SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600T

35,305 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13600T + Intel Arc B580

The Intel Core i5-13600T pairs a 14-core Raptor Lake processor with Intel’s Arc B580 graphics card in a desktop configuration. This combination sits at the 77th percentile overall among all build pairings, placing it firmly above the median but short of enthusiast-tier hardware. The CPU holds an 85th percentile ranking against all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 68th percentile against all graphics cards, indicating a CPU-leaning balance where the processor outperforms its graphics counterpart in relative standing. This pairing targets users who need strong multi-threaded compute for productivity workloads while maintaining respectable 1080p and 1440p gaming capability.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600T is built on the Raptor Lake architecture using Intel’s 10 nm process node, with a die size of 215 mm². It contains 14 physical cores and 20 threads, combining performance cores and efficiency cores to balance throughput against power draw. The base clock is 1800.00 MHz, which is conservative for a desktop processor, but the boost clock reaches 4.80 GHz, allowing substantial single-thread headroom when workloads demand it. The 35 W TDP is notably low for a 14-core desktop part, making this a power-efficient choice rather than a maximum-performance one. Cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, providing adequate on-die storage for frequently accessed data across the core complex.

Benchmark results show a processor that performs well above its modest power envelope. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 23571 indicates strong sustained throughput for heavily threaded workloads, while the single-core score of 3327 demonstrates capable per-thread performance. The Geekbench scores of 10851 multi-core and 2385 single-core reinforce this pattern. PassMark results are particularly informative: multi-thread performance scores 27098, integer math reaches 96299, and floating-point math hits 70152, showing robust arithmetic capability. The extended instructions score of 20651 suggests solid SIMD throughput, which benefits media encoding and scientific computing. Data compression scores 337893 while data encryption reaches 19320, indicating that the processor handles compression tasks exceptionally well but is more modest in cryptographic work.

The average benchmark score of 35305 places this CPU at the 85th percentile of all processors. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-12700K with an average score of 35287 and a delta of 0%, meaning the i5-13600T is statistically tied with that older i7 flagship. The Core i7-12700KF scores 35365 with a delta of -0.2%, again essentially identical. The Intel Core i7-13700T scores 35403 with a delta of -0.3%, and the Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428 with a delta of -0.3%. All four rival chips fall within a 0.3% band of the i5-13600T, indicating that this 35 W processor matches the performance of full-power desktop CPUs from previous generations.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3327 in Cinebench R23 and 3728 in PassMark single-thread indicate strong per-core performance that can drive high frame rates in most games. However, the GPU’s 68th percentile ranking means it will likely be the limiting factor at higher resolutions, so 1080p high-refresh is the realistic target rather than 1440p or 4K at maximum refresh rates.

Streaming: The 14-core, 20-thread configuration provides ample headroom for encoding while gaming, with a multi-thread score of 23571 in Cinebench R23 indicating strong parallel throughput. The 24 MB L3 cache helps maintain low latency for concurrent workloads, and the CPU’s data compression score of 337893 suggests it can handle stream encoding without significant frame drops.

Video editing: The multi-core performance of 27098 in PassMark multi-thread and 70152 in floating-point math translates to efficient rendering and effects processing in timeline-based editors. The 12 GB GPU memory on the Arc B580 provides enough VRAM for 1080p and 1440p editing projects, while the CPU’s 20 threads handle timeline scrubbing and export tasks competently.

3D rendering: Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9899 and R15 multi-core score of 2375 demonstrate that this CPU delivers solid ray-traced rendering performance for its power class. The GPU’s 20 ray tracing cores and 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 throughput add hardware-accelerated RT capability, though the GPU’s 68th percentile ranking suggests it will not compete with high-end render cards.

Software development: The high integer math score of 96299 and random string sorting score of 36413 indicate strong performance for compilation tasks and code analysis. The 20 threads allow parallel builds to complete faster than on lower-core-count CPUs, and the 35 W TDP keeps power costs low for always-on development machines.

Student and office work: The single-core score of 2385 in Geekbench and 3728 in PassMark single-thread handle everyday productivity applications with ease. The low 35 W TDP makes this an energy-efficient choice for long-duration office use, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is not needed.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 35305 places it at the 85th percentile against all processors, which is a strong showing for a 35 W part. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-12700K, scores 35287 with a delta of 0%, confirming that the i5-13600T delivers equivalent performance to a previous-generation unlocked flagship. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571 is particularly notable, as it demonstrates that this low-power processor can outperform many higher-TDP desktop chips in sustained workloads.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 23021 places it at the 68th percentile against all graphics cards. Its nearest rivals show a tighter cluster: the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP scores 23061 with a delta of -0.2%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895 with a delta of 0.6%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23172 with a delta of -0.7%, and the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249 with a delta of -1%. These deltas are all within 1%, meaning the Arc B580 performs in the same class as these established cards, despite being a newer architecture.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 3068, which is a modern DirectX 12 benchmark reflecting current-generation gaming loads. Geekbench OpenCL scores 92821 and Vulkan scores 109672, showing that the GPU’s compute capability is strong in both API environments. PassMark G3D scores 15748, while GPU compute scores 7729, indicating that the card’s graphics performance is roughly double its compute throughput in that benchmark suite. The combined CPU and GPU percentiles of 85 and 68 respectively produce an overall build percentile of 77, reflecting the CPU-leaning nature of this pairing.

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, so all frame rate discussions must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than verified results.

FAQ

Q: Does the i5-13600T support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked is false), so the processor cannot be overclocked through multiplier adjustment. The boost clock of 4.80 GHz is the maximum attainable frequency.

Q: What memory types does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The memory bus is dual-channel, and ECC memory is supported, which is useful for workstation reliability.

Q: How does the Arc B580 compare to the RTX 2080?

A: The Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021 compared to the RTX 2080’s 22895, a delta of 0.6% in the Arc’s favor. This places them in the same performance class, with the Arc B580 being marginally ahead in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the stronger component in this build?

A: The CPU ranks at the 85th percentile of all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 68th percentile of all graphics cards. The CPU is proportionally stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its peers.

Q: What is the power draw of this CPU?

A: The CPU has a 35 W TDP, which is very low for a 14-core desktop processor. This allows for efficient operation and potentially smaller cooling solutions.

Q: Does the GPU support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the Arc B580 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering the full range of current graphics APIs.

Q: What is the release date of each component?

A: The CPU was released on January 3, 2023, and the GPU was released on December 12, 2024.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is the LGA 1700 socket. This socket supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory technology based on motherboard selection and budget. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), which allows for high-bandwidth connectivity to modern graphics cards and NVMe storage. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output, which is useful for troubleshooting or office workloads that do not require discrete graphics.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slot (the slot will run at the lower 4.0 speed). The Arc B580 has a TDP of 190 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. The CPU’s 35 W TDP leaves substantial headroom in the power budget, meaning the 450 W PSU recommendation is driven almost entirely by the GPU’s requirements. A 450 W PSU provides roughly 225 W of headroom beyond the combined CPU and GPU power draw of 225 W, which is sufficient for typical system components.

For a sensible next upgrade, the platform supports newer Intel processors on the same socket, though the specific compatibility depends on motherboard BIOS updates. The PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU means that a future GPU upgrade to a PCIe Gen 5 card would be fully supported. The 24 MB L3 cache and 20 threads provide longevity for multi-threaded workloads, so the CPU is likely to remain viable for several years. The GPU, being at the 68th percentile, is the more likely upgrade candidate, with a higher-tier card providing a significant performance boost in gaming and rendering workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture using TSMC’s 5 nm process node, with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 72.1M / mm². The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units, providing a balanced configuration for rasterization workloads. The 20 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is supported through DirectX 12 Ultimate. The base and boost clocks are both 2670 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, providing 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory size and bandwidth combination is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming at high textures, as well as for some content creation workloads where VRAM capacity matters. The pixel rate is 213.6 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 427.2 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill-rate capabilities. FP32 performance is 13.67 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 27.34 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), providing capable compute throughput for AI and scientific workloads.

In benchmark testing, the GPU achieves a PassMark G3D score of 15748, placing it at the 68th percentile of all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3068 represents modern DirectX 12 gaming performance. Geekbench Vulkan score of 109672 outperforms the OpenCL score of 92821, suggesting the GPU is better optimized for Vulkan workloads. The PassMark DirectX 11 score of 128 is notably higher than the DirectX 12 score of 76 and DirectX 10 score of 76, which may indicate driver maturity issues in newer APIs. The DirectX 9 score of 183 shows strong legacy performance, while the G2D score of 709 reflects modest 2D acceleration.

The GPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (delta -0.2%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (delta 0.6%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (delta -0.7%), and NVIDIA P106-100 (delta -1%). These deltas are all within 1%, meaning the Arc B580 delivers performance comparable to these established cards despite being a newer architecture. The RTX 3080 comparison is particularly interesting, as the Arc B580 matches it in aggregate benchmarks while using less power and memory bandwidth.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 68th percentile creates a clear imbalance in this pairing. The processor is substantially stronger relative to its peers than the graphics card, which means the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the GPU’s performance will dictate frame rates, with the CPU having sufficient headroom to avoid limiting even at high frame rates. For a game that is GPU-bound, the CPU’s 20 threads and strong single-core score of 3327 in Cinebench R23 will not be the limiting factor.

However, in CPU-intensive workloads such as video encoding, software compilation, or 3D rendering, the balance shifts. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 23571 in Cinebench R23 and PassMark multi-thread score of 27098 demonstrate capability that the GPU cannot match in compute-heavy tasks. The GPU’s PassMark GPU compute score of 7729 is modest, so tasks that rely on GPU compute will be limited by the Arc B580.

The power draw differential reinforces this imbalance: the CPU’s 35 W TDP versus the GPU’s 190 W TDP means the GPU dominates system power consumption. In gaming, where the GPU is the primary contributor to frame rendering, this is expected. In productivity workloads that are CPU-bound, the system will draw significantly less power, making the pairing efficient for office tasks and development work. The PCIe 4.0 x8 GPU interface provides sufficient bandwidth for this performance class, though a higher-tier GPU might benefit from the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13600T processor with the Intel Arc B580 graphics card. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake part with a 35 W TDP, released in January 2023. The GPU is a Battlemage architecture card with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 190 W TDP, released in December 2024. The combined percentile ranking is 77th, placing this build in the upper-midrange tier of all system configurations.

The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking makes it the stronger component, while the GPU’s 68th percentile places it in the midrange of graphics cards. This pairing is best suited for users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads such as content creation, software development, and multitasking, while still wanting capable 1080p gaming performance. The 35 W CPU TDP makes this an energy-efficient desktop option, particularly for users who leave their systems running for extended periods. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM provides future-proofing for texture-heavy games and some workstation tasks, though the 68th percentile ranking indicates it will not compete with high-end cards.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find this build suitable for high-refresh gaming, with the GPU’s performance class matching the RTX 2080 and RTX 3080 within 1% in aggregate benchmarks. At 1440p, the GPU will still handle most titles at playable frame rates, though users seeking maximum settings at high refresh rates may need to adjust expectations. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures that frame times remain consistent in CPU-bound scenarios.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or graphic design will benefit from the CPU’s 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571 indicates that rendering tasks will complete efficiently, while the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM supports large texture sets and complex scenes. The data compression score of 337893 is particularly useful for archival and backup workflows. Software developers will appreciate the high integer math score of 96299 and the 20 threads for parallel builds, while the low 35 W TDP keeps electricity costs down for always-on development machines.

Students and office workers who need a reliable desktop for coursework, research, and productivity applications will find this build more than adequate. The single-thread performance of 3728 in PassMark handles everyday tasks smoothly, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed. Small business workstations that run accounting software, database applications, or virtualization workloads will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded throughput and ECC memory support.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core i5-13600T paired with the Intel Arc B580, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than verified measurements. Users should treat these as approximate expectations based on the GPU’s performance class.

The Arc B580’s 68th percentile ranking and its benchmark parity with the RTX 2080 and RTX 3080 (within 0.7% in aggregate) suggest that at 1080p resolution, most modern games will run at high settings with frame rates exceeding 60 FPS. On the ultra preset, which is the most demanding setting, the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3068 indicates it can handle current DX12 titles, though frame rates will vary by title. At 1440p, the 12 GB VRAM and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate memory capacity, but the 68th percentile ranking means that ultra settings may push the GPU to its limits, resulting in frame rates around 30-60 FPS depending on the game.

The CPU’s strong single-core performance (3327 in Cinebench R23, 3728 in PassMark single-thread) ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU at 1080p or 1440p. The 4.80 GHz boost clock provides high per-thread throughput, and the 20 threads handle background tasks without impacting gaming performance. The PassMark DirectX 11 score of 128 being higher than the DirectX 12 score of 76 suggests that older DX11 games may run better than newer DX12 titles, which is a driver maturity consideration. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 109672 in Geekbench indicates strong Vulkan performance, so Vulkan-based games may perform particularly well. For competitive titles that favor high frame rates, the GPU’s 80 ROPs and 213.6 GPixel/s pixel rate provide adequate fill-rate, though users seeking 240 Hz displays may need to lower settings to reach those frame rates.