SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400F

32,279 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070

23,877 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-14400F with the AMD Radeon RX 9070, creating a desktop platform that sits at the 76th combined percentile across all CPU+GPU pairings in the database. The processor, a 10-core Raptor Lake-R part, and the graphics card, based on the RDNA 4.0 Navi 48 chip, deliver a balanced combination for 1080p and 1440p gaming while offering enough compute headroom for productivity tasks. Measured frame rates across dozens of titles confirm the GPU drives high-refresh gaming at 1920x1080, while the CPU’s multi-threaded scores support streaming and content creation workloads without becoming the primary constraint.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1920x1080, this pairing is clearly strong. Measured results show Counter-Strike 2 at 239 FPS, Valorant at 468.2 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X at 285.2 FPS, all at 1080p ultra settings. The pair’s average FPS across all tested games is 149.7, and the frame rates in competitive titles comfortably exceed the 144 Hz threshold. At 2560x1440, esports titles remain fluid, with Counter-Strike 2 at 158 FPS and Valorant at 441.3 FPS, while heavier titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 53.2 FPS, indicating that 1440p high-refresh is achievable for less demanding games but not for the most graphically intensive ones.

Streaming benefits materially from the CPU’s multi-threaded capacity. The Core i5-14400F scores 21645 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 25470 in Passmark multithread, both of which indicate enough parallel headroom to encode video while a game runs. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth also help when using hardware encoding, though the CPU’s strong Passmark data encryption score of 16949 suggests it can handle software encoding without choking.

Video editing workflows depend on both components. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3055 and multicore score of 21645 provide solid timeline responsiveness and render performance. The GPU’s 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 throughput accelerates effects, and its 56 ray accelerators support hardware-accelerated rendering in modern editors. The 16 GB frame buffer is also ample for 4K preview timelines, as evidenced by the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 131539.

3D rendering and CAD workloads lean heavily on the CPU’s core configuration. With 10 cores and 16 threads, the i5-14400F produces a Passmark floating point math score of 61319 and an integer math score of 81524, which translate to strong performance for physics simulations and geometry processing. The GPU’s Passmark GPU compute score of 14737 adds further acceleration for GPU-based renderers, though the CPU remains the primary engine for single-threaded modeling tasks.

Software development is a comfortable fit. The CPU’s Passmark data compression score of 315521 speeds up build pipelines and archive operations, while the 20 MB L3 cache reduces latency for repetitive compilation steps. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility allow for testing graphics APIs, and the CPU’s ECC memory support adds stability for long-running test suites.

Student and office work are easily handled, though this pairing is overqualified. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 3701 and the GPU’s Passmark G2D score of 1280 ensure snappy UI responsiveness for spreadsheets, browsers, and document editing. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power draw modest in idle scenarios, and the 550 W suggested PSU provides ample headroom for the entire system in these lighter loads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32279, placing it at the 83rd percentile among all processors. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (32233, 0.1% faster), the Intel Core i9-11900 (32226, 0.2% faster), and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS (32354, 0.2% slower). These margins are negligible, meaning the i5-14400F performs statistically on par with a previous-generation high-end desktop chip and a current mobile processor, which is notable for a mid-range desktop part.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 23877, placing it at the 69th percentile among all graphics cards. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z (23736, 0.6% faster), the AMD Radeon RX 6800S (24063, 0.8% slower), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile (23628, 1.1% faster). The GPU sits within a tight band of these older or mobile parts, but its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6290 and Passmark G3D score of 25381 indicate it is a current-generation part that trades blows with those established cards.

The combined picture shows a balanced system. The CPU’s 83rd percentile is higher than the GPU’s 69th, suggesting the processor has more relative headroom than the graphics card. The pair’s combined percentile of 76 reflects this middle ground. In the pair ranking, this build ranks 1198 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 149.7 across all tested games, which places it in the top third of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and it has ECC memory support, which is unusual for a consumer part.

Benchmark results indicate strong multi-threaded performance for the price tier. Cinebench R23 multicore scores 21645, while the single-core score is 3055. Geekbench multicore is 11268 and single-core is 2058. Passmark multithread reaches 25470, with a single-thread score of 3701. The Passmark physics score of 1523 suggests gaming physics are handled well, and the data compression score of 315521 indicates strong file-handling capabilities.

The architecture uses a hybrid design, though the FACT PACK does not specify the P-core/E-core split. The 10 cores and 16 threads imply a configuration of performance and efficiency cores, which balances high-frequency single-thread work with parallel throughput. The boost clock of 4.70 GHz drives the single-core scores, while the 20 MB L3 cache helps with latency-sensitive workloads.

Real-world implications are clear. For gaming, the CPU’s single-thread performance is sufficient to feed the RX 9070 at 1080p, as measured frame rates in esports titles exceed 200 FPS. For productivity, the multi-threaded scores place it just behind or ahead of older i9 and Ryzen 7 parts, making it suitable for compiling, rendering, and streaming. The 65 W TDP also means cooling requirements are modest, which is a practical advantage for small form factor builds.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh will find this pairing nearly ideal. Measured FPS at 1920x1080 for competitive titles like Counter-Strike 2 (239 FPS), Valorant (468.2 FPS), and Rainbow Six Siege X (285.2 FPS) far exceed the refresh rates of most monitors. For 1440p gaming, the GPU still delivers playable frame rates in AAA titles, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 53.2 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 46.2 FPS, though esports titles like Overpower (86 FPS) remain fluid.

Content creators who edit video or work with 3D graphics benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded performance and the GPU’s compute capability. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21645 and the GPU’s Passmark GPU compute score of 14737 accelerate rendering tasks. The 16 GB VRAM is particularly useful for large textures and high-resolution previews, as seen in the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 131539.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s Passmark data compression score of 315521, which speeds up build and deployment cycles. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running processes, and the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support provides flexibility for platform costs. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 support enable modern graphics programming.

Students and small business workstations are served adequately, though the hardware is more powerful than typical office tasks require. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3701 and the GPU’s G2D score of 1280 ensure smooth operation for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet analysis. The 65 W CPU TDP and 220 W GPU TDP keep power consumption manageable for standard office environments.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data suggests the GPU is the limiting factor for most gaming workloads. The CPU’s 83rd percentile versus the GPU’s 69th percentile means the processor has more relative headroom. Measured FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p confirms this: for example, Counter-Strike 2 drops from 239 FPS at 1080p to 158 FPS at 1440p, a 34% reduction that is GPU-driven. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 25381 is the primary constraint in these scenarios.

However, the CPU can become a bottleneck in specific high-FPS esports scenarios. Valorant at 1080p reaches 468.2 FPS, which is near the CPU’s single-thread limit, as the GPU is not fully utilized at such extreme frame rates. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 3701 sets an upper bound for games that are heavily single-threaded, though this is rarely an issue at standard refresh rates.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU’s multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multicore 21645, Passmark multithread 25470) are strong but not class-leading, meaning rendering tasks are CPU-limited. The GPU’s compute score of 14737 is sufficient for acceleration but not overwhelming. In mixed workloads like streaming while gaming, the CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads provide enough parallel capacity to encode video without starving the game, as evidenced by the Passmark physics score of 1523.

Gaming Performance

This pairing delivers measured ultra-settings performance across a wide range of games. At 1920x1080, the average FPS across all tested titles is 149.7, with many games exceeding 100 FPS. Competitive shooters lead the pack: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 528.9 FPS, Valorant reaches 468.2 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege X achieves 285.2 FPS. Minecraft runs at 236 FPS, and Roblox at 311.2 FPS, indicating strong performance for lighter titles.

At 2560x1440, frame rates remain playable for most games. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 158 FPS, while Valorant sustains 441.3 FPS. Assetto Corsa hits 99.9 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 128.6 FPS. Heavier titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (53.2 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (46.2 FPS) fall below 60 FPS but remain playable with settings adjustments. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM prevents capacity issues at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to struggle with demanding titles. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 33.9 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 35.1 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 10.8 FPS. Competitive titles fare better, with Valorant at 369.8 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 89 FPS. The GPU’s 69th percentile and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth limit 4K performance, making this a 1080p and 1440p gaming build first.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is based on the Navi 48 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process with 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die. It has a base clock of 1330 MHz, a game clock of 2070 MHz, and a boost clock of 2520 MHz. The memory subsystem includes 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 3584 shading units, 224 TMUs, and 128 ROPs, with 56 ray accelerators.

Compute performance is substantial. The GPU achieves 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 (1:1), with a pixel rate of 322.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 564.5 GTexel/s. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6290 and Passmark G3D score of 25381 place it at the 69th percentile, just ahead of the NVIDIA GTX TITAN Z (23736) and behind the AMD RX 6800S (24063). The Geekbench Vulkan score of 58705 indicates strong API-agnostic compute.

The ray accelerators are critical for modern rendering. The 56 RT cores support DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in games and DCC applications. However, measured performance in ray-traced titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (68.8 FPS at 1080p) suggests the RT performance is adequate but not class-leading. The GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 74 is notably low, which may indicate driver or benchmark-specific limitations, but real-world gaming performance contradicts that single metric.

The 16 GB frame buffer is a key advantage. At 4K, textures can consume over 8 GB, and the 644.6 GB/s bandwidth ensures data transfer keeps pace with the 128 ROPs. The GPU’s dual-slot design and 2x 8-pin power connectors require a 550 W PSU, which is reasonable for the performance level.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The pair sits at the 76th combined percentile across all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Core i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32279, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (32233) and 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i9-11900 (32226).

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The Radeon RX 9070 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games?

A: The pair achieves an average FPS of 149.7 across all tested games, ranking 1198 out of 3732 pairs.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14400F supports ECC memory, which is confirmed in the FACT PACK.

Q: What is the GPU’s process node and transistor count?

A: The GPU uses a 4 nm process from TSMC with 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this GPU?

A: The Radeon RX 9070 has a TDP of 220 W and requires a 550 W power supply, with 2x 8-pin power connectors.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-14400F and AMD Radeon RX 9070. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, with a 65 W TDP and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The GPU is a 16 GB Navi 48-based card with a 220 W TDP. The combined percentile of 76 indicates this is a mid-to-upper tier pairing, with the CPU performing at the 83rd percentile and the GPU at the 69th percentile.

The pairing is best described as a 1080p and 1440p gaming system with productivity capabilities. Measured frame rates at 1080p exceed 100 FPS in most games, and the CPU’s multi-threaded scores support streaming and content creation. The GPU’s 69th percentile places it in the mid-range of all graphics cards, but its 16 GB VRAM and 36.13 TFLOPS compute make it competitive with older high-end parts like the GTX TITAN Z and RTX 3080 Mobile.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. The socket also provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is more than sufficient for the GPU’s PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, leaving substantial headroom for higher-TDP processors on the same socket, though the platform generation limits future CPU upgrades to the same socket family.

The GPU’s suggested PSU is 550 W, which is modest for a 220 W graphics card. This leaves headroom for additional drives or peripherals, but not necessarily for a more power-hungry GPU. The dual-slot design and 2x 8-pin connectors are standard, and the PCIe 5.0 x16 interface ensures no bandwidth bottleneck with current or near-future motherboards.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-TDP GPU with more compute performance, as the GPU is the current bottleneck for 4K gaming. The CPU’s 83rd percentile suggests it can support a more powerful graphics card without becoming the limiting factor in most workloads. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster DDR5 could improve the CPU’s performance in memory-sensitive tasks, given its dual-channel support.