SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13600KF + Intel Arc A580: A Balanced 1080p Desktop Powerhouse

This desktop build pairs Intel's 14-core Raptor Lake processor with Intel's Arc A580 graphics card, landing at the 87th percentile among all combined CPU-GPU pairings in the benchmark database. The CPU alone sits at the 86th percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 87th percentile among all graphics cards, indicating a remarkably well-matched duo where neither component dramatically overshadows the other. The data reveals a system designed for high-refresh 1080p gaming and productivity workloads, with the processor's strong multi-core performance complementing the GPU's solid 1080p-class rasterization and ray tracing capabilities.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A580 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-512 chip manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. This is a substantial die measuring 406 mm² and containing 21,700 million transistors, with a transistor density of 53.4 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1700 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz, while the 8 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at an effective 16 Gbps across a 256-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. This bandwidth figure is critical for 1080p gaming, as it provides ample headroom for high-resolution textures and modern game assets without becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios.

The A580's compute configuration includes 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units, which translate to a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 12.29 TFLOPS for FP32 operations and 24.58 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The GPU also features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores, though the architecture does not list dedicated tensor cores, instead relying on general-purpose compute for AI-assisted workloads. The ray tracing hardware is present and functional, but the 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggests that heavy RT workloads will tax the GPU more than rasterization.

In benchmark testing, the A580 scores 2229 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 91657 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 79381 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Vulkan score being notably lower than the OpenCL score (approximately 13% lower) suggests that the driver stack for Vulkan may not yet be fully optimized, a characteristic often seen in Intel's discrete GPU lineup. The average benchmark score of 57756 places the A580 at the 87th percentile among all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58085, 0.6% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (57367, 0.7% higher), the Intel Arc A570M (58239, 0.8% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58392, 1.1% higher). This places the A580 within a tight performance cluster, roughly 0.6% to 1.1% below these alternatives, making it a competitive mid-range option.

For rendering workloads, the 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance indicate solid capability for 1080p content creation. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for most current titles at 1080p with high settings, though it may become limiting in VRAM-intensive scenarios or with ultra-high-resolution texture packs. The dual-slot design and 2x 8-pin power connectors require a 450 W suggested PSU, which is a modest requirement for this performance class.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's benchmark results are comprehensive, spanning multiple test suites. In 3DMark, the i5-13600KF scores 9404 with 16 threads, 2166 with 2 threads, 4282 with 4 threads, 7074 with 8 threads, 10216 with max threads, and 1084 in single-thread. The scaling from 2 to 4 threads shows a 97.8% increase (from 2166 to 4282), while scaling from 4 to 8 threads shows a 65.2% increase (from 4282 to 7074), and from 8 to 16 threads a 32.9% increase (from 7074 to 9404). This diminishing scaling pattern indicates that the processor's hybrid architecture with performance and efficiency cores delivers strong multi-threaded performance, though the efficiency cores contribute less per-thread than the performance cores.

In Cinebench, the CPU achieves 3198 in R15 multi-core and 451 in single-core, 13325 in R20 multi-core and 1881 in single-core, and 31727 in R23 multi-core and 4479 in single-core. The R23 multi-core score of 31727 is particularly strong, placing the CPU well above many desktop processors. Geekbench results show 17933 multi-core and 2487 single-core, while PassMark scores include 475505 in data compression, 26957 in data encryption, 28865 in extended instructions, 152 in find prime numbers, 90424 in floating point math, 122169 in integer math, 37488 in multithread, 2226 in physics, 50851 in random string sorting, and 4118 in single-thread. The average benchmark score of 38103 places the i5-13600KF at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, with nearest rivals being the Intel Core i5-14490F (38149, 0.1% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (38194, 0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (38221, 0.3% higher), and the Intel Core i5-13600HX (38261, 0.4% higher). The CPU sits within 0.4% of all these rivals, indicating a very tight competitive field.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 57756 at the 87th percentile complements the CPU's 86th percentile position. The combined percentile of 87 reflects this balance. The data shows a system where the CPU's multi-threaded capabilities (31727 in Cinebench R23) and the GPU's 1080p-class performance (2229 in 3DMark Steel Nomad) create a cohesive whole, with neither component appearing to bottleneck the other in most workloads.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-13600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-S, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. The die size is 257 mm², and the processor uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. It features a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The architecture combines performance cores (P-cores) and efficiency cores (E-cores), a hybrid design that explains the benchmark scaling patterns. The 3DMark results show strong scaling up to 8 threads (7074), with more modest gains beyond that (9404 at 16 threads, 10216 at max threads), indicating that the E-cores contribute meaningfully to multi-threaded workloads but with lower per-thread performance than the P-cores. The single-thread score of 1084 in 3DMark and 4479 in Cinebench R23 demonstrate strong single-core performance, essential for lightly-threaded applications and gaming.

In PassMark, the processor achieves 122169 in integer math and 90424 in floating point math, indicating robust computational throughput for both integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy workloads. The data encryption score of 26957 and data compression score of 475505 highlight strong performance in these specific tasks, making the CPU well-suited for file compression, encryption, and data processing workloads. The extended instructions score of 28865 shows good SIMD and vector processing capability. The multithread score of 37488 and physics score of 2226 further reinforce the processor's multi-core strength.

The nearest rivals are all within 0.4% of the i5-13600KF's average score, with the Intel Core i5-14490F, Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, AMD Ryzen 7 250, and Intel Core i5-13600HX all trading blows within a narrow margin. This indicates that the i5-13600KF is a mature, well-optimized processor that holds its own against newer and more diverse competitors. For real workloads, the 24 MB of L3 cache and 5.10 GHz boost clock provide excellent responsiveness in gaming, while the 14 cores and 20 threads handle productivity tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

Based on the GPU's 87th percentile ranking and its 2229 score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, combined with the CPU's 86th percentile and strong single-thread performance (1084 in 3DMark single-thread, 4479 in Cinebench R23 single-core), this pairing is expected to deliver smooth 1080p gaming at high to ultra settings in most modern titles. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient memory throughput for 1080p textures, while the CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock and 24 MB L3 cache minimize frame time spikes in CPU-bound scenarios.

At 1080p with ultra settings, this system should achieve frame rates comfortably above 60 FPS in most esports and competitive titles, with potential for 144 Hz displays in less demanding games. For AAA titles, expect 60-90 FPS at high settings, with some reduction to medium settings for the most demanding releases. At 1440p, the GPU's 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance will likely limit frame rates to 40-60 FPS at high settings, making 1080p the primary resolution target for this build. The 24 ray tracing cores enable RT effects, but the modest FP32 throughput suggests RT performance will be best suited to lighter RT implementations or lower resolutions.

The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (31727 in Cinebench R23) ensures that background tasks like streaming or Discord do not cause frame drops, as the 20 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and content creation workloads. The balance between CPU and GPU percentiles (86 vs 87) suggests minimal bottlenecking in either direction, with the system performing as a cohesive unit across a wide range of gaming scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data indicates a well-balanced system where the CPU and GPU percentiles are nearly identical (86 vs 87), suggesting that neither component is a consistent bottleneck across all workloads. However, the nature of different workloads determines which component limits performance. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as low-resolution gaming with high frame rates, the i5-13600KF's 86th percentile ranking ensures it can feed frames quickly, with single-thread scores of 1084 in 3DMark and 4479 in Cinebench R23 indicating strong per-core performance.

In GPU-bound scenarios, such as high-resolution gaming with ultra settings, the Arc A580's 87th percentile ranking becomes the limiting factor. The GPU's 2229 score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance will cap frame rates in graphically intensive titles, particularly at 1440p or with heavy ray tracing enabled. The 8 GB VRAM may also become a constraint in games that require more than 8 GB of memory, potentially causing texture pop-in or reduced performance.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not directly measured, can be inferred from the benchmark scores. The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (10216 in 3DMark max threads) indicates it can handle high frame rate scenarios without bottlenecking the GPU, while the GPU's memory bandwidth (512.0 GB/s) and texture rate (384.0 GTexel/s) suggest it can maintain consistent frame delivery in GPU-bound scenarios. The combined 87th percentile ranking confirms that this pairing performs well as a whole, with neither component severely limiting the other in typical gaming workloads.

For productivity workloads, the CPU's 20 threads and high multi-core scores (31727 in Cinebench R23, 37488 in PassMark multithread) make it the dominant component, while the GPU accelerates tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering through its 3072 shading units and 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance. In rendering workloads, the CPU and GPU work in tandem, with the CPU handling geometry and physics while the GPU handles rasterization and shading.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i5-13600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between more affordable DDR4 memory or higher-bandwidth DDR5, with ECC memory support available for workstation applications. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, ensuring compatibility with the latest high-bandwidth storage and expansion cards, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the platform.

The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 175 W, with a suggested PSU rating of 450 W for the GPU alone. When combined, a power supply in the range suggested by the GPU's 450 W specification should provide sufficient headroom for this pairing, though the exact combined power draw is not specified in the data. The GPU requires 2x 8-pin power connectors and occupies a dual-slot form factor, so case and PSU planning should account for these requirements.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to increase system memory to the maximum supported by the platform (though the exact maximum is not specified) or to upgrade the GPU to a higher-tier model when the budget allows. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking means it will remain relevant for several more generations, so the GPU is the more likely upgrade candidate. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface on the GPU ensures compatibility with future GPU upgrades, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU provide headroom for next-generation storage devices. The socket 1700 platform is nearing the end of its upgrade lifecycle, so future CPU upgrades would likely require a motherboard change, but the current i5-13600KF should provide strong performance for years to come.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The combination of the CPU's 1084 3DMark single-thread score and 4479 Cinebench R23 single-core score with the GPU's 2229 3DMark Steel Nomad score and 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance supports 1080p gaming at high refresh rates. The CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock minimizes frame time variance, while the GPU's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate deliver smooth rendering. Expect 144 Hz performance in esports titles and 60-90 FPS in AAA games at 1080p high settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and strong multi-threaded performance (10216 in 3DMark max threads, 31727 in Cinebench R23) provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming while gaming. The PassMark data compression score of 475505 indicates efficient handling of stream encoding workloads. The GPU's 24 RT cores and 3072 shading units can also accelerate encoding tasks, freeing CPU resources for game logic.

Video editing: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with a PassMark integer math score of 122169 and floating point math score of 90424, make this system well-suited for video editing. The 24 MB L3 cache and 5.10 GHz boost clock accelerate timeline scrubbing and export processes. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth assist with effects processing and preview rendering.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727 indicates strong CPU rendering performance, while the GPU's 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS FP16 performance accelerate GPU-accelerated renderers. The 192 texture mapping units and 96 render output units provide solid geometry and pixel throughput for 3D scenes.

Software development: The CPU's 20 threads and high multi-core scores (37488 in PassMark multithread, 17933 in Geekbench multi-core) accelerate compilation and build processes. The PassMark extended instructions score of 28865 indicates strong SIMD performance for vectorized code. The data encryption score of 26957 supports secure development workflows.

Student and office work: The CPU's 86th percentile ranking and strong single-thread performance (4118 in PassMark single-thread) deliver responsive everyday computing. The 14 cores handle multitasking with many browser tabs, office applications, and communication tools simultaneously. The GPU's 87th percentile ensures smooth display output and hardware acceleration for productivity applications.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 87, placing this desktop build in the top 13% of all CPU-GPU pairings in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A580 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The A580's average benchmark score of 57756 is 0.6% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, 0.7% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE, 0.8% lower than the Intel Arc A570M, and 1.1% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT.

Q: What memory types does the Intel Core i5-13600KF support?

A: The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and how much VRAM does it have?

A: The Arc A580 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and how many cores does it have?

A: The i5-13600KF has 14 cores and 20 threads with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: What power supply is suggested for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Arc A580 is 450 W, and the GPU requires 2x 8-pin power connectors.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score and how does it compare to its rivals?

A: The CPU scores 31727 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, with an average benchmark score of 38103, placing it within 0.4% of its nearest rivals (Intel Core i5-14490F, Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, AMD Ryzen 7 250, and Intel Core i5-13600HX).

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is ideal for gamers targeting 1080p resolution with high refresh rates, supported by the GPU's 87th percentile ranking and the CPU's strong single-thread performance (1084 in 3DMark single-thread). The 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are well-suited for 1080p textures, while the CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock ensures consistent frame delivery. Users who play a mix of esports and AAA titles at 1080p will find this system well-balanced, with the CPU's 86th percentile ensuring no bottleneck in CPU-bound scenarios.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, and graphic design will benefit from the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, with Cinebench R23 multi-core scores of 31727 and PassMark integer math of 122169 providing strong compute throughput. The GPU's 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS FP16 performance accelerate GPU-accelerated effects and renders. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 37488 PassMark multithread score and 20 threads, while the data encryption score of 26957 supports secure development workflows.

Students and office workers will find the system responsive for everyday tasks, with the CPU's 4118 PassMark single-thread score ensuring snappy application launches and smooth multitasking. Small business workstations requiring reliable performance for data processing, spreadsheet analysis, and light content creation will benefit from the ECC memory support and the CPU's strong data compression score of 475505. The 24 MB L3 cache and PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide future-proofing for storage and expansion, while the dual-slot GPU with 8 GB VRAM handles display and acceleration duties for professional applications.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-13600KF processor with the Intel Arc A580 graphics card. The CPU, part of the Core 13th Gen series built on Raptor Lake architecture, offers 14 cores and 20 threads with a 5.10 GHz boost clock, while the GPU, based on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, provides 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The combined percentile of 87 places this system in the upper tier of desktop builds, with the CPU at the 86th percentile and GPU at the 87th percentile among their respective categories.

The pairing represents a well-balanced mid-range desktop configuration, with the CPU's launch MSRP of $294 and the GPU's performance class placing it in the upper mid-range segment. The system's strengths lie in its multi-threaded CPU performance (31727 in Cinebench R23) and solid 1080p gaming capability, making it a versatile choice for users who need both strong productivity and gaming performance. The 87th combined percentile indicates that this build outperforms the majority of desktop systems in the benchmark database, while the tight clustering of nearest rivals (all within 1.1%) suggests it competes closely with other popular mid-range options.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + Intel Arc A580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600KF

Intel Arc A580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds