SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600HX + Intel Arc A730M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600HX

38,261 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A730M

45,592 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600HX is a 14-core, 20-thread mobile processor built on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. Its configuration combines performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The chip carries 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, includes ECC memory support, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself. Integrated graphics come in the form of UHD Graphics 770, making the processor self-sufficient for basic display tasks without a discrete GPU.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 86th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 38,261. The multi-threaded Cinebench scores are particularly telling: Cinebench R23 multi-core yields 23,422, R20 multi-core produces 9,837, and R15 multi-core reaches 2,360. Single-core performance is equally respectable, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 3,306, R20 single-core at 1,388, and R15 single-core at 333. PassMark results reinforce this position: multi-thread score of 28,280, single-thread score of 3,684, integer math at 97,126, and floating-point math at 70,618. The data compression score of 328,686 and encryption score of 19,289 indicate strong throughput for data-intensive tasks.

The nearest rivals show how tightly grouped this segment is. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38,221, a delta of just 0.1% behind the i5-13600HX. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H sits 0.1% ahead at 38,312, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T trails by 0.2% at 38,194. The Intel Core 9 270H leads by 0.2% at 38,335. These margins are within noise, meaning the i5-13600HX trades blows with current-generation competitors. For real workloads, this translates to responsive application loading, smooth multitasking across 20 threads, and capable content creation performance. The 55 W TDP is a key constraint — this is a mobile chip designed for laptops, so sustained all-core workloads will depend heavily on the laptop's cooling solution. The boost clock of 4.80 GHz ensures snappy single-threaded response for everyday tasks and legacy software.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A730M is a mobile discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, using the DG2-512 chip fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process. The die contains 21,700 million transistors across a 406 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 53.4 million per mm². Memory configuration includes 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1100 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz. Compute resources include 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 raster output units, and 24 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate reaches 196.8 GPixel/s, while texture rate hits 393.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 12.60 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 25.19 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio. The GPU draws 80 W and connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with display outputs that are portable device dependent.

Benchmark data shows the Arc A730M in the 84th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 45,592. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 1,732. GeekBench OpenCL produces 70,352, while Vulkan reaches 64,693. The nearest rival comparisons place it in interesting company. The AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 45,384, trailing by 0.5%. The NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation sits 0.8% ahead at 45,972. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile leads by 1.0% at 45,152? No — the delta is 1.0% for RTX 5090 Mobile at 45,152, meaning the Arc A730M is 1.0% ahead. The NVIDIA RTX A2000 is 1.0% ahead of the Arc at 46,043. These deltas are minimal, indicating the Arc A730M performs at a level comparable to professional and high-end mobile GPUs.

For rendering workloads, the 12 GB VRAM is a significant asset, allowing larger textures and scenes to fit in memory without spillover. The 336.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution texture streaming and compute-heavy tasks. The 24 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles, though the 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 ceiling limits raw compute density compared to larger GPUs. The 2:1 FP16 ratio at 25.19 TFLOPS benefits applications that can use reduced precision. The GPU's end-of-life production status suggests it is being phased out, but benchmark performance remains competitive at its tier.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 85, placing this build above the vast majority of systems in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13600HX compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 250?

A: The i5-13600HX has an average benchmark score of 38,261, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 250's 38,221. The performance difference is negligible.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A730M?

A: The GPU features 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600HX supports ECC memory, which is notable for a mobile processor and beneficial for error-sensitive compute workloads.

Q: What is the TDP of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 80 W, for a combined thermal envelope of 135 W that the laptop cooling system must handle.

Q: What is the boost clock of the Intel Arc A730M?

A: The GPU boosts up to 2050 MHz, with a base clock of 1100 MHz. The memory runs at 1750 MHz.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this specific pairing. All gaming performance figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a well-balanced pairing where neither component drastically outclasses the other. The CPU sits in the 86th percentile, the GPU in the 84th, and the combined system in the 85th. This alignment suggests that in most workloads, both components will reach their limits at similar points, minimizing the chance of a severe bottleneck. The CPU's multi-threaded strength (Cinebench R23 multi-core at 23,422) supports the GPU's compute demands in physics, AI, and scene complexity. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth keep data flowing without starving the CPU's 20 threads.

In gaming scenarios, the balance depends on resolution. At lower resolutions, the CPU's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core at 3,306) will often be the limiting factor, as frame rates climb high enough to expose CPU overhead. At higher resolutions, the GPU's rendering throughput becomes the constraint, with the 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 and 196.8 GPixel/s pixel rate determining the ceiling. The GPU's 84th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 86th means that in GPU-bound workloads, the CPU has a slight headroom to keep feeding frames without becoming the primary limiter. In CPU-bound tasks like data compression (328,686 PassMark score) or integer math (97,126), the GPU is largely idle, and the CPU's 20 threads carry the load.

The 55 W CPU TDP and 80 W GPU TDP together create a thermal budget that laptop designs must respect. In sustained loads, thermal throttling could skew the balance, potentially making the CPU or GPU hit power limits before reaching compute limits. The absence of measured FPS data means bottleneck analysis relies on percentile proximity; the close 86/84 split is the strongest evidence that this pairing is designed to avoid lopsided performance.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU itself is not upgradeable in a traditional sense; the laptop's motherboard dictates the processor for the system's lifetime. The GPU is similarly integrated, so users cannot swap the Arc A730M for a different mobile GPU. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC as an option. Memory upgrades are the most practical path, provided the laptop has accessible SO-DIMM slots. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which accommodates high-speed NVMe storage and external GPU enclosures, though the laptop's physical design may limit expansion.

The GPU's TDP is 80 W, and the CPU's TDP is 55 W, for a combined 135 W. The FACT PACK does not provide a suggested PSU rating, so power headroom discussions must remain qualitative. A sensible next upgrade would focus on storage and memory: adding a PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drive to exploit the 20 CPU lanes, and maximizing RAM capacity and speed (either DDR4 or DDR5, depending on what the laptop supports). Since the CPU and GPU are fixed, users should consider whether the 12 GB VRAM and 20 threads meet their long-term needs before committing to this platform. The GPU's end-of-life status suggests that future driver optimization may taper off, making this a platform for current-generation tasks rather than a future-proof investment.

# Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing targets mobile users who need balanced performance for both productivity and graphics work. Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p will benefit from the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 84th percentile ranking, which handles modern titles at high settings across resolutions. Content creators working with video editing, 3D modeling, or photo processing will leverage the CPU's 20 threads and the GPU's 12.60 TFLOPS for rendering and encoding. The ECC memory support appeals to developers and researchers running long compute jobs where data integrity is critical. Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the multi-core performance sufficient for compilation, simulation, and data analysis. Small business workstations that require multi-threaded throughput for spreadsheets, databases, and light rendering will run comfortably on this setup.

The CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 84th percentile indicate a system that performs above average across the board, making it suitable for users who cannot afford specialized hardware but need general-purpose high performance. The 24 MB L3 cache and 24 ray tracing cores mean the system is ready for modern API workloads, including DirectX 12 Ultimate titles. The laptop form factor from the build class means this is a portable workstation rather than a desktop replacement, so users should prioritize workloads that benefit from mobility.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination of Intel Core i5-13600HX and Intel Arc A730M. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results. The GPU's average benchmark score of 45,592 and 84th percentile ranking suggest strong 1080p and 1440p gaming capability. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for high-resolution textures and modern game assets at these resolutions. The 336.0 GB/s bandwidth supports smooth texture streaming, while the 24 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,306 and multi-core score of 23,422 indicate that frame pacing and physics calculations will not be a major bottleneck at typical gaming framerates. The GPU's 196.8 GPixel/s pixel rate and 393.6 GTexel/s texture rate provide a solid foundation for rasterized rendering. In competitive titles like first-person shooters, the 4.80 GHz boost clock will help maintain high frame rates at 1080p. In graphically demanding AAA games at 1440p, the GPU's 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 will be the primary driver, and users should expect playable frame rates at medium-to-high settings. At 4K, the GPU may struggle to maintain high settings, given its 84th percentile position and the pixel rate ceiling. The absence of measured FPS data means these are directional estimates; actual performance will vary based on driver maturity, game optimization, and laptop thermal design.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-13600HX mobile processor with the Intel Arc A730M mobile GPU. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-HX chip with a 55 W TDP, while the GPU is a 12 GB GDDR6 Xe-HPG part with an 80 W TDP. The combined percentile is 85, placing this system above the vast majority of configurations in the benchmark database. The CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 84th percentile show near-parity in relative performance, making this a balanced platform for mixed workloads. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, so this build represents a mature, current-generation configuration rather than a state-of-the-art one. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $284, which reflects its mobile positioning. This is a mid-to-high-tier laptop system that prioritizes all-around performance over specialization.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13600HX achieves an average benchmark score of 38,261, placing it in the 86th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are separated by less than 0.2%, with the AMD Ryzen 7 250 at 38,221 (0.1% behind), Intel Core Ultra 9 285H at 38,312 (0.1% ahead), Intel Core Ultra 5 245T at 38,194 (0.2% behind), and Intel Core 9 270H at 38,335 (0.2% ahead). This clustering indicates the i5-13600HX is at parity with current-generation competitor chips. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,422 and single-core score of 3,306 are the headline numbers, showing strong multi-threaded scaling from the 14-core design.

The Intel Arc A730M achieves an average benchmark score of 45,592, placing it in the 84th percentile among all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1,732, with GeekBench OpenCL at 70,352 and Vulkan at 64,693. The nearest rivals show a tight spread: AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT at 45,384 (0.5% behind), NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation at 45,972 (0.8% ahead), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile at 45,152 (1.0% behind), and NVIDIA RTX A2000 at 46,043 (1.0% ahead). The combined picture is a system where both components perform in the mid-80s percentile range, resulting in an overall 85th percentile rank. This means the build outperforms roughly 85% of all systems in the database, with balanced strengths across CPU-bound and GPU-bound tasks. The data shows a cohesive platform that delivers above-average performance without a dominant bottleneck.