SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400

32,115 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 form a desktop pairing that occupies the 75th percentile overall, indicating a system positioned above the majority of configurations in the database. The CPU, part of the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, and the Ampere-architecture GPU, though released in different market cycles, combine to deliver strong compute and rendering capabilities. Notably, there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all gaming performance discussion here is estimated from the individual benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA102 chip, manufactured on an 8 nm process by Samsung. The GPU houses 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 45.1M per mm². It carries 10 GB of GDDR6X memory across a 320-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s. This memory configuration is substantial for high-resolution texture loading, and the bandwidth figure is particularly important for compute-heavy tasks where data movement often bottlenecks older architectures.

Clock speeds are listed at a base of 1440 MHz and a boost of 1710 MHz, with memory running at 1188 MHz or 19 Gbps effective. The GPU contains 8704 shading units, 272 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. For ray tracing, there are 68 dedicated RT cores, and for AI acceleration, 272 tensor cores. The FP32 performance is rated at 29.77 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1), meaning the card does not gain a throughput advantage on half-precision operations. Pixel fill rate is 164.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 465.1 GTexel/s.

In benchmark scores, the RTX 3080 posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4407, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 152423, and a Vulkan score of 33620. Passmark results show a G3D score of 25086 and a GPU compute score of 14397. The GPU sits at the 68th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23172. Its nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA P106-100 (score 23249, delta -0.3%), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 (23250, -0.3%), and AMD Radeon RX 6600M (23273, -0.4%), indicating the RTX 3080 is essentially performance-parity with these cards despite its higher bandwidth and larger memory bus. For rendering, the 68 RT cores will assist in real-time ray-traced workloads, while the 272 tensor cores enable DLSS and other AI-accelerated features. The 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for many current titles at high settings but may become a limiting factor in extreme texture-heavy scenarios or future releases.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU, Intel Core i5-14400, delivers strong multi-threaded results: Cinebench R23 multicore reaches 21315, while the single-core score is 3009. In Geekbench, the multicore score is 9807 and single-core is 1905. Passmark multithread is 25080, with single-thread at 3741. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32115, placing it at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-12800H (score 32121, delta 0%), Intel Core i7-13705H (32076, delta 0.1%), Intel Core i5-14450HX (32040, delta 0.2%), and Intel Core i9-11900 (32226, delta -0.3%). These deltas show the i5-14400 is statistically tied with these parts, meaning performance differences are negligible in aggregate benchmarks.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 23172 places it at the 68th percentile, which is lower than the CPU’s percentile ranking. This discrepancy suggests the GPU is the more likely limiting factor in many workloads, particularly gaming, but the CPU still provides ample headroom for the GPU to operate. The combined percentile for the build is 75, which is between the CPU and GPU percentiles, reflecting a balanced system where neither component drastically underperforms the other. In Cinebench R15, the CPU scores 2148 multicore and 303 single-core; in R20, 8952 multicore and 1263 single-core. Passmark data compression hits 314995, encryption 16731, extended instructions 19816, find prime numbers 80, floating point math 61549, integer math 82017, physics 1396, and random string sorting 32346. These scores indicate a processor that excels at integer and floating-point math, which translates to responsive general computing and efficient compilation tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory type based on platform cost and availability. ECC memory is supported, which is a feature relevant for workstation use where data integrity is critical. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for the RTX 3080, which uses PCIe 4.0 x16; the Gen 5 slot ensures future graphics cards can run at full bandwidth without a motherboard change.

The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, which is modest for a 10-core part, while the GPU’s TDP is 320 W. The suggested PSU is 700 W, leaving headroom for the rest of the system and potential overclocking, though the CPU’s multiplier is locked, so overclocking headroom is limited. For a sensible next upgrade, the GPU is the primary candidate for improvement, as its 68th percentile ranking is lower than the CPU’s 82nd percentile. A future GPU upgrade would be bottlenecked by the CPU only in highly threaded scenarios, but the data suggests the i5-14400 can still feed a faster card effectively. The memory bus is dual-channel, so upgrading from DDR4 to DDR5 is possible if the motherboard supports it, but the performance gain would be modest compared to a GPU swap. The RTX 3080 is end-of-life in production status, so buyers should consider this when planning longevity.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied to the measured performance

This pairing suits users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance for productivity but also want high-end GPU compute for rendering or gaming. The CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking and the GPU’s 68th percentile suggest a system that can handle both CPU-bound tasks like software compilation or physics simulations, and GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering or video encoding. For gamers at 1440p or 4K, the RTX 3080’s bandwidth and compute power are sufficient, though the 10 GB VRAM may be a consideration for ultra textures at 4K. Content creators editing high-resolution video will benefit from the CPU’s 16 threads and the GPU’s tensor cores for AI-accelerated effects. Developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance in integer math (Passmark integer math 82017). Students and small business workstations benefit from the CPU’s ECC memory support for data reliability, and the 65 W TDP keeps cooling requirements low, allowing for compact builds.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-14400 is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename, on a 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB shared L3. The die size is 215 mm². This configuration provides a strong balance between single-thread responsiveness and multi-thread throughput. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3009 indicates excellent per-core performance, which translates to snappy application launches and smooth operation in lightly threaded tasks. The multicore score of 21315 is competitive, as shown by its near-parity with the Intel Core i7-12800H and i9-11900, meaning it can handle heavy rendering or encoding workloads without falling behind.

In Passmark, the multithread score of 25080 and single-thread of 3741 reinforce this. The data compression score of 314995 suggests fast file archiving, while encryption at 16731 supports secure data handling. The physics score of 1396 is lower relative to other tests, indicating that gaming physics simulations may not be the CPU’s strongest suit, but it is still adequate. The CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking places it well above average, and its nearest rivals are all within a 0.3% delta, showing that the i5-14400 is a well-rounded mid-range part that competes with higher-tier laptop and older desktop chips. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback for troubleshooting or basic display output, though it is not intended for gaming.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3080’s 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth provide ample power for high frame rates. The CPU’s single-core score of 3009 in Cinebench R23 ensures minimal bottleneck in most titles. Expect strong performance at 1440p, with the 10 GB VRAM being sufficient for most current games at high settings, though ultra textures at 4K may exceed capacity.

Streaming: The GPU’s tensor cores and NVENC (implied by the architecture) offload encoding from the CPU. The CPU’s 16 threads can handle game logic and streaming software simultaneously, as evidenced by its multicore score of 21315 in Cinebench R23, which is high enough for simultaneous encoding and gameplay without major frame drops.

Video editing: The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 82017 and floating point score of 61549 indicate fast processing of codecs and effects. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 152423 accelerates render previews and exports. The 10 GB VRAM is adequate for 4K timelines, though 8K projects may require lower proxy resolution.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4407 and the CPU’s R23 multicore score of 21315 provide a strong combination for both GPU-accelerated and CPU-based rendering engines. The 272 tensor cores also support AI denoising, speeding up final frame output.

Software development: The CPU’s high integer math score (82017) and 16 threads make compilation and testing fast. The ECC memory support is a plus for long-running build servers or data-intensive applications. The GPU is less relevant here but can assist with parallel compute tasks like unit testing or simulation.

Student and office work: The 65 W TDP makes the system easy to cool, and the CPU’s single-core performance (3009 in R23) ensures responsive office applications. The integrated GPU provides a backup if the discrete card fails. The 82nd percentile CPU ranking means this system will handle multitasking, spreadsheets, and research without slowdown.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

There is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all FPS figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The RTX 3080’s 68th percentile ranking and the CPU’s 82nd percentile suggest that gaming performance will be GPU-limited in most scenarios. At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-core score of 3009 ensures high frame rates, but the GPU will still be the bottleneck in graphically intensive titles. At 1440p, the GPU’s 760.3 GB/s bandwidth and 29.77 TFLOPS should deliver high settings with smooth frame rates in most games. At 4K, the 10 GB VRAM may cause texture pop-in or reduced settings in some titles, but the GPU’s compute power is sufficient for 60 FPS in many games. For esports titles, the CPU’s single-thread performance is more than adequate for 200+ FPS, while for AAA games, expect 60-100 FPS at 1440p depending on optimization. These are estimates, not measured results.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 3080 has 68 RT cores dedicated to ray tracing.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The memory bandwidth is 760.3 GB/s.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 700 W.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory support is listed as true.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The GPU is at the 68th percentile among all GPUs.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload

The data reveals a clear division of labor. In CPU-intensive workloads like data compression (Passmark score 314995) and integer math (82017), the i5-14400 is the star, and the GPU is irrelevant. In GPU-intensive tasks like 3DMark Steel Nomad (4407) and OpenCL compute (152423), the RTX 3080 dominates, and the CPU is secondary. For gaming, the bottleneck shifts based on resolution. At lower resolutions, the CPU’s single-core performance (3009 in R23) may limit frame rates, but the GPU’s 68th percentile ranking is still lower than the CPU’s 82nd percentile, meaning the GPU is more likely to be the limiter overall. The combined percentile of 75 suggests a balanced system, but the GPU is the weaker link in terms of percentile position. In a future GPU upgrade, the CPU’s headroom would be sufficient to support a card with a higher percentile, as the CPU’s nearest rivals include the Core i9-11900, which is a higher-tier part. For productivity, the CPU is not the bottleneck; the GPU’s 10 GB VRAM may limit large dataset rendering, but the compute power is strong.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-14400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080. The pairing sits at the 75th combined percentile, indicating a high-mid-range system that outperforms most configurations but is not at the very top tier. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread part with a 65 W TDP, making it efficient and easy to cool, while the GPU is a power-hungry 320 W card that requires a 700 W PSU. The system is well-suited for 1440p gaming and productivity tasks, with the CPU providing strong multi-threaded performance for content creation and the GPU offering substantial compute and ray-tracing capabilities. The RTX 3080 is end-of-life, so this build represents a legacy high-end GPU paired with a current-generation mid-range CPU, which is a sensible combination for users prioritizing CPU longevity. The lack of measured FPS data means performance expectations are based on synthetic benchmarks, but the individual component scores suggest a capable system. The CPU’s 82nd percentile and GPU’s 68th percentile indicate the GPU is the weaker component, but the overall balance is good for a general-purpose desktop that can handle gaming, rendering, and development workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied to the measured performance

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds