SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600HX + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600HX

38,261 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600HX and Intel Arc A550M pairing represents a laptop-class configuration that sits at the 86th percentile among all CPU and GPU combinations, with the processor delivering an average benchmark score of 38261 and the graphics solution reaching 49737. The data shows no measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600HX is a 14-core, 20-thread mobile processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node from Intel. It operates with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, backed by a 24 MB shared L3 cache alongside 80 KB L1 and 2 MB L2 per core. The chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration and includes ECC memory support, which is unusual for a mobile part and signals suitability for workstation tasks. The processor’s 55 W TDP positions it firmly in the high-performance laptop segment rather than ultraportable territory.

Benchmark results show a strong multicore showing with Cinebench R23 multicore scoring 23422, while single-core performance reaches 3306 in the same test. The Cinebench R20 scores of 9837 multicore and 1388 single-core reinforce this pattern. PassMark multithread score of 28280 places the chip well above average, with integer math at 97126 and floating-point math at 70618. The processor’s 86th percentile vs all CPUs means it outperforms roughly 86% of all processors in the database, placing it in direct competition with the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (avg score 38221, deltaPct 0.1) and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (avg score 38312, deltaPct -0.1). The near-identical scores against these rivals indicate the i5-13600HX trades blows within a 0.2% margin across the board.

For real workloads, the 14-core configuration with 20 threads excels at heavily parallel tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The data compression PassMark score of 328686 demonstrates exceptional throughput in data-intensive operations, while data encryption at 19289 shows solid cryptographic performance. Single-threaded tasks, such as legacy applications or lightly threaded games, benefit from the 4.80 GHz boost clock, with a PassMark single-thread score of 3684. The processor’s 56th percentile position in single-core performance relative to its overall 86th percentile suggests the multicore design is the primary strength, making it a better fit for productivity than pure gaming responsiveness.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-13600HX support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the FACT PACK lists eccMemory as true, which is a notable feature for a mobile processor and supports its use in reliability-focused workstation scenarios.

Q: What is the process node and architecture of the Intel Arc A550M?

A: The GPU uses a 6 nm process node from TSMC, with the Xe-HPG architecture and the DG2-512 chip. It has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The i5-13600HX scores 38261 on average, which is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (38221), 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (38194), and 0.1% and 0.2% behind the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (38312) and Intel Core 9 270H (38335), respectively.

Q: What memory types does the i5-13600HX support?

A: The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, according to the FACT PACK memorySupport field.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The Intel Arc A550M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s bandwidth with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Is the Intel Arc A550M still in production?

A: No, the FACT PACK lists its production status as End-of-life, while the CPU remains Active. This means the GPU is no longer manufactured but may still be found in existing laptop builds.

Q: Does the CPU have an unlocked multiplier?

A: Yes, the FACT PACK lists multiplierUnlocked as true, which is unusual for a mobile processor and could appeal to enthusiasts, though laptop cooling limits practical overclocking.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates the CPU and GPU are extremely well balanced. The processor’s 86th percentile and the GPU’s 86th percentile match exactly, meaning neither component is dramatically stronger or weaker than the other relative to their respective pools. The combined percentile of 86 confirms this equilibrium. In CPU-heavy workloads like data compression (PassMark score 328686) or physics calculations (1810), the processor carries the load without GPU involvement. Conversely, GPU-bound tasks like OpenCL or Vulkan rendering rely entirely on the Arc A550M’s 49894 and 49580 Geekbench scores.

For gaming, the lack of measured FPS data means estimates must come from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s suggest it can handle modern titles at medium to high settings, but the CPU’s single-thread score of 3684 in PassMark becomes the limiting factor in CPU-bound scenarios like physics-heavy games or esports titles at high frame rates. The GPU’s 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is modest compared to higher-tier desktop cards, which could bottleneck performance at high resolutions or with texture-heavy workloads. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for 1080p gaming but may become limiting at 1440p or with future titles demanding more memory.

The balance shifts based on workload type. In 3D rendering, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23422 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 49894 complement each other, but the GPU’s 16 ray tracing cores and 2048 shading units will handle rasterization more efficiently than the CPU. For video editing, the CPU’s multicore strength handles encoding while the GPU accelerates effects and preview rendering. The data shows no single component consistently dominates, indicating a symbiotic relationship rather than a bottleneck scenario.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense; a user cannot swap out the processor without replacing the entire motherboard or laptop. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and future expansion. Memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives system builders flexibility, though the dual-channel configuration caps bandwidth at what the motherboard provides.

The GPU’s TDP is 60 W, while the CPU’s TDP is 55 W, totaling 115 W for the core components. The FACT PACK lists no suggested PSU for the GPU, but the combined thermal envelope suggests a laptop power adapter in the 150-200 W range would be necessary, though no exact figure is provided. The GPU’s slot width is listed as IGP, indicating it is integrated into the laptop chassis rather than a replaceable MXM module, so GPU upgrades are also not feasible. The production status of the GPU is End-of-life, which means future driver support and availability are limited.

A sensible upgrade path for this platform is limited by the soldered nature of both components. The memory and storage remain the primary upgradeable elements, with DDR5 support allowing for faster RAM and PCIe Gen 5 enabling high-speed NVMe drives. The processor’s 24 MB L3 cache and 20 lanes of PCIe Gen 5 future-proof the platform for storage bandwidth, but users cannot improve CPU or GPU performance without a new laptop. The ECC memory support is an unusual bonus that could justify this platform in reliability-focused environments where data integrity outweighs upgradeability.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 38261 places it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen 7 250 at 38221 (deltaPct 0.1) and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H at 38312 (deltaPct -0.1). The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23422 is the strongest indicator of sustained multithreaded performance, while the single-core score of 3306 shows competitive per-thread speed. PassMark results reinforce this with multithread at 28280 and single-thread at 3684, the latter being critical for responsive everyday use.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 49737 also lands at the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and Vulkan score of 49580 are nearly identical, showing consistent performance across different compute APIs. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti at 49957 (deltaPct -0.4) and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at 50001 (deltaPct -0.5), meaning the Arc A550M trails these by less than half a percent. The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT leads by 2.4% at 50951, while the RX 6800 XT at 48477 is 2.6% behind.

The combined picture shows both components performing at the same percentile level, which is rare and indicates a well-matched pairing. The CPU’s 23422 Cinebench R23 multicore score suggests it can feed the GPU adequately in gaming scenarios, while the GPU’s 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 performance can handle most modern workloads. The data suggests the pairing is neither CPU-limited nor GPU-limited in typical applications, making it a balanced mid-range mobile solution.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings, but the lack of measured FPS data means exact frame rates are unknown. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3684 in PassMark indicates it can drive high refresh rates in esports titles, though the GPU’s 131.2 GPixel/s pixel rate may cap performance in demanding titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, with the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23422 ensuring smooth gameplay and stream encoding simultaneously. The GPU’s 16 ray tracing cores and 2048 shading units can offload encoding tasks via Intel Quick Sync, though this is not explicitly confirmed in the data.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 328686 and floating-point math score of 70618 indicate strong performance in codec-heavy workflows, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 49894 accelerates effects and color grading. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and light 4K editing, but the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may slow high-bitrate footage.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23422 excels in CPU-based rendering engines like Blender Cycles, while the GPU’s 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 performance handles GPU-accelerated rendering. The 16 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for RT-enabled renders, though the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU’s 20 threads and PassMark integer math score of 97126 speed up compilation and testing, while the L2 and L3 cache sizes (2 MB per core and 24 MB shared) reduce memory latency. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3684 and the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM handle everyday tasks efficiently, but the 55 W CPU TDP and 60 W GPU TDP mean this is not a low-power device. The 86th percentile overall performance is overkill for basic office tasks, making this a premium choice for students needing occasional gaming or creative work.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs are complemented by 16 ray tracing cores, providing dedicated hardware for ray-traced workloads.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are quantified by its FP32 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s are modest figures that explain its mid-range positioning. The 86th percentile ranking against all GPUs places it alongside the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (avg score 49957, deltaPct -0.4) and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (avg score 50001, deltaPct -0.5), showing it performs within 0.5% of these established cards.

For rendering, the Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and Vulkan score of 49580 demonstrate strong compute throughput across APIs. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern games and applications. The 6 nm process from TSMC is more advanced than the CPU’s 10 nm, allowing for the relatively dense 53.4M transistors per mm². However, the GPU’s End-of-life production status means it will not receive future hardware revisions, though driver support may continue.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13600HX with the Intel Arc A550M in a laptop-class configuration, as indicated by the buildClass field. The combined percentile of 86 means this system outperforms 86% of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database. The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 2048 shading units, create a balanced mid-range mobile solution. The processor’s 55 W TDP and the GPU’s 60 W TDP total 115 W, which is typical for a performance laptop.

The pairing is notable for its symmetry: both components sit at the 86th percentile of their respective categories, and their average benchmark scores (38261 for CPU, 49737 for GPU) reflect a harmonious match. The CPU’s Raptor Lake architecture with 24 MB L3 cache provides strong single-threaded performance, while the GPU’s Xe-HPG architecture with 16 ray tracing cores offers modern rendering features. The lack of measured FPS data means the gaming experience is estimated, but the benchmark scores suggest a system capable of smooth 1080p gameplay and productive workloads.

The platform’s limitations include the soldered BGA 1964 socket for the CPU and the IGP slot width for the GPU, making upgrades impossible without replacing the entire laptop. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 offers some flexibility, and the PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU is forward-looking. The GPU’s End-of-life status is a concern for long-term use, but the CPU’s Active production status ensures ongoing availability.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need a balanced laptop for both productivity and gaming, but the soldered components mean it is a purchase rather than a build. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth sufficient for medium to high settings, with the CPU’s 4.80 GHz boost clock ensuring responsive gameplay. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23422 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 49894, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit large scenes.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s 20 threads and PassMark integer math score of 97126, while the ECC memory support adds data integrity for long-running builds. Students needing a versatile machine for coursework and casual gaming will find the 86th percentile performance exceeds typical requirements, but the 55 W CPU TDP and 60 W GPU TDP mean battery life will be shorter than ultraportable alternatives. Small business workstations requiring reliable performance for office tasks, data analysis, or light CAD work can leverage the CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 328686 and the GPU’s 16 ray tracing cores for visualization.

The End-of-life status of the GPU suggests this is not a future-proof investment for those expecting long-term driver support or high-resale value. Users who prioritize upgradeability should look elsewhere, as both the CPU and GPU are permanently soldered. However, for those who need a capable laptop today with strong multicore processing and modern GPU features, this pairing offers a balanced set of capabilities that match the 86th percentile ranking.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600HX + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600HX

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds