SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on Raptor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. The chip is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm², and it carries 24 MB of shared L3 cache alongside 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 80 KB of L1 cache per core. This CPU is paired in this build with the Intel Arc A750, a desktop GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with a base clock of 2050 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The Arc A750 includes 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, 112 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. This build is classified as a desktop system, and the combined percentile ranking across both components sits at 76, indicating a solidly above-average pairing. Note that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data, so all gaming performance discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

CPU Analysis

The Core i5-13600KF delivers strong multi-threaded performance for its class. In Cinebench R23, it scores 31727 in multi-core and 4479 in single-core. These numbers place it well within the upper tier of desktop processors, with a percentile ranking of 86 against all CPUs. The single-core score of 4479 indicates excellent per-thread capability, which matters for lightly threaded applications like older games or productivity tools that rely on one or two cores. The multi-core score of 31727 shows that the 14 cores (likely a mix of performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the split) and 20 threads scale effectively in heavily threaded workloads like video rendering or 3D modeling.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 38103, which places it just 0.1% behind the Intel Core i5-14490F (score 38149) and 0.2% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (score 38194). It also trails the AMD Ryzen 7 250 by 0.3% (score 38221) and the Intel Core i5-13600HX by 0.4% (score 38261). These deltas are negligible in real-world terms, meaning the 13600KF trades blows with those rivals within a fraction of a percent. In Geekbench, the CPU scores 17933 multi-core and 2487 single-core, reinforcing the pattern of strong all-around performance. The Passmark multi-thread score of 37488 and single-thread score of 4118 further confirm that this chip handles both parallel and sequential tasks competently.

For real workloads, the 3DMark thread scaling scores are instructive. The CPU scores 1084 in single-thread, 2166 in 2-thread, 4282 in 4-thread, 7074 in 8-thread, 9404 in 16-thread, and 10216 in max-thread tests. The scaling from 4 to 8 threads (4282 to 7074, a roughly 65% increase) and from 8 to 16 threads (7074 to 9404, a 33% increase) shows diminishing returns beyond 8 threads, which is typical for many games but not for fully threaded productivity tasks. The max-thread score of 10216 is only 8.6% higher than the 16-thread score, suggesting that the CPU’s additional threads beyond 16 provide modest gains, likely due to power or thermal limits. The Passmark integer math score of 122169 and floating point math score of 90424 indicate strong compute throughput for number-crunching tasks. Data compression scores 475505 in Passmark, while encryption scores 26957, and extended instructions score 28865, all pointing to capable performance in security and data-heavy applications. The find prime numbers score of 152 is low, but that is a specialized workload that does not reflect typical usage.

The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, which is reasonable for the performance level, and it supports ECC memory, a feature that appeals to workstation users who need error correction. The multiplier is unlocked, so overclocking is possible, and the PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The release date is 2022-09-26, and the launch MSRP is $294, though this page will not discuss pricing further per the rules. The process node of 10 nm from Intel, with a die size of 257 mm², is a mature design that balances power and performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core i5-13600KF and the Intel Arc A750 is largely determined by their respective percentiles and benchmark scores. The CPU ranks at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks at the 66th percentile among all GPUs. This gap suggests that the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, meaning in many gaming scenarios, the GPU is likely the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1084 in 3DMark and 4479 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicates it can feed frames quickly, but the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 12534 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 represent its raw rendering capability, which is more modest relative to the CPU’s standing.

For CPU-bound workloads like esports titles at low settings or high-refresh 1080p gaming, the 13600KF should be able to push high frame rates, but the Arc A750 may cap the maximum FPS due to its lower percentile position. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, and the CPU’s extra headroom goes unused. The FPS scaling evidence comes from the benchmark scores: the CPU’s 3DMark max-thread score of 10216 versus the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 shows a significant disparity in compute capability. In practical terms, the data suggests that for most modern games at 1440p or 4K, the user will be limited by the GPU, not the CPU. At 1080p with lower graphics settings, the CPU might keep up better, but the GPU’s 66th percentile ranking means it will still be the weaker link in many titles.

The memory bandwidth of the GPU, 512.0 GB/s, is substantial for an 8 GB card, which helps in texture-heavy workloads, but the 8 GB capacity could become a constraint in future titles that require more VRAM. The CPU’s support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory means the system memory bandwidth depends on the motherboard and memory kit chosen, which is not specified in the FACT PACK. The PCIe Gen 5 interface on the CPU provides plenty of bandwidth for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 bus, so no bottleneck is expected there. Overall, the bottleneck analysis points to the GPU as the primary limiter in graphics-intensive tasks, while the CPU is unlikely to hold back most workloads except in extremely thread-heavy productivity scenarios where its 86th percentile still leaves room for faster chips.

Gaming Performance

Since there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The Intel Arc A750’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 and Passmark G3D score of 12534 provide a baseline for its gaming capability, while the CPU’s high single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 4479, 3DMark single-thread 1084) ensures it can supply frames without bottlenecking in most scenarios. Given the GPU’s 66th percentile ranking, expect this pairing to handle 1080p gaming well in most titles, with playable frame rates in demanding games and high frame rates in esports or older titles. At 1440p, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth should still deliver playable performance in many games, but with reduced settings or lower FPS in the most demanding releases. At 4K, the GPU will struggle in AAA titles, and users should expect to lower settings significantly or accept sub-60 FPS in many cases.

For competitive shooters like CS:GO or Valorant, the CPU’s strong single-core scores should allow very high frame rates, but the GPU’s performance will cap the maximum FPS. In lighter games, this pairing could push well over 100 FPS at 1080p, but in heavy titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Microsoft Flight Simulator, expect more moderate results, likely in the 40-60 FPS range at 1080p with high settings. The GPU’s ray tracing cores (28) provide hardware RT support, but the modest FP32 throughput of 17.20 TFLOPS means ray tracing performance will be limited, and DLSS-like upscaling is not available since this is an Intel GPU; the FACT PACK does not list any upscaling features. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 ensure compatibility with modern APIs, but the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 70 is low relative to the G3D score, suggesting that DX12 performance may be inconsistent. Overall, the gaming estimates point to a capable 1080p and entry-level 1440p experience, with the CPU providing ample headroom and the GPU being the limiting factor in most titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory based on budget and performance needs. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the CPU supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation builds that require data integrity. The CPU’s PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is forward-looking and compatible with the latest GPUs and NVMe SSDs, though the Arc A750 itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The GPU’s suggested PSU is 550 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 125 W, so a power supply in that range should suffice for the whole system, though the FACT PACK does not specify a combined power draw. The GPU requires 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors, which is typical for a mid-range card.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the GPU should be the first component replaced, given its 66th percentile ranking versus the CPU’s 86th percentile. The CPU has headroom to drive a more powerful GPU, so upgrading to a higher-tier graphics card would balance the system better. However, the CPU’s Socket 1700 platform is not forward-compatible with newer sockets, so a future CPU upgrade would likely require a new motherboard. The GPU’s production status is listed as end-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage, so users looking for more performance might wait for that generation. The CPU is still active in production, so it remains a viable choice for new builds, but its release date of 2022-09-26 means it is a few years old. The platform’s support for DDR5 memory is a plus for future-proofing, but the lack of integrated graphics on this KF variant means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which is already the case in this build.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13600KF achieves an average benchmark score of 38103, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i5-14490F (avg score 38149, 0.1% higher), Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (38194, 0.2% higher), AMD Ryzen 7 250 (38221, 0.3% higher), and Intel Core i5-13600HX (38261, 0.4% higher). These deltas are tiny, meaning the 13600KF is effectively on par with those chips. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 31727 and single-core score of 4479 are strong, with the multi-core score being roughly 7 times the single-core score, indicating good scaling. The Geekbench multi-core score of 17933 and single-core score of 2487 further support the CPU’s balanced performance. In Passmark, the multithread score of 37488 and single-thread score of 4118 show consistent results across different benchmark suites.

The Intel Arc A750 has an average benchmark score of 20582, placing it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Arc B570 (avg score 20556, 0.1% lower), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, 0.2% lower), AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662, 0.4% higher), and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480, 0.5% lower). The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2612, which is modest, and its Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 and Vulkan score of 85631 show decent compute performance. In Passmark, the G3D score of 12534 is the most relevant for gaming, while the DirectX 11 score of 72 and DirectX 12 score of 70 are low, suggesting inconsistent DX performance. The GPU compute score of 5368 in Passmark indicates limited compute throughput for non-graphics tasks.

Combined, the CPU and GPU give this build a combined percentile of 76, reflecting a system that is above average overall but not top-tier. The CPU’s 86th percentile is significantly higher than the GPU’s 66th percentile, so the GPU drags down the combined score. In practical terms, the benchmark performance shows a CPU that can handle any modern workload with ease, paired with a GPU that is sufficient for mainstream gaming but not for high-end 4K or heavy ray tracing.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Intel Core i5-13600KF?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 38103, ranking in the 86th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13600KF compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14490F?

A: The i5-14490F has an average score of 38149, which is 0.1% higher than the i5-13600KF’s 38103, making the difference negligible.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc A750 ranks in the 66th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 20582.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600KF supports ECC memory, which is noted in the FACT PACK.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the Intel Arc A750?

A: The suggested PSU for the Arc A750 is 550 W.

Q: What is the boost clock of the Intel Core i5-13600KF?

A: The boost clock is 5.10 GHz, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this pairing should deliver solid frame rates in competitive titles, given the CPU’s single-thread score of 4479 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU’s 66th percentile ranking. The CPU will not bottleneck, but the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 12534 suggests that very high refresh rates (240 Hz or more) may be out of reach in demanding games. Streaming while gaming is feasible, as the CPU’s 20 threads (3DMark max-thread score 10216) provide enough headroom for encoding, but the GPU’s compute score of 5368 in Passmark indicates that hardware encoding performance is modest. Video editing in software like Premiere Pro would benefit from the CPU’s multi-core strength (Cinebench R23 multi-core 31727), with smooth timeline scrubbing and fast exports, though the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM might limit effects-heavy work. 3D rendering in Blender or similar tools would favor the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, with the Passmark floating point score of 90424 providing good compute throughput, but the GPU’s OpenCL score of 98554 shows it can assist in render tasks. Software development, including compilation, would see strong performance from the CPU’s multi-thread capabilities (Passmark integer math 122169), while the GPU’s role is minor. For student and office work, this system is overkill; the CPU’s single-thread score of 4118 in Passmark ensures snappy responsiveness in productivity apps, and the GPU accelerates any graphical tasks like CAD or light photo editing.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13600KF, a 14-core, 20-thread desktop CPU, with the Intel Arc A750, a desktop GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture. The CPU is from the Core 13th Gen series, using Raptor Lake architecture, while the GPU is from the Alchemist generation (Arc 7). The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile is 76, placing it above average but not at the top end of performance. The CPU’s percentile of 86 is notably higher than the GPU’s 66, indicating an imbalance where the CPU outclasses the GPU. The system is best described as a mainstream gaming or productivity desktop, capable of handling most tasks with ease, but with the GPU being the limiting factor for high-end graphics workloads. The CPU’s TDP of 125 W and the GPU’s TDP of 225 W suggest a mid-range power draw, and the suggested PSU of 550 W should cover the system. The GPU is end-of-life, with a successor named Battlemage, so buyers should be aware that this is a mature product.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who play at 1080p or entry-level 1440p, where the GPU’s 66th percentile and 8 GB VRAM are sufficient for most titles, and the CPU’s high single-core performance prevents bottlenecks. Content creators working with video or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 20 threads and strong multi-core scores (e.g., Cinebench R23 multi-core 31727), though they may find the GPU’s compute performance (Passmark GPU compute 5368) limiting for GPU-accelerated effects. Software developers who compile large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s multi-thread throughput (Passmark integer math 122169), and the ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation tasks. Students and office workers seeking a responsive system for everyday tasks will find this build more than adequate, with the CPU’s single-thread score of 4118 in Passmark ensuring smooth operation. Small business workstations that run database or virtualization workloads would benefit from the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, as well as ECC support, but the GPU is not necessary for such tasks. The primary limitation is the GPU’s 66th percentile, so users who demand high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming should consider a more powerful graphics card instead of this pairing.