SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14500HX + Intel Arc A770M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14500HX

35,094 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770M

18,383 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14500HX paired with the Intel Arc A770M is an all-Intel mobile combination: a 14-core Raptor Lake-HX mobile processor sitting in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, matched with a 16 GB Arc Alchemist discrete GPU in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. The combined build sits at the 73rd percentile, which places it firmly in upper-mainstream laptop territory — a machine whose CPU carries a disproportionate share of the performance load. No measured frame-rate data exists for this exact pairing, so all gaming figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

CPU Analysis

The Core i5-14500HX is a 14-core, 20-thread mobile processor built on Intel's 10 nm process within the Raptor Lake-HX family, part of the Core 14th Gen refresh released on January 7, 2024. It runs a 2.60 GHz base clock and boosts to 4.90 GHz, with a TDP of 55 watts — a clear signal that this chip is designed for thick chassis gaming and workstation laptops rather than ultrabooks. The die measures 257 mm² and the chip carries 24 MB of shared L3 cache alongside 2 MB of per-core L2 and 80 KB of per-core L1.

The benchmark picture is one of strong multi-threaded throughput paired with genuinely quick single-thread performance. In Cinebench R23, the processor posts 24234 points multi-core and 3421 points single-core — a ratio that reflects its hybrid core layout working effectively across heavily threaded rendering workloads. Cinebench R20 lands at 10178 multi-core and 1436 single-core, while the older R15 test records 2442 and 344 respectively. Geekbench shows 10171 multi-core and 2129 single-core, and Passmark's multithread score of 28508 sits alongside a single-thread result of 3629.

What do these numbers mean against the field? The 84th percentile placement says this is a top-sixth CPU in the database, and the nearest-rivals list is remarkably tight: the i9-12900HX sits just 0.3% away, the i7-13800H is 0.3% behind, the Core 7 253PTE trails by 0.4%, and the desktop i7-12700K is only 0.5% ahead. In practical terms, the 14500HX delivers performance effectively indistinguishable from a previous-generation mobile flagship — the i9-12900HX — while matching a desktop-class i7 within half a percent. That is an unusually strong showing for a mid-tier i5 part.

The Passmark sub-scores add texture. Integer math hits 95584, floating point 69442, data compression 333851, and encryption 19502, indicating solid throughput for developer toolchains, compression tasks, and cryptographic workloads. The extended instructions score of 20019 confirms healthy SIMD throughput, and physics at 1911 supports credible game simulation performance. The multiplier is unlocked, which matters for laptop vendors tuning sustained performance, though end-user overclocking in a mobile chassis is largely theoretical. Memory support spans DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory is supported — a rare and notable feature for a mobile part aimed at workstation use.

FAQ

Q: How does the i5-14500HX compare to the i9-12900HX?

A: The two are statistical equals. The i9-12900HX averages 35003 against the 14500HX's 35094 average benchmark score, a delta of just 0.3% — the i5 effectively matches a prior mobile flagship.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes. ECC memory support is listed as true, which is uncommon for a mobile consumer part and points toward workstation deployment scenarios.

Q: What generation and architecture is the i5-14500HX based on?

A: It is a Core 14th Gen refresh built on the Raptor Lake architecture, codenamed Raptor Lake-HX, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die.

Q: How much GPU memory does the Arc A770M have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The A770M carries 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus running at 16 Gbps effective, delivering 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Is the Arc A770M still in production?

A: No. Its production status is listed as End-of-life, which matters for long-term serviceability of any laptop built around it.

Q: Are the gaming frame rates in this article measured?

A: No. There is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU pairing. All frame-rate discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked?

A: Yes, the 14500HX has an unlocked multiplier, giving system integrators headroom for performance tuning within the 55 W TDP envelope.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform story here is fixed by design: the i5-14500HX uses Intel BGA 1964, a ball-grid socket soldered to the laptop motherboard. There is no socket-level CPU upgrade path — the chip you buy with the machine is the chip you keep. That makes the initial purchase decision the critical one, and the data suggests buyers are getting desktop-12700K-class performance (within 0.5%) in mobile form, which softens the lack of upgradeability considerably.

Memory flexibility is a genuine strength. Support for both DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus means vendors can ship cheaper DDR4 configurations or faster DDR5 ones, and ECC support opens doors for workstation builds where data integrity matters. On the interconnect side, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the A770M itself connects over PCIe 4.0 x16 — a standard, full-width link with no compromise on the GPU interface.

Power budgeting is straightforward from the pack: a 55 W CPU TDP plus a 120 W GPU TDP gives roughly 175 W of combined draw under full dual-component load, before accounting for the rest of the system. Any chassis housing this pairing needs cooling capacity sized for both components running simultaneously — a gaming laptop thermal design, not a thin-and-light one. Since the CPU's integrated UHD Graphics 770 remains present, the platform can also drop to low-power graphics on battery or for display duties.

A sensible next upgrade within this constraint set is a move at the machine level rather than the component level: the nearest-rivals data shows Core 7 253PTE-class parts trading within 0.4% of this chip, so stepping to a newer-generation mobile platform yields near-identical CPU performance — the meaningful upgrade vector is the GPU side, where the A770M's 62nd percentile standing lags the CPU's 84th.

Who Should Build It

This is a laptop build — buildClass is "laptop" — and the component mix defines its audience precisely.

Gamers targeting 1080p and moderate-settings-to-high settings play will find the A770M's 62nd-percentile GPU capable of mainstream performance, while the 84th-percentile CPU ensures the processor will never be the limiting factor in simulation-heavy or large-map titles. This is not a max-settings 1440p machine, but the combined 73rd percentile confirms a competent mainstream gaming laptop profile.

Content creators get the better half of this pairing. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24234 supports serious rendering throughput, and the 16 GB of GPU memory with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth gives video editors and 3D artists substantial VRAM headroom for timeline scrubbing and scene work — VRAM capacity that often matters more than raw GPU speed in production tools.

Developers and students benefit directly from the single-thread strength: a Geekbench single-core score of 2129 and Passmark single-thread of 3629 mean snappy IDEs, fast compiles on fewer cores, and responsive everyday use, while 20 threads handle parallel builds and containerized workloads. The encryption and compression scores (19502 and 333851) favor development tooling that leans on those operations.

Small business workstation buyers are arguably the sweet spot: ECC support, 14 cores, and a 24 MB L3 cache make this a legitimate mobile workstation CPU, and the end-of-life status of the A770M is the one caution — buyers planning multi-year fleet deployment should verify service and driver support timelines.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark set tells a consistent story. Cinebench R15: 2442 multi / 344 single. Cinebench R20: 10178 / 1436. Cinebench R23: 24234 / 3421. Geekbench: 10171 multi / 2129 single. Passmark multithread: 28508, with single-thread at 3629. The aggregate average benchmark score of 35094 puts the chip in the 84th percentile of all CPUs in the database — ahead of 84% of the field, and statistically tied with the i9-12900HX (0.3% gap), i7-13800H (0.3%), and Core 7 253PTE (0.4%), while trailing the desktop i7-12700K by only 0.5%.

The GPU side posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2278, Geekbench OpenCL at 89494, Vulkan at 74422, and a Passmark G3D score of 11774, averaging 18383 overall for the 62nd percentile. Its rivals bracket it tightly: the Radeon RX 460 is 0.1% behind, the FirePro D500 0.8% behind, the Radeon Pro 5700 1.1% behind, and the RTX 3060 Mobile 1.2% behind — placing the A770M essentially in RTX 3060 Mobile company on aggregate score, though its Passmark DirectX results (178 for DX9, 56 for DX10, 69 for DX11, 70 for DX12) show notable variance across API generations, with legacy DX9 running disproportionately well.

The combined picture is a 73rd-percentile build whose CPU outranks its GPU by 22 percentile points. The compute side reinforces this: GPU compute at 4778 in Passmark and 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 are respectable, but the CPU's 28508 multithread score and 84th-percentile standing dominate the pairing's identity. This is a CPU-led machine.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU is more than ready — Passmark physics of 1911 and single-thread of 3629 are exactly what high-refresh gaming demands — but the GPU's 62nd percentile caps frame rates first. Expect high-refresh play in esports and lighter titles, with AAA games running at mainstream settings. These are estimates; no measured FPS data exists for this pairing.

Streaming: This workload suits the build well. The 14500HX's 20 threads absorb encoder and OS overhead while the game runs, and its effective parity with the i9-12900HX (0.3% delta) means streaming performance matches previous mobile flagships.

Video editing: The standout scenario. Cinebench R23 multi at 24234 provides the render muscle, and 16 GB of GDDR6 with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth gives editors room for 4K timelines and GPU-accelerated effects without VRAM pressure.

3D rendering: Cinebench scores across R15, R20, and R23 scale linearly and confirm viewport and final-render competence. The Arc A770M's 4096 shading units, 32 RT cores, and Vulkan score of 74422 support GPU-accelerated rendering, though its 62nd percentile means CPU-based rendering will often be the faster path here.

Software development: Geekbench single-core of 2129 delivers fast interactive work; 20 threads handle parallel builds; the encryption score of 19502 and compression score of 333851 directly benefit repository operations, CI tasks, and container workflows. ECC support adds reliability for long test runs.

Student and office work: Overkill in the best sense. The single-thread figures make every office application feel instant, the UHD Graphics 770 iGPU can handle everyday display duties at low power, and battery-friendly operation is available when the discrete GPU idles.

Gaming Performance

No measured frame-rate data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination — the measured FPS table is empty and dataIsMeasured is false. All frame-rate discussion below is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores, not measured.

The estimates rest on a Passmark G3D score of 11774, a 3DMark Steel Nomad result of 2278, and the GPU's aggregate position 1.2% above the RTX 3060 Mobile. That comparison frames expectations: a machine broadly comparable in aggregate score to RTX 3060 Mobile-class laptops should deliver smooth 1080p gaming at high settings in most modern titles, with 1440p play plausible in lighter or well-optimized games, particularly where the A770M's generous 16 GB of VRAM avoids texture-memory limits that pinch smaller-framebuffer rivals.

The API-level Passmark spread — DX9 at 178 versus DX12 at 70 — suggests older titles will run exceptionally well relative to newer ones, a pattern typical of Intel's Alchemist drivers. The CPU side contributes zero concern: physics at 1911 and the 84th-percentile aggregate mean frame-time consistency and simulation-heavy scenarios will not be processor-limited. Ray tracing capability exists via 32 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support, but enabling RT will reduce settings headroom given the GPU's mid-tier standing.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class, all-Intel pairing: the Core i5-14500HX mobile CPU on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture, paired with the Arc A770M discrete GPU on the Xe-HPG Alchemist architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors across a 406 mm² die at 53.4M transistors per mm². Both components come from the same vendor, which historically simplifies driver coordination on paper.

Tier-wise, the numbers are unambiguous. CPU at the 84th percentile, GPU at the 62nd, combined build at the 73rd. That composite defines an upper-mainstream laptop: flagship-adjacent processing power from a mid-tier i5 — statistically tied with the i9-12900HX — matched with a mid-pack GPU carrying excellent VRAM specs. The GPU's end-of-life status is the one structural caveat for a machine being evaluated today; the CPU remains in active production. For buyers, the summary is simple: a processing-led laptop with a competent, memory-rich graphics subsystem, best suited to users whose workloads weight CPU throughput and VRAM capacity above pure GPU speed.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck direction is clear and quantified: the GPU. A 22-percentile gap separates the CPU's 84th from the GPU's 62nd, and the FPS scaling implication is that games will hit GPU limits long before the processor breaks a sweat. In gaming, the A770M's Passmark G3D of 11774 and Steel Nomad score of 2278 define the ceiling, while the 14500HX's physics score of 1911 and single-thread strength of 3629 leave consistent headroom — the classic signature of a GPU-bound gaming laptop.

Flip the workload and the picture reverses. In rendering, compilation, and compute tasks that scale with threads, the CPU's 28508 Passmark multithread score takes over, and the GPU's compute score of 4778 in Passmark means heavily GPU-compute-dependent workloads will underutilize the processor. The one workload class that balances the two is video editing, where the CPU renders, the 16 GB of VRAM buffers, and neither component starves the other.

The pairing is best understood as deliberate over-provisioning on the CPU side: buyers get i9-12900HX-class processing (a 0.3% delta) with a GPU in RTX 3060 Mobile company (a 1.2% delta in aggregate score). For CPU-heavy professions that game moderately, that balance is rational. For gaming-first buyers, the GPU is the component that sets expectations — and every frame-rate figure here is an estimate from benchmark data, not a measurement, because no measured FPS rows exist for this combination.