SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600T

35,305 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13600T + Intel Arc A750

This desktop pairing combines a 14-core Raptor Lake processor with Intel's Arc A750 graphics card, placing the system at the 76th percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 66th percentile among all graphics cards. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of each component.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600T is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture using a 10nm process node. It features a base clock of 1800 MHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 35W TDP that makes it a notably power-efficient desktop part. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support included. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

In multi-threaded workloads, the i5-13600T delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571, which places it within striking distance of the Intel Core i7-12700K (avg score 35287) and i7-12700KF (35365), with delta percentages of 0% and -0.2% respectively. This means the 13600T is effectively neck-and-neck with those older i7 parts in aggregate benchmark performance, despite its lower TDP. The single-core Cinebench R23 result of 3327 demonstrates strong per-thread performance, which is critical for lightly-threaded applications. The Geekbench scores of 10851 multi-core and 2385 single-core reinforce this pattern: the chip handles both parallel and serial workloads competently.

The PassMark suite provides additional insight into specialized workloads. The multi-thread score of 27098, integer math at 96299, and floating-point math at 70152 indicate solid general-purpose compute capability. Data compression scores 337893, while data encryption hits 19320, suggesting the chip handles compression tasks particularly well relative to encryption workloads. The extended instructions score of 20651 and random string sorting at 36413 round out the picture of a balanced processor. The find prime numbers score of 82 is a weaker result, indicating that the chip is less optimized for certain integer-heavy single-threaded algorithms. Physics simulation scores 1287 in PassMark, which is modest but acceptable for a 35W part.

The 85th percentile ranking against all CPUs means this processor outperforms the vast majority of desktop and laptop chips currently tracked. Its nearest rivals, including the i7-12700K and i7-13700T, all show delta percentages within 0.3% of each other, indicating that the 13600T sits in a highly competitive performance band. For real workloads, this translates to strong multi-core rendering in Cinebench, responsive single-threaded application performance, and capable data compression throughput, all while maintaining a low 35W TDP that makes it suitable for compact or thermally constrained builds.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) using TSMC's 6nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2050 MHz and boosts to 2400 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The chip includes 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation units. Ray tracing is handled by 28 dedicated RT cores, and the card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the A750 scores 2612, which is a modest result for a modern graphics card. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 and Vulkan score of 85631 indicate that compute workloads perform reasonably well under both APIs. PassMark results show DirectX 11 scoring 72, DirectX 12 scoring 70, and DirectX 9 scoring 181, with DirectX 10 lagging at 65. The G3D score of 12534 and G2D score of 732 place the card in the 66th percentile among all GPUs. Compute performance is reflected in the PassMark GPU compute score of 5368.

The pixel rate of 268.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 537.6 GTexel/s are substantial figures, supporting the card's ability to handle high-resolution rasterization and texture-heavy scenes. The FP32 throughput of 17.20 TFLOPS and FP16 of 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) provide solid math throughput for both gaming and compute tasks. The nearest rivals include the Intel Arc B570 (avg score 20556, delta 0.1%) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, delta 0.2%), with the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662, delta -0.4%) and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480, delta 0.5%) nearby. This clustering indicates the A750 performs at a level comparable to these cards in aggregate benchmark terms.

The card uses a dual-slot design with power connectors of 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin, and has a TDP of 225W with a suggested PSU of 550W. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 and offers display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0. For rendering workloads, the 8 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient capacity for 1080p and 1440p textures, while the RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles. The 66th percentile ranking shows the A750 outperforms a majority of GPUs but sits below higher-tier cards, making it a mid-range solution for gaming and light-to-moderate rendering tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 35305, while the GPU's average is 20582. The combined percentile for this pairing is 76, indicating that the system outperforms three-quarters of all tracked CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking is notably higher than the GPU's 66th percentile, suggesting the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU achieves 23571 multi-core and 3327 single-core. These scores indicate strong multi-threaded rendering capability that would benefit video encoding and 3D rendering tasks. The Cinebench R20 scores of 9899 multi-core and 1397 single-core follow the same pattern, while R15 scores of 2375 multi-core and 335 single-core complete the picture. The Geekbench results of 10851 multi-core and 2385 single-core corroborate the Cinebench findings.

For the GPU, the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 represents its DirectX 12 gaming performance. The PassMark G3D score of 12534 and compute score of 5368 reflect its overall graphics and compute throughput. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 and Vulkan score of 85631 demonstrate strong API-specific performance, with Vulkan slightly trailing OpenCL.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU operates at a high level relative to its competition, while the GPU performs at a more modest level. This creates an asymmetrical profile: the processor can handle demanding multi-threaded workloads without becoming a bottleneck, but the GPU will likely limit frame rates in graphically intensive games. The data indicates that for CPU-bound tasks like compilation, encoding, or productivity suites, this system performs admirably. For GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming or GPU rendering, the A750 becomes the limiting factor.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile gap between CPU (85th) and GPU (66th) is the primary indicator of system imbalance. The processor is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the graphics card, meaning that in gaming scenarios, the GPU will typically be the bottleneck at higher resolutions and quality settings. Conversely, in CPU-intensive workloads such as software compilation, data compression, or multi-threaded rendering, the processor will perform at a high level while the GPU remains underutilized.

The CPU's 35W TDP contrasts sharply with the GPU's 225W TDP, reinforcing that the graphics card dominates power consumption and likely heat output. In gaming, the frame rate will be governed by the GPU's 66th percentile performance, not the CPU's 85th percentile capability. The PassMark physics score of 1287 and single-thread score of 3728 suggest that even in CPU-light gaming scenarios, the processor has ample headroom.

For productivity workloads that are primarily CPU-bound, the system will feel swift and responsive. The data compression score of 337893 and integer math score of 96299 indicate strong throughput for data-heavy tasks. However, GPU-accelerated tasks like video encoding (if using the Arc A750's encoders) or GPU rendering will be constrained by the A750's mid-range compute performance. The DirectX 12 score of 70 in PassMark versus DirectX 11 at 72 suggests that the card handles modern APIs adequately but does not excel in any particular graphics API.

The 512 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM are sufficient for 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p workloads, but they may cause stuttering or texture pop-in in VRAM-hungry titles at higher settings. The CPU's dual-channel memory support (DDR4 or DDR5) will not limit the GPU in most scenarios, as the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides ample bandwidth. Overall, the bottleneck profile is clear: the GPU limits gaming performance, while the CPU is the stronger component in compute-heavy tasks.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity but still want a capable discrete GPU for gaming and light creative work. The 85th percentile CPU makes this system well-suited for software developers, students in engineering or computer science programs, and small business workstations that run multi-threaded applications. The 14 cores and 20 threads handle parallel compilation, virtualization, and data processing efficiently, while the 35W TDP keeps power costs low in always-on environments.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the A750 adequate for most titles at medium-to-high settings, though the 66th percentile GPU ranking indicates it is not a high-end gaming card. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's strong Cinebench scores, but GPU-accelerated effects will be limited by the A750's compute performance. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and entry-level 1440p creative work, making this a reasonable choice for hobbyist creators who occasionally render or edit.

The system is less suitable for users who demand high-refresh 1440p gaming or 4K rendering, as the GPU will struggle at those resolutions. However, for users who value CPU throughput for their primary workloads and game occasionally, this pairing offers a balanced compromise. The ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 5 CPU lanes also make this platform attractive for entry-level workstation use where data integrity is important.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh 1080p gaming, the A750's 66th percentile performance suggests it can deliver playable frame rates in most titles, but not consistently at 144Hz in demanding games. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3728 in PassMark ensures that frame pacing remains stable in CPU-light scenarios, but GPU-bound scenes will cap the frame rate.

Streaming while gaming benefits from the CPU's 20 threads, which can handle encoding overhead without strangling game performance. The PassMark multi-thread score of 27098 indicates sufficient headroom for software encoding, though using the GPU's hardware encoder would free up CPU resources further.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will see strong timeline performance from the CPU's 23571 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. The A750's compute score of 5368 provides acceleration for effects and transitions, though it will not match higher-end GPUs for heavy color grading or 4K multi-stream editing.

3D rendering in Blender or similar tools relies heavily on both CPU and GPU. The CPU's rendering performance is excellent for a 35W part, but the GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is mid-range. Renders that use GPU acceleration will take longer than on higher-tier cards, but CPU-based rendering will be competitive.

Software development benefits from the 14 cores and 20 threads, which speed up compilation and test execution. The data compression score of 337893 helps with build artifacts and package management, while the single-core performance ensures fast IDE responsiveness. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes.

Student and office workloads are well-served by this system. The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance handles spreadsheet simulations, data analysis, and virtual machines, while the GPU provides enough graphics power for presentations and light photo editing. The 35W CPU TDP keeps the system quiet and cool, making it suitable for shared or small office spaces.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The following frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the Intel Core i5-13600T and the Intel Arc A750, and should not be treated as measured results.

Based on the GPU's 66th percentile ranking and its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612, the A750 is positioned for 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings in most modern titles. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 70 in PassMark suggests it handles modern APIs reasonably well, but the DirectX 9 score of 181 indicates legacy titles may run better. The 8 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient memory for 1080p textures, but 1440p gaming will require reduced settings to stay within VRAM limits.

The CPU's 85th percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The single-thread score of 3728 ensures that CPU-heavy games and simulation titles will run smoothly. Frame rates in esports titles like CS2 or Valorant could likely exceed 144 FPS at 1080p, given the CPU's strength and the GPU's mid-range capability. In AAA titles at 1080p ultra settings, frame rates would likely fall in the 40–70 FPS range depending on the game, with ray tracing enabled reducing performance further due to the 28 RT cores.

At 1440p, the A750 would likely require medium settings to maintain 60 FPS in most games, and high-refresh 1440p gaming would be limited to lighter titles. The GPU's pixel rate of 268.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 537.6 GTexel/s are adequate for 1440p, but the 8 GB VRAM may cause issues in VRAM-heavy titles at that resolution. Overall, treat all FPS figures as estimates, not measured data.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T ranks at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35305.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc A750 has an average benchmark score of 20582, placing it at the 66th percentile. Its nearest rival, the Intel Arc B570, scores 20556 (0.1% delta), while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534 (0.2% delta).

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600T supports ECC memory, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined CPU+GPU pairing ranks at the 76th percentile among all tracked system combinations.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this pairing?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All gaming frame rates discussed are estimates based on individual component benchmark scores.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A750 has a TDP of 225W and a suggested PSU rating of 550W.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class system pairing the Intel Core i5-13600T (14 cores, 20 threads, Raptor Lake architecture) with the Intel Arc A750 (Xe-HPG architecture, 8 GB GDDR6). The CPU ranks at the 85th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 66th percentile among all graphics cards. The combined percentile of 76 indicates this system outperforms three-quarters of all tracked CPU+GPU combinations.

The CPU's 35W TDP makes it an energy-efficient choice, while the GPU's 225W TDP is typical for a mid-range discrete card. The system is best described as a CPU-forward pairing, where the processor's strong multi-threaded performance and high percentile ranking are the standout features. The GPU provides competent but not exceptional graphics performance suitable for 1080p gaming and light creative work.

This pairing is appropriate for users who need strong CPU throughput for productivity tasks and occasional gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads. It is not a high-end gaming rig, but it offers a balanced feature set for a desktop workstation or a general-purpose home computer.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The platform offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for current and near-future GPUs and NVMe storage. The CPU's ECC memory support adds a reliability feature that is uncommon in consumer desktop parts.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots. The card requires a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connector, and the suggested PSU is 550W, leaving headroom for a more powerful GPU in the future. The GPU's 225W TDP is the dominant power consumer in this system, so upgrading the CPU later would not require a PSU change.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-performing GPU, as the CPU's 85th percentile ranking has more headroom than the GPU's 66th percentile. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and 550W PSU recommendation would accommodate a wide range of graphics cards. The Socket 1700 platform also supports higher-TDP processors, though the 35W i5-13600T's cooling solution would need to be revisited if upgrading to a more power-hungry CPU. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means users can choose their memory platform based on availability and budget, with DDR5 offering higher bandwidth for CPU-intensive tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600T

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds