SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400F

32,279 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

19,765 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14400F and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT form a desktop pairing that targets high-refresh 1080p gaming and mainstream productivity. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is an RDNA 2.0 design with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. Combined, this build sits at the 74th percentile across all system pairings, with the CPU at the 83rd percentile and the GPU at the 65th percentile. The data shows a pairing where the processor has more headroom than the graphics card, making the GPU the primary constraint in most gaming workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400F is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die size. It contains 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 pool. This is a desktop-class processor on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, supporting dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with ECC memory capability included.

Benchmark scores indicate a strong multi-threaded performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 21,645 in multi-core and 3,055 in single-core. The R20 results are 9,090 multi-core and 1,283 single-core, while R15 shows 2,181 multi-core and 307 single-core. Geekbench reports 11,268 multi-core and 2,058 single-core. PassMark results include 25,470 for multithread, 3,701 for single-thread, 81,524 for integer math, 61,319 for floating point math, 315,521 for data compression, and 16,949 for data encryption.

The 83rd percentile ranking against all CPUs places it above most processors, but the nearest rivals show how tight the competition is. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U scores 32,233 average, just 0.1% behind the i5-14400F's 32,279 average. The Intel Core i9-11900 is 0.2% behind at 32,226, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is 0.2% ahead at 32,354. The Intel Core i7-12800H trails by 0.5% at 32,121. These deltas are statistically negligible, meaning the i5-14400F trades blows with mobile and older desktop chips from rival families.

For real workloads, the multi-core scores suggest strong rendering and compilation performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 21,645 indicates the CPU can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software builds without becoming the bottleneck in a mid-range system. The single-core score of 3,055 in R23 is more relevant for lightly-threaded applications like legacy games or office tasks, where the 4.70 GHz boost clock keeps responsiveness high. The PassMark physics score of 1,523 and find prime numbers score of 86 are lower, but these are niche tests that do not reflect typical usage patterns. The data compression score of 315,521 highlights strong throughput for file archiving and data-heavy workflows.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 32,279, placing it at the 83rd percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, averages 32,233, a 0.1% difference. The Intel Core i9-11900 averages 32,226, 0.2% behind. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is 0.2% ahead at 32,354, and the Intel Core i7-12800H trails by 0.5% at 32,121. These results show the i5-14400F is a solid mid-tier desktop chip that sits between mobile high-end parts and older desktop flagship models.

The GPU, an AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT, has an average benchmark score of 19,765 and sits at the 65th percentile against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are professional and older workstation cards. The NVIDIA Tesla K40m scores 19,885, 0.6% ahead. The AMD FirePro D300 scores 19,637, 0.7% behind. The AMD FirePro W7000 scores 19,905, 0.7% ahead, and the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 scores 19,602, 0.8% behind. These deltas are small, but the RX 6650 XT is a gaming card, so the comparison is more about raw compute than real-world gaming relevance.

In synthetic benchmarks, the GPU achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,859. Geekbench results include 97,969 in Metal, 10,111 in OpenCL, and 81,306 in Vulkan. PassMark results show 17,166 in G3D, 7,532 in GPU compute, and lower scores for legacy DirectX tests: 109 for DX10, 169 for DX11, 62 for DX12, and 215 for DX9. The G2D score is 918. The combined picture is a CPU that outperforms its GPU in percentile terms by 18 points, suggesting the processor has more headroom than the graphics card can utilize in most gaming scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile gap between the CPU (83rd) and GPU (65th) is the first indicator of imbalance. In gaming workloads, the GPU is the limiting factor. The measured FPS data confirms this. At 1920x1080, demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 run at 46.9 FPS on ultra, while Red Dead Redemption 2 hits 44.7 FPS. These are GPU-bound results, as the CPU's single-core and multi-core scores are strong enough to feed the GPU at these frame rates.

The pair rank by FPS is 2,410 out of 3,732 pairs, with an average FPS of 106.3 across all games tested. This places the pairing in the 35th percentile of all CPU-GPU combinations, which seems low but reflects the GPU's mid-tier position. The CPU is not the bottleneck in these tests; the RX 6650 XT's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus limit performance at higher resolutions.

Evidence from FPS scaling shows the GPU's constraint. In Counter-Strike 2, FPS drops from 163.4 at 1080p to 104.8 at 1440p and 61.7 at 4K. In Valorant, the drop is from 370 at 1080p to 316 at 1440p and 252 at 4K. These are CPU-friendly games, so the GPU still delivers high frame rates, but the scaling is not linear, indicating the GPU is working harder at higher resolutions. In contrast, Ark: Survival Ascended falls from 24.2 FPS at 1080p to 15.3 at 1440p and 10.1 at 4K, showing a severe GPU limitation in unoptimized titles. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 25,470 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,645 are far above what these games require, reinforcing the GPU-bound conclusion.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14400F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, but the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so the interface is not a limiting factor for the RX 6650 XT. The 65 W TDP of the CPU is modest, and the GPU has a 176 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 450 W. This leaves headroom for a more powerful GPU without necessarily upgrading the power supply, depending on the rest of the system.

The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is not an option, but the boost clock of 4.70 GHz is already high. The platform supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer chip and could appeal to small business workstations or entry-level servers. The production status is Active for the CPU, while the GPU is End-of-life, so the GPU is the component more likely to be replaced first.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU has the headroom to support it. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and multi-core scores suggest it can keep pace with more powerful graphics cards without becoming the limiting factor. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU means future GPUs using that interface will be fully compatible, although the current GPU only uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Memory upgrade to DDR5 would improve bandwidth, but the current dual-channel support is adequate for the performance class.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a gamer at 1920x1080 resolution who wants high frame rates in competitive titles and playable performance in AAA games. The measured FPS shows 163.4 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, 192 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege, and 370 FPS in Valorant at 1080p ultra. For single-player games, Cyberpunk 2077 at 46.9 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 44.7 FPS are playable but not smooth at ultra settings, so a user might reduce settings for higher frame rates.

Content creators can benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,645 and PassMark multithread score of 25,470 indicate the CPU can handle video editing and 3D rendering tasks. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p rendering but may limit 4K texture workloads. Software developers will appreciate the 10 cores and 16 threads for compilation, though the lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is always required.

Students and small business workstations can use this build for office productivity, where the single-core performance is more than adequate. The ECC memory support is a niche feature that adds reliability for data-sensitive work. The 65 W CPU TDP and 450 W suggested PSU keep the system energy-efficient, which is beneficial for always-on workstations.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP is $196.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32,279, which is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM size and memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 280.3 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14400F supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 450 W.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT sits at the 65th percentile against all GPUs.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 74.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT is based on the Navi 23 chip, using the RDNA 2.0 architecture on a 7 nm TSMC process. The die contains 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² area, with a transistor density of 46.7M per mm². The GPU has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations units. It includes 32 ray tracing cores, bringing hardware-accelerated ray tracing to this mid-range card.

Clock speeds are a base of 2055 MHz, a boost of 2635 MHz, and a game clock of 2410 MHz. The memory runs at 2190 MHz, effective 17.5 Gbps, across a 128-bit bus for 8 GB of GDDR6. This configuration yields a bandwidth of 280.3 GB/s. The pixel rate is 168.6 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 337.3 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 10.79 TFLOPS for FP32 and 21.59 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The power requirement is a 176 W TDP with a single 8-pin connector and a 450 W suggested PSU. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is narrower than the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 x16 support but sufficient for the card's bandwidth needs.

Benchmark results show the GPU's compute strengths and weaknesses. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,859 is modest. Geekbench Metal scores 97,969, OpenCL 10,111, and Vulkan 81,306. PassMark G3D is 17,166 and GPU compute is 7,532. Legacy DirectX scores are low, with DX10 at 109, DX11 at 169, DX12 at 62, and DX9 at 215. These numbers indicate the card is designed for modern APIs, not older ones. For rendering, the FP32 throughput of 10.79 TFLOPS is adequate for 1080p and 1440p workloads, but the 8 GB VRAM will be a constraint for large scenes or high-resolution textures.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-14400F with the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is an RDNA 2.0 card with 8 GB VRAM and a 176 W TDP. The combined percentile is 74, indicating this pairing outperforms roughly three-quarters of all tested CPU-GPU combinations.

The CPU's 83rd percentile and the GPU's 65th percentile create an imbalance where the processor is the stronger component. The pair rank by FPS is 2,410 out of 3,732, with an average FPS of 106.3 across all games. This places the build in the mid-range tier, capable of high-refresh 1080p gaming and entry-level 1440p gaming, but not suited for 4K ultra settings in demanding titles.

The data is measured, not estimated, so the FPS figures are actual results. This build is best described as a mainstream gaming PC with a CPU that has room to grow, making it a candidate for future GPU upgrades without changing the platform.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data at ultra settings shows a clear 1080p focus. In competitive shooters, the RX 6650 XT delivers excellent results: Valorant runs at 370 FPS at 1080p, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 357 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 163.4 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege hits 192 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 142 FPS. These titles benefit from the CPU's strong single-core performance, allowing the GPU to reach high frame rates.

At 1440p, the numbers drop but remain playable. Valorant still hits 316 FPS, CS:GO 245 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege 126 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone manages 130.9 FPS. For AAA games, the picture changes. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 46.9 FPS at 1080p, 35.8 FPS at 1440p, and 26 FPS at 4K. Red Dead Redemption 2 is similar at 44.7, 32.8, and 21 FPS respectively. Ark: Survival Ascended is the most demanding, with only 24.2 FPS at 1080p and 10.1 FPS at 4K.

At 4K, most titles are not playable at ultra settings. Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 34.4 FPS, Control at 32.2 FPS, and The Medium at 22.9 FPS. Some lighter titles like Valorant (252 FPS) and Roblox (79.5 FPS) handle 4K well. The data suggests this build is best used at 1080p for AAA games and can stretch to 1440p for competitive titles, but 4K should be reserved for less demanding games or with settings reduced.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming is the primary strength of this build. At 1080p, the measured FPS exceeds 144 in Valorant, CS:GO, and Rainbow Six Siege, making it suitable for competitive play on high-refresh monitors. The 163.4 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 142 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone further support this use case.

Streaming is feasible but not ideal. The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads can handle encoding, but the GPU is already working hard in games. The PassMark multithread score of 25,470 and data encryption score of 16,949 suggest the CPU can handle streaming overhead, but frame drops may occur in CPU-intensive games at high bitrates.

Video editing is a strong workload for this CPU. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,645 and PassMark floating point math score of 61,319 indicate the CPU can handle timeline editing and export efficiently. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p projects, but 4K editing may require proxy workflows.

3D rendering benefits from the CPU's multi-core performance and the GPU's 10.79 TFLOPS FP32 compute. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 10,111 shows the GPU can accelerate rendering, but the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking ensures it will not bottleneck rendering tasks.

Software development is well-served by the 10 cores and 16 threads. The PassMark integer math score of 81,524 and data compression score of 315,521 indicate fast compilation and binary processing. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running builds or server-like tasks.

Student and office work is more than covered. The single-core performance of 3,055 in Cinebench R23 and 3,701 in PassMark single-thread ensures snappy response in productivity applications. The 65 W CPU TDP and 450 W suggested PSU keep the system efficient for daily use, and the GPU's compute capabilities can accelerate spreadsheet or data visualization tasks if needed.