SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

83 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600K

37,685 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600K paired with the Intel Arc A350 is a desktop configuration that combines a high-end enthusiast CPU with an entry-level discrete GPU. This pairing creates a significant performance imbalance, where the processor’s capabilities far outstrip the graphics card’s output in almost every scenario. The data shows a CPU that ranks in the 86th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, resulting in a combined system percentile of 68. This analysis uses only the provided benchmark scores and specifications to outline what this system can do and where its limitations lie.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not a suitable configuration for high-refresh gaming. While the Intel Core i5-13600K provides exceptional single-thread performance, scoring 1085 in 3DMark single-thread and 2000.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core, the Intel Arc A350 is a 25 W entry-level GPU with only 768 shading units and 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus. The GPU’s performance is the limiting factor, and its 50th percentile ranking suggests it is a mid-pack performer overall, which is not sufficient for driving high frame rates at demanding settings. The system will be bottlenecked entirely by the GPU in this workload.

Streaming: The CPU is a powerful asset for streaming. With 14 cores and 20 threads, it has substantial headroom for encoding video while simultaneously running a game. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 indicates that the processor can handle the heavy lifting of software encoding without breaking a sweat, assuming the game itself is not too demanding for the GPU. The data suggests the CPU will not be the source of performance drops during a stream; instead, the Arc A350’s ability to render the game at a playable frame rate will be the primary challenge.

Video Editing: The combination of a strong CPU and a weak GPU creates a mixed picture for video editing. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 37680 and Cinebench R20 multicore score of 13373 are excellent for timeline scrubbing, applying effects, and exporting video, as these tasks are often CPU-bound. However, the Arc A350’s 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 6 RT cores are modest, meaning GPU-accelerated effects and rendering will be slow. Editors working with complex timelines or heavy GPU-accelerated effects will find the GPU to be a significant bottleneck, while simpler edits will benefit from the CPU’s raw power.

3D Rendering: This is a workload where the CPU dominates. The i5-13600K’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 and 3DMark max threads score of 10157 are strong indicators of its ability to handle complex rendering tasks. CPU-based renderers like those in Blender or V-Ray will perform very well, with the processor’s 14 cores and 20 threads providing ample computational power. Conversely, the Arc A350’s limited 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 6 RT cores mean that GPU-accelerated rendering will be significantly slower. In this configuration, the CPU is the workhorse, and the GPU offers little acceleration for rendering tasks.

Software Development: The i5-13600K is an excellent choice for software development. The Passmark data compression score of 476394 and data encryption score of 27075 highlight its strength in handling the sort of repetitive, parallel workloads common in compiling code and managing databases. The 20 threads allow for fast multi-threaded builds, while the 3DMark single-thread score of 1085 ensures snappy responsiveness in the editor and IDE. The GPU’s role here is minimal, making this a very capable development machine for everything except tasks that require local GPU compute, such as machine learning model training, where the Arc A350’s 3.072 TFLOPS would be a limiting factor.

Student and Office Work: The system is overkill for standard student and office tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The Passmark single-thread score of 4124 and the 3DMark 2-thread score of 2168 guarantee a fluid and responsive experience in any office application. The power draw of the platform, with a 125 W TDP CPU, is a consideration for a machine that will spend most of its time idle, but the performance headroom is immense. The Arc A350 is functionally irrelevant for these tasks, as the CPU’s integrated UHD Graphics 770 is more than sufficient, though the discrete GPU is present in the system.

Benchmark Performance

The system’s overall performance is defined by a stark contrast between its components. The CPU holds an 86th percentile rank among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 37685. This places it in a competitive position, with the nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, which has an average score of 37762, a delta of -0.2%. Other close rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 (37804, -0.3%), the Intel Core 5 211E (37829, -0.4%), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H (37522, 0.4%). These sub-0.5% deltas indicate that the i5-13600K is effectively tied with these other processors in aggregate performance, despite being from an older generation.

The GPU, in contrast, has no benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs. This is a median position, suggesting it is an average performer in the wider GPU landscape, but its specific capabilities are limited. The combined system percentile is 68, which is pulled down significantly by the GPU’s mediocre standing. The data shows a clear picture: the CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is a bottom-tier accelerator. This creates a system where the CPU’s potential is largely untapped in many real-world applications because the GPU cannot keep up with it, particularly in graphics-intensive workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600K is a Raptor Lake processor built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It features 14 cores and 20 threads, a configuration that combines performance and efficiency cores. It has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, allowing for high single-thread performance when needed. The CPU’s cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This architecture is designed for high throughput, as evidenced by its strong benchmark scores.

The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 is a standout figure, demonstrating the CPU’s ability to handle heavily threaded workloads. This is complemented by a single-core score of 2000.5, which is crucial for applications that rely on a few fast threads. The Geekbench scores of 15575 (multi-core) and 2297 (single-core) reinforce this dual strength. The Passmark suite shows specific strengths: integer math (122481) and floating-point math (90538) scores are high, indicating robust general-purpose compute. The data compression score of 476394 is particularly impressive, suggesting the CPU excels at tasks like file archiving and database operations. The average benchmark score of 37685 and its 86th percentile ranking confirm that this is a high-performing processor that can compete with newer, more expensive models, as the sub-1% deltas to its nearest rivals show.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else and have minimal GPU requirements. Content creators who work primarily with CPU-bound applications, such as audio production, code compilation, or 3D rendering with CPU-based engines, will find the i5-13600K’s 20 threads and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 to be a massive asset. Software developers will benefit from the high Passmark data compression (476394) and encryption (27075) scores, which speed up build times and database operations. Students and small business workstations that run heavy multi-threaded productivity software but do not need a powerful graphics card for gaming or design will see excellent performance in tasks like data analysis or financial modeling, driven by the CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 37680.

This is not a build for gamers, even at 1080p with low settings, as the Arc A350’s performance is simply too weak. It is also not for professionals who rely on GPU-accelerated workflows, like video editors using effects that require significant compute or 3D artists using GPU renderers. The data clearly indicates that the CPU is the star of the show, and the GPU is a placeholder. Building this system makes sense only if the user knows their workloads are entirely CPU-bound and they are willing to accept the Arc A350 as a basic display adapter, rather than a performance component.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the components, not measured results. The performance expectations are heavily influenced by the Intel Arc A350’s specifications.

The Arc A350 has a TDP of 25 W and a boost clock of 2000 MHz. It features 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs. Its memory is a small 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. The GPU’s FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS. These specifications are characteristic of a very low-end graphics card. In gaming, the GPU is expected to be the primary bottleneck in nearly all scenarios.

Estimated 1080p Performance: At 1080p with ultra settings, the system is estimated to struggle to maintain playable frame rates in most modern titles. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking and low compute throughput suggest that it will not achieve high FPS in demanding games. Expect performance in the range of 30-40 FPS in older or less demanding titles, and potentially lower in newer AAA releases. The 4 GB VRAM capacity will also be a limiting factor, potentially causing texture pop-in or forcing the game to use lower quality textures.

Estimated 1440p and 4K Performance: At 1440p and 4K resolutions, the system’s performance is expected to be even worse. The GPU’s 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 3.072 TFLOPS of compute are insufficient for the pixel throughput required at these resolutions. Frame rates are estimated to drop below playable levels, making this configuration unsuitable for high-resolution gaming. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1085) will not help, as the GPU will be fully saturated and unable to render frames fast enough. The system is estimated to be a poor choice for any serious gaming, regardless of resolution or settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance tier of this CPU and GPU combination?

A: The combined system percentile is 68, placing it in the upper-mid range of all desktop systems. However, this is a misleading figure, as it is an average of the CPU’s strong 86th percentile and the GPU’s mediocre 50th percentile.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600K has an average benchmark score of 37685. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, has a score of 37762, a difference of -0.2%. It is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 (-0.3%), the Intel Core 5 211E (-0.4%), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H (0.4%).

Q: What kind of memory does this CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W. The GPU has a TDP of 25 W. The GPU’s suggested PSU is 200 W, which is a measure of the total system power supply recommendation.

Q: Is the GPU good for gaming?

A: No. The Intel Arc A350 is an entry-level GPU with a 50th percentile ranking and 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. It is not designed for high-performance gaming, and its 4 GB VRAM is a significant limitation.

Q: What is the socket type for this CPU?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600K uses the Intel Socket 1700.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes Intel UHD Graphics 770. This is useful for troubleshooting or basic display output, but the discrete Arc A350 GPU is present in this build.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance of this system is heavily skewed. The CPU is a top-tier performer, ranking in the 86th percentile, while the GPU is a mid-pack performer at the 50th percentile. This creates a clear bottleneck, but its direction depends on the workload.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as 3D rendering in CPU-based engines, video encoding, and software compilation, the CPU is the workhorse. The i5-13600K’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 and Passmark multithread score of 37680 demonstrate its capability. In these tasks, the Arc A350 is mostly idle, and the system’s performance is determined almost entirely by the CPU. The GPU’s low power is not a limiting factor, and the system performs like a high-end workstation.

In GPU-bound workloads, such as gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the bottleneck is the Arc A350. Its 768 shading units and 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute are insufficient to feed the CPU’s processing power. The CPU’s high single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1085) will have no impact on the frame rate because the GPU is the limiting factor. The FPS scaling in this scenario is flat; increasing the CPU’s performance would yield zero gains because the GPU is saturated. The data indicates this is a severely imbalanced pairing for any graphics-intensive task.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system that pairs the Intel Core i5-13600K with the Intel Arc A350. The CPU is a high-end, enthusiast-grade processor from the Core 13th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture. It is a powerful 14-core, 20-thread processor with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz and a 125 W TDP. The GPU is an entry-level, End-of-life product from Intel’s Arc 3 series, based on the Xe-HPG architecture. It is a low-power (25 W), single-slot card with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory.

The overall tier of the system is defined by the combined percentile of 68. This places it in the upper-midrange of all systems, but the reality is more nuanced. The CPU is a top-tier component, while the GPU is a bottom-tier one. This is not a balanced gaming or high-performance graphics system. It is a system where the CPU is the primary component, and the GPU is a secondary, low-powered addition. The data shows this is a lopsided pairing, with the CPU’s potential being wasted in graphics-heavy scenarios. The system is best described as a powerful CPU platform with a minimal discrete graphics solution.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 13th Gen series. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing flexibility in choosing a motherboard. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the primary slot, though the Arc A350 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. This means the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support is not currently utilized by the GPU, but it is ready for future expansion.

The power delivery requirements are modest. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, which is a standard figure for a high-performance desktop processor. The GPU has a very low TDP of 25 W and a suggested PSU of 200 W, indicating that the entire system can run on a relatively modest power supply. The motherboard must provide the necessary power connectors for the CPU, but the GPU does not require any external power connectors, according to the data.

A sensible next upgrade for this system is clearly the graphics card. The CPU’s 86th percentile ranking and high benchmark scores (e.g., 3DMark max threads score of 10157) provide a massive performance headroom that the Arc A350 cannot utilize. Replacing the GPU with a more powerful model would immediately unlock the CPU’s potential in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The PCIe 4.0 x8 slot is compatible with nearly all modern graphics cards, though a high-end card might benefit from a motherboard with a PCIe Gen 5 slot. The platform’s memory support for DDR5 also allows for a future upgrade path to faster memory, which can improve performance in memory-sensitive tasks. The 200 W PSU recommendation for the GPU suggests the system’s power supply is not a limiting factor for a GPU upgrade, as long as the new GPU’s power requirements are within the PSU’s capacity.