 2690. This result places the GPU in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, a position that is entirely inconsistent with a card featuring 31,100 million transistors and 32.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The nearest rivals for this GPU, based on the average score of 2690, are the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (1% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (1.1% slower), the Intel Arc Pro B50 (1.1% slower), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 (1.7% slower). These are all entry-level or legacy parts, and the comparison suggests that the 3DMark score for the RTX 5070 SUPER is not a valid representation of its real-world rendering capability. In fact, the data shows that the GPU’s theoretical specifications, such as a pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 502.4 GTexel/s, are several magnitudes higher than the rivals it is currently benchmarked against. The RTX 5070 SUPER’s 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores would suggest significant ray tracing and AI-processing power, which cannot be accurately gauged from this single, likely erroneous, score.

Usage Scenarios

  • High-Refresh Gaming: The i5-14600’s 4300-point single-core Cinebench R23 score ensures strong performance in gaming. However, the RTX 5070 SUPER’s 3DMark score of 2690 is critically low, placing it in the 18th percentile. This data suggests that while the CPU can feed frames, the GPU would be a severe bottleneck, making high-refresh gaming at any modern resolution impossible based on the available measurements.
  • Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and high multi-core scores, such as the 30464 in Cinebench R23, provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming workloads simultaneously with game rendering. The GPU also has 200 tensor cores, which could theoretically assist with encoding, but the measured performance is too low to rely on for rendering the game itself.
  • Video Editing: This scenario is heavily CPU-dependent, and the i5-14600 is a strong performer. Its 14680 Geekbench multicore score and high Passmark multithread score of 35848 indicate the system can handle video editing timelines, codecs, and exports efficiently. The GPU would be expected to accelerate effects and rendering, but its benchmark score is not high enough to confirm any benefits.
  • 3D Rendering: The CPU's 30464 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is a robust metric for CPU-based rendering, placing it near the Intel Core i9-12900KS. The GPU, with 6400 shading units and 32.15 TFLOPS, is theoretically suited for GPU-accelerated rendering, but the 2690 3DMark score would be a major concern for tasks relying on it.
  • Software Development: The i5-14600 is an excellent choice for compilation and multitasking. The Passmark data compression score of 434620 and integer math score of 117078 indicate that code building and complex data manipulation will be quick. The GPU is less critical here, so its low benchmark score is less of a concern for this workload.
  • Student and Office Work: The CPU’s 2424 Geekbench single-core score and 4167 Passmark single-thread score ensure snappy performance for web browsing, office suites, and coding assignments. The system's overall performance is far beyond the requirements for these tasks, making it a very capable, albeit unnecessary, powerhouse for basic productivity.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance tier of the Intel Core i5-14600?

A: The i5-14600 is a high-tier desktop CPU, ranking in the 89th percentile of all processors with an average benchmark score of 44889.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its direct rivals?

A: The i5-14600 is essentially tied with the Intel Core i9-12900KS and AMD EPYC 4344P (0.5% slower than both), while being 0.7% faster than the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and 1% faster than the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H.

Q: What is the GPU's benchmark performance?

A: In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RTX 5070 SUPER scored 2690 points, placing it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Does the GPU benchmark score align with its specifications?

A: No. The GPU has 6400 shading units and 18 GB of GDDR7 memory, but its 3DMark score of 2690 is comparable to entry-level cards like the GT 1030 and GT 440, suggesting the score is not representative of its theoretical power.

Q: What are the memory specifications for the GPU and CPU?

A: The GPU features 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus with a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the process size for both components?

A: The Intel CPU is manufactured on a 10 nm process, while the NVIDIA GPU uses a more advanced 5 nm process.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the i5-14600 includes Intel UHD Graphics 770, which can be useful for troubleshooting or systems without a discrete GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600 is built for the Intel Socket 1700 platform. It uses the Raptor Lake architecture and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is a significant upgrade path for future storage and expansion cards. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is modest, but the system also includes the RTX 5070 SUPER with a 275 W TDP. This combined power draw suggests that a robust power supply is necessary for the entire system.

The data does not list a suggested PSU wattage for the GPU, so the power supply headroom must be inferred from the high TDP of the GPU. A sensible next upgrade for users on this platform would be to address the GPU performance. Given the anomalous benchmark results, re-testing the GPU or installing a different graphics card would be the logical next step. The CPU itself is a strong performer, and its Intel Socket 1700 platform is a mature ecosystem. However, since this socket does not support newer generations, the upgrade path for the CPU would involve moving to a new motherboard and chipset for future Intel processors. The current CPU is well-suited for a high-end build, but the GPU data suggests that the graphics card may need to be replaced or its drivers updated to achieve the expected performance level.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is a study in contrasts, making it difficult to recommend for a specific user based on the benchmark data alone. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread powerhouse with a 89th percentile ranking, making it ideal for content creators, software developers, and prosumers who rely on heavy multi-threaded workloads like video encoding, 3D modeling, and code compilation. Its performance is nearly identical to the Intel Core i9-12900KS, a previous generation flagship, meaning it can handle almost any productivity task thrown at it. The 65 W TDP also makes it an efficient choice for small business workstations and student systems that need high throughput without excessive power draw.

However, the GPU's 18th percentile ranking presents a serious problem for gamers. A gaming PC built for high-refresh 1080p or 1440p gaming would be severely hampered by a GPU that scores like a GT 1030 or GT 440 in 3DMark. The data does not support this pairing for gaming. The GPU’s theoretical specifications, including 18 GB of VRAM and 32.15 TFLOPS, point to a card meant for high-end rendering, but the measured score is a critical failure. Therefore, this build should only be considered by users who are confident that the GPU benchmark is an error and who primarily need the immense CPU power. For those users, the i5-14600 provides a phenomenal foundation for a workstation, and the RTX 5070 SUPER can be swapped out for a more reliable GPU without changing the motherboard or CPU.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark performance of this system is defined by a high-performing CPU and a critically underperforming GPU. The Intel Core i5-14600 demonstrates its class with an average benchmark score of 44889, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900KS, is only 0.5% faster, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D is 0.7% slower. In contrast, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of just 2690 from its single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 run. This score places the GPU in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, making it comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (1.1% slower) and GT 440 (1.7% slower). The combined percentile for this build is 54, pulled down significantly by the GPU’s low score.

The combined picture is one of severe imbalance. The CPU is a top-tier component, delivering scores that rival the best desktop processors. The GPU, however, scores in the bottom fifth of all graphics cards, which is a result that is impossible to reconcile with its modern architecture and high-end specifications. The data shows a system where the CPU is performing at a flagship level, but the GPU is performing at an entry-level or legacy level. This makes the system unsuitable for any graphics-intensive work according to the measurements, despite the CPU being an excellent choice for productivity.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing Intel's Core 14th Gen architecture with NVIDIA's GeForce 50-series architecture. The core components, the Intel Core i5-14600 CPU and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER GPU, represent a mix of a mainstream high-end processor and a next-generation graphics card. The CPU is a 14-core Raptor Lake part with a 65 W TDP, and the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 part with a 275 W TDP and 18 GB of GDDR7 memory. The system is intended for high-performance desktop use, but the benchmark data shows a significant discrepancy in the performance tier of the two components. The CPU is a top-tier performer at the 89th percentile, while the GPU is at the bottom of the barrel at the 18th percentile. The combined percentile of 54 reflects this split, indicating a build that is neither a high-end gaming rig nor a top-tier workstation based on the data. It is a pairing of a strong processor with a graphics card that has not demonstrated its capabilities in the benchmark results.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance of this system is heavily skewed. Based on the benchmark scores, the Intel Core i5-14600 is the dominant component, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is the primary bottleneck. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking indicates it can handle any computational task without breaking a sweat. However, the GPU’s 18th percentile ranking means it is the limiting factor in any workload that requires graphical processing. In gaming, the GPU would limit frame rates to a level consistent with a GT 1030, despite the CPU being capable of much more. The FPS scaling is estimated to be poor; the CPU can calculate game logic and physics at a high rate, but the GPU cannot render the frames fast enough to keep up, creating a massive bottleneck. In compute tasks like 3D rendering, the CPU would finish its portion of the work quickly, but the GPU would fail to accelerate the rendering process effectively, leaving the system to rely on the CPU’s 30464 Cinebench R23 multi-core score for all processing. The data shows that the CPU is the clear performance leader, and the GPU is a severe limitation. Any workload that is not purely CPU-bound will be significantly held back by the graphics card’s benchmark performance.