SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600

44,889 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

17,083 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600 is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R refresh) and fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. The core configuration splits into performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core mix; the chip carries a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The 24 MB shared L3 cache, 2 MB per-core L2 cache, and 80 KB per-core L1 cache provide ample on-die storage for frequently accessed data. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory support listed as enabled — a feature that pushes this consumer CPU toward entry-level workstation duties. The processor also integrates UHD Graphics 770, which serves as a fallback display output but plays no meaningful role in gaming or compute workloads when a discrete GPU is present.

Benchmark results across multiple suites paint a consistent picture of a strong mid-range to upper-mid-range CPU. In Cinebench R23, the i5-14600 scores 30464 points in multi-core and 4300 points in single-core. The multi-core figure is particularly telling: it indicates that the 14-core design scales well under all-core loads, while the single-core score demonstrates excellent per-thread performance — a critical factor for lightly threaded tasks like legacy games or daily office applications. The Geekbench results (14680 multi-core, 2424 single-core) corroborate this balance. PassMark sub-tests show specific strengths: integer math at 117078, floating-point math at 85759, and extended instructions at 25674. The data compression score of 434620 and encryption score of 25082 suggest the processor handles data-heavy workloads efficiently, though the find prime numbers score of 155 is a weak point — an indicator that the CPU does not excel at highly branch-dependent integer algorithms.

The CPU's percentileVsAllCpus of 89 means it outperforms the vast majority of all CPUs in the benchmark database. The avgBenchmarkScore of 44889 positions it just slightly below the Intel Core i9-12900KS (45094, deltaPct -0.5%) and the AMD EPYC 4344P (45122, deltaPct -0.5%), while being marginally ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44573, deltaPct +0.7%) and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (44466, deltaPct +1.0%). This tight clustering — all within roughly 1% of each other — means the i5-14600 trades blows with flagship last-generation parts and current-generation mid-range chips. For real workloads, this translates to: video encoding, code compilation, and 3D rendering tasks will see performance nearly identical to a Core i9-12900KS, while the single-core advantage over the Ryzen 5 7500X3D (via the 4300 Cinebench R23 single-core score) suggests faster responsiveness in everyday applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 44889 places it at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU's average benchmark score of 17083 places it at the 60th percentile among all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 75, indicating that this pairing sits in the upper quartile of all desktop configurations. This gap — 89th percentile CPU versus 60th percentile GPU — is the single most important numerical relationship in this build, as it reveals a processor that substantially outclasses its graphics counterpart in raw benchmark terms.

Looking at GPU-specific scores: the RX 7600 XT achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2348, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 92426, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 48366. PassMark results show G3D at 17132, G2D at 1030, and GPU compute at 8987. The DirectX sub-scores (DX10: 85, DX11: 167, DX12: 65) are legacy API tests and reflect the GPU's architectural focus on modern pipelines. The nearest GPU rivals show how tightly grouped this card is: the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 scores 17037 (deltaPct +0.3% relative to the RX 7600 XT), the AMD Radeon HD 7970M scores 17019 (deltaPct +0.4%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 scores 17208 (deltaPct -0.7%), and the NVIDIA Tesla M4 scores 16932 (deltaPct +0.9%). The RTX 3070 comparison is notable: despite being a previous-generation card, it edges out the RX 7600 XT by 0.7% in average benchmark score — a small but real deficit.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU operates in a different performance tier than the GPU. The i5-14600 competes with (and slightly edges out) chips like the Ryzen 5 7500X3D and Core Ultra X9 388H, while the RX 7600 XT sits in a mid-pack GPU tier alongside the GTX 690 and HD 7970M — both of which are ancient architectures. This imbalance means that in CPU-bound workloads (compilation, rendering, multitasking), the system will feel far more powerful than in GPU-bound workloads (gaming at high resolutions, GPU compute). Benchmark results indicate the CPU will rarely bottleneck; the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-heavy scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a pronounced CPU-over-GPU imbalance. With the CPU at the 89th percentile and the GPU at the 60th percentile, the processor has roughly 29 percentile points of headroom over the graphics card. In practical terms, this means for most gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, the RX 7600 XT will be the component that determines maximum frame rates and visual fidelity settings. The CPU will sit idle waiting for the GPU to finish rendering frames — a classic GPU-bound scenario.

Evidence from the benchmark scores supports this. The CPU's multi-threaded Cinebench R23 score of 30464 and PassMark multithread score of 35848 indicate massive parallel processing headroom. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 17132 (with the RTX 3070 slightly ahead at 17208) places it in a performance tier where modern AAA titles at 1440p or 4K resolution will stress the graphics card far more than the CPU. Even at 1080p, where CPUs typically become more relevant, the i5-14600's single-core score of 4300 in Cinebench R23 is strong enough to feed frames to the GPU without becoming the constraint in most titles.

The bottleneck direction is unambiguous: the GPU limits gaming and GPU compute workloads, while the CPU limits almost nothing in this configuration. For productivity tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the balance is more nuanced — those workloads can use both components (CPU for simulation/encoding, GPU for effects/rendering), and the CPU's 89th percentile position means it will handle its share easily. However, any workload that relies heavily on GPU compute (machine learning inference, GPU-accelerated rendering) will see the RX 7600 XT's 60th percentile position as the ceiling. The FPS scaling story, while unmeasured for this exact pairing, follows from the percentile gap: frame rates in CPU-light titles will be GPU-limited, and even in CPU-heavy titles, the i5-14600's strong single-thread performance (2424 Geekbench single-core) will keep it ahead of the GPU's demands.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p with high refresh rate displays, the CPU's 89th percentile single-thread performance (4300 Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures frame times remain low, but the GPU's 60th percentile position will cap maximum FPS in demanding titles. Expect smooth but not extreme frame rates; the RX 7600 XT's 16 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth handle modern textures, but the 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limits raw pixel pushing.

Streaming: The i5-14600's 20 threads and strong multi-core scores (30464 Cinebench R23) provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The CPU can handle x264 encoding at reasonable presets without stealing frames from the GPU-bound game. The RX 7600 XT's lack of dedicated tensor cores (null in the FACT PACK) means GPU-accelerated encoding relies on the AMD encoder, which is adequate but not class-leading.

Video editing: The CPU's data compression score of 434620 and floating-point math score of 85759 support fast timeline scrubbing and effect processing. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM allows for large preview buffers and multi-layer compositions, but the 60th percentile GPU score means export times will be moderate. The 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is a limiting factor for 4K multi-stream editing.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles CPU) will perform excellently — the 30464 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is roughly on par with a Core i9-12900KS, which renders scenes quickly. GPU-based rendering will see the RX 7600 XT's 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 and 176.3 GPixel/s pixel rate as the constraint, placing it below dedicated rendering GPUs.

Software development: The CPU's 20 threads and 89th percentile ranking make compilation fast, especially with the high integer math score of 117078. The 24 MB L3 cache reduces cache misses during large builds. The GPU's 60th percentile position is irrelevant for most development tasks unless the workflow includes GPU compute.

Student and office work: This is massively over-specified for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU's single-core performance (2424 Geekbench) ensures snappy UI response, and the GPU's G2D score of 1030 handles 2D acceleration easily. The 65 W CPU TDP and 190 W GPU TDP make this a reasonable desktop for a dorm room or small office, though the system is far more than needed for these tasks.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this CPU+GPU pairing is a desktop builder who prioritizes CPU performance for productivity and accepts mid-range GPU performance for gaming and graphics workloads. The 89th percentile CPU ranking makes this an excellent choice for software developers who compile large codebases and run virtual machines, as the 20 threads and 117078 integer math score directly accelerate build times. Content creators who work in video editing or 3D modeling but rely primarily on CPU rendering will benefit from the i5-14600's 30464 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, while the RX 7600 XT handles preview rendering and effects acceleration adequately.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find this system capable of high settings in most titles, though the 60th percentile GPU position means they should not expect 4K ultra gaming. Students in engineering or computer science fields will appreciate the CPU's compilation speed and the system's ability to run simulation software, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU fails. Small business workstations that run database queries, financial modeling, or data analysis software will benefit from the CPU's 434620 data compression score and 25082 encryption score, though the GPU will be underutilized in these roles. The build is NOT ideal for gamers at 1440p or 4K who want maximum settings — the GPU's 60th percentile position will be the bottleneck, and the CPU's headroom will go unused.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14600 compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D?

A: The i5-14600 has an average benchmark score of 44889, which is 0.7% higher than the Ryzen 5 7500X3D's 44573. In multi-core workloads, the i5-14600's 30464 Cinebench R23 score indicates a slight edge, but the difference is within noise margins for most real applications.

Q: Is the RX 7600 XT faster than the RTX 3070?

A: No. The RTX 3070 has an average benchmark score of 17208, which is 0.7% higher than the RX 7600 XT's 17083. The RX 7600 XT does have 16 GB VRAM versus the RTX 3070's unspecified amount, which may help in VRAM-heavy scenarios, but raw benchmark performance slightly favors the RTX 3070.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined system percentile is 75, meaning this desktop configuration outperforms 75% of all systems in the benchmark database. The CPU sits at the 89th percentile while the GPU sits at the 60th percentile.

Q: Does this CPU support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplierUnlocked field is false, meaning the Intel Core i5-14600 does not have an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Users must rely on the stock 2.70 GHz base and 5.20 GHz boost clocks.

Q: What memory types does this system support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode. The specific memory type used will depend on the motherboard, as the socket (Intel Socket 1700) accommodates boards with either memory standard.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 7600 XT have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 has a launch MSRP of $255. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has a launch MSRP of 329 USD.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. All frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component, not measured results. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking and the GPU's 60th percentile ranking suggest the following expectations:

At 1080p ultra settings, the RX 7600 XT's 17132 PassMark G3D score (with the RTX 3070 at 17208 as a reference point) indicates the GPU will deliver playable frame rates in most titles, but not high-refresh (144Hz+) performance in demanding AAA games. The 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 176.3 GPixel/s pixel rate are mid-range figures that support roughly 60-100 FPS in esports titles and 40-60 FPS in graphically intensive single-player games at ultra settings. The CPU will not be the limiting factor — its 4300 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensures frame times stay low, but the GPU's pixel throughput caps maximum FPS.

At 1440p ultra settings, frame rates will drop further, likely into the 30-60 FPS range depending on the title. The 16 GB VRAM (288.0 GB/s bandwidth) prevents texture-related stutters, but the 128-bit memory bus is a bottleneck for high-resolution rendering. At 4K ultra settings, the GPU's 60th percentile position becomes severely limiting, with sub-30 FPS expected in most modern titles — this is not a 4K gaming system. For gamers targeting 1080p medium-to-high settings with occasional 1440p, this pairing delivers a smooth experience; for 1440p ultra or 4K, a stronger GPU is required.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") pairing the Intel Core i5-14600 (14th Gen, Raptor Lake architecture) with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (Radeon RX 7000 series, RDNA 3.0 architecture). The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread processor with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a 16 GB GDDR6 card with a 190 W TDP, requiring a 450 W suggested PSU. The system's combined percentile is 75, placing it in the upper quartile of all desktop configurations. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking makes this a high-tier processor system, while the GPU's 60th percentile ranking makes it a mid-tier graphics system. Overall, this is a productivity-first desktop with gaming capability — the CPU dominates the performance profile, and the GPU serves as a competent but not exceptional graphics companion.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is based on the Navi 33 chip (codename "Hotpink Bonefish") using RDNA 3.0 architecture on TSMC's 6 nm process, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 32 ray-tracing cores and no dedicated tensor cores. Clock speeds are 1980 MHz base, 2470 MHz game, and 2755 MHz boost, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The 16 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus yields 288.0 GB/s bandwidth — a large capacity but relatively narrow bus width. Compute throughput is rated at 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 and 22.57 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio), with pixel rate of 176.3 GPixel/s and texture rate of 352.6 GTexel/s.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 17083 places it at the 60th percentile among all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2348 reflects modern API performance, while Geekbench OpenCL (92426) and Vulkan (48366) scores show compute capability. The nearest rival comparison is telling: the RTX 3070 (avg score 17208) is 0.7% faster, while the GTX 690 (17037) and HD 7970M (17019) are 0.3-0.4% slower. For rendering, this GPU handles 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming well, with 16 GB VRAM providing headroom for texture-heavy mods or large scenes. The 32 ray-tracing cores support hardware ray tracing, but the lack of tensor cores means AI-accelerated features (like DLSS-style upscaling) are not available — AMD's FSR relies on shader-based algorithms instead. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is a limiting factor for high-resolution textures and heavy compute workloads, as the 128-bit bus constrains data flow despite the large VRAM pool.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8 — meaning the graphics card runs at half the lane width of the CPU's PCIe 5.0 capability. The 65 W CPU TDP and 190 W GPU TDP combine for a total of 255 W, with the suggested PSU at 450 W, leaving roughly 200 W of headroom for other components (drives, fans, motherboard). This PSU headroom is comfortable for the current configuration but limits future upgrades to GPUs with similar or lower power draws.

The platform is at the end of its socket generation — Intel Socket 1700 supports 12th, 13th, and 14th Gen Core processors, but no future generations. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU within the same platform, such as a card with a higher average benchmark score than the RX 7600 XT's 17083, to better match the CPU's 89th percentile performance. However, the PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface on the RX 7600 XT means that upgrading to a GPU requiring PCIe 4.0 x16 (or PCIe 5.0) would improve bandwidth. The 450 W PSU may need upgrading if a significantly more powerful GPU is installed. For CPU upgrades, the best available option on this socket would be a higher-core-count 14th Gen part, though the i5-14600's 30464 Cinebench R23 multi-core score already positions it near the top of the platform's performance range. Memory upgrades from DDR4 to DDR5 (or faster DDR5) would provide marginal gains, as the dual-channel memory bus is not explicitly bandwidth-limited in the FACT PACK. The platform is mature and stable, but any future CPU upgrade requires a motherboard change to a newer socket.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600 + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds