SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400F

32,279 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

50,951 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Hardware Analysis: Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

This pairing combines a 10-core Intel Raptor Lake desktop processor with an AMD RDNA 2 flagship graphics card, targeting a desktop build that sits in the 85th percentile overall against all CPU+GPU pairings in the database. The CPU alone ranks in the 83rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands in the 86th percentile among all graphics cards, indicating a well-matched set of components that both perform near the top of their respective categories. The data for this combination contains no measured FPS rows, so all gaming frame rates discussed in this analysis are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of each component rather than direct testing of the pairing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 6900 XT delivers 23.04 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and a 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, placing it comfortably in the top tier for pushing high frame rates at demanding resolutions. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4079 and Passmark G3D score of 26732 indicate strong raw rasterization performance, while the i5-14400F's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3055 provides the per-thread throughput needed to keep frame pacing consistent in CPU-bound titles.

Streaming: The combination of the i5-14400F's multithreaded capability and the GPU's dedicated video hardware makes this a viable streaming platform. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21645 and Passmark multithread score of 25470 show sufficient headroom for encoding overhead alongside game rendering, though the GPU's 16 GB GDDR6 memory helps with high-bitrate captures. The lack of integrated graphics on the i5-14400F means all display and encode tasks fall to the RX 6900 XT, which is capable but requires the system to stay within the GPU's thermal and power envelope.

Video editing: The i5-14400F's 10 cores and 16 threads handle timeline scrubbing and export workloads effectively, as evidenced by its Geekbench multicore score of 11268 and Passmark integer math score of 81524. The RX 6900 XT's 5120 shading units and 128 ROPs accelerate effects processing and preview rendering, while the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth moves large frame buffers efficiently. For 4K timelines with multiple streams, the CPU's 20 MB shared L3 cache reduces memory stalls, and the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support offers flexibility in platform memory configuration.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9090 and R15 multicore score of 2181 indicate solid performance for CPU-based rendering tasks, though this is not a workstation-class part. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 23.04 TFLOPS and texture rate of 720.0 GTexel/s accelerate viewport rendering and GPU-accelerated renderers. The 16 GB VRAM is particularly useful for complex scenes that exceed 8 GB footprints, and the 80 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing for compatible engines, though the RDNA 2 implementation trails dedicated ray tracing hardware in raw throughput.

Software development: The i5-14400F's Passmark data compression score of 315521 and extended instructions score of 19937 show strong performance for compilation workloads that leverage modern instruction sets. The single-thread score of 3701 on Passmark ensures quick response times in IDEs and build tools that rely on single-core performance. The 65 W TDP keeps power draw modest during long build sessions, and the platform's support for ECC memory (with appropriate motherboard and memory choices) adds reliability for development environments where data integrity matters.

Student and office work: The i5-14400F's Cinebench R15 single-core score of 307 and Geekbench single-core score of 2058 are more than adequate for document processing, spreadsheet calculations, and web browsing. The RX 6900 XT is massively overpowered for this workload class, but its presence means the system will never struggle with GPU-accelerated applications or multiple high-resolution displays. The 65 W CPU TDP contributes to a system that runs cool and quiet under light loads, though the GPU's 300 W TDP means the overall system still requires substantial cooling when active.

FAQ

Q: Does the Core i5-14400F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics field for this CPU is listed as "N/A," meaning the system requires a discrete GPU for any display output. The RX 6900 XT in this pairing fulfills that role.

Q: What memory types does the i5-14400F support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The specific memory bandwidth figures are not provided in the data, but the platform allows builders to choose between the two standards based on motherboard selection.

Q: How does the RX 6900 XT compare to the RTX 5070 Ti in average benchmark score?

A: The RX 6900 XT has an average benchmark score of 50951, while the RTX 5070 Ti has an average score of 49957. The AMD card leads by 2 percent according to the deltaPct value in the nearest rivals data.

Q: What is the PCIe interface for the RX 6900 XT?

A: The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), so the system has forward-looking PCIe bandwidth for future expansion.

Q: Is the i5-14400F overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked is false). The boost clock of 4.70 GHz is the maximum achievable frequency without external clock generator manipulation, which is not supported on this platform.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RX 6900 XT is 700 W. The GPU itself has a 300 W TDP and requires two 8-pin power connectors.

Q: What ray tracing hardware does the RX 6900 XT include?

A: The GPU has 80 RT cores dedicated to ray tracing acceleration, alongside 5120 shading units and 320 texture mapping units. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support confirms hardware ray tracing capability.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a Raptor Lake Refresh part built on Intel's 10 nm process, featuring 10 cores and 16 threads in a hybrid configuration that combines performance and efficiency cores. The base clock of 2.50 GHz boosts up to 4.70 GHz, and the 65 W TDP makes it one of the more power-efficient desktop processors in the Core 14th Gen lineup. The die size of 215 mm² houses 20 MB of shared L3 cache, with per-core L2 caches of 1.25 MB and per-core L1 caches of 80 KB, providing a substantial cache hierarchy for a mid-range desktop part.

Benchmark results show a CPU that punches above its power envelope. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21645 places it in strong contention with laptop processors like the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, which scores 32354 on average and trails the i5 by -0.2 percent, and the Intel Core i7-12800H at 32121, which the i5 leads by 0.5 percent. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3055 demonstrates that the boost clock of 4.70 GHz translates into excellent per-thread performance, which is critical for legacy applications and lightly threaded workloads.

The Passmark suite reveals specific strengths. The integer math score of 81524 and floating point math score of 61319 indicate balanced arithmetic capability, while the data compression score of 315521 shows strong memory subsystem performance. The extended instructions score of 19937 confirms that the CPU accelerates modern SIMD workloads effectively. The find prime numbers score of 86 is notably low, suggesting that this CPU is not optimized for the specific algorithm used in that test, but this is not representative of real-world performance across general workloads.

The nearest rivals list shows the i5-14400F sits in a tight cluster of mobile and desktop processors. Against the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, the i5 leads by 0.1 percent with an average benchmark score of 32279 versus 32233. The Intel Core i9-11900 is just 0.2 percent behind at 32226. This positions the i5-14400F as a processor that delivers last-generation flagship performance at a mid-range power budget, making it suitable for systems where thermals and power draw matter.

The architecture details matter for application compatibility. Raptor Lake-R builds on the Alder Lake design with refined clocks and cache, and the 10-core, 16-thread configuration provides a balance between single-thread responsiveness and multithreaded throughput. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with ECC support available, which is unusual for a consumer desktop part and expands its applicability to entry-level workstation builds. The lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory, but in this pairing that is already the case.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1440p or 4K resolution with high refresh rates will find this pairing well suited to their needs. The RX 6900 XT's 86th percentile GPU ranking and 23.04 TFLOPS of compute provide the raw horsepower for demanding titles at high settings, while the i5-14400F's 83rd percentile CPU ranking ensures that frame delivery is not CPU-limited in most scenarios. The 16 GB VRAM provides headroom for texture-heavy games at 4K, and the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth keeps data flowing to the GPU's 5120 shading units.

Content creators working with video editing and motion graphics will benefit from the CPU's multicore scores and the GPU's compute capabilities. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9090 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 187673 indicate that both components can accelerate rendering pipelines. The 16 GB VRAM on the GPU is particularly valuable for previewing 4K timelines without dropping to proxy files, and the CPU's 20 MB L3 cache helps with multi-stream decode workloads.

Software developers who compile large codebases or run virtualized environments will appreciate the i5-14400F's Passmark multithread score of 25470 and data encryption score of 16949. The ECC memory support adds a layer of data integrity that is important for long-running build processes or database workloads. The 10 cores and 16 threads provide ample parallelism for modern build tools that scale across cores.

Students and office workers who need a system that will remain responsive for years will find this build offers substantial longevity. The CPU's single-thread performance of 3701 on Passmark ensures snappy application launches, while the GPU's capabilities future-proof the system against increasingly graphics-intensive web applications and productivity software. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps idle and light-load power consumption reasonable, though the GPU dominates the system's power profile.

Small business workstations that handle a mix of office productivity and occasional GPU-accelerated tasks will find the combination of ECC-capable CPU and 16 GB GPU memory appealing. The system can handle financial modeling, CAD viewing, and video conferencing without strain, and the PCIe 4.0 x16 GPU interface ensures full bandwidth for data-intensive workflows.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 32279 places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with the nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U at 32233, a delta of 0.1 percent. The Intel Core i9-11900 is equally close at 32226, just 0.2 percent behind. This tight clustering indicates that the i5-14400F delivers performance comparable to higher-tier processors from previous generations, making it a strong mid-range choice.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 50951 places it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA CMP 50HX, scores 51790 and leads by 1.6 percent, while the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 trails at 50001, a 1.9 percent deficit. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is 2 percent behind at 49957, and the Intel Arc A550M is 2.4 percent behind at 49737. These deltas show the RX 6900 XT holding its own against much newer hardware.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 4079, which is a strong result for a DX12 workload that stresses modern rendering features. The Geekbench compute scores are notably high: OpenCL with 187673 and Metal with 177021, while Vulkan comes in at 148525. These numbers indicate that the GPU excels in general-purpose compute tasks, which is relevant for applications that offload work to the GPU beyond traditional graphics rendering.

The Passmark GPU tests show a mixed picture. The G3D score of 26732 is excellent, but the DirectX 12 score of 113 is lower than the DirectX 11 score of 279, which is unusual and may reflect driver optimization differences. The DirectX 10 score of 167 and DirectX 9 score of 268 suggest that older API performance is adequate but not exceptional. The G2D score of 1055 indicates solid 2D acceleration for desktop workloads.

Combined, the CPU and GPU produce a system that ranks in the 85th percentile of all pairings. The near-perfect alignment of CPU and GPU percentiles (83 and 86, respectively) means neither component dramatically outclasses the other, which is the hallmark of a balanced build. The data shows no measured FPS for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from these benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is built on the Navi 21 chip using TSMC's 7 nm process, with 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die. The RDNA 2.0 architecture brings 5120 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 128 ROPs, along with 80 dedicated RT cores for ray tracing. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1825 MHz, with a game clock of 2015 MHz and a boost clock of 2250 MHz, delivering 23.04 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 46.08 TFLOPS of FP16 compute at a 2:1 ratio.

Memory configuration is a key strength: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus provides 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz, or 16 Gbps effective. This bandwidth is crucial for 4K gaming and compute workloads that move large data sets, and the 16 GB capacity offers substantial headroom over 8 GB cards for high-resolution textures and multi-tasking with GPU-accelerated applications.

The pixel rate of 288.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 720.0 GTexel/s indicate the GPU can fill framebuffers and sample textures at high speeds, which directly translates to high fill rates in games. The 80 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the RDNA 2 implementation is less performant than NVIDIA's dedicated RT cores in raw ray throughput. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support confirms feature-level parity with modern APIs, including variable rate shading and mesh shaders.

The 300 W TDP and triple-slot cooler design make this a power-hungry card that requires substantial case airflow. The 2x 8-pin power connectors and 700 W suggested PSU mean builders need a quality power supply with sufficient headroom. The card measures 267 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 50 mm in width, which is large but fits in most mid-tower cases. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, and 1x USB Type-C, providing modern connectivity options.

The GPU's benchmark scores show it competing with much newer hardware. The Passmark G3D score of 26732 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4079 demonstrate strong rasterization performance, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 148525 indicates good compute capability under modern APIs. The nearest rival comparison shows the RX 6900 XT performing within 2 percent of the RTX 5070 Ti, a much newer card, which speaks to the longevity of the RDNA 2 architecture.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a well-balanced pairing with a combined percentile of 85, built from components that individually rank at 83 (CPU) and 86 (GPU) percentiles. This alignment means neither component is dramatically weaker than the other, which minimizes bottleneck scenarios in most workloads. The CPU's strong single-core performance (3055 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 3701 in Passmark single thread) ensures that it can feed the GPU's frame rendering pipeline without becoming the limiting factor in GPU-bound scenarios.

In CPU-bound workloads like physics simulation, the Passmark physics score of 1523 is relatively modest, which could become a bottleneck in games that rely heavily on physics calculations. However, the multicore score of 25470 in Passmark multithread shows that the CPU can handle parallel tasks effectively, so this bottleneck would be limited to specific game engines rather than general gaming performance.

The GPU is the clear performance leader in this pairing, with its 86th percentile ranking slightly ahead of the CPU's 83rd. In GPU-bound scenarios, such as high-resolution gaming with maxed settings, the RX 6900 XT will be the primary determinant of frame rates, and the CPU will have sufficient headroom to avoid limiting performance. The 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 23.04 TFLOPS compute ensure the GPU is the limiting factor in most modern games at 1440p and 4K.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts depending on the application. In video editing, the GPU accelerates effects and rendering while the CPU handles timeline operations and encoding, creating a complementary relationship. In 3D rendering, CPU-based renderers will be limited by the i5-14400F's multicore performance, while GPU-based renderers will be limited by the RX 6900 XT's compute throughput. The 16 GB VRAM provides ample capacity for complex scenes, but the 80 RT cores may become a bottleneck in ray-traced workloads that stress RT performance.

The FPS scaling picture, estimated from benchmark scores since no measured data exists, suggests that at 1080p the CPU's single-thread performance will be more relevant, potentially creating slight CPU limitations in very high frame rate scenarios. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, which is the ideal situation for a gaming build as it allows for consistent frame delivery. The tight percentile alignment (83 vs 86) supports the conclusion that this is a balanced system with no dominant bottleneck in typical workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i5-14400F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configurations. The memory bandwidth figure is not provided in the data, but the platform's flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-performance DDR5. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is a rare feature for consumer platforms and provides an upgrade path to more reliable workstation configurations.

The CPU connects to the rest of the system via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), which is forward-looking for storage devices and future expansions. The RX 6900 XT uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe 5.0 lanes and runs at full bandwidth. This means the GPU is not bandwidth-limited by the platform, and there is headroom for future PCIe 5.0 devices.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU makes it easy to cool with modest air coolers or compact liquid coolers, leaving thermal headroom for the GPU's 300 W TDP to dominate the system's cooling requirements. The suggested PSU of 700 W provides adequate power for the system, and the 2x 8-pin GPU power connectors are standard on quality power supplies. A sensible next upgrade would be a faster GPU in the same power class, as the CPU has sufficient single-thread and multicore performance to support higher-end graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck.

The platform's DDR4/DDR5 compatibility means that a motherboard upgrade could be deferred, but moving to a newer Intel socket would require a new motherboard and possibly new memory. The Socket 1700 platform is at the end of its lifecycle, so future CPU upgrades would require a platform change. The GPU, however, can be carried forward to a new platform, and the 16 GB VRAM ensures it remains relevant for several more years.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs the Intel Core i5-14400F with the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, producing a system that ranks in the 85th percentile overall. The CPU is a mid-range 10-core processor from Intel's Core 14th Gen series, and the GPU is a high-end RDNA 2 card from AMD's RX 6000 series. The combination targets high-refresh gaming and content creation workloads where both components contribute meaningfully.

The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 86th percentile ranking combine to place this build in the upper tier of all systems in the database. The 65 W CPU TDP and 300 W GPU TDP create a power profile that requires a quality 700 W power supply but is manageable in most mid-tower cases. The triple-slot GPU cooler demands sufficient case clearance, but the 267 mm length fits in most modern cases.

The build class is explicitly desktop, meaning this is not a mobile or workstation configuration. The lack of integrated graphics on the CPU means the GPU is essential for display output, but this is standard for high-performance desktop builds. The production status of the CPU is active, while the GPU is end-of-life, which is reflected in the GPU's 2020 release date versus the CPU's 2024 release date.

Overall, this pairing represents a sensible combination of a modern, efficient CPU with a previous-generation flagship GPU that still competes with current mid-range and high-end cards. The 2 percent lead over the RTX 5070 Ti in average benchmark score demonstrates that the RX 6900 XT remains relevant, and the 16 GB VRAM ensures it can handle future game releases. The system is well-suited for high-refresh 1440p gaming, 4K gaming at high settings, and GPU-accelerated content creation.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component. The data clearly shows a GPU with 86th percentile performance and a CPU with 83rd percentile performance, which together indicate a system capable of high frame rates in modern games.

At 1080p resolution, the CPU's single-core performance will be more influential, and the i5-14400F's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3055 and Passmark single-thread score of 3701 suggest it can sustain high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. The GPU's 23.04 TFLOPS of compute is more than sufficient for 1080p, so the CPU is likely the limiting factor in esports titles that can exceed 300 FPS. Estimated frame rates in competitive shooters could reach 200-300+ FPS, while more demanding AAA titles would likely see 150-200 FPS at high settings.

At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, and the RX 6900 XT's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 5120 shading units can drive high refresh rate monitors. Estimated frame rates in AAA titles at ultra settings would range from 100-160 FPS depending on the game's optimization, with lighter titles exceeding 200 FPS. The 16 GB VRAM prevents memory capacity from being a limiting factor at this resolution, even with high-resolution texture packs.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, and the RX 6900 XT's 86th percentile ranking indicates it can handle 4K gaming at playable frame rates. Estimated performance in AAA titles at ultra settings would be 60-100 FPS, with some very demanding titles dropping to 50-60 FPS. The 80 RT cores enable ray tracing at 4K, but enabling ray tracing will reduce frame rates significantly, and DLSS-style upscaling is not available (the GPU relies on FSR, which is not benchmarked in the data).

The estimated performance picture shows a system that excels at 1440p high-refresh gaming and is capable of 4K gaming at high settings. For esports titles at 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures high frame rates, while for visually demanding single-player games, the GPU's compute and memory bandwidth deliver immersive performance. These estimates are based on the benchmark scores and should be verified with direct testing, but the data strongly suggests a capable gaming system.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400F

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds