SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600

44,889 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM represents a specific desktop configuration targeting a balance between modern CPU capabilities and established GPU architecture. The processor, part of the Core 14th Gen series, uses the Raptor Lake architecture on an Intel 10 nm process node, while the graphics card leverages the Ampere architecture on Samsung’s 8 nm node. This combination places the build at the 70th combined percentile, indicating a system that sits above the midpoint of all desktop configurations in the database but does not reach the top tier of performance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake-R design. Its hybrid architecture combines performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core distribution. The base clock is 2.70 GHz, which can boost up to 5.20 GHz under load, providing a substantial frequency headroom for single-threaded workloads. The processor has a 65 W TDP, classifying it as a mainstream power envelope rather than a high-power enthusiast part.

The cache hierarchy is notable for its depth. Each core has 80 KB of L1 cache and 2 MB of L2 cache, while the shared L3 cache totals 24 MB. This large L3 pool benefits workloads that exhibit data locality across multiple cores. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering flexibility for system builders. ECC memory support is included, which is a feature typically associated with workstation-class processors.

In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU demonstrates strong multi-threaded capability. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 places it in a competitive position, while the single-core score of 4300 shows excellent per-thread performance. Geekbench results follow a similar pattern with a multi-core score of 14680 and a single-core score of 2424. PassMark results further break down performance by workload type: integer math scores 117078, floating-point math scores 85759, and data compression scores 434620. The extended instructions score of 25674 indicates robust SIMD capability, which benefits scientific and media applications.

The average benchmark score of 44889 places the i5-14600 at the 89th percentile among all CPUs in the database. This is an impressive standing, but the nearest rivals provide context. The Intel Core i9-12900KS scores 45094, which is only 0.5% higher. The AMD EPYC 4344P also scores 45122, again 0.5% higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44573, which is 0.7% lower, and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44466, which is 1% lower. These tight margins indicate that the i5-14600 sits in a highly competitive performance band where architectural differences matter more than raw core counts.

For real workloads, the multi-threaded scores suggest the CPU can handle content creation tasks such as video encoding and 3D rendering, while the single-threaded scores indicate snappy responsiveness in everyday applications and games that rely on a few fast cores.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores place it at the 89th percentile, which is a strong position. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 represents the kind of performance that can tackle multi-threaded rendering jobs without stalling. The single-core score of 4300 is equally important for applications that are not well-parallelized. In Geekbench, the multi-core score of 14680 and single-core score of 2424 reinforce the picture of a balanced processor.

The GPU, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM, has no benchmark scores listed in the FACT PACK and its average benchmark score is 0. Its percentile versus all GPUs is 50, placing it exactly at the median. This is a stark contrast to the CPU, which sits at the 89th percentile. The combined percentile for the build is 70, reflecting the GPU’s more modest standing relative to the processor.

The GPU’s FP32 performance is 16.60 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 16.60 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 135.4 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 259.4 GTexel/s. These numbers are moderate by current standards but represent a capable mid-range graphics solution. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination means that any gaming performance discussion must be framed as estimates derived from the component scores.

The data shows a system where the CPU is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU. This imbalance has implications for workload distribution, which will be explored later.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is associated with the Core 14th Gen series. The processor supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, allowing for high-bandwidth devices such as modern NVMe SSDs and graphics cards. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, providing a basic display output capability if a discrete GPU is not present.

Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. This is a practical advantage because it allows builders to choose between older, more affordable DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 modules depending on availability and preference. ECC memory support is present, which is unusual for a mainstream desktop processor and adds value for workstation use cases.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is a generation behind the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 capability but does not bottleneck the graphics card in most scenarios. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 220 W. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, meaning the total system power draw is manageable with a standard power supply. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector, simplifying cable management.

A sensible next upgrade would involve addressing the GPU, as the CPU’s 89th percentile ranking leaves ample headroom for a more powerful graphics card. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU ensures that future GPUs will have the necessary bandwidth. The memory support for DDR5 also allows for a future transition to faster memory without changing the motherboard, provided the platform is retained.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the CPU’s single-core performance is strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4300 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2424. These scores indicate the processor can feed a high-refresh monitor in esports titles. The GPU’s 50th percentile standing suggests it can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming at moderate settings, but the lack of measured FPS data means exact refresh rates are estimates.

Streaming benefits from the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads. The PassMark multi-thread score of 35848 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 provide enough parallel throughput to encode video while gaming. The CPU is unlikely to be the bottleneck in a streaming workload; the GPU’s capabilities will define the quality ceiling.

Video editing relies on both multi-threaded CPU performance and GPU acceleration. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 and the GPU’s FP32 performance of 16.60 TFLOPS suggest the system can handle 1080p and some 1440p editing timelines. The 8 GB VRAM on the GPU is a limiting factor for very large projects or high-resolution effects.

3D rendering is primarily a CPU-bound task. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 and the PassMark floating-point math score of 85759 indicate the processor can produce competitive render times in CPU-based renderers. GPU-accelerated renderers would rely on the RTX 3070 TiM’s 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, which are present but not top-tier.

Software development workloads vary widely. Compilation is often multi-threaded, benefiting from the CPU’s 14 cores. The PassMark integer math score of 117078 and data encryption score of 25082 suggest the processor handles compilation and hashing tasks efficiently. The 20 threads allow for parallel builds, while the single-thread performance keeps interactive development responsive.

Student and office work is easily handled by this configuration. The CPU’s single-thread scores ensure snappy application launches and spreadsheet calculations. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed, and the 65 W CPU TDP keeps power consumption reasonable for a dorm room or small office.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is based on the GA104 chip and uses the Ampere architecture. It is manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. The transistor density is 44.4 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

The memory clock is 1750 MHz with an effective data rate of 14 Gbps. The base clock is 915 MHz with a boost clock of 1410 MHz. The GPU contains 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. For ray tracing, there are 46 RT cores, and for AI acceleration, there are 184 tensor cores.

The FP32 performance of 16.60 TFLOPS is the key compute metric. The pixel rate of 135.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 259.4 GTexel/s determine how quickly the GPU can fill the screen and apply textures. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game APIs.

The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking is modest. It is described as end-of-life in production status, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor. The predecessor is the GeForce 20 series. The GPU has a triple-slot width, which is large and may require careful case selection. The dimensions are 270 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 55 mm in width. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

For rendering tasks, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is a constraint. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth helps, but the capacity limits texture-heavy scenes or high-resolution rendering. The RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the 50th percentile standing suggests performance will be mid-range compared to other GPUs.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination. There are no rows in the measuredFpsUltraByGame field, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

The CPU’s single-core performance is strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4300 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2424. This suggests the processor can keep up with game logic and physics calculations. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking and FP32 performance of 16.60 TFLOPS indicate it can handle modern games at 1080p with high settings, and possibly 1440p with adjustments.

At 1080p, the GPU is likely the limiting factor in most games. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck frame rates in most titles. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures but may struggle with some ultra-quality packs. At 1440p, the GPU’s performance will be more strained, and frame rates will depend on the specific game and settings.

The lack of measured FPS data means these are qualitative expectations. The GPU’s pixel rate of 135.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 259.4 GTexel/s provide a theoretical ceiling for fill-rate-bound scenarios. The 46 RT cores enable ray tracing, but enabling it will significantly reduce frame rates given the GPU’s mid-range standing.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets gamers who prioritize CPU performance and are willing to accept a mid-range GPU. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 make this an excellent choice for gamers who also stream or record gameplay. The GPU’s 50th percentile standing is adequate for 1080p gaming, which is the sweet spot for this build.

Content creators who work with video editing will benefit from the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 and PassMark multi-thread score of 35848 provide the parallel throughput needed for rendering timelines. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p editing but may limit 4K projects.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s integer math score of 117078 and data encryption score of 25082. The 20 threads enable fast parallel builds, and the single-thread performance keeps interactive tools responsive. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long compile sessions.

Students and small business users will find this build more than capable. The CPU’s single-thread scores ensure smooth office applications, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup if the discrete GPU is not needed. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps electricity costs low.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile compared to all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 sits at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 44889.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance percentile compared to all GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 70.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14600 supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation-class processors.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is 550 W.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this configuration, so all gaming performance figures are estimates.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU is at the 89th percentile, while the GPU is at the 50th percentile. The combined percentile is 70, which is close to the average of the two, suggesting that neither component fully dominates the other in terms of overall system performance.

In CPU-bound workloads such as 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation, the CPU’s performance will be the defining factor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 and PassMark integer math score of 117078 indicate the processor can handle these tasks without issue. The GPU’s role in these workloads is secondary, and its 50th percentile standing is not a limiting factor.

In GPU-bound workloads such as gaming at high resolutions, the GPU will be the bottleneck. The CPU’s single-thread performance is sufficient to feed the GPU in most games, but the GPU’s FP32 performance of 16.60 TFLOPS and 8 GB VRAM will limit frame rates and texture quality. This is especially true at 1440p and above, where the GPU’s mid-range standing becomes apparent.

The FPS scaling between resolutions would show this pattern. At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread scores allow the GPU to reach its maximum frame rate. As resolution increases, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and frame rates will drop accordingly. The lack of measured FPS data prevents quantifying this scaling, but the benchmark scores support this interpretation.

The upgrade path is clear. Replacing the GPU with a higher-percentile model would bring the system’s performance more in line with the CPU’s capabilities. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures future GPUs will not be bandwidth-limited. The 550 W suggested PSU may need to be upgraded for a more power-hungry GPU, but the current configuration is well within its limits.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-14600 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, using the Raptor Lake architecture on an Intel 10 nm process. The GPU is based on the Ampere architecture with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

The build’s combined percentile is 70, placing it above the median desktop configuration. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking is the standout feature, while the GPU’s 50th percentile is the limiting factor. This is a configuration that prioritizes processor performance for productivity and multi-threaded workloads, while providing adequate graphics capability for 1080p gaming.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 44889 places it in the same performance band as the Intel Core i9-12900KS, AMD EPYC 4344P, AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, and Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, with deltas of -0.5%, -0.5%, 0.7%, and 1% respectively. The GPU has no nearest rivals listed and no benchmark scores, making its performance classification more challenging.

Overall, this is a balanced desktop system for users who need strong CPU performance for content creation and productivity, with moderate gaming capability. The GPU’s end-of-life status and 8 GB VRAM suggest it is not intended for future high-end gaming, but it remains a viable option for current titles at 1080p.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds