SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400

32,115 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14400 and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT form a desktop pairing that targets a high-performance segment of the market, though the data shows a significant imbalance in their respective performance percentiles. The CPU, a Raptor Lake Refresh part on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, holds an 82nd percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU, an RDNA 3.0 flagship, sits at a lower 55th percentile. This pairing combines a strong mid-range processor with a high-end graphics card, resulting in a combined system percentile of 69. The benchmark data indicates that this configuration is heavily skewed toward graphics workloads, with the CPU potentially limiting the GPU in certain scenarios, despite the CPU’s own robust multi-threaded capabilities.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400 is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on a 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The chip’s cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and includes support for ECC memory. The processor is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking is not a primary feature, and it ships with integrated UHD Graphics 730. Its launch MSRP was $221.

Benchmark results place this CPU firmly in the upper echelon of processors. In Cinebench R23, it scores 21,315 points in multi-core and 3,009 points in single-core tests. The single-core score, a strong indicator of everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded application performance, is complemented by a multi-core score that suggests substantial throughput for heavy workloads. The Cinebench R20 results show a multi-core score of 8,952 and a single-core score of 1,263, while the older R15 test yields 2,148 multi-core and 303 single-core. This consistency across Cinebench versions indicates a balanced architecture that scales well with thread count.

Beyond Cinebench, the i5-14400 shows specific strengths in synthetic workloads. Its Passmark multi-thread score is 25,080, with a single-thread score of 3,741. The data compression score is particularly high at 314,995, and integer math hits 82,017, while floating-point math scores 61,549. These numbers suggest the CPU is well-suited for tasks like file archiving, cryptographic operations (data encryption score of 16,731), and complex calculations. The extended instructions score of 19,816 points to solid AVX-512 or similar SIMD performance. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32,115.

The nearest rivals, per the data, are the Intel Core i7-12800H with an average score of 32,121 (0% delta), the Intel Core i7-13705H at 32,076 (0.1% delta), and the Intel Core i5-14450HX at 32,040 (0.2% delta). The data shows the i5-14400 is effectively performance-equivalent to these parts, despite being a desktop chip versus mobile H-series processors. It also slightly edges out the Intel Core i9-11900, which scores 32,226 but with a -0.3% delta, meaning the i5-14400 is 0.3% faster than that older flagship. This places the i5-14400 in a performance tier that rivals previous-generation high-end parts, making it a capable engine for both productivity and gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture for this build is defined by a significant gap between the CPU and GPU scores. The Intel Core i5-14400’s average benchmark score is 32,115, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. In contrast, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has an average benchmark score of 13,745, putting it in only the 55th percentile of all GPUs. This combined build achieves a 69th percentile ranking overall.

The CPU’s performance is its clear strength. Its 82nd percentile ranking means it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. In Geekbench, it scores 9,807 multi-core and 1,905 single-core. The Passmark results further detail its capabilities: a physics score of 1,396, a random string sorting score of 32,346, and a prime number finding score of 80. These figures, while varied, all contribute to the 25,080 multi-thread score. The CPU’s single-thread Passmark score of 3,741 is strong and indicates that it will not hold back gaming frame rates in most scenarios.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are, however, less impressive relative to its peers. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 5,623. Its Geekbench Vulkan score is 71,068, while the OpenCL score is 12,756. The Passmark G3D score is 29,009, with a G2D score of 1,232. The GPU’s compute performance is reflected in a Passmark GPU Compute score of 16,828. The nearest rivals for the GPU are the AMD Radeon 660M with an average score of 13,812 (-0.5% delta), the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile at 13,821 (-0.5% delta), and the AMD Radeon RX 570X at 13,871 (-0.9% delta). Interestingly, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT scores 13,543, which is 1.5% lower than this card.

The data shows that this pairing’s overall performance is dragged down by the GPU’s modest 55th percentile ranking, which is unexpectedly low for a card with the RX 7900 XT’s specifications. The combined 69th percentile reflects a system that is top-tier on the CPU side but mid-pack on the GPU side. For workloads that rely heavily on the CPU, this system will perform excellently. For graphics-intensive tasks, the GPU’s relative performance against other GPUs in the database is less dominant, though its absolute scores are still substantial. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all performance estimates for gaming are derived from these benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, using the Navi 31 chip, and is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The chip contains 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die, with a transistor density of 109.1 million per mm². The GPU features 5,376 shading units, 336 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 192 render output units (ROPs). It has 84 dedicated ray tracing cores.

Memory specifications are a highlight of this card. It comes with 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2500 MHz, with an effective data rate of 20 Gbps. The GPU’s base clock is 1387 MHz, with a boost clock of 2394 MHz and a game clock of 2025 MHz. This configuration results in a pixel rate of 459.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 804.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 51.48 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 103.0 TFLOPS (2:1).

The board is a dual-slot design, 276 mm long, 110 mm high, and 51 mm wide, requiring two 8-pin power connectors and a recommended 700 W power supply. It has a TDP of 300 W. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It is marked as end-of-life in production status, with a successor in the Navi IV generation. Its launch MSRP was 899 USD.

In terms of benchmark performance, the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,623 indicates solid DirectX 12 rasterization performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 71,068 is notably higher than the OpenCL score of 12,756, suggesting the card’s compute capabilities are better utilized through the Vulkan API. The Passmark G3D score of 29,009 and the DirectX 11 score of 340 point to strong legacy API performance, while the DirectX 12 score of 110 is lower, which may indicate driver overhead or testing variance. The 84 ray tracing cores are present for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though no specific ray tracing benchmark scores are provided. The 20 GB VRAM and 800 GB/s bandwidth make this card suitable for high-resolution textures and large datasets, but its 55th percentile ranking suggests that while its absolute performance is high, many other GPUs in the database score better on average.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 69.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14400 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-12800H?

A: The i5-14400 has an average benchmark score of 32,115, while the i7-12800H scores 32,121. The delta percentage is 0%, indicating they perform nearly identically.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT?

A: The RX 7900 XT has a memory bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s, utilizing 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14400 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU has ECC memory support enabled.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is in the 55th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and the GPU?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 is built on a 10 nm process by Intel, while the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT uses a 5 nm process by TSMC.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-14400 has a locked multiplier, as its multiplierUnlocked field is false.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is suited for users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads while still requiring high-end graphics capability. The CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation, where the 10 cores and 16 threads can be fully utilized. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,315 and the Passmark multi-thread score of 25,080 indicate strong performance in these tasks. Students and professionals in engineering or data science fields who run simulations or process large datasets will benefit from the CPU’s integer and floating-point math scores (82,017 and 61,549, respectively) and its data compression score of 314,995.

The GPU, with its 20 GB VRAM and 800 GB/s bandwidth, is geared toward gamers who want to play at high resolutions with high texture quality. However, its 55th percentile ranking means it is not the absolute fastest GPU available. For small business workstations that need a balance of CPU power for productivity applications and a GPU for occasional graphics work, this system is viable, though the GPU may be overkill for office tasks. Developers will appreciate the CPU’s compile times, and the GPU’s compute potential, as shown by the Geekbench Vulkan score of 71,068, can be leveraged for GPU-accelerated computing tasks. The CPU’s support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory offers flexibility in building a system within a chosen platform.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,009 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3,741, suggests it will not bottleneck modern gaming workloads. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,623 indicates it can handle DirectX 12 titles well, though its overall 55th percentile ranking implies that other GPUs will offer higher frame rates.

For 1080p gaming, the CPU’s high single-core speed will likely allow the GPU to reach its maximum output, but the GPU’s performance is the limiting factor. At 1440p, the load shifts more to the GPU, and the 20 GB VRAM will accommodate high-resolution textures. At 4K, the GPU’s bandwidth of 800 GB/s and its compute power, shown by the FP32 score of 51.48 TFLOPS, will be crucial, but the 55th percentile suggests it may not deliver top-tier 4K frame rates in the most demanding titles. The presence of 84 RT cores allows for ray tracing, but without specific RT benchmark numbers, it is not possible to quantify the performance impact. Gamers should expect solid, high-refresh-rate performance at 1080p and 1440p in most titles, with 4K performance depending heavily on the specific game and settings. The estimates are based on the GPU’s absolute scores, which are high, but its relative ranking against other GPUs must be considered.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU’s single-thread performance (3,009 in Cinebench R23) is sufficient to drive high frame rates, but the GPU’s 55th percentile ranking suggests it may not consistently hit the highest FPS in esports titles at 1080p. It is better suited for 1440p high-refresh gaming where the GPU’s 20 GB VRAM and 800 GB/s bandwidth provide a solid foundation.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads, with a multi-thread score of 25,080, can handle game encoding and streaming overhead simultaneously. The GPU’s compute capabilities (16,828 Passmark GPU Compute) can also offload encoding tasks, making this a viable setup for a single-PC streaming rig.

Video Editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,315 and the Passmark floating-point math score of 61,549 will speed up rendering and effects application. The GPU’s large 20 GB frame buffer is advantageous for scrubbing timelines and applying GPU-accelerated effects, though its compute scores indicate it is not the fastest for export rendering.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s multi-core performance is strong for CPU-based rendering, as evidenced by the 8,952 Cinebench R20 multi-core score. The GPU’s 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 performance will accelerate viewport interactions and GPU-based renderers, but its 55th percentile suggests other GPUs may be faster for this workload.

Software Development: The CPU’s integer math score of 82,017 and data compression score of 314,995 are highly relevant for code compilation and version control operations. The 10-core, 16-thread configuration provides ample parallelism for build systems.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s 3,741 single-thread Passmark score ensures snappy responsiveness in productivity applications. The discrete GPU is unnecessary for this workload, but its presence does not hinder performance. The system is overpowered for basic tasks but will handle any academic software without issue.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that combines an Intel Core i5-14400 CPU with an AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT GPU. The CPU is a 14th-generation Core i5 part, based on the Raptor Lake architecture, while the GPU is from the Radeon RX 7000 series, based on RDNA 3.0. The combined system percentile is 69, which places it in the upper-mid range of all builds in the database. The CPU’s 82nd percentile is the dominant factor in this ranking, while the GPU’s 55th percentile is a notable weak point. This pairing is not a balanced one; it pairs a top-quartile CPU with a mid-pack GPU. The system is best described as a productivity-focused workstation with a high-end graphics card attached, rather than a strictly balanced gaming rig.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates an imbalance in this pairing. The CPU, at the 82nd percentile, is significantly stronger than the GPU, at the 55th percentile. This means the GPU is the primary bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the CPU can easily feed the GPU with draw calls and physics calculations, but the GPU’s lower relative performance will limit the frame rate. The CPU’s single-thread performance (3,009 Cinebench R23) is high enough that it is unlikely to be the limiting factor in most games. The GPU’s 3DMark score of 5,623 and its 55th percentile ranking suggest it will be the component that prevents the system from achieving the highest possible frame rates.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the CPU will be the primary workhorse, and the GPU will be underutilized. The CPU’s multi-thread scores (21,315 Cinebench R23, 25,080 Passmark) far exceed the GPU’s compute scores (16,828 Passmark GPU Compute) in relative terms. The FPS scaling, estimated from the scores, would show that at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU can push more frames, but the GPU may not keep up. At higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck. This system would benefit from a more powerful GPU to achieve a balanced configuration, or a less powerful CPU to save cost without sacrificing gaming performance. The data suggests that the CPU is holding back the potential of the GPU in some scenarios, but more often, the GPU's lower percentile is the ceiling for graphics performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds