SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600KF paired with the Intel Arc A310E represents a distinctive desktop configuration that combines a high-end CPU with an entry-level discrete GPU. This pairing is unusual, as the processor’s strong multi-threaded performance contrasts sharply with the graphics card’s modest rendering capabilities. The data shows a system with a combined percentile of 68, indicating it outperforms a majority of benchmarked configurations, yet the specific balance between its components requires careful analysis for potential use cases.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is a compact, single-slot graphics card based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It features 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units, with a die size of 157 mm² containing 7,200 million transistors. The GPU operates at a fixed 2000 MHz for both base and boost clocks, which is relatively high for a low-power card. Memory consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth—a figure that is sufficient for light tasks but will constrain performance in modern titles with high-resolution textures.

The card includes 6 dedicated ray tracing cores, supporting hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible applications. Its FP32 throughput is rated at 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 6.144 TFLOPS. Pixel rate is 32.00 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 64.00 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it feature-complete for current APIs. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and uses no external power connectors, drawing a maximum of 75 W.

The Arc A310E’s benchmark score places it at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it sits exactly in the middle of the performance distribution. With no benchmark scores listed in the data and no nearest rivals provided, its positioning is derived solely from this percentile figure. The 4 GB memory capacity and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are the limiting factors for higher resolutions; at 1080p, the card may handle lighter esports titles, but its FP32 throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS suggests it will struggle with demanding AAA games. For rendering workloads, the 6 RT cores offer some capability, but the low memory bandwidth will hamper complex scenes. The GPU’s end-of-life production status and release date of 2024-03-31 indicate it is a legacy product, now succeeded by Battlemage architecture.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is not well-served by the Arc A310E. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance indicate it can only manage low to medium settings at 1080p in less demanding titles. The CPU’s strong single-threaded score of 1084 in 3dmark_single_thread ensures frame pacing is not CPU-limited, but the GPU’s 4 GB memory will bottleneck texture-heavy games, preventing consistent high-refresh rates in modern esports titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The i5-13600KF scores 10216 in 3dmark_max_threads, indicating robust multi-tasking capability. However, the GPU’s limited rendering power means streaming will be constrained to less demanding games or lower quality settings. The CPU can handle software encoding without impacting frame rates significantly, but the overall gaming experience will still be bound by the Arc A310E.

Video editing: The CPU excels in this workload. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31727 places the processor well above average, making quick work of rendering timelines and exporting video. The GPU’s 6 RT cores and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 can accelerate effects and transitions, but the 4 GB VRAM may be insufficient for large 4K projects. The combination is workable for 1080p editing but will feel restricted at higher resolutions.

3D rendering: The CPU’s performance is the star here. A Geekbench multi-core score of 17933 and Passmark integer math score of 122169 indicate strong computational throughput for CPU-based rendering engines. The GPU’s ray tracing cores support RT-accelerated workloads, but the low bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s will slow down scene loading and texture streaming. For final-frame rendering, this system relies mostly on the CPU, which is a solid choice for hobbyist renders.

Software development: The i5-13600KF’s 20 threads handle compilation tasks efficiently, with a Passmark multi-thread score of 37488. The GPU is less relevant here, but its support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 makes it adequate for graphics debugging. Data compression score of 475505 in Passmark indicates fast build times for large codebases. This is a productive environment for coding, testing, and running virtual machines.

Student and office work: This scenario is over-served by the CPU. The i5-13600KF’s 3dmark_2_threads score of 2166 ensures snappy response in office applications. The GPU’s 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support multiple monitors, which is beneficial for productivity. The system is more powerful than needed for typical student tasks, but the low-power GPU keeps the system quiet and efficient, making it a capable workstation that will not feel outdated quickly.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The die size is 257 mm², and it uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. Cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The CPU’s benchmark scores are consistently strong. Cinebench R23 multi-core reaches 31727, while single-core hits 4479. Geekbench multi-core is 17933, with single-core at 2487. Passmark results further illustrate its capability: multi-thread score of 37488, floating-point math at 90424, and integer math at 122169. Data encryption scores 26957, and extended instructions score 28865. The 3dmark tests show scaling from 2166 in 2-thread to 10216 in max-thread, indicating excellent multi-core efficiency.

In the percentile ranking, the i5-13600KF sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 86% of tested processors. Its average benchmark score is 38103. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14490F with an average score of 38149 and a delta of -0.1%, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T at 38194 with -0.2%, the AMD Ryzen 7 250 at 38221 with -0.3%, and the Intel Core i5-13600HX at 38261 with -0.4%. The data shows the i5-13600KF is within 0.4% of these competitors, making it statistically tied with them in overall performance. This is a mature, high-performance desktop CPU that excels in multi-threaded workloads, as evidenced by its 3dmark_max_threads score of 10216, which is nearly five times its 2-thread score.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 68, meaning this system outperforms 68% of all benchmarked configurations in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13600KF compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14490F?

A: The i5-14490F has an average benchmark score of 38149, which is 0.1% higher than the i5-13600KF’s 38103. This difference is negligible, indicating nearly identical performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A310E?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-13600KF support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is listed in its specifications.

Q: What is the boost clock of the Intel Core i5-13600KF?

A: The boost clock is 5.10 GHz, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz.

Q: How many ray tracing cores does the Intel Arc A310E have?

A: The GPU has 6 ray tracing cores, supporting hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the Intel Arc A310E?

A: The suggested PSU is 250 W, and the GPU itself has a TDP of 75 W.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The system is built on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8. This configuration offers a clear upgrade path: the CPU can be swapped for a higher-tier Raptor Lake processor on the same socket, though the data does not specify which models are compatible beyond the current one. The GPU, being end-of-life, is the primary candidate for replacement. Its successor is Battlemage, implying a newer generation is available. The Arc A310E uses no external power connectors and has a 75 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. This leaves significant headroom in most power supplies, meaning a more powerful GPU could be installed without upgrading the PSU, provided the user has a unit with sufficient wattage and connectors. The CPU’s 125 W TDP is modest for its performance class, and the platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures future GPUs will not be bottlenecked by interface bandwidth. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-performing GPU, as the CPU’s 86th percentile ranking indicates it has ample headroom to drive a more capable graphics card. Memory could also be expanded, though the data does not specify maximum capacity.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance over graphics. Gamers at 1080p with esports titles will find the Arc A310E adequate, but those seeking high-refresh experiences in AAA games will be disappointed. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit most from the i5-13600KF’s 86th percentile CPU ranking, which excels in multi-threaded tasks like Cinebench R23’s 31727 score. Developers will appreciate the 20 threads for compilation and virtualization, supported by a Passmark multi-thread score of 37488. Students and office workers will find the system over-powered for their needs, but the low 75 W GPU TDP keeps the system efficient. Small business workstations requiring multi-monitor setups will value the GPU’s 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs. The combined 68th percentile ranking suggests this system is balanced for productivity but not for gaming enthusiasts. The CPU’s 86th percentile is the primary selling point, while the GPU’s 50th percentile is a limiting factor for graphics-intensive applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are extensive and consistently high. In 3dmark tests, it scores 9404 in 16-thread, 2166 in 2-thread, 4282 in 4-thread, 7074 in 8-thread, 10216 in max-thread, and 1084 in single-thread. Cinebench R15 multi-core is 3198, with single-core at 451. Cinebench R20 multi-core reaches 13325, with single-core at 1881. Cinebench R23 multi-core is 31727, with single-core at 4479. Geekbench multi-core is 17933, with single-core at 2487. Passmark tests show data compression at 475505, data encryption at 26957, extended instructions at 28865, find prime numbers at 152, floating-point math at 90424, integer math at 122169, multi-thread at 37488, physics at 2226, random string sorting at 50851, and single-thread at 4118.

The GPU has no benchmark scores listed in the data, but its percentile rank is 50. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 38103, placing it at the 86th percentile. The combined picture is one of asymmetry: the CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is average. This is reflected in the combined percentile of 68, which is pulled down by the GPU’s mid-range standing. The i5-13600KF’s nearest rival, the i5-14490F, differs by only -0.1%, indicating the CPU is at the top of its class. The GPU’s lack of benchmark data makes direct comparisons impossible, but its 50th percentile places it exactly at the median of all GPUs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system combining the Intel Core i5-13600KF and Intel Arc A310E. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Core 13th Gen series, based on Raptor Lake architecture, with an 86th percentile ranking. The GPU is an Intel Arc A310E, a single-slot, 75 W card with 4 GB memory, ranked at the 50th percentile. The combined percentile is 68, indicating an above-average overall system. The pairing is unusual: the CPU is a high-end desktop part, while the GPU is entry-level. This results in a system that is well-suited for CPU-intensive tasks but limited in graphics performance. The i5-13600KF’s launch MSRP is $294, though the GPU has no listed launch price. The CPU’s production status is active, while the GPU is end-of-life. This is a system where the processor defines its character, and the GPU is best considered a placeholder or a solution for low-power, multi-display setups.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data clearly indicates a significant bottleneck in the GPU. The CPU’s 86th percentile versus the GPU’s 50th percentile shows a large disparity. In gaming workloads, the Arc A310E will be the limiting factor, as its 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are far below what the CPU can feed. The CPU’s 3dmark_single_thread score of 1084 ensures it can generate frames faster than the GPU can render them, leading to GPU-bound scenarios in most games. In productivity tasks, the CPU is the dominant component, with its 31727 Cinebench R23 multi-core score driving performance. The GPU’s 6 RT cores may offload some ray tracing work, but its low memory bandwidth will bottleneck complex scenes. The FPS scaling from the CPU’s perspective is strong, but the GPU cannot translate that into high frame rates. For workloads that rely on GPU compute, such as machine learning or certain rendering engines, the system will be heavily limited. The data suggests that for balanced performance, the GPU should be upgraded to match the CPU’s capability, as the current pairing leaves significant CPU headroom unused in graphics-intensive applications.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest it can handle esports titles at 1080p with medium settings, likely achieving playable frame rates above 60 FPS in games like Counter-Strike or Valorant. For AAA games, the 4 GB memory and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will be severe limitations, with estimated frame rates dropping below 30 FPS at 1080p ultra settings. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures that frame times are consistent, but the GPU will be the bottleneck. At 1440p or 4K, the Arc A310E is expected to struggle significantly, with estimated frame rates falling to unplayable levels in modern titles. The 6 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but at these performance levels, enabling ray tracing would likely result in single-digit frame rates. The GPU’s 2000 MHz clock is high, but it cannot compensate for the narrow 64-bit memory bus. For gaming, this system is best suited for older or less demanding titles at 1080p. The CPU’s high percentile does not translate to gaming performance because the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + Intel Arc A310E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600KF

Intel Arc A310E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds