SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

85%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600T

35,305 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600T paired with the Intel Arc A310 is a desktop build that presents a stark contrast in performance tiers. The CPU is a high-end, power-efficient 14-core processor, while the GPU is a low-power entry-level discrete graphics card. Because no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components and their percentile positions.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures here are estimates based on the component benchmark scores. The Intel Arc A310 sits at the 40th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 7550. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R7 250 (deltaPct -0.1), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (deltaPct -0.4), and notably the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, which scores slightly higher with a deltaPct of 1. This positions the Arc A310 as a very entry-level gaming solution.

The GPU's raw computational specs reinforce this assessment. With a PassMark G3D score of 5433 and DirectX 11 and 12 scores of 33 and 29 respectively, the A310 will struggle with modern titles at high settings. The DirectX 9 score of 69 suggests that legacy games run relatively better, but this is an older API. For 1080p gaming, the expectation is playable frame rates only in less demanding esports titles at low-to-medium settings. For modern AAA games, the 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely be a limiting factor, causing stutter and texture pop-in at higher detail levels.

The CPU, however, is a different story. The Intel Core i5-13600T is a powerhouse with an average benchmark score of 35305, placing it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3327 ensures that the CPU will not be the bottleneck in frame generation for most games. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming in eSports titles, the i5-13600T can easily feed the Arc A310 with more frames than the latter can render. The practical result is that the GPU will be the definitive performance ceiling in almost every gaming scenario, making this a combination that is not suited for high-fidelity or high-refresh gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a massive performance gulf between the two components. The CPU, Intel Core i5-13600T, achieves an average benchmark score of 35305, placing it at the 85th percentile. This score is nearly identical to its closest rivals, including the Intel Core i7-12700K (deltaPct 0), the Intel Core i7-12700KF (deltaPct -0.2), and the Intel Core i7-13700T (deltaPct -0.3). This indicates the i5-13600T delivers performance on par with a previous-generation i7 desktop flagship, a remarkable feat for a 35 W TDP part.

The GPU, Intel Arc A310, presents a starkly different picture. With an average benchmark score of 7550, it sits at the 40th percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, scores 7472, meaning the A310 is only 1% behind it. While this puts it in a similar class to the GTX 1650, that is a low bar for modern gaming. The combined percentile for this build is 63, dragged down significantly by the GPU. The data clearly shows a pairing of a high-tier CPU with an entry-tier GPU, a combination that will define its capabilities in all workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. It has 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. The GPU includes 6 dedicated ray tracing cores, which is notable for its class, but its raw compute power is limited. The FP32 performance is 2.688 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is 5.376 TFLOPS (2:1). These figures explain its benchmark scores, such as the Geekbench OpenCL score of 30607 and Vulkan score of 28964.

The memory subsystem is a significant constraint. The 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus provides 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is insufficient for many modern game textures at 1080p, let alone higher resolutions. The GPU's PassMark G2D score of 625 is adequate for desktop and 2D workloads, but the G3D score of 5433 confirms its 3D rendering limitations. The DirectX 12 score of 29 is particularly low, suggesting that the GPU's modern API performance is weak. The low TDP of 30 W and single-slot design indicate it is intended for basic functionality and low-power systems rather than performance-oriented gaming. The suggested PSU of 200 W further confirms its low-power design.

Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing is a textbook example of a CPU-bound system, but in an unusual way. Typically, a CPU bottleneck means the processor cannot keep up with the GPU. Here, the opposite is true; the CPU is vastly overpowered relative to the GPU. The CPU's 85th percentile performance and the GPU's 40th percentile performance create a situation where the Arc A310 is almost certainly the bottleneck in any graphics-intensive task.

Evidence for this lies in the FPS scaling expectations. In gaming, a more powerful CPU can render more frames, but the GPU must output them. Since the A310's PassMark G3D score is 5433, its rendering capacity is limited. The CPU's high single-core score (Cinebench R23 single-core 3327) means it can process game logic and physics quickly, but the frames will be waiting at the GPU. Therefore, in gaming, the GPU is the sole limiting factor. In non-gaming tasks, the balance shifts. For tasks like video encoding or general productivity, the CPU's 20 threads and high multi-core score (Cinebench R23 multi-core 23571) will be the primary engine, and the GPU's role is minimal. The GPU is so weak that it will not bottleneck the CPU in most CPU-centric workloads; it simply contributes little to them.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600T is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S) on Intel's 10 nm process. Its base clock is 1800.00 MHz, with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. This low base clock and high boost clock, combined with a 35 W TDP, highlight its efficiency focus. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and includes ECC memory support. The CPU has a 24 MB shared L3 cache and a 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache.

The benchmark results paint a picture of a highly capable workstation CPU that sips power. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571 is exceptional, placing it at the 85th percentile and rivaling the Intel Core i7-12700K. This makes it superb for multi-threaded workloads like video rendering, software compilation, and 3D modeling. The single-core score of 3327 is equally impressive, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and strong performance in lightly-threaded applications. Its Geekbench multi-core score of 10851 and single-core score of 2385 confirm its balanced high performance. The PassMark multi-thread score of 27098 and integer math score of 96299 show strong computational throughput, while the floating-point math score of 70152 indicates solid performance for scientific and engineering calculations. This CPU is a powerful engine for a wide range of professional applications.

Who Should Build It

This build is ideal for a specific niche: users who require significant CPU power but have minimal 3D graphics requirements. The target user is not a gamer. The Arc A310's 40th percentile ranking and low DirectX 12 score make it unsuitable for modern gaming beyond the lightest esports titles.

The primary audience is professionals and creators who work with CPU-intensive applications. For software developers, the 14 cores and 20 threads, along with a PassMark data compression score of 337893, make this an excellent platform for compiling code and running virtual machines. For students and researchers in fields like data analysis, the high multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core 23571) can handle large datasets and complex simulations. This is also a solid choice for a small business workstation where tasks involve office productivity, web development, and financial modeling, all of which benefit from the CPU's high single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 2385) and multi-core capability. The 4 GB GPU is sufficient for driving multiple displays with its 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, making it a functional, if not powerful, graphics solution for productivity.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance class of the Intel Core i5-13600T?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T is a high-performance desktop CPU, ranking at the 85th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 35305.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13600T compare to the Intel Core i7-12700K?

A: The i5-13600T has an average benchmark score of 35305, which is essentially identical to the Intel Core i7-12700K's score of 35287, showing a deltaPct of 0.

Q: What is the gaming performance of the Intel Arc A310?

A: Gaming performance is limited. The Arc A310 ranks at the 40th percentile of all GPUs, with a PassMark G3D score of 5433, indicating it is only suitable for light or older games. Its DirectX 12 score is 29.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A310 have?

A: The Intel Arc A310 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU in this build?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T has a TDP of 35 W, while the Intel Arc A310 has a TDP of 30 W. The suggested PSU for this system is 200 W.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-13600T support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600T supports ECC memory, along with both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 63.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the 13th Gen Intel Core i5-13600T processor with the Intel Arc A310 graphics card. The pairing is defined by its extreme asymmetry: a top-tier CPU at the 85th percentile and an entry-level GPU at the 40th percentile. The i5-13600T is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-S part designed for efficiency with a 35 W TDP, capable of delivering performance on par with the Intel Core i7-12700K. The Arc A310 is a low-power 30 W GPU built on the Xe-HPG architecture with only 4 GB of GDDR6 memory. The overall tier of this system, as indicated by its 63rd combined percentile, is a high-performance workstation CPU paired with a basic display and video output GPU. It is not a balanced gaming machine, but rather a specialized tool for CPU-centric computing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700. The Core i5-13600T supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering flexibility in choosing memory modules. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, ensuring high bandwidth for future expansion cards. The motherboard must be chosen to support either DDR4 or DDR5, as the CPU supports both but not simultaneously.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system is the GPU. The i5-13600T is an extremely capable processor that can easily support a much more powerful graphics card for gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking means it will not become a limiting factor for a long time. Given the 200 W suggested PSU for the current configuration, a GPU upgrade would likely necessitate a higher-capacity power supply. The i5-13600T's powerful integrated graphics are not present in the pack, but the discrete A310 is the current bottleneck. Swapping the A310 for a higher-tier GPU would transform this from a productivity-focused workstation into a very capable gaming or content creation machine, fully leveraging the CPU's multi-core might.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: Not recommended. The Arc A310's 40th percentile performance and low DirectX 12 score of 29 mean it cannot produce the frame rates necessary for high-refresh gaming. The CPU can, but the GPU is the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU is more than capable of handling the encoding workload. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571 and 20 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, although the GPU's weak gaming performance makes this scenario unattractive for modern titles.

Video Editing: This is a viable scenario. The CPU's strong multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core 23571) and high PassMark integer math score (96299) will handle timeline editing and rendering efficiently. The GPU will assist with effects, but its 4 GB VRAM and 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 performance will limit the complexity of real-time effects.

3D Rendering: This is an excellent use case for the CPU. The 14 cores and 20 threads, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23571, will render scenes quickly. The Arc A310's 6 ray tracing cores are present, but its low FP32 throughput of 2.688 TFLOPS will not significantly accelerate GPU-based renders.

Software Development: This is a prime target audience. The CPU's high compilation speed (PassMark data compression score 337893) and multi-threaded performance (PassMark multi-thread 27098) make it ideal for building large projects and running containerized workloads.

Student and Office Work: Excellent. The CPU's high single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 2385) ensures snappy application responsiveness. The Arc A310's 4 GB VRAM and 4x mini-DisplayPort outputs provide sufficient support for multiple high-resolution monitors, though its PassMark G2D score of 625 is adequate for standard 2D desktop workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600T + Intel Arc A310

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600T

Intel Arc A310

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds