SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14490F

38,149 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-14490F + Intel Arc A580

This pairing combines Intel’s 10-core Raptor Lake refresh processor with Intel’s Arc A580 graphics card, targeting a desktop build that sits at the 87th percentile across all CPU-GPU combinations in the database. The CPU carries a 65 W TDP and boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the GPU brings 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Benchmark data for this exact combination is estimated, not measured — no measured FPS rows exist for this pairing in the FACT PACK, so all gaming performance figures below are projections from the individual component scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14490F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R refresh) using Intel’s 10 nm process node. It operates at a 2.50 GHz base clock and reaches 5.00 GHz boost, with a 65 W TDP that makes it a moderate-power desktop part. The cache hierarchy is substantial for a mainstream chip: 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The die measures 215 mm², and the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with PCIe Gen 5 providing 16 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded performer. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23000 places this CPU in the 86th percentile among all processors, while the single-core score of 3247 indicates solid per-thread performance. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score of 9660 and single-core score of 1363 follow the same pattern — the chip scales well across all cores. The R15 results (2318 multicore, 327 single-core) reinforce this consistency.

PassMark tests reveal workload-specific strengths. The multithread score of 28662 and integer math score of 87844 suggest strong general-purpose compute, while floating-point math at 66558 and data compression at 340026 point to capable number-crunching and archival workloads. The extended instructions score of 21731 shows good SIMD throughput, and data encryption at 18225 indicates reasonable security-related processing. The single-thread score of 3873 confirms the boost clock translates into real per-core performance.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the i5-14490F sits within a tight band. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T scores 38194 on average (0.1% higher), the Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38103 (0.1% lower), the AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38221 (0.2% higher), and the Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 38261 (0.3% higher). The average benchmark score of 38149 means this chip is essentially interchangeable with those competitors in aggregate performance — differences of less than 0.3% are within noise for most workloads. For real-world use, this means the i5-14490F delivers comparable multi-core throughput to a 13th-gen i5-K series part while being a locked multiplier chip (multiplier unlocked: false) on the same LGA 1700 platform.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 87 places this pairing above most desktop builds, but the balance between CPU and GPU is not perfectly matched. The CPU’s 86th percentile and the GPU’s 87th percentile are nearly identical, which suggests neither component dramatically outclasses the other in raw benchmark terms. However, the nature of the workloads matters more than the aggregate percentiles.

For CPU-bound tasks like data compression (340026 in PassMark), integer math (87844), and multithreaded rendering (23000 in Cinebench R23), the i5-14490F will be the limiting factor only if the GPU is idle. Conversely, for GPU-bound scenarios like 3D rendering with ray tracing or high-resolution gaming, the Arc A580’s 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth will dominate the equation. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 175 W TDP create a system where the GPU draws nearly three times the power — an indication that the graphics card is the heavier load in gaming and rendering tasks.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent because no measured FPS data exists for this pairing. Based on the benchmark scores, the CPU’s single-thread performance (3873 in PassMark, 3247 in Cinebench R23) is more than sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios; the Arc A580’s 87th percentile GPU rank means it will likely be the bottleneck at 1080p and 1440p in graphically intense titles, while the CPU becomes the constraint in lightly threaded games or at very high frame rates where the GPU has headroom. The 16 threads and 5.00 GHz boost help avoid severe CPU stalls, but the 8 GB VRAM on the GPU could limit texture-heavy workloads before either chip reaches peak compute.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The i5-14490F’s single-core score of 3873 in PassMark and 3247 in Cinebench R23 provide the per-thread speed needed for high-refresh monitors, while the Arc A580’s 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate deliver adequate frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. The 8 GB memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth should handle most competitive titles, but the GPU’s 87th percentile rank suggests it will cap frame rates in demanding games before the CPU does.

Streaming: The 10 cores and 16 threads give the CPU headroom for encoding workloads alongside gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 28662 and data encryption score of 18225 indicate the i5-14490F can handle software encoding at moderate bitrates, though the GPU’s lack of dedicated tensor cores means hardware-accelerated encoding relies on Intel’s media engine rather than AI upscaling.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore of 23000 and PassMark floating-point math of 66558 point to strong performance in timeline rendering and effects processing. The GPU’s 24.58 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) can accelerate preview rendering in supported applications, and the 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 23000 Cinebench R23 multicore score provides solid CPU-based rendering throughput, while the GPU’s 24 ray tracing cores and 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 support GPU-accelerated renderers. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth helps with large scene data, but the 8 GB memory may limit extremely complex scenes.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 87844 and data compression score of 340026 indicate strong compilation and build performance. The 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 24 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequent code recompilation.

Student and office work: The 65 W TDP keeps power draw modest, and the single-thread score of 3873 ensures responsive everyday use. The CPU’s 86th percentile rank means it is overkill for basic office tasks, but the combination with the Arc A580 provides headroom for occasional photo editing or light 3D work without being a power-hungry workstation.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14490F uses the LGA 1700 socket, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface — so the CPU’s PCIe lanes are backward-compatible but the GPU does not tap into Gen 5 bandwidth. This platform is current-generation for Intel’s 14th Gen Core series, with the production status marked as active for both components.

Memory flexibility is a key advantage. The dual-channel support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means builders can choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5 depending on motherboard selection. The lack of ECC support (eccMemory: false) rules out error-correcting memory for workstation use. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is modest, and the GPU’s suggested PSU of 450 W means a typical 500-550 W power supply is sufficient for the whole system, leaving room for modest upgrades.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, since the CPU’s 86th percentile leaves headroom for more powerful graphics cards. The Arc A580’s 87th percentile is close to the CPU, so moving to a GPU in the 90th+ percentile would shift the balance toward GPU-bound workloads without requiring a CPU change. Alternatively, upgrading memory from DDR4 to DDR5 (if starting with DDR4) could improve memory bandwidth for data-heavy tasks, though the CPU’s performance is already competitive with rivals like the Core i5-13600KF (0.1% difference). The platform does not support an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not an option — a CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard if moving to a different socket.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all gaming figures below are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores. The Arc A580’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 79381 indicate capable 1080p performance, while the CPU’s single-core strength (3873 PassMark) ensures minimal frame pacing issues.

At 1080p with ultra settings, expect the GPU to be the primary limiter in most titles. The 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest frame rates in the range of 60-100 FPS for moderately demanding games, with lighter esports titles exceeding that. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p ultra textures in most current games, though titles with very large texture packs may cause stuttering. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth helps mitigate VRAM pressure, but it cannot replace capacity.

At 1440p, the GPU’s 87th percentile rank indicates playable frame rates in most games, but ultra settings may push the 8 GB VRAM to its limit. The 24 ray tracing cores provide hardware RT support, but the 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 is modest for ray-traced workloads — expect to lower RT settings or use upscaling. The CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost and 24 MB L3 cache keep frame times consistent, so the bottleneck at this resolution is the GPU’s raw compute rather than CPU feeding.

At 4K, the Arc A580 is likely below the threshold for smooth ultra gaming. The 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 8 GB memory will struggle with high-resolution textures and heavy shading — this pairing is better suited to 1080p high-refresh or 1440p medium-high settings. The CPU would not be the limiting factor at 4K; the GPU’s 175 W TDP and 12.29 TFLOPS are the constraining specs.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A580 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation, Arc 5 series) using TSMC’s 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It runs at a 1700 MHz base clock and 2000 MHz boost, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a strong figure that helps the GPU punch above its compute class in bandwidth-sensitive workloads.

The GPU has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs, producing a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s. The 24 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for RT workloads, though the FP32 throughput of 12.29 TFLOPS is the more relevant figure for standard rasterization. FP16 performance doubles to 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), which benefits compute tasks that can use reduced precision. The GPU does not list tensor cores, so AI-accelerated features rely on other hardware paths.

Benchmark results confirm the GPU’s mid-range positioning. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657 place it in the 87th percentile among all GPUs. The average benchmark score of 57756 is close to the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58085, 0.6% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (57367, 0.7% higher), the Intel Arc A570M (58239, 0.8% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58392, 1.1% higher). This means the A580 sits in a tight competitive cluster where differences of ±1% are negligible — it trades blows with those rivals depending on the specific workload.

The 175 W TDP with dual 8-pin power connectors and a suggested PSU of 450 W makes it a moderate-power card. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, supporting modern monitors. API support covers DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current and near-future titles. The 8 GB memory capacity is the most limiting factor for longevity, as texture-heavy games at higher resolutions will exceed this budget.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 38149, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, scores 38194 (0.1% higher), while the Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38103 (0.1% lower) — the i5-14490F is effectively tied with both. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38221 (0.2% higher) and the Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 38261 (0.3% higher), all within a 0.3% band. This indicates the CPU’s performance is highly competitive but not class-leading; it matches the previous generation’s i5-K series and newer Ultra parts.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 57756, putting it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58085 (0.6% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE scores 57367 (0.7% higher), the Intel Arc A570M scores 58239 (0.8% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58392 (1.1% higher). The Arc A580 is the lowest-scoring of this group but by less than 1.1%, so the differences are minor in practice.

The combined percentile of 87 reflects the balanced pairing of two mid-to-high percentile components. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23000 and the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2229 together suggest a system that handles both CPU-heavy productivity and GPU-accelerated graphics without a glaring weak point. The PassMark multithread score of 28662 for the CPU and Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657 for the GPU reinforce this — neither component drags the other down significantly.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node.

Q: How much VRAM does the Arc A580 have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false), so overclocking is not supported on this part.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i5-14490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel memory bus, but ECC memory is not supported.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT?

A: The Arc A580 scores 1.1% lower than the RX 6950 XT in average benchmark score (57756 vs 58392), which is a minor difference in real-world performance.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Arc A580 is 450 W, with a 175 W TDP and dual 8-pin power connectors.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A580 has 24 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets builders who want a balanced 1080p gaming and productivity machine without overspending on either component. The CPU’s 86th percentile and GPU’s 87th percentile make it suitable for high-refresh 1080p gaming — the 5.00 GHz boost and 12.29 TFLOPS GPU handle esports and moderate AAA titles smoothly, though 4K gaming is not realistic with 8 GB VRAM.

Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 23000 Cinebench R23 multicore score and the GPU’s 24.58 TFLOPS FP16 compute. The 16 threads handle parallel encoding and rendering tasks, while the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth moves large frame buffers efficiently. Software developers will appreciate the 87844 integer math score and 340026 data compression score for fast builds and archive operations.

Students and office workers get a system that is overkill for basic tasks but provides headroom for photo editing, light CAD, or occasional gaming. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps idle power low, and the 450 W suggested PSU means the system does not require a high-end power supply. Small business workstations that run multi-threaded applications like data analysis or virtualization will find the 10 cores and 24 MB L3 cache sufficient for moderate loads.

The combination is less ideal for enthusiasts seeking 1440p ultra or 4K gaming — the GPU’s 8 GB memory and 12.29 TFLOPS will bottleneck at those resolutions. Similarly, professionals relying on AI-accelerated workflows should note the lack of tensor cores on the GPU. For the target audience of 1080p gamers and general productivity users, this build offers a well-matched CPU-GPU pair with no single component dramatically limiting the other.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + Intel Arc A580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14490F

Intel Arc A580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds