SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14500HX + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14500HX

35,094 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14500HX paired with the Intel Arc A350M represents a specific configuration within the mobile landscape, targeting a balance between multi-threaded CPU capability and entry-level discrete graphics. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark data to interpret what this combination means for prospective users, focusing on workload suitability, performance positioning, and system-level characteristics.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14500HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a thermal design point (TDP) of 55 W. The processor features a hybrid configuration, though the exact P-core/E-core split is not specified in the data, its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool is critical for workloads that benefit from fast access to frequently used data, such as gaming and content creation applications.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 84th percentile of all CPUs tested, indicating strong overall performance. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 24,234 points in multi-core and 3,421 points in single-core. The multi-core score suggests significant capability in heavily threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The single-core score is equally important for responsiveness in everyday tasks and for applications like older games that rely on fewer threads. The Geekbench scores of 10,171 multi-core and 2,129 single-core corroborate this profile, showing a balanced architecture that handles both parallel and serial workloads effectively.

The PassMark suite provides granular insights. The multi-thread score of 28,508 and single-thread score of 3,629 indicate that the CPU is well-rounded. The integer math score of 95,584 and floating-point math score of 69,442 show strong arithmetic capabilities, which are directly relevant to scientific computing, financial modeling, and any number-crunching application. The data encryption score of 19,502 and data compression score of 333,851 are particularly notable; the compression score is exceptionally high, suggesting that tasks like file archiving and data transfer will be very fast. The extended instructions score of 20,019 also points to efficient handling of modern SIMD workloads, which are common in multimedia processing.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the i5-14500HX is extremely competitive. It sits just 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900HX and 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13800H, while also being 0.4% faster than the Intel Core 7 253PTE. Interestingly, it is 0.5% slower than the desktop-class Intel Core i7-12700K, but the gap is negligible in real-world terms. This positioning means that within the mobile space, this i5 processor delivers performance that rivals previous-generation top-tier mobile chips and even some desktop parts, making it an excellent choice for users who need desktop-like performance in a laptop form factor.

Balance and Bottleneck

In any system, the balance between CPU and GPU determines which component becomes the limiting factor for specific workloads. This configuration presents a clear dichotomy: the CPU is a high-performance part designed for heavy multi-threading, while the GPU is an entry-level discrete component. The data shows the CPU has an average benchmark score of 35,094, while the GPU has an average benchmark score of 24,647, creating a significant performance gap.

In CPU-intensive workloads such as 3D rendering, video encoding, or code compilation, the i5-14500HX will be the dominant contributor. The high multi-core scores in Cinebench R23 and PassMark indicate that these tasks will execute quickly, and the GPU will have minimal influence on the outcome. The bottleneck in these scenarios is rarely the processor; instead, it will be the speed of the storage or memory subsystem.

Conversely, in GPU-intensive workloads like modern 3D gaming at high settings, the Arc A350M will be the limiting factor. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus are modest by modern standards, and its 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is far below what is required for demanding titles at high resolution. In these scenarios, the CPU will be largely idle while the GPU struggles to keep up, meaning that frame rates will be constrained by the graphics solution, not the processor.

This imbalance is not necessarily a flaw; it depends on the intended use case. For users who primarily run CPU-heavy applications and only occasionally game at lower settings, this pairing is sensible. The CPU ensures that productivity tasks are swift, while the GPU provides a baseline level of graphical acceleration that is superior to integrated graphics. However, for users who prioritize gaming, this configuration will feel lopsided, as the powerful CPU will be underutilized. The data suggests that this system is optimized for compute and content creation over high-end gaming. The combined percentile of 77 for the entire build reflects that it is a good overall system, but the individual component performance levels indicate that the CPU is the star of the show.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data paints a clear picture of a system with a powerful processor and a modest graphics card. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,234 places it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, which is a strong result for a mobile part. This score is roughly 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i9-12900HX and 0.5% lower than the Intel Core i7-12700K, showing that it is firmly in the upper echelon of mobile processors. The single-core score of 3,421 is equally competitive, ensuring snappy performance in daily use and in lightly threaded applications.

The GPU, Intel Arc A350M, achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24,546 and a Vulkan score of 24,747. These scores place it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs, which is respectable for an entry-level part. Its average benchmark score of 24,647 puts it in close competition with the AMD Radeon RX 590, against which it is 0.4% slower, and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, against which it is 0.5% slower. Interestingly, it is 0.8% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and 1.5% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630. This positioning indicates that the Arc A350M offers performance roughly equivalent to older desktop GPUs, which is an impressive feat for a low-power mobile chip, but it is still far from what is needed for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p or 4K.

The combined picture is one of a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks. The average CPU benchmark score of 35,094 is over 40% higher than the GPU’s average of 24,647, which means that the processor will almost always be the component that finishes its work first. In a mixed workload environment, the system will feel fast for productivity, but games will be limited by the GPU’s performance envelope. The overall build percentile of 77 suggests that this is a well-above-average system, but the distribution of performance is heavily skewed toward the CPU.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is tailored for users who prioritize processor performance over graphics fidelity. The primary audience is content creators and professionals who work with multi-threaded applications. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,234 and PassMark multi-thread score of 28,508 demonstrate that it can handle video editing, 3D modeling, and software development with ease. For a video editor, the high data compression score of 333,851 means that exporting and encoding projects will be fast. For a software developer, the integer math score of 95,584 and the 24 MB of L3 cache will make code compilation and virtual machine management much more efficient.

Students and small business users will also find this system suitable. The CPU’s single-core performance of 3,421 in Cinebench R23 ensures that everyday tasks like web browsing, office applications, and spreadsheet analysis are responsive. The ECC memory support is a feature that could appeal to professionals who require data integrity for financial or scientific work. The processor’s 55 W TDP suggests that it can be adequately cooled in a standard laptop chassis, making it a reliable workhorse for daily use.

Gamers, however, should approach this build with caution. The Arc A350M is an entry-level GPU, and its performance is suited for older titles or modern games at low to medium settings. For gamers who primarily play esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends, the GPU’s 3.379 TFLOPS performance will be sufficient to achieve playable frame rates at 1080p. However, for AAA titles at high settings, the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will be a significant limitation. This system is not designed for high-refresh-rate gaming, and users who prioritize gaming should look elsewhere.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh-rate gaming, this system will struggle. The GPU’s performance is on par with the AMD Radeon RX 590, which is a desktop GPU from several generations ago. At 1080p, users can expect playable frame rates in less demanding titles, but the 4 GB VRAM will quickly become a bottleneck in modern games with high-resolution textures. The CPU is more than capable of keeping up with the GPU’s output, so the frame rate will be entirely dictated by the graphics card.

Streaming is a mixed bag. The CPU’s strong multi-core performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 score of 24,234, means that software encoding via x264 is a viable option. The processor can handle both the game and the encoding workload without significant frame drops. However, the GPU’s performance is not sufficient for high-fidelity gaming, so streamers will need to compromise on game settings to maintain a stable stream.

Video editing is where this system shines. The CPU’s high multi-core scores and the excellent data compression score of 333,851 make timeline scrubbing, rendering, and exporting very efficient. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for hardware acceleration in most editing software, though it may struggle with complex effects or 4K timelines. Overall, this is a capable machine for 1080p video editing.

3D rendering is another strong suit. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,234 is a strong indicator of performance in applications like Blender or V-Ray. The 20 threads will be fully utilized, and the 24 MB of L3 cache will help with complex scene data. The GPU can assist with viewport rendering, but its limited VRAM will preclude it from being a primary renderer for large scenes.

Software development is an excellent fit. The high integer math score of 95,584 and the 20 threads make compiling large codebases faster. The ECC memory support is a bonus for developers who value stability. The CPU’s single-core performance ensures that IDE responsiveness is never an issue.

Student and office work is handled with ease. The CPU’s single-core score of 3,421 in Cinebench R23 ensures that applications launch quickly and remain responsive. The GPU is more than enough for basic graphical tasks like presentations and video playback. The 55 W TDP also means that the system will be relatively power-efficient for all-day battery life, though the discrete GPU may draw additional power when active.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows in the FACT PACK for this exact CPU and GPU combination. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and must be treated as approximations rather than definitive results. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 24,647, which is comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 590, suggests that this system is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in older titles.

For esports games like Valorant, Counter-Strike 2, or Dota 2, the Arc A350M should deliver frame rates well above 60 FPS at 1080p with lower settings. These games are not particularly demanding on the GPU, and the CPU’s strong single-core performance will ensure high minimum frame rates. However, for modern AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield, the 4 GB VRAM will be the primary obstacle. Users will need to reduce textures to medium or low to avoid stuttering, and even then, the frame rate may drop below 30 FPS at 1080p. The GPU’s 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is simply not enough to handle the complex shading and geometry of modern games at high settings.

In GPU-bound scenarios, the CPU will be underutilized, meaning that the i5-14500HX’s performance advantage will not translate to higher frame rates. The bottleneck is firmly on the graphics side. Users who are willing to play at 720p or with aggressive upscaling may find the system playable, but it is not a gaming machine in the traditional sense. The data suggests that the Arc A350M is best suited for light gaming or as a media consumption device.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture and uses the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, which is a compact design for a discrete mobile GPU. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz, resulting in an effective 14 Gbps data rate. It has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is the most significant limitation, as 4 GB is insufficient for modern games at high resolutions with high-quality textures.

The GPU features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 24 raster output units (ROPs). It also includes 6 ray tracing cores, which support hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles, though the performance will be limited by the overall GPU power. The pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s, which are modest figures. The FP32 performance is 3.379 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is 6.758 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, indicating that the GPU can accelerate certain compute tasks when they are optimized for FP16.

In benchmark tests, the Arc A350M scores 24,546 in Geekbench OpenCL and 24,747 in Geekbench Vulkan. These scores place it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs, which is a decent result for an entry-level part. Its performance is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 590, a desktop GPU from 2018, and it is slightly faster than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630. This means that the Arc A350M can handle light to medium graphics workloads, but it is not a high-performance part. The GPU’s TDP of 25 W is very low, which means it is designed for thin-and-light laptops where power efficiency is critical. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. For rendering tasks, the GPU can accelerate viewport performance in applications like Blender, but its 4 GB VRAM limits its ability to handle large scenes or high-resolution textures.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14500HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a proprietary mobile socket. This means that the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded in a traditional sense. Users who want a faster processor in the future will need to purchase a new laptop. The system supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, which provides flexibility, though the specific speed is not listed in the data. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the processor, which is a modern standard that allows for fast NVMe SSDs and future expansion.

The GPU is also a mobile part that is likely soldered to the motherboard, so it cannot be upgraded. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs. The GPU’s TDP of 25 W is low, and the CPU has a TDP of 55 W, meaning the total system power draw is manageable. The suggested PSU is not specified in the data, but given the low TDPs, a standard laptop power adapter will be sufficient. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, which means that Intel has discontinued production, but this does not affect its current functionality.

For a sensible next upgrade, users should look at the platform level. Since the CPU and GPU cannot be replaced, the most impactful upgrades would be to increase the system memory to the maximum supported amount and to install a fast NVMe SSD to take advantage of the PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The CPU’s strong performance means that it will be relevant for several years, so the main limitation will be the GPU. Users who find the Arc A350M insufficient for their needs should consider a laptop with a more powerful GPU, such as an Intel Arc A-series or NVIDIA RTX-class mobile chip, but that would require a different system entirely.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU build?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 77, indicating it is in the top 23% of all systems tested.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14500HX compare to the Intel Core i7-12700K?

A: The i5-14500HX has an average benchmark score of 35,094, which is 0.5% lower than the i7-12700K’s score of 35,287, making the desktop part slightly faster.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14500HX supports ECC memory, which is useful for professional applications requiring data integrity.

Q: What is the processor’s socket and PCIe support?

A: The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the processor.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific configuration?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all gaming frame rates are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: How does the GPU’s performance compare to the AMD Radeon RX 590?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has an average benchmark score of 24,647, which is 0.4% lower than the Radeon RX 590’s score of 24,744, showing nearly identical performance.