SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600K

37,685 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600K and Intel Arc B570 pairing represents a desktop build that combines a high-end 13th Gen CPU with a mid-range current-generation GPU. The data indicates a system designed for capable 1440p gaming and productivity, though there are distinct asymmetries between the CPU's strong performance class and the GPU's more modest standing relative to all other hardware.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600K is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die. It operates with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, drawing a 125 W TDP. The chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes Intel UHD Graphics 770 as integrated graphics. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache, alongside 2 MB L2 and 80 KB L1 per core, provides a robust foundation for both gaming and multi-threaded workloads.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales well with thread count, though with some diminishing returns at the top end. The 3DMark scores progress from 1085 in single-thread to 2168 in 2-thread, 4283 in 4-thread, 7074 in 8-thread, 9368 in 16-thread, and peak at 10157 in max-threads. This scaling curve indicates that the chip gains substantial performance through its first 16 threads, with the final 4 threads (Hyper-Threading on the efficiency cores) adding roughly 8% over the 16-thread result. In Cinebench, the multicore R23 score of 24221 versus a single-core score of 2000.5 demonstrates that this is a processor with strong per-core performance that also scales effectively across all cores. The Geekbench scores of 15575 multicore and 2297 single-core reinforce this dual strength.

The PassMark suite reveals specialized capabilities that matter for specific workloads. The floating-point math score of 90538 and integer math score of 122481 show balanced arithmetic performance, while the extended instructions score of 28805 suggests solid SIMD throughput. Data compression at 476394 and encryption at 27075 indicate that the chip handles these tasks with significant headroom. The processor sits at the 86th percentile against all CPUs, placing it firmly in the upper tier of available processors. Its average benchmark score of 37685 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, with the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scoring 37762 (-0.2% delta) and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H scoring 37522 (+0.4% delta), showing that the i5-13600K is effectively performance-equivalent to these modern alternatives despite being from an earlier generation.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's aggregate performance places it at the 86th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 65th percentile. The combined percentile for this pairing is 76, indicating that as a system, it outranks about three-quarters of all desktop configurations in the database. This gap between CPU and GPU percentiles is a defining characteristic of the build.

The GPU benchmarks for the Intel Arc B570 show a strong DirectX 12 result in 3DMark Steel Nomad with a score of 2649. In Geekbench, the Vulkan score of 96844 exceeds the OpenCL score of 83514, suggesting the architecture performs well under modern graphics APIs. The PassMark G3D score of 14195 is the most comprehensive gaming-oriented metric, while the GPU compute score of 7281 indicates moderate compute throughput. The DirectX 9 score of 164, DirectX 11 score of 118, and DirectX 12 score of 72 in PassMark show an unusual inversion where older APIs score higher, which is a characteristic of Intel's driver stack rather than raw capability. The GPU's average benchmark score of 20556 places it within 0.1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534) and 0.1% behind the Intel Arc A750 (20582), making these the primary performance comparators.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a top-15% component and the GPU is a solid mid-range part. For workloads that are CPU-bound, this build will perform like a high-end machine; for GPU-bound tasks, it will perform like a competent mainstream system. The data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor in most scenarios.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i5-13600K compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical, with the i5-13600K at 37685 and the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 at 37762, a difference of only -0.2%. In practical terms, the two CPUs are performance equivalents.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier relative to all other graphics cards?

A: The Intel Arc B570 sits at the 65th percentile against all GPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly two-thirds of the graphics cards in the database. Its average benchmark score of 20556 is essentially tied with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and the Intel Arc A750.

Q: Does the CPU support error-correcting memory?

A: Yes, the Core i5-13600K supports ECC memory. This is a feature that can be relevant for workstation builds where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The Arc B570 has a memory bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s, delivered through a 160-bit bus using 10 GB of GDDR6 memory running at an effective speed of 19 Gbps.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread performance?

A: The single-thread Cinebench R23 score is 2000.5, while the multicore score is 24221, a ratio of roughly 12:1. This indicates excellent scaling across the 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 76, which places this build above 76% of all desktop configurations in the benchmark database.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific combination?

A: No, the data pack contains no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core i5-13600K with the Intel Arc B570. All frame rate discussions are estimates based on the individual component benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

This configuration suits a user who prioritizes CPU-heavy tasks while maintaining a respectable gaming experience. Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 86th percentile standing, with the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 and 3DMark max-threads score of 10157 indicating strong multi-threaded throughput. Software developers compiling large codebases will see excellent performance from the PassMark integer math score of 122481 and data compression score of 476394.

Students and small business users building a single workstation will find this balanced for coursework and office productivity, with the CPU's single-thread performance of 4124 in PassMark ensuring responsive application use. Gamers targeting 1440p resolution will find the GPU's 65th percentile adequate for most titles, though those seeking maximum frame rates at 4K may need to consider a higher-tier GPU. The build is less suitable for users whose primary workload is GPU compute, as the Arc B570's compute score of 7281 in PassMark is modest relative to the CPU's capabilities.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in this pairing for gaming workloads. The CPU's 86th percentile versus the GPU's 65th percentile creates a 21-point gap, meaning the i5-13600K has significantly more headroom than the Arc B570 can utilize. In CPU-bound scenarios like simulation games or heavily threaded productivity applications, the system will perform at a high level. In GPU-bound scenarios such as modern game rendering at high resolutions, the Arc B570 will limit frame rates well before the CPU reaches its capacity.

The combined percentile of 76 sits between the individual component percentiles, reflecting that system performance is constrained by the weaker link. The FPS scaling, though not measured for this exact pairing, can be inferred from the GPU's DirectX performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2649 suggests that at 1440p ultra settings, the GPU will deliver playable but not exceptional frame rates in demanding titles. The CPU's 3DMark 2-thread score of 2168 and single-thread score of 1085 indicate it can feed the GPU effectively at high frame rates in less demanding games, where the bottleneck shifts entirely to the graphics card.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture (Battlemage generation) using TSMC's 5 nm process, with a die size of 272 mm² containing 19,600 million transistors. It operates at a fixed clock speed of 2500 MHz for both base and boost, which simplifies power delivery characteristics. The 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus provides 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth, a figure that is adequate for 1440p gaming but may be a limiting factor at higher resolutions with large texture packs.

The GPU contains 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output pipelines. It has 18 ray tracing cores, which enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the modest core count suggests this will be a performance-heavy feature. The FP32 throughput of 11.52 TFLOPS and FP16 of 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) place it in the mid-range of current graphics cards. The pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s are consistent with its 65th percentile ranking.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a GPU that performs best under modern APIs. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 96844 is notably higher than the OpenCL score of 83514, suggesting strong driver optimization for Vulkan titles. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 is competitive for its class. However, the PassMark DirectX scores show significant variation across API versions, with DirectX 9 at 164 being more than double the DirectX 12 score of 72, which indicates that older games may run relatively better than newer ones. The GPU's average benchmark score of 20556 is essentially identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534) and Intel Arc A750 (20582), making these the most relevant performance references.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i5-13600K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory technology. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for the Arc B570's bandwidth needs. The platform is mature, and the CPU's 125 W TDP is manageable for most mid-range motherboards.

The GPU has a 150 W TDP and requires a single 8-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. This leaves significant headroom for upgrades. If a user were to replace the Arc B570 with a more powerful GPU, the CPU's 86th percentile performance would not become a bottleneck until pairing with a top-tier graphics card. Conversely, the platform's support for DDR5 means a memory upgrade path exists for those currently using DDR4. The next sensible upgrade for this build would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU has substantial headroom. The Arc B570's dual-slot design and 272 mm length (10.7 inches) mean it will fit in most mid-tower cases, and the 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs support multi-monitor setups.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-13600K with the Intel Arc B570. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake part that ranks at the 86th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37685. The GPU is a Battlemage-generation card that ranks at the 65th percentile against all GPUs, with an average score of 20556. The combined system percentile of 76 indicates an upper-mid-tier desktop configuration.

The pairing is characterized by a significant CPU advantage over the GPU. This makes it a build where the processor will excel in productivity and multi-threaded workloads, while the graphics card provides competent but not class-leading gaming performance. The overall tier is that of a high-end productivity machine with mainstream gaming capability. The CPU's nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and Intel Core Ultra 5 235H, perform within 0.4% of it, confirming that the i5-13600K remains a competitive choice. The GPU's nearest rivals, including the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and Intel Arc A750, all score within 0.5% of each other, placing the Arc B570 in a tightly contested mid-range segment.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this build will deliver high frame rates in esports titles, with the CPU's single-thread score of 4124 in PassMark ensuring minimal CPU-side frame pacing issues. At 1440p, the GPU's 65th percentile will provide smooth gameplay in most titles, though the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2649 suggests that ultra settings in the most demanding games will require some adjustments.

Streaming benefits from the CPU's 20 threads, with the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 providing ample encoding headroom while gaming. Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro will leverage the CPU's PassMark data compression score of 476394 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 83514 for accelerated effects. 3D rendering in Blender or similar software will be CPU-bound, with the Cinebench R15 multicore score of 3642 indicating solid performance, though the GPU compute score of 7281 will not accelerate cycles as effectively as a more compute-focused card.

Software development, including compilation and testing, will be a strong suit. The PassMark integer math score of 122481 and extended instructions score of 28805 indicate robust performance for build tools and code analysis. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running test suites. For students and office work, the system is overqualified, with the CPU's 86th percentile ensuring snappy response in any productivity application, while the GPU's capabilities handle presentation graphics and light photo editing without issue.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the data pack. All frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 and its 65th percentile ranking, at 1440p ultra settings, modern AAA titles will likely run in the 50-70 FPS range. The GPU's 10 GB of VRAM and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for this resolution, though texture-heavy games may approach the memory limit. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (PassMark 4124, 3DMark single-thread 1085) will allow the GPU to reach its full potential, with estimates in the 80-110 FPS range for demanding titles and well over 144 FPS in competitive shooters.

The GPU's PassMark DirectX results show an interesting pattern, with DirectX 9 scoring 164 versus DirectX 12 at 72. This suggests that older games running on DirectX 9 or 11 may perform relatively better than their newer counterparts, as the driver stack appears optimized for legacy APIs. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 96844 indicates that Vulkan titles will perform well, potentially exceeding DirectX 12 performance. Ray tracing performance, while hardware-accelerated with 18 RT cores, will be limited; the FP32 throughput of 11.52 TFLOPS suggests that enabling ray tracing at 1440p will require significant settings reductions to maintain playable frame rates.