SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600

44,889 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600 paired with the Intel Arc A310E represents a distinctly asymmetric desktop configuration. The CPU is a high-performance 14-core processor that sits in the 89th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is a low-profile, entry-level accelerator that lands exactly in the 50th percentile of all GPUs. This pairing creates a system where the processor's capabilities vastly outstrip the graphics subsystem, making it suitable for specific productivity and compute workloads rather than high-end gaming. The following analysis breaks down the platform characteristics, workload suitability, and benchmark performance of this combination.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600 is built on the Raptor Lake architecture and uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. This socket supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing between older, more prevalent DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits depending on motherboard selection. The platform also supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for workstation-oriented builds that require error correction in memory operations.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 16 lanes available from the processor itself. This high-bandwidth interface is forward-looking for storage devices and accelerators, though the Arc A310E GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is fully compatible with the Gen 5 slots and does not bottleneck the GPU's bandwidth requirements given its modest 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. The platform also includes the integrated UHD Graphics 770, which serves as a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or encounters issues.

The CPU has a 65-watt TDP, which is relatively modest for a 14-core processor. The Arc A310E has a 75-watt TDP, and the system's suggested PSU is rated at 250 watts. This means the platform has substantial headroom for upgrades. A sensible next step would be replacing the Arc A310E with a more powerful discrete GPU, as the CPU's performance ceiling is far above what the current graphics card can utilize. The 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU can accommodate virtually any modern graphics card, and the 250-watt PSU requirement can be scaled up to support higher-tier GPUs. The CPU's unlocked multiplier is false, meaning overclocking is not supported, but the boost clock of 5.20 GHz provides strong out-of-the-box performance for single-threaded tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A310E with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 64-bit memory bus is not suited for high-refresh gaming at 1080p or higher resolutions. The GPU's 50th percentile standing among all GPUs indicates mid-pack performance, and its 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is limiting. Frame rates in modern titles will be modest, and the 4 GB VRAM capacity will restrict texture quality settings in newer games.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming workloads. The AV1 and hardware encoding capabilities of the Arc A310E, combined with the CPU's high multithreaded performance, can handle simultaneous gaming and encoding, though the GPU's gaming performance will limit the playable titles to less demanding esports or older games.

Video editing: The CPU excels in this scenario with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30464 and a Passmark multithread score of 35848. The Arc A310E contributes 6 RT cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, enabling hardware-accelerated effects and rendering in compatible applications. However, the 4 GB VRAM will limit the complexity of effects and the resolution of preview timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU's 14 cores deliver strong performance for CPU-based rendering, with a Cinebench R20 multicore score of 12794. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest for GPU rendering, and the 64-bit memory bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain larger scenes. The 6 RT cores provide some ray tracing acceleration, but the overall GPU throughput is low for professional rendering workloads.

Software development: The CPU's high single-thread score of 4300 in Cinebench R23 and 2424 in Geekbench single-core indicate fast compilation and code analysis. The Passmark data compression score of 434620 and encryption score of 25082 show strong performance for data-heavy development tasks. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most software development workflows.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for typical office tasks. The CPU's performance is far beyond what word processing, spreadsheet analysis, or web browsing requires, and the GPU's capabilities are sufficient for basic display output and 2D acceleration. The system will be responsive and snappy but underutilized in these scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using TSMC's 6 nm process node. It features the DG2-128 chip with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates at a fixed 2000 MHz clock for both base and boost, with memory running at 1937 MHz, translating to 15.5 Gbps effective data rate. The 4 GB GDDR6 memory is accessed through a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU contains 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units. It has 6 RT cores for ray tracing acceleration but no dedicated tensor cores. The pixel rate is 32.00 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 64.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is rated at 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 6.144 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio.

The Arc A310E supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It has 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs and uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. The card is single-slot, requires no power connectors, and has a 75-watt TDP. The GPU is end-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage.

Benchmark results for the GPU are not available in the data, but its 50th percentile standing among all GPUs indicates it performs at the median level. The 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is suitable for light rendering tasks and basic compute workloads, but the 64-bit memory bus and 4 GB VRAM capacity will be the primary limiting factors in GPU-intensive applications.

Balance and Bottleneck

This configuration exhibits a severe CPU-to-GPU imbalance. The CPU sits in the 89th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 50th percentile. The combined percentile for the system is 70, reflecting the midpoint between the two components' standings. The CPU's average benchmark score is 44889, while the GPU has no reported benchmark scores, further highlighting the disparity.

In gaming workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The Arc A310E's modest compute throughput and memory bandwidth will constrain frame rates regardless of the CPU's capabilities. The CPU has more than enough headroom to feed the GPU, so CPU utilization will likely be low in most gaming scenarios. This means the CPU's performance is effectively wasted in gaming, as the GPU cannot translate the CPU's processing power into higher frame rates.

In CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, software compilation, and data processing, the CPU will be the primary contributor, and the GPU will have minimal impact. The 14 cores and 20 threads provide substantial parallel processing capability, and the high single-thread performance ensures responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks.

The bottleneck analysis depends entirely on the workload. For gaming, the GPU is the hard limit. For productivity and compute, the CPU is the workhorse, and the GPU provides supplemental acceleration in supported applications. The system's overall balance is skewed heavily toward the CPU, making it a poor fit for graphics-intensive tasks but an excellent fit for CPU-centric workloads.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core i5-14600 use?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 uses the Intel Socket 1700.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the Arc A310E have?

A: The Arc A310E has 124.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth through a 64-bit bus with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz and a base clock of 2.70 GHz.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14600 supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's TDP and recommended PSU?

A: The Arc A310E has a 75-watt TDP, and the suggested PSU for the system is 250 watts.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 is in the 89th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: What PCIe interface does the Arc A310E use?

A: The Arc A310E uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance over graphics capability. The Intel Core i5-14600's 89th percentile standing makes it an excellent choice for software developers who need fast compilation times, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2424 and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30464. Data analysts and researchers working with large datasets will benefit from the Passmark data compression score of 434620 and integer math score of 117078.

Content creators focused on CPU-based rendering and encoding will find the 14 cores and 20 threads well-suited for their workloads. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 12794 and Passmark multithread score of 35848 indicate strong performance in parallel processing tasks. The Arc A310E provides basic GPU acceleration for compatible applications.

Students and small business users will find this system more powerful than necessary for typical office tasks, but the headroom ensures longevity for future software requirements. The CPU's 65-watt TDP and the GPU's 75-watt TDP keep power consumption manageable for standard desktop use.

The system is not recommended for gamers seeking high-refresh experiences or for professionals requiring substantial GPU compute. The Arc A310E's 4 GB VRAM and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance are insufficient for modern AAA gaming at high settings or for GPU-accelerated rendering of complex scenes. Users in those categories should consider a more balanced configuration with a stronger GPU.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-14600 demonstrates strong benchmark results across multiple testing suites. In Cinebench R15, the CPU scores 3070 in multicore and 433 in single-core tests. Moving to Cinebench R20, the scores are 12794 multicore and 1806 single-core. The newer Cinebench R23 test shows 30464 multicore and 4300 single-core scores.

Geekbench results show a multicore score of 14680 and a single-core score of 2424. Passmark tests reveal a multithread score of 35848, a single-thread score of 4167, and specific workload scores including 434620 for data compression, 25082 for data encryption, 25674 for extended instructions, 155 for finding prime numbers, 85759 for floating point math, 117078 for integer math, 2330 for physics, and 48043 for random string sorting.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 44889, placing it in the 89th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-12900KS with an average score of 45094 (0.5% higher), the AMD EPYC 4344P with 45122 (0.5% higher), the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D with 44573 (0.7% lower), and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H with 44466 (1.0% lower). This places the i5-14600 in a tight competitive band with these processors.

The Arc A310E has no benchmark scores reported in the data, but its 50th percentile standing among all GPUs indicates median performance. The combined percentile for the system is 70, reflecting the CPU's high standing and the GPU's mid-pack position.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-14600 with the Intel Arc A310E. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, using the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process node. The GPU is an Intel Arc A310E from the Alchemist (Arc 3) generation, built on the Xe-HPG architecture using TSMC's 6 nm process.

The CPU's 89th percentile ranking places it among the top performers in the database, while the GPU's 50th percentile places it at the median. The combined percentile of 70 indicates an overall system that is above average but held back by the graphics subsystem. The CPU's average benchmark score of 44889 is competitive with high-end processors, while the GPU's lack of benchmark scores leaves its performance characterization to its percentile standing.

The system's launch MSRP for the CPU is $255. The GPU has no reported launch MSRP. The CPU is marked as active in production, while the GPU is end-of-life with Battlemage as its successor.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600 is a desktop processor with 14 cores and 20 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture. It operates at a base clock of 2.70 GHz and boosts to 5.20 GHz. The CPU is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus and includes support for ECC memory. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770. The CPU has a 65-watt TDP and was released on January 7, 2024.

Benchmark results show strong performance across all tests. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30464 indicates excellent parallel processing capability, while the single-core score of 4300 shows fast single-thread performance. The Geekbench multicore score of 14680 and single-core score of 2424 confirm this pattern. Passmark scores demonstrate specialized workload performance, with particularly strong results in data compression (434620) and integer math (117078).

The CPU's percentile ranking of 89 among all CPUs places it ahead of the vast majority of processors. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900KS, scores only 0.5% higher on average, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D is 0.7% lower. This indicates the i5-14600 performs at a level comparable to higher-tier processors despite its mainstream positioning.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and hardware specifications.

The Arc A310E's 50th percentile standing among all GPUs suggests it delivers average frame rates in modern games. With 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, the GPU can handle esports titles and older games at 1080p with medium settings. The 4 GB VRAM capacity will be a limiting factor in newer titles, requiring reduced texture quality and resolution settings.

The CPU's high performance ensures that it will not be a bottleneck in gaming scenarios. The Raptor Lake architecture's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4300, ensures smooth frame pacing even in CPU-intensive game scenes. However, the GPU's modest specifications will cap overall frame rates.

For 1080p gaming, the system can be expected to deliver playable frame rates in less demanding titles such as esports games and older AAA releases. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU's 64-bit memory bus and 4 GB VRAM will significantly limit performance, and frame rates will likely be below playable thresholds in modern games. Ray tracing performance will be minimal despite the 6 RT cores, as the overall GPU throughput is insufficient for demanding ray-traced scenes.

The GPU has 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, which are modest counts for a modern graphics card. The pixel rate of 32.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 64.00 GTexel/s are sufficient for basic rendering but will struggle with high-resolution textures and complex shader effects. The GPU's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 ensures compatibility with modern graphics APIs, but the hardware's capabilities will limit the visual quality achievable in games.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + Intel Arc A310E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600

Intel Arc A310E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds