SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14490F

38,149 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14490F and Intel Arc B580 form a desktop pairing that targets a specific performance tier. The CPU, a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake Refresh part, sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU, based on the Xe2-HPG Battlemage architecture, holds the 68th percentile among all GPUs. This configuration’s combined percentile is 77, placing it firmly in the upper-midrange segment of the benchmark database. The data indicates a system built for high-refresh 1080p and capable 1440p gaming, alongside solid productivity performance, though the absence of measured game FPS data requires that all gaming expectations be framed as estimates derived from synthetic benchmarks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14490F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65W TDP. The chip uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This configuration does not include integrated graphics, making the discrete Arc B580 a mandatory component.

Benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 23000 points in multi-core and 3247 in single-core. The single-core score of 3247 places it in a competitive position for lightly-threaded tasks, while the multi-core figure indicates robust performance for rendering and compilation workloads. The PassMark suite reinforces this: multi-thread score is 28662, integer math is 87844, and floating-point math is 66558. Data compression scores 340026, while encryption hits 18225. These numbers suggest the CPU handles a mix of integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy workloads without a significant weakness.

The 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs is notable. The nearest rivals in the database show the i5-14490F is tightly clustered: it is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13600KF, 0.1% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 250, and 0.3% behind the Intel Core i5-13600HX. This means the 14490F is effectively performance-identical to its immediate competitors, with differences that are within measurement noise. The practical implication is that in CPU-bound scenarios, this chip will trade blows with those alternatives. The 10-core, 16-thread layout (likely a hybrid P-core/E-core design) delivers strong multi-threading but is not a top-tier HEDT part; it is a mainstream desktop processor that punches above its weight in productivity.

The L3 cache of 24 MB is adequate for gaming and general use, though not exceptional. The lack of ECC memory support and the locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: false) indicate this is not aimed at overclockers but rather at system integrators and users who want a stable, out-of-the-box experience. The 5.00 GHz boost clock ensures high responsiveness in single-threaded applications, and the 65W TDP suggests manageable thermal output for a standard air cooler.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 38149, which is the basis for its 86th percentile position. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 23021, placing it at the 68th percentile. The combined percentile for the build is 77, reflecting a system that is stronger on the CPU side than the GPU side but still well-balanced overall.

Looking at the GPU’s synthetic results, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3068, which is a modern, demanding test. In Geekbench, the OpenCL score is 92821 and Vulkan is 109672, indicating strong compute performance under different APIs. The PassMark G3D score is 15748, while the older DirectX tests show 183 in DX9, 128 in DX11, and 76 in DX12 (the latter two are low because they are likely legacy tests not optimized for this architecture). The G2D score is 709, and GPU compute is 7729.

The GPU’s nearest rivals are revealing. It is 0.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, 0.2% behind the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, 0.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, and 1% behind the NVIDIA P106-100. The comparison to the RTX 3080 is noteworthy: a modern, high-end card is only 0.7% ahead in average score, suggesting the Arc B580 delivers RTX 3080-level rasterization performance in synthetic aggregate. The RTX 2080 comparison shows the B580 has a slight edge, meaning it outperforms a previous-generation high-end card.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is near the top of its class (86th percentile) and a GPU that is solidly mid-to-upper range (68th percentile). The 77th combined percentile indicates that, in balanced workloads, this system will outperform a majority of configurations in the database. The CPU is the dominant component in terms of relative strength, which has implications for bottleneck behavior.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a CPU-favored balance. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile, while the GPU is at the 68th percentile. This 18-point gap suggests that in CPU-bound workloads, the system will perform exceptionally well, but in GPU-bound tasks, the Arc B580 may limit the CPU’s potential.

For gaming at high frame rates, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3247) means it can feed frames quickly. However, the GPU’s 68th percentile means that at higher resolutions and graphical settings, the GPU will become the limiting factor. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 15748 versus the CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 28662 shows the CPU has more raw aggregate power, but games rely heavily on the GPU.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent because no measured FPS data exists for this combination. The FACT PACK states that measuredFpsUltraByGame is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, bottleneck analysis must rely on the percentile gap and synthetic scores. The GPU’s nearest rival, the RTX 3080, is only 0.7% ahead in average score, but the RTX 3080 typically has higher memory bandwidth and different driver optimization, which could affect real-world scaling. The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within 0.3%, so the CPU is not a differentiator in its own tier.

In productivity tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU’s 86th percentile and multi-thread score of 23000 in Cinebench R23 will dominate. The GPU’s compute score of 7729 in PassMark provides acceleration for some workloads, but the CPU will handle most of the heavy lifting. In gaming, the bottleneck will shift: at 1080p with a high-end CPU, the GPU is likely the limit; at 4K, the GPU is almost certainly the constraint. The 12 GB VRAM on the GPU is sufficient for most modern titles, but the GPU’s overall 68th percentile means it is not a top-tier 4K performer.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s 86th percentile and 5.00 GHz boost clock can drive high frame rates, but the GPU’s 68th percentile will cap performance in demanding titles. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3068 and PassMark G3D of 15748 indicate it can handle esports and older titles at high refresh, but newer AAA games may require reduced settings to maintain 144+ FPS. Expect the GPU to be the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads, with a multi-thread score of 28662 in PassMark, provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU also supports hardware encoding, which can offload the CPU. This combination is well-suited for a single-PC streaming setup, as the CPU can handle the encoding load without significantly impacting game performance.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 indicates strong rendering performance for export tasks. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth can accelerate effects and timeline scrubbing. The CPU’s 16 threads will handle 4K timeline playback, while the GPU assists with encoding and effects. This is a capable system for hobbyist and semi-professional video work.

3D rendering: The CPU’s multi-core score of 23000 in Cinebench R23 is excellent for CPU-based rendering engines. The GPU’s FP32 of 13.67 TFLOPS and 20 ray tracing cores provide acceleration for GPU-based renderers. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for most scenes, though very large scenes may exceed it. This system can handle Blender or similar workloads with reasonable speed.

Software development: The CPU’s integer math score of 87844 and data compression score of 340026 indicate strong performance for compilation and build tasks. The 16 threads will parallelize compilation jobs effectively. The GPU is less critical here, but its compute capabilities can assist with parallel workloads. This is a solid developer machine.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3873 in PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness in office applications. The system is overkill for basic tasks but provides headroom for multitasking, large spreadsheets, and light content creation. The 65W CPU TDP and 190W GPU TDP mean the system runs cool and quiet under typical office loads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory kits. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, allowing for future high-bandwidth storage or GPU upgrades. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its performance class.

The CPU’s TDP is 65W, and the GPU’s suggested PSU is 450W. This leaves substantial headroom for a future GPU upgrade. If a user were to replace the Arc B580 with a higher-tier card, the 450W PSU recommendation would likely need to increase, but the CPU’s low TDP means the platform can accommodate a more power-hungry GPU without changing the processor. The socket is at the end of its lifecycle, so a CPU upgrade would require a motherboard change, but a GPU upgrade is straightforward.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has more headroom. The CPU’s 86th percentile means it can drive a GPU that is higher than the 68th percentile without becoming a major bottleneck. The memory support for DDR5 also allows for future speed increases, though the current dual-channel configuration is standard. The lack of a launch MSRP for the CPU means pricing is not listed, but the GPU’s launch MSRP is 249 USD.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B580 is a discrete GPU based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process. It features 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, with a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units. It includes 20 ray tracing cores, and its FP32 performance is 13.67 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 27.34 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

Memory is a key strength: 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, providing 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2375 MHz, effective 19 Gbps. This large VRAM capacity is unusual at this performance tier and allows for higher texture quality and resolution without running out of memory. The GPU’s base and boost clocks are both 2670 MHz.

The benchmark scores show a mixed picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3068 is a modern DX12 test, and the GPU’s nearest rival, the RTX 3080, is only 0.7% ahead in average score. This suggests the B580 is competitive with a previous-generation high-end card in aggregate raster performance. However, the Geekbench Vulkan score of 109672 indicates strong API-level performance, while the OpenCL score of 92821 is slightly lower.

The GPU’s 68th percentile ranking places it above average but not in the top tier. The 12 GB VRAM is a differentiator, as many cards in this percentile have only 8 GB. For rendering, the 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 and 20 RT cores provide decent compute and ray tracing capabilities, though the RT performance is not top-tier. The pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s are solid for its class.

The GPU’s power draw is 190W, and it requires a 450W PSU. It uses a single 8-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card measuring 272 mm in length. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, supporting modern high-refresh monitors. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Who Should Build It

This system is best suited for gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh and 1440p high-settings gaming. The CPU’s 86th percentile ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 68th percentile handle most games at these resolutions. Esports players will find the CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost clock and PassMark single-thread score of 3873 ideal for maximizing FPS in titles like CS2 or Valorant.

Content creators who prioritize CPU rendering will benefit from the 16 threads and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000. Video editors can leverage the 12 GB GPU memory for effects and the CPU for export. 3D artists using CPU renderers will see strong performance, while those using GPU renderers will find the 13.67 TFLOPS acceptable for medium-complexity scenes.

Software developers and data analysts will appreciate the high integer and floating-point math scores (87844 and 66558). The 16 threads accelerate compilation, and the 65W CPU TDP keeps power costs low during long builds. Students and office workers get a system that never feels slow, with the GPU providing optional acceleration for creative projects. Small business workstations that need reliable multi-threaded performance for databases or spreadsheets will find the CPU’s data compression score of 340026 valuable.

The system is not ideal for 4K gaming, as the GPU’s 68th percentile will struggle with the highest settings. It is also not a top-tier compute workstation, as the GPU’s 20 RT cores are not enough for heavy ray-traced rendering. However, for the majority of users who want a fast, well-rounded desktop, this pairing delivers.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F scores 23000 points in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc B580 have?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU build?

A: The combined percentile is 77, indicating it outperforms 77% of all configurations in the database.

Q: Is the GPU faster than an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080?

A: Yes, the Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021, which is 0.6% higher than the RTX 2080’s score of 22895.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so the i5-14490F is not unlocked for overclocking.

Q: What is the GPU’s power consumption and PSU requirement?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 190W, and the suggested PSU is 450W.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all gaming FPS figures are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores and are not guaranteed to match real-world results.

Based on the CPU’s 86th percentile and the GPU’s 68th percentile, the estimated performance at 1080p ultra settings is strong. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3247 and PassMark single-thread of 3873 suggest it will not bottleneck modern games. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3068, which is competitive with the RTX 3080 (0.7% behind), implies that in rasterized titles, the B580 can deliver high frame rates at 1080p. Expect 100+ FPS in well-optimized games like esports titles, and 60-90 FPS in demanding AAA games at ultra settings.

At 1440p, the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM becomes an advantage, allowing high texture settings without memory overflow. The GPU’s 456.0 GB/s bandwidth and 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 suggest it can handle 1440p ultra in older or less demanding games, but newer titles may require lowering settings to high or medium to maintain 60 FPS. The CPU will not be a limiting factor at this resolution.

At 4K, the GPU’s 68th percentile is insufficient for ultra settings. The 12 GB VRAM is enough, but the raw compute power is not. Expect to reduce settings to medium or use upscaling to achieve playable frame rates. The CPU’s performance becomes irrelevant at this resolution, as the GPU is the clear bottleneck. The lack of measured data means these are estimates, but the synthetic scores provide a reasonable basis for these expectations.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) pairing the Intel Core i5-14490F with the Intel Arc B580. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake Refresh part with a 65W TDP, and the GPU is a Battlemage (Arc 5) generation card with a 190W TDP and 12 GB VRAM. The combined percentile is 77, placing this system in the upper-midrange tier of the database.

The CPU’s 86th percentile and GPU’s 68th percentile define the system’s character. It is a CPU-heavy configuration, meaning it excels in productivity tasks like rendering and compilation while remaining a capable gaming machine. The GPU’s closest rival, the RTX 3080, is only 0.7% ahead in average score, which highlights the B580’s strong price-to-performance ratio (though price is not discussed here). The system is well-balanced for its intended use case: high-refresh 1080p gaming and serious multi-threaded work. The 12 GB VRAM provides future-proofing for higher resolutions, and the 24 MB L3 cache on the CPU ensures responsive gameplay. Overall, this pairing delivers a cohesive experience for users who need both strong compute and solid graphics performance without stepping into the highest echelon of hardware.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + Intel Arc B580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14490F

Intel Arc B580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds