SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + Intel Arc B770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B770

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13600KF + Intel Arc B770

This desktop build pairs Intel’s Core i5-13600KF processor with Intel’s Arc B770 graphics card, creating a platform that sits at the 68th percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations in the benchmark database. The CPU is firmly established as a strong mid-range performer, ranking above 86% of all CPUs tracked, while the GPU lands at the 50th percentile, representing a balanced pairing where the processor carries the performance load. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the individual benchmark scores of each component.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i5-13600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which places it in the Raptor Lake generation of Intel’s 13th Gen Core series. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing between older, more established memory platforms and newer high-bandwidth options. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the processor itself, which is a notable capability for storage and expansion cards, though the Arc B770 GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16.

The i5-13600KF carries a TDP of 125 watts, while the Arc B770 specifies a 225-watt TDP. The suggested power supply for the GPU is 550 watts, which provides a clear reference point for PSU headroom when selecting components for this build. A 550-watt unit meets the minimum requirement, though the combined draw of a 14-core processor under load and the GPU suggests that builders should consider the total system power budget carefully when adding drives, fans, and other peripherals.

The platform is not a current-generation socket, meaning that a sensible next upgrade would involve moving to a newer socket alongside a newer processor generation. However, within the Socket 1700 ecosystem, the i5-13600KF’s unlocked multiplier allows overclocking headroom, and the dual memory support means users can retain existing DDR4 or migrate to DDR5 depending on their motherboard choice. The CPU’s production status is listed as Active, so replacement units and compatible motherboards remain available for system repairs or incremental upgrades.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 68, placing it above roughly two-thirds of all tracked desktop configurations. The CPU alone sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, a strong position that reflects its multi-threaded capabilities. The GPU, by contrast, sits at exactly the 50th percentile among all GPUs, indicating a mid-pack graphics solution that does not boost the overall build tier as much as the processor does.

The CPU’s average benchmark score across all tests is 38,103. This places it in extremely close competition with several rivals: the Intel Core i5-14490F scores 38,149 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T scores 38,194 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38,221 (0.3% higher), and the Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 38,261 (0.4% higher). The differences are within a fraction of a percent, meaning that in real-world applications, the i5-13600KF is effectively performance-equivalent to these alternatives despite being an earlier-generation part.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU demonstrates its strength. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,727 and the Geekbench multi-core score of 17,933 show substantial scaling across the 14 cores and 20 threads. The PassMark multi-thread score of 37,488 reinforces this picture. Single-thread performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,479 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2,487, indicating that the processor does not sacrifice responsiveness in lightly-threaded tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600KF is built on Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It contains 14 cores and 20 threads, a hybrid arrangement that combines performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core distribution. The base clock is 3.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, providing a wide frequency range for both sustained and burst workloads.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache configuration supports the processor’s strong performance in both single-threaded and multi-threaded benchmarks. The 3DMark results show scaling from 2,166 in the 2-thread test to 10,216 in the max-thread test, with intermediate scores of 4,282 at 4 threads, 7,074 at 8 threads, and 9,404 at 16 threads. This progression indicates healthy scaling as thread count increases, though the gains from 16 threads to max threads are modest, suggesting that the 20-thread configuration provides diminishing returns beyond 16 threads.

In Cinebench R15, the multi-core score of 3,198 versus a single-core score of 451 shows a 7:1 ratio, while R20 shows 13,325 versus 1,881, and R23 shows 31,727 versus 4,479. The PassMark suite provides additional workload-specific insight: integer math scores 122,169, floating-point math scores 90,424, extended instructions score 28,865, and data compression scores 475,505. Data encryption scores 26,957, random string sorting scores 50,851, and the physics test scores 2,226. The processor also supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation-class reliability requirements.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong CPU performance for multi-threaded productivity but do not require top-tier GPU acceleration. The 86th percentile CPU ranking means that content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the 14-core, 20-thread configuration. The 50th percentile GPU, meanwhile, provides adequate but not exceptional graphics performance for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.

Students and small business users building desktop workstations will find the platform suitable for tasks like data analysis, programming, document processing, and light media work. The CPU’s strong multi-threaded scores in Cinebench and PassMark indicate that compilation tasks, simulation workloads, and batch processing will run efficiently. The ECC memory support adds a layer of reliability that can matter for data-intensive work.

Gamers targeting 1080p or 1440p resolution with medium to high settings will find this build capable, though the GPU’s 50th percentile position suggests that 4K gaming at ultra settings would strain the graphics card. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,479 in Cinebench R23 and 2,487 in Geekbench indicates strong gaming responsiveness in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU will become the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, evidenced by the 3DMark single-thread score of 1,084 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,479, supports high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. The GPU’s mid-pack position, however, means that achieving very high refresh rates at 1440p or above will require reduced settings. At 1080p, the combination should handle competitive titles well.

Streaming: The 20-thread configuration provides headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 37,488 and the 3DMark max-thread score of 10,216 indicate that the CPU can manage simultaneous gaming and streaming workloads without crippling performance, though dedicated encoding hardware on the GPU may be preferable for quality.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,727 and Geekbench multi-core score of 17,933 point to strong performance in timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory provides ample capacity for handling large video buffers and effects processing.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will benefit from the 14 cores and 20 threads, with the PassMark floating-point math score of 90,424 indicating solid computational throughput. GPU-accelerated rendering will be constrained by the GPU’s 50th percentile position, making the CPU the primary rendering engine.

Software development: Compilation tasks will scale well across the 20 threads, and the PassMark integer math score of 122,169 suggests strong performance in build pipelines. The data encryption score of 26,957 supports secure development workflows.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread performance ensures responsive everyday use, while the multi-threaded capabilities handle occasional batch tasks. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for office applications and light graphics work.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, all frame-rate expectations are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores. The CPU’s 86th percentile ranking suggests it will not bottleneck most gaming workloads, while the GPU’s 50th percentile position indicates mid-range graphics capability.

At 1080p, the i5-13600KF’s strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1,084, Geekbench single-core of 2,487) should allow the Arc B770 to operate near its full potential in most titles. The GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are moderate figures that should handle popular esports titles and older AAA games at high settings with high frame rates.

At 1440p, frame rates will drop as the GPU’s mid-pack position becomes more pronounced. The 16 GB VRAM provides generous capacity for textures, but the raw compute throughput will limit performance in demanding modern titles. At 4K, the GPU is likely to be the clear bottleneck, with frame rates falling below comfortable playable levels in graphically intensive games unless settings are lowered substantially.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B770 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture and uses the BMG-G31 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process with a die size of 368 mm². The GPU contains 4,096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units, along with 32 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 2,100 MHz with a boost clock of 2,400 MHz, and memory runs at 2,000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory operates on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. This is a substantial memory capacity that supports high-resolution textures and large datasets. The pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is rated at 19.66 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, providing broad API compatibility. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 connections. The card requires a 550-watt power supply, uses a dual-slot cooler, and draws power through one 6-pin and one 8-pin connector. Since the GPU has no benchmark entries in the FACT PACK, its 50th percentile ranking is the primary performance indicator, meaning it sits exactly at the median of all GPUs tracked by the database.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core i5-13600KF use?

A: The processor uses Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for Intel’s 13th Gen Core series.

Q: Does the i5-13600KF support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the memory support is listed as DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: How does the i5-13600KF compare to the Intel Core i5-14490F?

A: The i5-14490F has an average benchmark score of 38,149, which is 0.1% higher than the i5-13600KF’s score of 38,103. The difference is negligible.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the Arc B770?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 watts, based on the GPU’s 225-watt TDP.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc B770 have?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build sits at the 68th percentile among all tracked CPU+GPU combinations.

Q: Does the i5-13600KF support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory support is listed as true for this processor.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance in this build is clearly tilted toward the CPU. The processor’s 86th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking means that in most workloads, the Arc B770 will be the limiting component. The CPU’s high multi-threaded scores — Cinebench R23 multi-core of 31,727, Geekbench multi-core of 17,933, PassMark multi-thread of 37,488 — provide far more computational capacity than the GPU’s mid-pack compute throughput can match.

In gaming workloads, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1,084, Cinebench R23 single-core of 4,479) ensures that frame rates are unlikely to be CPU-limited in most titles. The GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth will define the upper bound of graphics performance, particularly at higher resolutions where the GPU’s mid-pack position becomes the dominant factor.

In productivity workloads, the CPU will drive performance for compilation, rendering, and data processing, while the GPU accelerates only those tasks that specifically leverage its compute capabilities. The 16 GB VRAM is a notable strength for large datasets, but the raw compute throughput limits its usefulness in GPU-heavy rendering scenarios. The combined 68th percentile ranking reflects a system where the processor substantially outperforms the graphics card, making the GPU the primary upgrade target for anyone seeking higher overall system performance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-13600KF with the Intel Arc B770. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake processor from Intel’s 13th Gen Core series, running at base and boost clocks of 3.50 GHz and 5.10 GHz respectively, with a 125-watt TDP. The GPU is a Battlemage-generation Arc 7 part based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, featuring 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, 4,096 shading units, and a 225-watt TDP.

The overall tier of this build, based on the combined percentile of 68, places it in the upper-middle range of tracked desktop configurations. The CPU’s 86th percentile ranking establishes it as a high-tier processor, while the GPU’s 50th percentile positions it as an exactly median graphics solution. This asymmetry defines the character of the build: it is a system with substantial CPU headroom for productivity and multi-threaded tasks, paired with a graphics card that delivers competent but not exceptional gaming and GPU-accelerated performance. For users who prioritize processor-heavy workloads and play games at 1080p or modest 1440p settings, this pairing offers a coherent balance; for those seeking high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming, the GPU would be the first component to upgrade.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + Intel Arc B770

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600KF

Intel Arc B770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds