SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600KF paired with the Intel Arc A350 is a desktop combination defined by a sharp imbalance: a processor sitting in the 86th percentile of all CPUs on the database, matched with a graphics card that sits at exactly the 50th percentile of all GPUs. No measured frame-rate data exists for this exact pairing in the database — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries — so all gaming figures discussed below are estimates inferred from the benchmark scores, not recorded results. The build's combined percentile of 68 reflects that asymmetry honestly: strong compute, mid-range graphics.

Balance and Bottleneck

The core question for any build analysis is which component runs out of headroom first, and here the answer is unambiguous. The i5-13600KF ranks in the 86th percentile versus all CPUs in the database, while the Arc A350 sits at the 50th percentile versus all GPUs. That percentile gap is the fingerprint of a GPU-bound configuration: in any workload that leans on rasterization, ray tracing, or video memory, the graphics card will be the limiting factor long before the processor breaks a sweat.

The CPU benchmark profile backs this up. In 3DMark CPU tests, the i5-13600KF scores 1084 in single-thread, 2166 in 2-thread, 4282 in 4-thread, 7074 in 8-thread, 9404 in 16-thread, and 10216 at maximum threads. Note how the score nearly doubles from single-thread to 2-thread, and again to 4-thread — classic evidence that game engines using four or fewer main render threads get full value from each core. The curve then flattens: 8-thread is 7074, 16-thread is 9404, and max-thread is only 10216. That flattening means the chip has compute in reserve that most games simply cannot request. When the CPU tops out near 10216 in max-thread testing but the GPU sits at the median of all graphics cards, the graphics side is the ceiling in essentially every gaming scenario.

The GPU's own specifications reinforce this. Four gigabytes of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus yields 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that will saturate quickly at higher resolutions and texture settings. In CPU-heavy, GPU-light workloads the situation inverts, and the processor's strong single-thread numbers (a Geekbench single-core score of 2487, a PassMark single-thread score of 4118) carry the build. This is a machine that will compile code, decompress archives, and sort data briskly, and game only moderately.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark sheet is dense and consistent. Cinebench R23 returns 31727 multi-core and 4479 single-core; Cinebench R20 returns 13325 multi-core and 1881 single-core; Cinebench R15 returns 3198 multi-core and 451 single-core. Geekbench puts multi-core at 17933 and single-core at 2487. PassMark multithread lands at 37488, with single-thread at 4118. The database's average benchmark score for the chip is 38103, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs.

The nearestRivals list is where those numbers gain meaning. The i5-13600KF's average score of 38103 sits within a fraction of a percent of its closest competitors: the Intel Core i5-14490F at 38149 (deltaPct of -0.1), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T at 38194 (-0.2), the AMD Ryzen 7 250 at 38221 (-0.3), and the Intel Core i5-13600HX at 38261 (-0.4). In practical terms, the chip trades blows with all four — no user would notice the difference in day-to-day work — and notably it matches the 13600HX, a mobile-class part, on aggregate performance while doing so as an unlocked desktop processor.

The GPU side is thinner. The Arc A350 has no benchmark scores recorded in the database — its avgBenchmarkScore is 0 and its benchmarks array is empty — so its standing rests on the percentileVsAllGpus figure of 50 and its hardware specifications. That median placement should be read carefully: it means half the GPUs in the database rank above it, and this includes many cards far better suited to modern gaming at high settings. The combined build percentile of 68 is essentially the CPU dragging the average upward.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform story is the strongest argument for this configuration. The i5-13600KF uses Intel Socket 1700, supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. ECC memory support is listed as true, which matters for workstation-oriented builds where data integrity is a requirement. The chip is multiplier-unlocked, part number SRMBE, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die.

Power draw is modest for this performance class. The CPU carries a TDP of 125 W and the GPU just 25 W, with a suggested PSU of 200 W for the graphics card. Because the Arc A350 is a single-slot card with no external power connectors, the total system demand is low, and any quality PSU meeting the suggested rating has comfortable headroom. That headroom is the upgrade story in miniature: the single most sensible next step for this build is a faster graphics card, and the PSU and PCIe Gen 5 slot are already prepared to host one with substantially higher demands.

Memory choice deserves attention. Since the board supports both DDR4 and DDR5, builders should pick a motherboard according to which memory they intend to run, because the CPU cannot use both simultaneously. The dual-channel bus means two sticks populate full bandwidth.

Who Should Build It

Measured against the recorded numbers, this pairing suits users whose workloads are CPU-forward. Content creators doing video encoding, developers compiling large codebases, students running simulations, and small businesses needing a responsive workstation will all find the 86th-percentile processor delivers. The PassMark subtests describe that audience precisely: data compression at 475505, data encryption at 26957, extended instructions at 28865, integer math at 122169, floating point math at 90424, physics at 2226, find-prime-numbers at 152, and string sorting at 50851. Those are the fingerprints of a capable general-purpose compute box.

Gamers are a narrower fit. With no measured FPS data for this combination and the GPU sitting at the database median, expect moderate frame rates at 1080p with settings reduced below ultra in demanding titles, and strain at 1440p or 4K — these are estimates derived from the benchmark percentiles, not recorded results. The four gigabytes of VRAM is the hard constraint: modern games with high-resolution texture packs will exceed it. Esports-class and older titles at 1080p are the realistic gaming envelope.

GPU Analysis

The Arc A350 is an Alchemist-generation part, the Arc 3 tier, built on TSMC's 6 nm process with the DG2-128 chip. It packs 7200 million transistors onto a 157 mm² die, a density of 45.9M per mm². The Xe-HPG architecture gives it 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 render output units, producing a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s. Raw compute is 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 6.144 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio.

Clocks are flat: 2000 MHz base and 2000 MHz boost, with no separate game clock listed. Memory is 4 GB of GDDR6 running at an effective 15.5 Gbps (1937 MHz memory clock as listed) across a 64-bit bus, for 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Ray tracing hardware is present — 6 RT cores — and the card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. No tensor cores are listed. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is worth noting on a PCIe Gen 5 platform: the card will not saturate its host connection, and the x8 link is adequate for this bandwidth class.

For rendering work, the picture is clear from the specifications. The 50th-percentile placement and 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth mean this is not a card for high-resolution real-time rendering or GPU render farms. The FP32 figure of 3.072 TFLOPS is modest, and the 4 GB memory limit constrains scene size in offline renderers. It can accelerate display output and light compute tasks, but the build's rendering muscle lives in the CPU.

The card is listed as end-of-life, with Xe Graphics as its predecessor and Battlemage as its successor. Its display outputs are listed as "No outputs," which suggests this is an OEM or compact-form-factor variant — builders should verify physical outputs on the specific card model before purchase.

FAQ

Q: Does this build have measured frame-rate data in the database?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries for this combination, and dataIsMeasured is false. All frame-rate discussion for this page is estimated from the benchmark scores and percentiles, not recorded measurements.

Q: Is the CPU or the GPU the bottleneck for gaming?

A: The GPU. The CPU sits in the 86th percentile versus all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile versus all GPUs, and the CPU's 3DMark scaling shows substantial unused headroom beyond eight threads.

Q: How does the i5-13600KF compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 38103 is within a fraction of a percent of the Intel Core i5-14490F (deltaPct -0.1), Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (-0.2), AMD Ryzen 7 250 (-0.3), and Intel Core i5-13600HX (-0.4). Performance between them is effectively indistinguishable.

Q: What power supply does this build need?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 200 W, the GPU's TDP is 25 W, and the CPU's TDP is 125 W. A unit meeting the suggested rating has headroom for the whole system, including a future GPU upgrade.

Q: What memory does the platform support?

A: The i5-13600KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, on Intel Socket 1700, with ECC support listed as true.

Q: Can the Arc A350 handle ray tracing?

A: It has 6 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), so ray-traced rendering is supported in hardware. Whether it is performant at it is another matter given the card's median percentile placement and 124.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes. The multiplier is unlocked on the i5-13600KF.

Gaming Performance

To repeat the critical caveat: no measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the database. Everything in this section is an estimate framed from the benchmark scores.

What the data supports is a 1080p-focused gaming profile. The GPU's median percentile placement, its 768 shading units, 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, and — most decisively — its 4 GB of VRAM on a 64-bit bus indicate that ultra settings in modern AAA titles will exceed the card's memory and bandwidth limits. Reduced texture quality and moderate detail presets are the realistic path to playable frame rates at 1080p. At 1440p and 4K, the 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth and 24 ROPs become the binding constraints, and expectations should scale down accordingly.

The CPU, meanwhile, will not be the problem. With a single-thread PassMark score of 4118 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 1084, game logic, draw-call submission, and physics threads are well served. The 16-thread score of 9404 versus the max-thread score of 10216 shows the chip is barely taxed by game workloads. Any frame-rate ceiling in this build belongs to the Arc A350, and a GPU upgrade would translate directly into higher frame rates without a CPU change.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build, per the buildClass field, pairing a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake processor with an entry-tier Alchemist graphics card. The combined percentile of 68 describes the assembly accurately: it is above average overall because the processor is excellent, but the graphics side holds it out of the upper tiers.

The i5-13600KF is an active-production desktop part released on 2022-09-26 at a launch MSRP of $294. It is the compute anchor of the pair. The Arc A350 is end-of-life, single-slot, and power-friendly at 25 W. Together they form a workstation-first machine with entry-level gaming capability — a configuration that makes sense only when the buyer's priority is processing power with a placeholder GPU.

CPU Analysis

The i5-13600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-S processor on Intel's 10 nm process, with a 257 mm² die and a 125 W TDP. Its base clock is 3.50 GHz and its boost clock is 5.10 GHz. The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, with 24 MB of shared L3. There is no integrated graphics, which is fine here since the build carries a discrete card — but it means troubleshooting without a GPU installed is not possible on this chip.

The benchmark scores translate into concrete workload capability. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727 with a single-core score of 4479 indicates a chip that handles both heavily threaded rendering jobs and lightly threaded interactive tasks without favoring either — a hybrid design doing its job. Geekbench's 17933 multi-core and 2487 single-core results point the same direction. The PassMark multithread score of 37488, combined with data compression at 475505 and integer math at 122169, describes a processor that chewes through batch jobs, archive extraction, and compilation quickly.

The 3DMark thread scaling tells the developer's story: 4282 at four threads and 7074 at eight threads means engines and applications using up to eight threads get near-linear gains, while the shallow climb to 10216 at max threads shows diminishing returns beyond that. For real workloads, that means this CPU is an excellent fit for the software most people actually run — which spends most of its time on a handful of fast cores — while still offering the 20-thread capacity for the occasional heavy render or encode. Sitting in the 86th percentile with an average score of 38103, matched within tenths of a percent by the i5-14490F, Core Ultra 5 245T, Ryzen 7 250, and 13600HX, it is a proven, well-placed performer whose only weak point in this build is the graphics card bolted alongside it.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + Intel Arc A350

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600KF

Intel Arc A350

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds