SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400

32,115 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

58,392 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400 is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and produced on Intel's 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that positions it as a mainstream power envelope. The chip's cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. This configuration supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel arrangement, and it includes ECC memory support. The processor also carries Intel UHD Graphics 730 as integrated graphics, though this pairing with a discrete GPU makes that secondary.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded throughput relative to its class. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,315 and single-core score of 3,009 indicate strong scaling across its 10 cores and 16 threads. Geekbench results reinforce this: a multi-core score of 9,807 and single-core score of 1,905. The PassMark multi-thread score of 25,080 and single-thread score of 3,741 (recorded twice as 3,741) further confirm balanced performance. The processor's average benchmark score of 32,115 places it in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database.

The nearest rivals illustrate its competitive positioning. The Intel Core i7-12800H scores 32,121, a delta of 0% — essentially identical performance. The Intel Core i7-13705H is 0.1% ahead at 32,076, and the Intel Core i5-14450HX is 0.2% ahead at 32,040. The Intel Core i9-11900 trails by 0.3% with a score of 32,226 (note the higher raw score but negative deltaPct, indicating a different averaging method). These tight margins mean the i5-14400 trades blows with mobile and older desktop chips, but its desktop platform advantages in memory bandwidth and sustained power delivery may yield real-world benefits beyond raw scores.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8,952 and R15 multi-core score of 2,148 suggest strong performance in rendering tasks that scale with core count. The PassMark data compression score of 314,995 and integer math score of 82,017 indicate robust throughput for productivity applications. The floating-point math score of 61,549 and extended instructions score of 19,816 point to capable scientific and financial workloads. The single-core performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 score of 3,009, is sufficient for lightly threaded tasks like web browsing and office applications, but the processor's real strength lies in multi-core scenarios.

# Balance and Bottleneck

For this combination, no measured FPS rows exist in the data, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU holds an 82nd percentile position among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. This close alignment suggests a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other, though the GPU's higher percentile implies it is marginally more capable relative to its peers.

The CPU's PassMark physics score of 1,396 and the GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 14,199 indicate that gaming workloads will be largely GPU-bound at higher resolutions. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 28,070 dwarfs the CPU's multithread score of 25,080 in terms of raw gaming performance potential. However, at lower resolutions or with less demanding graphics settings, the CPU's single-thread score of 3,741 (PassMark) and Geekbench single-core of 1,905 may become the limiting factor. The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads are sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios, but the 65 W TDP suggests power delivery could constrain sustained all-core loads.

The GPU's memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s and 16 GB of GDDR6 memory mean it can handle high-resolution textures and complex scenes without becoming a bottleneck itself. The CPU's 20 MB L3 cache and dual-channel memory support (either DDR4 or DDR5) provide adequate data throughput for the GPU. In CPU-intensive workloads like physics simulations or AI-based game logic, the CPU's 82nd percentile ranking will hold up well, but the GPU's 88th percentile suggests the graphics card is the stronger component overall.

The estimated FPS picture, derived from the benchmark scores, points to a system that delivers smooth performance at 1440p and 4K gaming, where the GPU is the primary driver. At 1080p with high refresh rates, the CPU's single-core performance may cap frame rates in esports titles, but this is unlikely to be a significant limitation given the CPU's single-core scores are competitive with its rivals.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14400 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This dual-memory support gives builders flexibility: those with existing DDR4 kits can reuse them, while new builds can opt for DDR5 for better bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), enabling high-speed storage and future GPU bandwidth headroom. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 serves as a fallback display output or for troubleshooting, though it is not intended for gaming.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the GPU will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The GPU's suggested PSU is 700 W, while the CPU's TDP is 65 W, leaving ample headroom for a system with a 700 W or higher power supply. The GPU requires 2x 8-pin power connectors and occupies a triple-slot width, so case and PSU compatibility must be verified.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-tier Intel 14th Gen processor that fits the Socket 1700 — the data shows the i5-14400 sits close to the i7-12800H and i7-13705H in performance, so stepping up to a desktop i7 or i9 would provide measurable gains in multi-threaded workloads. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster DDR5 modules would improve bandwidth-sensitive tasks. The GPU's end-of-life production status means future upgrades would require a new graphics card, but the PCIe 4.0 x16 slot ensures compatibility with modern GPUs. The 700 W suggested PSU provides headroom for a more power-hungry GPU, though the current 335 W TDP of the RX 6950 XT is already substantial.

# Who Should Build It

This desktop build targets users who need strong multi-core CPU performance and high-end GPU capabilities. For gamers at 1440p or 4K resolutions, the GPU's 88th percentile ranking (PassMark G3D score of 28,070) and 16 GB VRAM ensure high settings are achievable. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 21,315) prevents it from becoming a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios.

Content creators will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded rendering scores: Cinebench R20 multi-core of 8,952 and PassMark integer math of 82,017. Video editors and 3D artists can leverage the GPU's compute performance (PassMark GPU compute of 14,199 and Geekbench OpenCL of 205,998) for accelerated rendering and effects. Software developers will find the CPU's data encryption score of 16,731 and extended instructions score of 19,816 useful for compilation and cryptographic workloads.

Students and small business workstations can handle typical productivity tasks — the CPU's single-core scores (Geekbench 1,905, Cinebench R23 3,009) are more than adequate for office applications, while the GPU accelerates any graphical tasks. The CPU's ECC memory support is a plus for data integrity in workstation scenarios. The build's desktop class and combined percentile of 85 indicate it sits in the upper tier of systems.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 32,115, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-12800H, scores 32,121 with a 0% delta, meaning the two are statistically tied. The i7-13705H is 0.1% faster, and the i5-14450HX is 0.2% faster, while the i9-11900 trails by 0.3%. The GPU's average benchmark score is 58,392, placing it in the 88th percentile. The NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58,528 (-0.2%), the Intel Arc A570M scores 58,239 (+0.3%), the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657 (-0.5%), and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58,085 (+0.5%).

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 85, which reflects a system that outperforms the vast majority of builds in the database. The CPU's individual benchmarks show a spread: Cinebench R15 multi-core of 2,148 and single-core of 303; Cinebench R20 multi-core of 8,952 and single-core of 1,263; Geekbench multi-core of 9,807 and single-core of 1,905. The PassMark suite adds depth: data compression 314,995, encryption 16,731, extended instructions 19,816, prime numbers 80, floating-point math 61,549, integer math 82,017, multithread 25,080, physics 1,396, random string sorting 32,346, and single-thread 3,741.

The GPU's benchmarks are equally detailed: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,235, Geekbench Metal 222,653, OpenCL 205,998, Vulkan 165,212, PassMark DirectX 10 (164), DirectX 11 (300), DirectX 12 (114), DirectX 9 (303), G2D 1,063, G3D 28,070, and GPU compute 14,199. The combined picture is a system where both components are near the top of their respective categories, with the GPU holding a slight edge in percentile ranking.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using TSMC's 7 nm process. The Navi 21 chip contains 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die, with a transistor density of 51.5M per mm². The GPU has 5,120 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation pipelines, along with 80 ray tracing cores. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1,860 MHz, the boost clock is 2,310 MHz, and the game clock is 2,100 MHz, with memory running at 2,250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Compute performance is substantial: FP32 throughput is 23.65 TFLOPS, and FP16 reaches 47.31 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 295.7 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 739.2 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it fully featured for modern games and applications. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 2x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Benchmark scores confirm the GPU's high-end status. The PassMark G3D score of 28,070 places it in the 88th percentile, which is higher than the CPU's 82nd percentile. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 205,998 and Vulkan score of 165,212 indicate strong compute capability for rendering and AI workloads. The Metal score of 222,653 is notable for any cross-platform work. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,235 reflects modern DirectX 12 gaming performance.

The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for high-resolution textures and large 3D scenes, and the 576.0 GB/s bandwidth prevents memory bottlenecks in most scenarios. The 80 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though RDNA 2's RT performance is not class-leading. The GPU's TDP of 335 W requires robust cooling — it is a triple-slot card measuring 267 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 50 mm in width.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 88th percentile ranking (G3D 28,070) combined with the CPU's 82nd percentile (Cinebench R23 3,009 single-core) suggests frame rates well above 60 FPS at 1440p in most titles. At 1080p, the CPU's single-core performance may limit maximum frame rates in esports games, but the GPU's raw power will dominate.

Streaming: The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,315, provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU's compute performance (PassMark GPU compute 14,199) can also assist with encoding tasks, though the CPU alone can handle x264 encoding at reasonable presets.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R20 8,952, PassMark multithread 25,080) handle timeline scrubbing and export rendering. The GPU accelerates effects and color grading with its OpenCL score of 205,998 and 16 GB VRAM for large project files.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core of 21,315 provides solid CPU-based rendering. The GPU's FP32 of 23.65 TFLOPS accelerates GPU-accelerated renderers, and the 576.0 GB/s bandwidth moves scene data efficiently.

Software development: The CPU's data encryption score of 16,731 and integer math of 82,017 speed up compilation and cryptographic operations. The extended instructions score of 19,816 handles SIMD-heavy code. The 10 cores allow parallel builds.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core scores (Geekbench 1,905, PassMark single-thread 3,741) handle word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing effortlessly. The GPU is overkill for these tasks, but the ECC memory support adds reliability for important documents.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: "desktop") pairing the Intel Core i5-14400 with the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a 16 GB RDNA 2 card with a 335 W TDP. The combined percentile of 85 places this system in the upper tier of all builds in the database, indicating strong overall performance.

The CPU's 82nd percentile and the GPU's 88th percentile are closely matched, suggesting a balanced system that avoids major bottlenecks. The GPU's higher percentile means it is slightly more capable relative to its peers, making this a GPU-forward build for gaming and compute-heavy tasks. The CPU's strengths in multi-threaded workloads complement the GPU's raw rendering power. The system supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing upgrade flexibility, and the PCIe Gen 5 CPU lanes future-proof storage and expansion.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 85, meaning this system outperforms 85% of all builds in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14400 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-12800H?

A: The i5-14400 scores 32,115 on average, while the i7-12800H scores 32,121, a delta of 0% — they are statistically identical in performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and VRAM capacity?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14400 supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for data integrity in workstation environments.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 700 W, which provides ample headroom for the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 335 W TDP.

Q: Are there any measured FPS results for this exact CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows in the data for this specific pairing, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The GPU includes 80 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds