SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14490F

38,149 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14490F is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It uses Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². The chip operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, providing a wide frequency range that suits both bursty single-threaded workloads and sustained multi-threaded tasks. The thermal design power is 65 W, which keeps it within reach of mainstream cooling solutions without requiring exotic setups. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, a configuration that helps feed the 10 cores efficiently across diverse application demands.

In terms of raw benchmark performance, the i5-14490F posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 and a single-core score of 3247. The multi-core result places it in the 86th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors currently tracked. The nearest rivals show how tightly grouped this segment is: the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T scores 38194 on average, which is just 0.1% higher, while the Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38103, a 0.1% deficit. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 sits 0.2% ahead, and the Intel Core i5-13600HX trails by 0.3%. These sub-percentage differences indicate that the i5-14490F is effectively at parity with the top of its performance class, with real-world differences more likely to come from cooling, memory, and platform configuration than from the processor itself.

The PassMark suite reinforces the CPU's balanced character. The multi-thread score is 28662, while single-thread performance is 3873. Integer math scores 87844, floating-point math scores 66558, and extended instructions score 21731. Data compression hits 340026, data encryption reaches 18225, and random string sorting scores 35608. Physics processing scores 2093, and prime number finding scores 122. These figures paint a picture of a processor that handles arithmetic, encryption, compression, and physics simulation with consistent competence, without any obvious weak spot that would bottleneck a general-purpose desktop.

For real workloads, the 65 W TDP and 10-core/16-thread configuration make the i5-14490F a strong fit for compile jobs, spreadsheet recalculation, database queries, and multi-tasking environments where many threads are in flight simultaneously. The boost clock of 5.00 GHz ensures that single-threaded tasks like legacy application code or lightly threaded scripts still receive snappy execution. The 24 MB of L3 cache is generous for this class and helps with datasets that fit within that footprint, reducing repeated memory traffic.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination; the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components, not observed results. Treat the following as directional guidance rather than guaranteed performance.

Given the CPU's 86th percentile standing and the GPU's 44th percentile position, the Arc A380 will almost certainly be the limiting factor in gaming scenarios. The i5-14490F has ample headroom to feed frames to the GPU, but the Arc A380's 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus with 186.0 GB/s bandwidth, combined with its 1024 shading units and 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, caps the overall output. For 1080p ultra settings in modern titles, expect playable but not high-refresh results; the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 6252 and DirectX 12 score of 35 suggest that newer API titles will run but with frame rates that hover near console-like 30-60 FPS territory depending on the game's optimization.

At 1440p, the Arc A380 will struggle more significantly. The 6 GB frame buffer and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest for that resolution, and the 44th GPU percentile places it below the median of tracked graphics cards. Users targeting 1440p should expect to reduce settings to medium or low to maintain playable frame rates, and even then, some titles may not reach 60 FPS consistently. The GPU's nearest rivals—AMD FirePro W5170M at 0.4% higher score, AMD Radeon HD 8870M at 1.1% lower, NVIDIA GeForce MX330 at 1.2% lower, and AMD Radeon 880M at 1.4% lower—confirm that this is entry-level discrete graphics territory, closer to integrated solutions in some cases than to dedicated gaming GPUs.

For esports and lightweight titles, the picture improves. Games that are CPU-bound or that scale well on modest GPUs will run comfortably, and the i5-14490F's strong single-thread score of 3247 in Cinebench R23 and PassMark single-thread score of 3873 will keep frame pacing smooth. The Arc A380's 8 ray tracing cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support mean that ray-traced effects are technically available, but the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will limit ray tracing to low resolutions and minimal ray counts.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark scores is one of a CPU that vastly outperforms its GPU companion. The i5-14490F's average benchmark score is 38149, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are within 0.3% in either direction, confirming that it sits at the top of its performance tier. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2318 and single-core score of 327, along with the R20 scores of 9660 multi-core and 1363 single-core, all reinforce the same conclusion: this is a high-end mainstream processor.

The Intel Arc A380, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 8558 and sits in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD FirePro W5170M (8595, 0.4% higher), AMD Radeon HD 8870M (8462, 1.1% lower), NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (8458, 1.2% lower), and AMD Radeon 880M (8436, 1.4% lower). The Geekbench scores of 38224 for OpenCL and 36736 for Vulkan show that the GPU has reasonable compute potential for its class, but the PassMark DirectX scores—37 for DirectX 10, 38 for DirectX 11, 35 for DirectX 12, and 73 for DirectX 9—indicate that real-world graphics workloads do not translate into high throughput. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 is a clear signal of limited gaming capability.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 65, which reflects the CPU pulling the overall score upward while the GPU drags it down. In practical terms, this means the system will excel at computation-heavy tasks that leverage the CPU, but will underdeliver in graphics-intensive scenarios. The split is stark: the CPU outperforms 86% of all processors, while the GPU outperforms only 44% of all graphics cards. For any workload where the GPU matters, the Arc A380 is the ceiling.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else and are willing to accept entry-level graphics as a secondary concern. The i5-14490F's 86th percentile CPU standing makes it a natural fit for software developers compiling large codebases, data analysts running complex queries, and small business workstations that handle office suites, spreadsheets, and database applications with many concurrent threads. The 10-core, 16-thread configuration and 23000 Cinebench R23 multi-core score ensure that these workloads complete quickly, and the PassMark data compression score of 340026 indicates strong throughput for file archiving and backup tasks.

Content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound applications—audio processing, batch photo editing, or non-GPU-accelerated video encoding—will find the i5-14490F sufficient, provided they do not rely on the Arc A380 for rendering or effects. The CPU's floating-point math score of 66558 and extended instructions score of 21731 show healthy computational throughput for scientific and engineering software. Students and office users will see negligible benefit from the GPU for typical tasks, but the CPU ensures smooth multitasking across dozens of browser tabs, document editors, and communication tools.

Gamers at 1080p with modest expectations can build around this pairing for esports and older titles, but the Arc A380's 44th GPU percentile means that modern AAA games at high settings will be disappointing. Users who plan to game should budget for a stronger GPU later, as the CPU has ample headroom to support a mid-range or even high-end graphics card without becoming the bottleneck.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14490F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose memory based on budget and availability, though the CPU does not support ECC memory. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, ensuring that future graphics cards and NVMe drives can run at full bandwidth. The platform is mature, with a wide range of motherboards available across price points.

The Arc A380 has a TDP of 75 W and requires a 250 W suggested power supply, with a single 8-pin power connector. The CPU's 65 W TDP means that the total system power draw is modest, and most standard ATX power supplies will handle the load without issue. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs.

For a sensible next upgrade, the GPU is the obvious candidate. The CPU's performance headroom—86th percentile—means that swapping the Arc A380 for a more capable graphics card will yield substantial gaming improvements without requiring a CPU change. The 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and dual-channel memory support are future-proof enough for at least one more GPU generation. The CPU itself is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is not an option, but the boost clock of 5.00 GHz already provides high single-thread performance. The platform is effectively end-of-life for new CPU releases, so further CPU upgrades would require a motherboard change, but the i5-14490F is strong enough that this is unlikely to be a near-term need.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14490F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics field is listed as N/A, so a discrete GPU like the Arc A380 is required for display output.

Q: What memory types does the i5-14490F support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, but ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the Arc A380's launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP is 149 USD.

Q: How does the i5-14490F compare to the Intel Core i5-13600KF?

A: The i5-14490F's average benchmark score is 38149, which is 0.1% higher than the i5-13600KF's 38103, making them effectively identical in performance.

Q: Is the Arc A380 suitable for 1440p gaming?

A: Based on its 44th GPU percentile and 6 GB memory capacity, 1440p gaming would require reduced settings, and even then some titles may not reach 60 FPS. The GPU is better suited to 1080p.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for the Arc A380?

A: The suggested PSU is 250 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 75 W with a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: Does the i5-14490F support PCIe Gen 5?

A: Yes, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This pairing is not suited to high-refresh gaming at modern settings. The Arc A380's 44th GPU percentile and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 indicate that frame rates will be modest, and the CPU's strength will largely go unused in GPU-bound scenarios. For 1080p esports titles, frame rates may reach playable levels, but 144 Hz or higher is unrealistic for demanding games.

Streaming: The i5-14490F's 10 cores and 16 threads provide enough headroom for software encoding at reasonable quality, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000. However, the Arc A380 does not have a strong hardware encoder reputation, so streamers should plan to use CPU-based encoding, which will work but may impact gaming performance if the game is also CPU-heavy.

Video editing: CPU-based editing and encoding are viable, as the 23000 multi-core score and PassMark data compression score of 340026 indicate strong throughput for codecs that rely on the CPU. GPU-accelerated effects and rendering will be limited by the Arc A380's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 2762 PassMark GPU compute score, so expect slower previews and longer render times for GPU-accelerated workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU will handle CPU-based renderers well, with the multi-thread score of 28662 in PassMark and 23000 in Cinebench R23. GPU-based renderers will be disappointing, as the Arc A380's compute performance is entry-level, and its 6 GB memory may not fit larger scenes.

Software development: This is a strong scenario. The 10-core/16-thread CPU with a 5.00 GHz boost clock handles compilation, testing, and container workloads efficiently, and the 86th CPU percentile means it outperforms most systems. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this pairing a cost-effective choice for developers.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3873 in PassMark ensures snappy application launches and responsive document editing, while the multi-thread capability handles multitasking across many applications. The GPU is more than enough for 2D desktop rendering and basic video playback, and the 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-14490F with the Intel Arc A380. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake-R part with a 65 W TDP, and the GPU is an entry-level Alchemist (Arc 3) card with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 75 W TDP. The combined percentile is 65, which places the overall system in the upper-mid range of tracked configurations, but the split between components is significant: the CPU sits at the 86th percentile while the GPU sits at the 44th percentile. This is a CPU-centric build where the processor dictates the system's class, and the GPU is a placeholder for basic display and light gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The imbalance between the i5-14490F and the Arc A380 is substantial and will define the user experience. The CPU's 86th percentile versus the GPU's 44th percentile means that in any GPU-intensive workload—gaming, GPU rendering, GPU compute—the Arc A380 will be the sole bottleneck. The benchmark data supports this: the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 is far above the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808, and the PassMark multi-thread score of 28662 versus the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 6252 shows the disparity clearly.

In CPU-bound workloads, the balance is reversed. Compilation, data processing, and multi-threaded productivity tasks will run at speeds consistent with the CPU's 86th percentile, and the GPU will sit mostly idle. For those workloads, the pairing is well balanced because the GPU is not a factor. However, for any workload that offloads to the GPU, such as DirectX 12 gaming, the Arc A380's 35 PassMark DirectX 12 score and 44th percentile will cap performance well below what the CPU can feed. Users who intend to game or use GPU-accelerated applications should treat this as a temporary configuration and plan a GPU upgrade; the CPU has enough headroom to support a much stronger graphics card without becoming the limiting factor.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14490F + Intel Arc A380

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14490F

Intel Arc A380

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds