SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600

44,889 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 pairing represents a desktop configuration that combines a high-core-count 14th-generation processor with a previous-generation flagship graphics card. The data positions this combination at the 79th percentile overall, indicating a system that is significantly above average but not at the absolute top tier. The CPU alone sits at the 89th percentile against all processors, while the GPU rests at the 68th percentile, a disparity that suggests the processor has more headroom for demanding computational tasks than the graphics card does for extreme visual workloads.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA102 chip, manufactured on an 8 nm process by Samsung. The GPU packs 28,300 million transistors into a 628 mm² die, giving it a transistor density of 45.1M per mm². It operates at a base clock of 1440 MHz with a boost clock of 1710 MHz, and the memory runs at 1188 MHz with 19 Gbps effective speed. The memory subsystem consists of 10 GB of GDDR6X on a 320-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s — a figure that remains competitive for high-resolution texture streaming.

The compute configuration includes 8704 shading units, 272 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. For accelerated workloads, the card carries 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores, which handle ray tracing and AI-accelerated features respectively. Pixel fill rate is rated at 164.2 GPixel/s, while texture fill rate reaches 465.1 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput is 29.77 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 29.77 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad API compatibility.

Benchmark results for the GPU show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4407, which reflects modern DirectX 12 rendering performance. In Geekbench, the OpenCL score reaches 152423 while Vulkan scores 33620. PassMark results include a G3D score of 25086, a GPU compute score of 14397, and G2D at 1054. The DirectX 12 PassMark score of 100 and DirectX 11 score of 207 indicate that the card's strength is more pronounced in compute-heavy workloads than in legacy rasterization tests. The 760.3 GB/s bandwidth is the key enabler for high-resolution texture data, and the 10 GB VRAM capacity, while not enormous by modern standards, is sufficient for most current titles at high settings.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 and a single-core score of 4300. In Cinebench R20, it scores 12794 multi-core and 1806 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 3070 multi-core and 433 single-core. Geekbench results are 14680 multi-core and 2424 single-core. PassMark multi-thread performance is 35848, with single-thread at 4167. The CPU's average benchmark score is 44889, placing it at the 89th percentile versus all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-12900KS at 45094 with a delta of -0.5%, the AMD EPYC 4344P at 45122 with -0.5%, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D at 44573 with +0.7%, and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H at 44466 with +1%. This places the i5-14600 virtually tied with a previous-generation flagship i9, which is notable for a mid-range processor.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 23172, placing it at the 68th percentile versus all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA P106-100 at 23249 with -0.3%, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 at 23250 with -0.3%, the AMD Radeon RX 6600M at 23273 with -0.4%, and the AMD Radeon R9 M290X at 23276 with -0.4%. The RTX 3080 is essentially neck-and-neck with these cards in aggregate score, though the data does not include specific gaming measurements for this pairing.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is a top-11% performer while the GPU is a top-32% performer. This means that in workloads that stress both components equally, the GPU will likely reach its limits before the CPU does. The combined percentile of 79 reflects this balance, indicating a system that is strong overall but with a clear performance ceiling set by the graphics card.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-14600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates on the Intel Socket 1700 platform and is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported.

In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 30464 indicates strong parallel performance that rivals older high-end desktop processors. The single-core score of 4300 shows excellent per-thread performance, which is critical for lightly threaded applications. Geekbench multi-core at 14680 and single-core at 2424 corroborate this dual strength. PassMark results further break down the performance: data compression scores 434620, data encryption scores 25082, extended instructions score 25674, find prime numbers scores 155, floating point math scores 85759, integer math scores 117078, physics scores 2330, and random string sorting scores 48043.

The 89th percentile ranking versus all CPUs means only 11% of processors in the database outperform it on average. The fact that it matches the Core i9-12900KS within 0.5% is telling: the i5-14600 delivers previous-generation flagship multi-threaded performance at a lower core count, likely due to architectural efficiency and higher clocks. For real workloads, this translates to fast compilation times, smooth video encoding, and responsive multitasking. The 14-core, 20-thread configuration with a 5.20 GHz boost clock is well-suited for both content creation and high-refresh gaming.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4300 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4407 suggest the system is capable of driving high frame rates at 1440p and potentially 4K, though the GPU's 68th percentile ranking means it will be the limiting factor in the most demanding titles.

Streaming: The 14-core, 20-thread CPU with a multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 30464 provides ample headroom for encoding while gaming, and the GPU's 272 tensor cores can offload AI-based encoding tasks, making simultaneous game capture and broadcast viable without significant performance loss.

Video Editing: The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 35848 and the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 152423 indicate strong performance in timeline scrubbing and effect rendering, with the 10 GB VRAM and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth handling 4K video layers effectively.

3D Rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 12794 ensures fast CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 throughput accelerates GPU-accelerated renderers, though the 10 GB VRAM may cap very large scene sizes.

Software Development: The CPU's Geekbench multi-core score of 14680 and PassMark integer math score of 117078 support fast code compilation, while the 24 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed data, making build times and test execution efficient.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's single-core Geekbench score of 2424 and PassMark single-thread score of 4167 ensure snappy responsiveness for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle basic display output if the discrete GPU is not needed.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU's 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 68th percentile creates an asymmetric balance. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, physics simulation, or data compression, the processor will drive performance, and the GPU will rarely be the bottleneck. The PassMark physics score of 2330 and data compression score of 434620 show the CPU's strength in these areas. Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like high-resolution gaming or GPU rendering, the RTX 3080 will reach its limits first, capping frame rates or render times.

The FPS scaling evidence must be treated as estimated because the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination. However, based on the benchmark scores, the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4407 and PassMark G3D score of 25086 suggest that at 4K resolution, the GPU will become the limiting factor in most games. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-core performance may keep up with the GPU, but the GPU will still cap maximum frame rates in less demanding titles. The 10 GB VRAM could also become a constraint in texture-heavy scenarios, potentially causing stutter or reduced settings in the most demanding games.

For productivity workloads, the CPU's 89th percentile ranking means it will rarely bottleneck the system, and the GPU's compute capability of 14397 in PassMark GPU compute suggests it can accelerate certain tasks, but the CPU will generally lead in multi-threaded scenarios. The overall balance leans toward CPU-heavy workloads, where the i5-14600 delivers near-flagship performance.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the FACT PACK confirms that dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. With the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4407 and the CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4300, the system is expected to deliver high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p in most titles, with the GPU acting as the primary performance limiter.

At 4K resolution, the RTX 3080's 10 GB VRAM and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth should provide playable frame rates in many games, but the 68th percentile GPU ranking suggests it will not be an ultra-high-refresh 4K powerhouse. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, except possibly in esports titles at very high frame rates where the 5.20 GHz boost clock and 4300 single-core score become critical. The 272 tensor cores could enable DLSS-based upscaling, effectively boosting frame rates in supported titles, though this is a qualitative expectation rather than a measured figure.

For competitive shooters at 1080p with reduced settings, the CPU's single-thread performance of 4167 in PassMark should allow the GPU to reach its frame rate ceiling. For story-driven games at 1440p with high settings, the GPU's texture rate of 465.1 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 164.2 GPixel/s should deliver smooth experiences, but the 10 GB VRAM may require texture quality adjustments in future titles.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets gamers at 1440p who prioritize high refresh rates with the CPU's 4300 single-core Cinebench R23 score and the GPU's 4407 3DMark Steel Nomad score. Content creators working with 4K video will benefit from the CPU's multi-thread score of 30464 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 152423 for accelerated effects. Software developers will appreciate the CPU's integer math score of 117078 and 20 threads for parallel builds, while the 24 MB L3 cache aids in compilation.

Students in engineering or data science programs will find the CPU's 89th percentile ranking sufficient for simulations and coding assignments, and the GPU can handle moderate machine learning workloads with its 272 tensor cores. Small business workstations requiring reliable multi-tasking will benefit from the CPU's 20 threads and the system's 79th combined percentile, ensuring responsiveness under moderate load. The system is less suited for enthusiasts seeking maximum 4K gaming performance, as the GPU's 68th percentile ranking is the limiting factor.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 320 W TDP of the GPU suggest a system that requires a capable power supply, but the 700 W suggested PSU rating provides adequate headroom for typical operation. The build is a strong choice for users who need a balanced system that leans toward compute-heavy tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking versus all processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 sits at the 89th percentile, meaning it outperforms 89% of all CPUs in the database based on average benchmark score.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3080 have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 79, indicating the system is above average overall but not at the top tier.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked is false), so the 5.20 GHz boost clock is the maximum.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and what PSU is suggested for the GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 320 W with a suggested PSU of 700 W.

Q: What are the CPU's nearest rivals and their performance deltas?

A: The nearest rivals are the Intel Core i9-12900KS at -0.5%, AMD EPYC 4344P at -0.5%, AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D at +0.7%, and Intel Core Ultra X9 388H at +1%.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, so users can choose either memory type depending on motherboard support. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for the RTX 3080's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, with headroom for future GPUs. The motherboard must have a compatible BIOS for 14th-gen support, and the 65 W TDP of the CPU means a modest VRM design is sufficient.

The GPU uses a 1x 12-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card measuring 285 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The 700 W suggested PSU provides headroom for the 320 W GPU TDP and 65 W CPU TDP, leaving room for drives and peripherals. A sensible next upgrade would be a newer-generation GPU with more VRAM, as the 10 GB capacity is the most likely constraint in the current configuration. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking suggests it will remain relevant for several years, so upgrading the GPU first is the logical path. The platform's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means users can keep existing memory if they choose a compatible motherboard, reducing upgrade costs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-14600 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 5.20 GHz boost clock, and the GPU is an Ampere-based card with 10 GB GDDR6X memory and 8704 shading units. The system sits at the 79th combined percentile, with the CPU at the 89th percentile and the GPU at the 68th percentile.

The overall tier is high-mid-range, where the processor delivers near-flagship performance from previous generations, while the graphics card offers solid but not class-leading capability. The 65 W CPU TDP and 320 W GPU TDP make this a system that requires a standard ATX power supply with sufficient wattage, and the dual-slot GPU with a 285 mm length fits in most mid-tower cases. This pairing is well-suited for users who need strong multi-threaded performance for productivity while maintaining the ability to play modern games at high settings, though the GPU will be the limiting factor in the most demanding scenarios. The build represents a balanced approach where CPU-heavy workloads see exceptional performance, and GPU-bound tasks like 4K gaming are playable but not extreme.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds