SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600KF paired with the Intel Arc A770 forms a desktop build that targets high-performance gaming and content creation, with both components landing in the upper percentiles of their respective categories. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile among all processors, while the GPU reaches the 90th percentile among all graphics cards, and the combined build achieves an 88th percentile ranking. This is a pairing of two capable Intel parts — the 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake processor and the 16 GB Arc A770 from the Alchemist generation — and the benchmark data shows a system that is balanced enough for demanding workloads, though the lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means all gaming performance must be treated as estimates derived from the synthetic scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core i5-13600KF and the Arc A770 is close enough that neither component overwhelmingly dominates the other in a typical workload, but the data does reveal where each part is likely to limit performance. The CPU’s benchmark scores scale strongly with thread count: 3DMark scores rise from 1084 in the single-thread test to 2166 with 2 threads, 4282 with 4 threads, 7074 with 8 threads, 9404 with 16 threads, and 10216 with max threads. This near-linear scaling from 8 to 16 threads indicates that the processor has substantial multi-threaded headroom, and the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31727 reinforces that point. The GPU, meanwhile, delivers an average benchmark score of 68809, which places it just 0.3% behind the NVIDIA CMP 90HX and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25, according to the nearest rival data. These rival deltas are small, meaning the Arc A770 is firmly in the middle of a competitive pack rather than at the top or bottom of its tier.

In gaming workloads, the bottleneck will shift depending on resolution and settings. At lower resolutions, the CPU’s single-thread performance — a Geekbench single-core score of 2487 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4479 — becomes the limiting factor, as the GPU is likely to be underutilized when frame rates are very high. The 13600KF’s single-thread scores are strong for a desktop processor, but they are not the absolute highest in its class, so a fast GPU like the Arc A770 could outpace the CPU in very light scenes. At higher resolutions, the GPU takes over as the primary constraint, because the Arc A770’s 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth are the figures that determine how many pixels can be pushed per second. The CPU’s multi-threaded strength means it will not be the bottleneck in most modern games, but the GPU’s 90th percentile ranking versus the CPU’s 86th percentile suggests that, in a perfectly balanced system, the processor is slightly more likely to limit frame rates in CPU-bound titles.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is clearly the dominant component, and the GPU’s role is more supplementary. The 13600KF’s PassMark multithread score of 37488 and its 3DMark max-threads score of 10216 show that it can feed the GPU with data faster than the GPU can process it in most compute tasks. The Arc A770’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 109175 is respectable, but it is not in the same league as the CPU’s multi-threaded output for tasks that rely on general-purpose cores. The practical result is that a user who spends most of their time in CPU-heavy applications — such as compiling code, running spreadsheets, or transcoding video — will see the processor doing the heavy lifting, while the GPU accelerates specific tasks like rendering or AI inference. The 13600KF’s PassMark data compression score of 475505 and data encryption score of 26957 further confirm that the CPU is the workhorse in data-heavy scenarios, and the GPU will rarely be the limiting factor there.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i5-13600KF delivers a set of benchmark scores that place it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 38103. Its nearest rivals are extremely close: the Intel Core i5-14490F scores 38149, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T scores 38194, the AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38221, and the Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 38261. The delta percentages are all under 0.5%, meaning the 13600KF is essentially tied with these processors in raw performance, and any difference would be imperceptible in real-world use. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31727 is the standout figure, as it shows the 14-core, 20-thread configuration scaling well under load, while the single-core score of 4479 confirms that the 3.50 GHz base clock and 5.10 GHz boost clock are delivering competitive per-thread performance. The Geekbench multicore score of 17933 and single-core score of 2487 align with these results, and the 3DMark scores — 10216 at max threads and 1084 at single thread — show consistent scaling across thread counts.

The Intel Arc A770, sitting at the 90th percentile among all GPUs, has an average benchmark score of 68809. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA CMP 90HX at 69000 (0.3% ahead), the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 at 68562 (0.4% behind), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 at 69870 (1.5% ahead), and the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 at 69986 (1.7% ahead). These are all professional or workstation-class cards, which suggests the Arc A770 is competing well above its consumer-oriented positioning. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 is modest, but the Geekbench OpenCL score of 109175 and Vulkan score of 94284 indicate strong compute performance for a card with 4096 shading units and 32 ray tracing cores. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth gives the card a memory advantage over many rivals in its class, and the 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is the raw compute figure that drives most gaming and rendering workloads.

Combined, the two components produce a build with an 88th percentile ranking, which reflects a system that is above average across all possible configurations. The CPU’s 86th percentile and the GPU’s 90th percentile are close enough that the pairing feels intentional — neither part is dramatically over- or under-powered relative to the other. The data does not include measured FPS figures for this exact combination, so gaming performance must be inferred from the benchmark scores, but the synthetic results suggest that the CPU will not hold back the GPU in most scenarios, and the GPU will not be the limiting factor in CPU-heavy tasks. The average benchmark scores — 38103 for the CPU and 68809 for the GPU — are both respectable for their respective categories, and the combined picture is of a system that can handle modern games at high settings and demanding productivity workloads without a clear weak point.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The 13600KF’s single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4479 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 1084, is strong enough to drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the Arc A770’s 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth provide the GPU headroom needed for 1440p or 4K gaming. At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU is more likely to be the constraint, but the data indicates both parts are capable of maintaining high refresh rates in most titles, assuming the game is well-optimized for the Arc A770’s Xe-HPG architecture.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, as evidenced by the 3DMark max-threads score of 10216 and the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31727, provide enough parallel processing power to handle game encoding and streaming software simultaneously without significant frame drops. The GPU’s 32 ray tracing cores and 4096 shading units can also offload some encoding work, but the CPU is the primary asset here, and its 86th percentile ranking suggests it will not be overwhelmed by a streaming workload.

Video editing: The 13600KF’s PassMark integer math score of 122169 and floating-point math score of 90424 indicate strong performance in the calculations used for video encoding and effects processing, while the Arc A770’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory allows for large timelines and high-resolution previews. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 109175 shows it can accelerate rendering tasks, and the combination should handle 4K editing with multiple layers, though export times will be driven primarily by the CPU’s multi-threaded output.

3D rendering: The Arc A770’s 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and its 90th percentile ranking among GPUs make it a competent renderer for GPU-accelerated engines, while the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31727 ensures that CPU-based rendering tasks will complete reasonably quickly. The 16 GB of VRAM is a notable advantage for large scenes, and the GPU’s 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die suggest it has the compute resources for complex workloads.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 475505 and data encryption score of 26957 are directly relevant to compilation tasks and build servers, where large codebases need to be processed quickly. The 13600KF’s 20 threads allow for parallel compilation, and its 86th percentile ranking means it will outperform most consumer processors in this role. The GPU’s role in development is minor, but the 16 GB of memory is useful for testing graphics applications.

Student and office work: The 13600KF’s single-thread performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2487 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4118, ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday applications like web browsers, word processors, and spreadsheets, while the CPU’s 125 W TDP means it will not place an unreasonable burden on a typical office power supply. The Arc A770 is overkill for this scenario, but the 16 GB of VRAM and dual-slot design do not introduce any practical drawbacks beyond the initial cost and power draw.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users who want a single system that can handle both high-end gaming and serious productivity without compromising on either front. Gamers running at 1440p or 4K will benefit from the Arc A770’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, which are figures that support high-resolution textures and detailed scenes, while the 13600KF’s 86th percentile CPU ranking ensures that frame rates will not be CPU-limited in most titles. Content creators who work with video, 3D rendering, or large datasets will find the CPU’s 20 threads and the GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 performance to be a balanced combination, though those who prioritize GPU compute should note that the Arc A770’s 90th percentile is slightly higher than the CPU’s 86th percentile, meaning the GPU is the stronger relative component.

Software developers working on large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 475505 and multithread score of 37488, which translate to faster builds and more responsive test environments. Students and office workers who occasionally play games or edit videos will find this system more than sufficient, as the CPU’s single-thread scores — 2487 on Geekbench and 4479 on Cinebench R23 — deliver smooth everyday performance, and the GPU’s presence means no task is off-limits. Small business workstations that need to handle everything from accounting software to light CAD work will benefit from the 13600KF’s 14 cores and the Arc A770’s 16 GB of VRAM, though the lack of measured FPS data means those relying on gaming performance should temper expectations until real-world tests are available. The build’s 88th combined percentile indicates it is a well-above-average system, and the nearest rival deltas — all under 1.7% for the GPU and under 0.5% for the CPU — show that this pairing is competitive with other mid-to-high-end configurations.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for the Intel Core i5-13600KF paired with the Intel Arc A770, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores for each component. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1084 and Geekbench single-core score of 2487 suggest it can handle the game logic and draw call processing required for high frame rates at 1080p, while the GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth indicate it can push high resolutions with demanding settings. At 1080p, the CPU is likely to be the limiting factor in esports titles, where frame rates can exceed the CPU’s ability to feed the GPU, but the 13600KF’s 5.10 GHz boost clock and single-thread scores are strong enough that most games will still run at refresh rates above 60 FPS.

At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, and the Arc A770’s 90th percentile ranking suggests it can maintain high settings in most modern games, though the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 indicates that the most demanding titles may require some settings reductions to hit 60 FPS. At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, as the 16 GB of VRAM is sufficient for high-resolution textures, but the 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 performance may not be enough for maximum settings in the latest releases. The lack of measured FPS data means these expectations are qualitative, but the benchmark scores — particularly the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31727 and the GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 94284 — provide a reasonable basis for estimating that this build can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, with 4K requiring compromises in graphics quality.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600KF is built on the Intel Socket 1700 platform with the Raptor Lake architecture, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This gives builders flexibility in choosing memory, though the CPU’s 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache are fixed. The socket supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which means the GPU slot is capable of running the latest graphics cards, though the Arc A770 itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The CPU’s 125 W TDP and the GPU’s 225 W TDP together suggest a total system draw that is well within the capability of the 550 W suggested PSU for the GPU, though users who plan to add more components or heavily overclock the CPU — which has an unlocked multiplier — may want additional headroom.

A sensible next upgrade for this build would be a faster GPU, as the Arc A770’s end-of-life production status and the availability of its successor, Battlemage, mean that newer cards will likely offer better performance. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that any modern GPU will be able to run at full bandwidth on this platform, and the 16 GB of VRAM on the current GPU is already generous for most workloads. Alternatively, users could add more storage or faster memory, as the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support allows for upgrades without changing the motherboard. The platform’s 86th percentile CPU ranking means the processor will not be the limiting factor for several years, so the upgrade path is primarily about the GPU and memory, with the 550 W PSU providing enough headroom for a mid-range GPU swap but possibly requiring an upgrade for a top-tier card.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². Its base clock is 3.50 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, and it has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, which is a configuration that supports both high single-thread responsiveness and substantial multi-threaded throughput. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer part and makes it suitable for workstation-style builds where data integrity is a priority.

The benchmark data shows a processor that scales exceptionally well with thread count. The 3DMark scores rise from 1084 at single thread to 10216 at max threads, a nearly 10x improvement that reflects the efficient use of 20 threads, and the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31727 places it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs. The PassMark scores reinforce this: a multithread score of 37488, an integer math score of 122169, and a floating-point math score of 90424 all indicate strong performance in compute-heavy workloads like video encoding, scientific simulations, and code compilation. The single-thread scores — 4118 on PassMark and 2487 on Geekbench — are competitive for desktop processors, meaning the chip does not sacrifice everyday responsiveness for its multi-core capabilities. The nearest rivals are all within 0.5% of its average score of 38103, which suggests that the 13600KF is at the very top of its performance tier, and any differences between it and the i5-14490F, Core Ultra 5 245T, Ryzen 7 250, or i5-13600HX would be negligible in real-world use.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-13600KF with the Intel Arc A770, two components that together achieve an 88th combined percentile ranking. The CPU is a Raptor Lake part with 14 cores and 20 threads, sitting at the 86th percentile among all processors, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation card with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, sitting at the 90th percentile among all graphics cards. The combination is well-matched in terms of performance tier: the CPU’s average benchmark score of 38103 and the GPU’s average score of 68809 are both solidly above average for their categories, and the small delta percentages to their nearest rivals — under 0.5% for the CPU and under 1.7% for the GPU — confirm that neither component is a standout outlier in either direction.

The build class is desktop, which means it is intended for a traditional tower case with a power supply, and the GPU’s dual-slot design and 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connectors require a PSU with the appropriate cables, with 550 W suggested for the GPU alone. The CPU’s 125 W TDP and the GPU’s 225 W TDP combine for a total draw that is manageable for most mid-range power supplies, and the platform’s support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory provides flexibility in system configuration. The overall tier is high — the 88th percentile places this build above the vast majority of possible configurations — and the data suggests it is a capable system for gaming, content creation, and productivity, though the absence of measured FPS data means that gaming performance should be verified with real-world testing before making a purchase decision based on frame rates.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build achieves an 88th combined percentile ranking, with the CPU at the 86th percentile among all processors and the GPU at the 90th percentile among all graphics cards.

Q: How does the Core i5-13600KF compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 38103, which is just 0.1% behind the Intel Core i5-14490F (38149), 0.2% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (38194), 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (38221), and 0.4% behind the Intel Core i5-13600HX (38261).

Q: What is the memory configuration of the Intel Arc A770?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s and an effective memory speed of 16 Gbps.

Q: Does the build support overclocking?

A: Yes, the CPU has an unlocked multiplier, and its base clock is 3.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, allowing for manual overclocking beyond these figures.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU, and what comes after it?

A: The Intel Arc A770 is end-of-life, and its successor is Battlemage, which is the next generation of Intel graphics.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and what does that mean for cooling?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, which indicates it requires a capable air or liquid cooler to maintain boost clocks under sustained load.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this exact combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for the Core i5-13600KF with the Arc A770, so all gaming performance estimates are based on the benchmark scores for each component.