SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600

44,889 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600 and Intel Arc A380 pairing represents a desktop build that combines a high-end 14th Gen processor with an entry-level discrete graphics card. The CPU sits in the 89th percentile of all processors, while the GPU rests in the 44th percentile of all graphics cards, resulting in a combined system percentile of 67. This stark contrast in performance tiers defines the character of this machine: a productivity-focused workstation that can handle light gaming, rather than a dedicated gaming rig. The data shows a platform with exceptional computational headroom that is currently constrained by its graphics subsystem.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600 is a Raptor Lake Refresh part built on the Intel 10 nm process node, featuring a die size of 257 mm². It offers 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This configuration is typical of Intel's hybrid architecture, combining performance and efficiency cores to balance throughput and power draw.

Benchmark results indicate the CPU's substantial capability. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 30464 points in multi-core and 4300 points in single-core tests. The R20 results show 12794 multi-core and 1806 single-core, while R15 shows 3070 and 433 respectively. Geekbench scores reach 14680 for multi-core and 2424 for single-core. PassMark results further illustrate the strengths: integer math scores 117078, floating point math scores 85759, and extended instructions score 25674. The multi-threaded PassMark score of 35848 places the CPU in the 89th percentile of all processors. Data compression scores 434620, while encryption scores 25082.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 44889 puts it in close competition with several rivals. It sits just 0.5% behind the Intel Core i9-12900KS (score 45094) and the AMD EPYC 4344P (score 45122). Conversely, it leads the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D by 0.7% (score 44573) and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H by 1% (score 44466). This positioning indicates the i5-14600 is competitive with previous-generation flagship parts, making it a strong choice for compute-heavy workloads.

For real-world use, these scores translate to brisk performance in compiling code, batch photo processing, and video encoding. The single-core score of 4300 in R23 suggests responsive application loading and strong performance in lightly-threaded tasks. The 20 threads handle heavily parallel workloads efficiently, though the 65 W TDP suggests the processor operates within a moderate power envelope. The PassMark physics score of 2330 and single-thread score of 4167 reinforce the picture of a balanced, high-performance desktop CPU.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14600 compare to the Intel Core i9-12900KS?

A: The i5-14600 has an average benchmark score of 44889, which is 0.5% lower than the i9-12900KS's score of 45094. The two processors perform nearly identically in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What memory types does the Intel Core i5-14600 support?

A: The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation use.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A380 support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A380 includes 8 dedicated ray tracing cores, part of its Xe-HPG architecture. It also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate.

Q: What is the PCIe generation for the CPU's lanes?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the CPU. The GPU, however, connects via PCIe 4.0 x8.

Q: How does the Arc A380's performance compare to the NVIDIA GeForce MX330?

A: The Arc A380 has an average benchmark score of 8558, which is 1.2% higher than the MX330's score of 8458. The margin is small, placing them in the same performance tier.

Q: What is the recommended power supply for the Intel Arc A380?

A: The suggested PSU for the Arc A380 is 250 W. The GPU itself has a TDP of 75 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-14600 overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, meaning the processor does not support unlocked overclocking. The boost clock of 5.20 GHz is the maximum factory setting.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from benchmark data shows a system where the CPU vastly outperforms the GPU. The processor's 89th percentile rank among all CPUs is matched against the GPU's 44th percentile rank. This creates a combined percentile of 67 for the build. The data clearly indicates that the CPU is not the limiting factor in any graphics-related task.

Focusing on the GPU, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields a score of 808. Geekbench OpenCL scores 38224, and Vulkan scores 36736. PassMark G3D scores 6252, while G2D scores 610. The graphics card's average benchmark score is 8558. Its nearest rival, the AMD FirePro W5170M, scores 8595, a 0.4% difference. The AMD Radeon HD 8870M scores 8462, 1.1% lower, and the AMD Radeon 880M scores 8436, 1.4% lower. This places the A380 in the same performance class as mobile and older discrete parts.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 is more than seven times higher than its single-core score of 4300, indicating strong scaling across cores. In PassMark, the integer math score of 117078 is notably higher than the floating point score of 85759, suggesting the CPU excels in general arithmetic and logic operations. The data compression score of 434620 is exceptionally high, making this a strong processor for file archiving and data transfer tasks.

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The dataIsMeasured field is false, which means the following gaming analysis is projected rather than empirical.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is shared with other 14th Gen and earlier Raptor Lake processors. The motherboard must support this socket, and the chipset determines features like memory type and PCIe lane distribution. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though not simultaneously. Choosing DDR5 would provide higher bandwidth, while DDR4 offers a lower-cost pathway. ECC memory support is present, a feature often reserved for workstation-class hardware.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is the primary interface for the graphics card. The Arc A380, however, uses PCIe 4.0 x8. This means the GPU does not fully utilize the available CPU lanes, but this does not bottleneck the card because its bandwidth requirements are modest. The platform supports the latest PCIe 5.0 devices, such as high-end NVMe SSDs, which would operate at full speed.

The suggested PSU for the Arc A380 is 250 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 75 W. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W. This leaves substantial headroom for additional components. The power supply requirements are modest, meaning most standard desktop PSUs will suffice. However, the 1x 8-pin power connector on the GPU must be available.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful graphics card. The CPU's 89th percentile performance can easily drive a higher-tier GPU without becoming a bottleneck. Users could also add more memory or faster storage, but the most impactful change would be replacing the A380 with a card that matches the CPU's performance tier. The platform will not need a motherboard change for the CPU, as it is a current-generation part.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need substantial CPU power but have light graphics requirements. Professionals working with spreadsheets, databases, or data analysis will benefit from the high integer math score of 117078 and the 89th percentile CPU rank. Developers compiling large codebases will see reduced build times thanks to the 20 threads and multi-core R23 score of 30464. Students in engineering or computer science can run virtual machines and simulation software smoothly.

Content creators working with 2D graphics or audio editing will find the CPU's floating point score of 85759 sufficient. The high data compression score of 434620 makes this a good choice for archival workloads. Small business workstations handling accounting, inventory, or office productivity will find the performance more than adequate.

The GPU's 44th percentile rank means this is not a build for serious gaming or 3D rendering. Users who occasionally play light or older games will be fine, but those seeking high frame rates should look elsewhere. This is a workstation first, with gaming as an afterthought.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU combination, the following figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The Arc A380's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 and PassMark G3D score of 6252 suggest it is entry-level. The GPU's 44th percentile rank means it will struggle with modern titles at high settings.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the A380 will likely produce playable frame rates in esports titles like Counter-Strike or League of Legends, which are not GPU-intensive. For AAA games, users should expect reduced settings or lower resolutions. The GPU's 6 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, but may be limiting in some titles. The memory bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s is modest, which will cap performance in bandwidth-sensitive games.

The CPU is not a limiting factor in gaming. Its single-core score of 4300 in R23 ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU will be the bottleneck in almost every gaming situation. Users should set expectations accordingly: this is a 1080p low-to-medium settings gaming machine at best.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between CPU and GPU is heavily skewed. The CPU sits in the 89th percentile, while the GPU sits in the 44th. This means the GPU is the limiting factor for any graphics workload. In gaming, the FPS will be constrained by the A380's compute capabilities, not the CPU's processing power.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is fully utilized, and the GPU plays a minor role. Tasks like video encoding use the CPU's Quick Sync via the integrated UHD Graphics 770, bypassing the discrete GPU entirely. This makes the A380 nearly irrelevant for non-graphics tasks. The CPU's benchmarks show no signs of bottlenecking from the GPU, as the scores are independent of the graphics card.

The FPS scaling in gaming would show a flat line if the CPU were upgraded, because the GPU cannot keep up. Conversely, upgrading the GPU would show significant FPS gains, as the CPU has headroom to feed a faster card. The data points to a clear conclusion: the balance is poor for gaming but acceptable for compute-heavy work.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system combining an Intel Core i5-14600 CPU with an Intel Arc A380 GPU. The CPU is a high-end 14th Gen part with 14 cores and 20 threads, while the GPU is an entry-level Alchemist part with 1024 shading units. The combined system percentile is 67, which puts it above the median but below the high-performance tier.

The CPU's 89th percentile rank indicates it is among the top 11% of all processors. The GPU's 44th percentile rank places it just below the median. This pairing creates a system that excels at CPU-intensive tasks but lags in graphics performance. The overall tier is that of a productivity workstation with entry-level gaming capability.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not recommended. The GPU's 44th percentile rank and low compute scores will not sustain high frame rates at high refresh rates. The CPU can handle the frame generation, but the GPU will cap FPS well below 144 Hz in most titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and high multi-core score of 30464 in R23 can handle encoding while gaming. However, the GPU's low performance means gaming quality will be compromised. The Arc A380 supports hardware encoding, which offloads the work, but the gaming experience will be limited.

Video editing: The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance and the presence of UHD Graphics 770 with Quick Sync make this viable for 1080p editing. The discrete GPU accelerates effects and rendering, but its low score means longer export times for complex projects.

3D rendering: Poor fit. The GPU's FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS is too low for serious rendering. The CPU can handle physics and scene preparation, but final frame rendering will be slow.

Software development: Excellent fit. The high integer math score of 117078 and data compression score of 434620 speed up compilation and build times. The 20 threads handle parallel builds efficiently.

Student and office work: Excellent fit. The CPU's single-thread score of 4167 in PassMark ensures snappy application response. The GPU is sufficient for document rendering and basic display output.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380 is based on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 7,200 million transistors across 157 mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s. The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. It includes 8 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, while FP16 reaches 8.397 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

The GPU's benchmark scores reflect its entry-level status. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 is low, and the PassMark G3D score of 6252 is modest. The PassMark DirectX 11 score of 38 and DirectX 12 score of 35 indicate weak API performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 38224 is better but still below high-end parts.

For rendering, the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance is sufficient for light 2D work and basic 3D. The 8 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the low compute throughput means ray-traced scenes will run at low frame rates. The GPU's 44th percentile rank confirms its position as an entry-level part, suitable for office work and casual gaming. The 6 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p textures but will be strained by high-resolution assets.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + Intel Arc A380

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600

Intel Arc A380

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds