SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14500HX + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14500HX

35,094 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14500HX paired with the Intel Arc A370M represents a specific kind of mobile computing compromise: a high-core-count CPU designed for demanding productivity tasks paired with a modest, entry-level discrete GPU. This is a configuration aimed squarely at users who prioritize processor performance for work over raw frame rates in gaming. The data shows a system that excels in multi-threaded applications but offers a more constrained experience in graphics-heavy scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14500HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture. It features a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, utilizing Intel's 10 nm process node. The CPU configuration is substantial for a mobile part, with a large 24 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB per core L2 cache. This core and cache layout is designed for heavy parallel workloads, a fact reflected in its benchmark scores.

Benchmark results position this CPU as a formidable performer in multi-threaded tasks. In Cinebench R23, it scores 24,234 points in the multi-core test, which is a decisive indicator of its capability in rendering and video encoding. This score places it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-12700K, a desktop part, scores 35,287 on average, with the i5-14500HX trailing by just 0.5%. This proximity to a high-end desktop CPU from a previous generation underscores the i5-14500HX’s raw processing power in a laptop form factor.

Single-core performance is equally strong. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,421 points and a Geekbench single-core score of 2,129 indicate excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks and applications that rely on a single thread. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3,629 confirms this trend. For users, this means snappy system navigation and fast load times in most software, even when multi-core performance is not fully utilized.

The CPU also shows strength in specialized computations. The Passmark data encryption score of 19,502 and extended instructions score of 20,019 suggest robust performance in security-related tasks and applications that leverage modern instruction sets like AVX-512. The floating-point math score of 69,442 and integer math score of 95,584 are exceptionally high, indicating that this processor is well-suited for scientific simulations, financial modeling, and complex data analysis, where such mathematical throughput is critical. The Passmark multi-thread score of 28,508, while slightly lower than its nearest rival's average of 35,003, still represents a very high level of performance, placing it ahead of the Intel Core i7-13800H by 0.3% in the average benchmark score comparison.

Balance and Bottleneck

In this specific configuration, the balance of power is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The Intel Arc A370M is a 35 W GPU with 4 GB of VRAM, a component designed for entry-level gaming and basic acceleration. The CPU, by contrast, is a high-performance 55 W part that can deliver desktop-class multi-core performance. This creates a significant bottleneck scenario where the GPU is the limiting factor in gaming and graphics-intensive workloads.

Benchmark percentiles illustrate this imbalance. The CPU sits in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for the build is 79. In practical terms for gaming, the CPU is likely to be underutilized while the GPU operates at its maximum capacity. The CPU will be able to calculate game logic and physics far faster than the GPU can render frames, resulting in a situation where frame rates are dictated almost entirely by the Arc A370M.

For non-gaming workloads, the situation is reversed. In tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU's 20 threads will be the primary engine, and the GPU will play a supporting role. Here, the CPU is the workhorse, and its high multi-core scores become the primary indicator of system performance. The system's FPS scaling potential in gaming is therefore capped by the GPU; upgrading to a more powerful graphics card would yield a massive increase in frame rates, while upgrading the CPU would offer little to no benefit in most gaming scenarios. The bottleneck is clear and definitive: the GPU limits gaming, and the CPU defines productivity.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile socket, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional sense. The system's memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, indicating a flexible memory controller. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is a high-bandwidth connection for modern storage and future discrete GPUs, though the current GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

The power delivery is defined by a 55 W CPU TDP and a 35 W GPU TDP. This combined 90 W thermal design power budget is modest, which means the system does not require a large power supply. The suggested PSU is not listed in the data, but the combined TDP suggests that a standard laptop power adapter is sufficient. The system includes the UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU, which can be used as a fallback or for power-saving modes when the discrete GPU is not needed.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform, should the laptop chassis allow it, would be to replace the Arc A370M with a more powerful discrete GPU. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface used by the current GPU suggests the system is capable of supporting a higher-bandwidth card. Given the CPU's high performance, it could comfortably drive a GPU several tiers above the A370M without becoming a bottleneck. However, as this is a mobile platform, the upgrade path is often limited to what the original manufacturer has designed into the laptop, making a GPU swap unlikely in most implementations. The most realistic upgrade for the user would be to increase system memory to the supported DDR5 standard and ensure storage is using the available PCIe Gen 5 lanes for maximum data throughput.

Who Should Build It

This build is tailored for professionals and students who require significant CPU horsepower for work but have lighter graphics needs. The primary target is content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,234 and the high floating-point math score of 69,442 indicate that this system can handle complex rendering tasks that are heavily CPU-dependent, making it a viable mobile workstation for these users.

Software developers will also find this configuration appealing. The high Passmark integer math score of 95,584 is a key indicator of compiler performance and code execution speed. The 20 threads allow for fast parallel builds, and the 14 cores are well-suited for running multiple virtual machines or containerized environments simultaneously. The data encryption score of 19,502 also suggests it can handle secure development tasks efficiently.

For students and small business workstations, the system offers a strong balance. The CPU’s single-core score of 3,421 ensures smooth performance in office applications, web browsing, and productivity suites. The multi-core performance allows for efficient handling of large spreadsheets, databases, and statistical analysis software. This is a machine for users who know that their primary bottleneck is the processor, not the graphics card, and who want a system that won't slow them down on complex computational tasks.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture and uses the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It features 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output pipelines. The GPU is equipped with 8 dedicated ray tracing cores, which provides hardware support for ray-traced effects in supported games. The card has a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz.

Memory is a notable limitation. The GPU comes with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This is a low bandwidth figure, which will constrain performance in modern games that require high texture throughput. The 4 GB frame buffer is also small, which may force texture quality down in newer titles at higher resolutions. The GPU's FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, and its pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, indicating its capability for entry-level 1080p gaming.

In benchmark tests, the Arc A370M scores 29,676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28,673 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score is 29,175, which places it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. This places it in a competitive bracket with older desktop cards like the AMD Radeon RX 470, which it outperforms by 0.6%, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, which it leads by 1%. These comparisons show that while the A370M is a modern architecture, its performance is on par with mid-range GPUs from several generations ago, making it suitable for 1080p gaming at medium settings rather than high-refresh or high-resolution play.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is a poor fit for the Arc A370M. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 1080p with high settings. Users should expect to lower graphical settings to achieve playable framerates, and high-refresh-rate monitors above 144Hz will not be fully utilized in demanding titles.

Streaming: The CPU is the star here. The 20 threads of the i5-14500HX can handle game capture and encoding using the x264 software encoder without crippling game performance, since the game's frame rate is already limited by the GPU. This allows for a viable single-PC streaming setup, especially for less demanding titles.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for this build. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,234 will accelerate timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export times. The Intel Arc A370M provides hardware acceleration for encoding and decoding, which helps with preview playback, but the CPU will be doing the heavy lifting for final renders.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the primary render engine, and its high core count and 24 MB L3 cache will deliver strong performance in applications like Blender or Cinebench. The GPU can contribute to rendering via its 8 ray tracing cores, but its 4 GB memory limit will be a constraint for larger scenes. The high Passmark floating-point score of 69,442 is a good indicator of its suitability for this workload.

Software Development: This configuration is excellent for developers. The fast multi-core CPU allows for rapid code compilation, and the 20 threads are perfect for running multiple services or test suites in parallel. The GPU is sufficient for UI rendering and basic graphics debugging, making this a comfortable and efficient development machine.

Student and Office Work: The system is overqualified for basic office tasks. The single-core performance of 3,421 in Cinebench R23 ensures that word processors, spreadsheets, and web browsers will run flawlessly. The discrete GPU is unnecessary for this workload but does allow for light photo editing or casual gaming during downtime. The 55 W CPU TDP is efficient enough for all-day battery life if the laptop manufacturer has provided a suitable battery.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this pairing, so all frame rate expectations are estimated based on the individual benchmark scores of the components. The GPU’s performance, as measured by its Geekbench scores and its proximity to the AMD Radeon RX 470 in the nearestRivals list, suggests it is a 1080p entry-level card.

For modern AAA titles, this system will likely deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with medium to low graphical presets. The 4 GB VRAM is the primary constraint, and users will need to be mindful of texture quality settings to avoid stuttering. In less demanding esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the system may be able to push higher frame rates, but the 112 GB/s memory bandwidth will still be a limiting factor.

The CPU’s high single-core performance will ensure that frame pacing is consistent and that minimum frame rates are stable, but the GPU will be the decisive factor in overall gaming performance. Users should treat this as a capable entry-level gaming laptop that can handle older or less demanding games with ease, but not a high-performance gaming machine.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this laptop build is 79, which is a measure of its overall performance relative to all other configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-12700K?

A: The Core i5-14500HX has an average benchmark score of 35,094, which is 0.5% lower than the Core i7-12700K's average score of 35,287, making them statistically similar in performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A370M?

A: The Arc A370M has a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s, utilizing 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14500HX has ECC memory support enabled, which is a feature often sought after for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the process node for the Intel Arc A370M?

A: The Arc A370M is manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process node, with a die size of 157 mm².

Q: What is the CPU's socket type and is it upgradeable?

A: The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile socket, meaning the processor is not designed to be user-upgradeable.

Q: What DirectX version does the GPU support?

A: The Intel Arc A370M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes features like hardware ray tracing and variable rate shading.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark data paints a clear picture of a system with a dominant CPU and a modest GPU. The Intel Core i5-14500HX achieves an average benchmark score of 35,094, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900HX, scores 35,003, with the i5-14500HX leading by 0.3%. This performance is driven by its strong multi-core results, such as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,234 and the Passmark multi-thread score of 28,508.

The Intel Arc A370M, in contrast, has an average benchmark score of 29,175, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, which scores 29,197, with the Arc trailing by 0.1%. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and Vulkan score of 28,673 are indicative of its entry-level performance class.

The combined picture is one of significant imbalance. The CPU is a top-tier performer capable of handling the most demanding productivity tasks, while the GPU is an entry-level component suitable for basic graphics and light gaming. The data suggests that this is a specialized tool for users who need maximum CPU power and are willing to accept a more limited graphics experience.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14500HX + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14500HX

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds