SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i5-13600KF paired with the Intel Arc B570 creates a desktop configuration where the CPU and GPU occupy distinctly different performance tiers. The processor sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card reaches only the 65th percentile among all GPUs. This 21-point gap indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting factor in most graphics-bound tasks, while the CPU possesses substantial headroom for compute-heavy workloads that do not rely on the rasterizer.

Benchmark scaling data reinforces this imbalance. The i5-13600KF demonstrates strong multi-threaded scaling, moving from 2,166 points in the 3dmark 2-thread test to 10,216 points at maximum threads — a roughly 4.7x improvement. Single-thread performance sits at 1,084 points in 3dmark, while the 4-thread score reaches 4,282, suggesting efficient utilization of the performance cores. The GPU, by contrast, shows a PassMark G3D score of 14,195, which places it just 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and 0.1% behind the Intel Arc A750 in the nearest rival comparisons.

For gaming at 1080p, the CPU is unlikely to bottleneck the GPU in most titles, as the i5-13600KF's single-thread score of 4,479 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong per-core throughput. However, at lower resolutions or with lighter graphical loads, the Arc B570's 65th percentile position means the GPU will frequently be the ceiling. The data shows no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rate expectations must be derived from the underlying benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, and represents the Arc 5 tier of Intel's discrete graphics lineup. The chip, designated BMG-G21, is manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 19,600 million transistors packed into a 272 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 72.1 million per square millimeter. This is a dual-slot card measuring 272 mm in length and 115 mm in height, requiring a single 8-pin power connector and a suggested 450 W power supply.

Memory configuration consists of 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, providing 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2375 MHz, translating to 19 Gbps effective. The GPU core operates at a flat 2500 MHz for both base and boost clocks, with no dynamic variance between the two. The shading engine comprises 2,304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units, along with 18 dedicated ray tracing cores. Pixel throughput is rated at 200.0 GPixel/s, while texture rate reaches 360.0 GTexel/s.

Compute performance is rated at 11.52 TFLOPS for FP32 operations and 23.04 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with display outputs including one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 connectors. The PCIe interface is Gen 4.0 with an x8 lane configuration.

Benchmark results show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,649, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores reach 83,514 and 96,844 respectively. PassMark results include a G3D score of 14,195, a GPU compute score of 7,281, and DirectX 11 performance of 118 points, which is notably higher than the DirectX 12 score of 72 and DirectX 10 score of 65. The 2D graphics score of 661 suggests adequate desktop composition performance. The GPU's average benchmark score of 20,556 places it 0.1% ahead of the RTX 3070 Mobile, 0.1% behind the Arc A750, 0.4% ahead of the Quadro M4000M, and 0.5% behind the Radeon R9 M390X.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing reaches 76, indicating that the configuration outperforms roughly three-quarters of all desktop systems in the database. The CPU's average benchmark score of 38,103 places it at the 86th percentile, while the GPU's average of 20,556 sits at the 65th percentile — the CPU is clearly the stronger component in this pairing.

Looking at the CPU benchmarks in detail, Cinebench R23 results show a multicore score of 31,727 and single-core score of 4,479. Cinebench R20 yields 13,325 multicore and 1,881 single-core, while R15 produces 3,198 multicore and 451 single-core. Geekbench reports 17,933 multi-core and 2,487 single-core. The 3DMark thread scaling tests show 9,404 at 16 threads, 7,074 at 8 threads, 4,282 at 4 threads, 2,166 at 2 threads, and 1,084 at single thread, with maximum threads reaching 10,216.

PassMark results for the CPU include a multithread score of 37,488, single-thread score of 4,118, integer math at 122,169, floating-point math at 90,424, data compression at 475,505, data encryption at 26,957, extended instructions at 28,865, physics at 2,226, random string sorting at 50,851, and prime number finding at 152. The nearest CPU rivals are tightly clustered: the i5-14490F scores 38,149 (0.1% higher), the Core Ultra 5 245T scores 38,194 (0.2% higher), the Ryzen 7 250 scores 38,221 (0.3% higher), and the i5-13600HX scores 38,261 (0.4% higher). This means the i5-13600KF is within statistical noise of its closest competitors, with deltas under half a percent.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals show similar tight grouping: the RTX 3070 Mobile averages 20,534 (0.1% higher), the Arc A750 averages 20,582 (0.1% lower), the Quadro M4000M averages 20,480 (0.4% higher), and the Radeon R9 M390X averages 20,662 (0.5% lower). The combined picture is a CPU that leads its class comfortably, paired with a GPU that trades blows with mid-range competitors from previous generations.

# Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads but still require competent 1080p gaming and general graphics acceleration. The i5-13600KF's 86th percentile CPU standing makes it suitable for software developers compiling large codebases, students running virtual machines, and small business workstations handling spreadsheets and database queries. The 14-core, 20-thread configuration with 24 MB of shared L3 cache provides substantial parallel compute for multi-tasking environments.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31,727 particularly compelling, as this reflects strong performance in threaded rendering workloads. However, the Arc B570's 65th percentile GPU position means GPU-accelerated effects and encoding will be more modest, with the card performing comparably to the Arc A750 and RTX 3070 Mobile. Gamers at 1080p will likely find the combination adequate for high-refresh esports titles, though the lack of measured FPS data means expectations should be calibrated from the benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

Creators working with OpenCL or Vulkan APIs will see respectable compute performance, with Geekbench scores of 83,514 and 96,844 respectively. The 10 GB VRAM buffer allows for larger textures and more complex scenes than 8 GB alternatives, which benefits 3D modelling and texture-heavy workloads. Students in engineering or scientific disciplines will appreciate the ECC memory support, which is uncommon in consumer desktop platforms.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S die. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The core configuration combines performance and efficiency cores, though the exact hybrid layout is not specified in the data. Base clock operates at 3.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing manual overclocking. The thermal design power is rated at 125 W.

Cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support — a notable feature for workstation use. The processor connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 and was released on September 26, 2022, with a launch MSRP of $294.

The benchmark data reveals a processor with excellent single-thread and multi-thread characteristics. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,479 puts it among the faster desktop CPUs, while the multicore score of 31,727 demonstrates strong parallel scaling. The 3DMark thread scaling tests show a smooth progression from 1,084 single-thread to 10,216 at maximum threads, indicating the scheduler and core topology handle increased thread counts effectively.

PassMark results show particular strengths in integer math (122,169) and floating-point math (90,424), which translate to strong general-purpose computing and scientific workloads. Data compression scores of 475,505 and random string sorting at 50,851 suggest excellent database and file-handling performance. The 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms that this processor outperforms the majority of installed processors, with nearest rivals all within 0.4% of its average score.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the i5-13600KF's single-thread performance (4,479 in Cinebench R23) ensures the CPU can feed frames quickly, but the Arc B570's 65th percentile position means maximum refresh rates will be limited by GPU throughput. Competitive titles with lighter graphics demands may run at high frame rates, while AAA games will likely require setting adjustments.

Streaming: The 14-core, 20-thread configuration provides ample headroom for simultaneous game capture and encoding, with passmark multithread scores of 37,488 indicating strong multitasking capability. The GPU's Xe2-HPG architecture includes dedicated media hardware, though specific encoder quality metrics are not in the data.

Video editing: CPU-based rendering will be smooth, with the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31,727 handling timeline previews and export tasks efficiently. GPU-accelerated effects will rely on the Arc B570's compute capabilities, which are comparable to the Arc A750 and RTX 3070 Mobile in average benchmark scores.

3D rendering: The CPU's 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache excel at CPU-based ray tracing and physics simulation, while the GPU's 18 RT cores and 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 performance provide moderate GPU-accelerated rendering. The 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for medium-complexity scenes.

Software development: Compilation tasks will benefit from the multicore score of 31,727 and integer math performance of 122,169, while the 86th percentile CPU ranking ensures fast build times. The 20 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the single-thread score of 4,479 keeps interactive tooling responsive.

Student and office work: The CPU's data compression score of 475,505 and random string sorting of 50,851 make spreadsheet operations, database queries, and document processing fast. The GPU's 2D score of 661 handles desktop composition smoothly, and the 10 GB VRAM is irrelevant for typical office workloads but present when needed.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact Intel Core i5-13600KF + Intel Arc B570 combination in the data set, so all frame rate expectations must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The GPU's 65th percentile position and average benchmark score of 20,556, which places it within 0.1% of the RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc A750, suggest that gaming performance will closely mirror those cards.

At 1080p ultra settings, the Arc B570's 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 200.0 GPixel/s pixel rate indicate it can handle most modern titles at playable frame rates, though demanding games may require settings reductions. The 10 GB GDDR6 memory with 380.0 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate capacity for 1080p textures, though 1440p and 4K will stress the 160-bit bus. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (4,479 in Cinebench R23) ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU at typical gaming resolutions.

The DirectX 12 score of 72 in PassMark and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,649 suggest that modern API titles will perform reasonably well, while the higher DirectX 11 score of 118 indicates strong legacy API performance. The 18 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing capability, but users should expect significant performance drops when enabling ray tracing effects. The absence of measured FPS data means these are directional estimates, not guarantees.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Arc B570 compare to the Arc A750?

A: The two GPUs are extremely close, with the A750 averaging 20,582 in benchmark scores versus 20,556 for the B570 — a difference of just 0.1% in favor of the A750.

Q: What is the CPU's strongest benchmark area?

A: The i5-13600KF scores 31,727 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 122,169 in PassMark integer math, indicating particularly strong threaded compute and general processing performance.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor for this build?

A: The GPU is the bottleneck, sitting at the 65th percentile among all GPUs while the CPU reaches the 86th percentile — a 21-point gap that makes the GPU the primary constraint in graphics-heavy workloads.

Q: What memory types does the i5-13600KF support?

A: The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available — a feature not commonly found on consumer desktop processors.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The Arc B570 features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective).

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Core Ultra 5 245T?

A: The Core Ultra 5 245T averages 38,194 in benchmark scores, which is 0.2% higher than the i5-13600KF's 38,103 — the difference is negligible in practice.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The Arc B570 has a 150 W TDP and uses a single 8-pin power connector, with a suggested power supply rating of 450 W.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class configuration pairing the Intel Core i5-13600KF with the Intel Arc B570. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake processor released in September 2022, while the GPU is a Battlemage-generation card released in January 2025, representing the Arc 5 tier of Intel's discrete graphics lineup. The combined percentile ranking of 76 indicates that this system outperforms roughly three-quarters of all desktop configurations in the database.

The CPU's 86th percentile ranking makes it the standout component, offering performance within 0.4% of its nearest rivals (the i5-14490F, Core Ultra 5 245T, Ryzen 7 250, and i5-13600HX). The GPU's 65th percentile ranking places it in the mid-range tier, trading positions with the RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc A750. This pairing creates a system where the CPU has significant headroom for future GPU upgrades, while the GPU is adequate for current 1080p gaming and general graphics tasks.

The build uses Intel Socket 1700 for the CPU and PCIe 4.0 x8 for the GPU. The CPU's launch MSRP was $294, while the GPU's launch MSRP was 219 USD. The configuration is well-balanced for productivity-focused users who also want competent gaming performance, with the CPU carrying most of the heavy lifting in compute workloads.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The processor connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for current and near-future expansion cards. The GPU, meanwhile, uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for the Arc B570's bandwidth requirements.

The GPU's suggested power supply is 450 W, while the CPU has a 125 W TDP. This leaves significant headroom in most power supplies for upgrades. The Arc B570 uses a single 8-pin power connector, and the card is dual-slot with a 272 mm length, so case compatibility is straightforward. The 10 GB GDDR6 memory and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for current games, but users seeking higher resolutions or ray tracing performance would benefit from a GPU upgrade.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's 86th percentile ranking and 20 threads provide substantial headroom for more powerful graphics cards. The PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU ensures that future GPUs using that interface will be accommodated. For memory, the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support allows users to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5 depending on motherboard selection. The platform's ECC memory support is an unusual feature that could justify keeping this system for workstation duties even as newer platforms emerge.