SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600HX + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600HX

38,261 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13600HX + Intel Arc A370M: A Balanced Mobile Performer with Clear Strengths

This mobile pairing combines Intel's 14-core Raptor Lake-HX processor with the entry-level Arc A370M discrete GPU, resulting in a system that sits at the 80th combined percentile among all laptop configurations. The CPU is the clear star, delivering top-tier multi-threaded performance that rivals processors from a newer generation, while the GPU provides competent 1080p gaming and acceleration features rather than high-end frame rates. The data shows a configuration optimized for productivity and content creation workloads, with gaming capability that is respectable but not class-leading. Notably, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination — all gaming performance discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around Intel's BGA 1964 socket, which means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded independently. The build class is a laptop, so the upgrade path is inherently limited compared to desktop systems; users should plan for the entire system's lifespan rather than component-level swaps. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and ECC memory is supported, which is unusual for a mobile Core i5 and suggests suitability for data-integrity-sensitive workloads. The memory bus width is standard dual-channel, and the platform offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing substantial bandwidth for future NVMe storage or external GPU enclosures, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

The CPU's TDP is 55 W, which is modest for a 14-core part and indicates that laptop manufacturers can pair it with relatively slim cooling solutions. The GPU has a 35 W TDP, and no suggested PSU is listed in the FACT PACK; for a laptop, this is less critical since power delivery is handled by the integrated adapter. However, the combined thermal envelope of roughly 90 W for the two primary components means that a capable air cooler is sufficient, and users should not expect extreme chassis designs to be necessary. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output when the discrete GPU is idle, which can save power during light tasks.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform is primarily memory and storage: moving to dual-channel DDR5 at the highest supported speed and adding PCIe Gen 5 NVMe storage would maximize the CPU's data throughput. Since the CPU is soldered, the only real performance upgrade path is an external GPU via the PCIe lanes, though this is atypical for laptops. For users who outgrow the Arc A370M, the platform's CPU headroom suggests that an eGPU solution could extend gaming viability without replacing the entire system. The DDR4 and DDR5 support also means users can choose memory based on availability and cost, though the dual-channel requirement is essential for optimal iGPU and CPU performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13600HX delivers exceptional multi-threaded performance, scoring 23,422 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3,306 in single-core. The single-core score represents strong per-thread performance, but the multi-core result is where this CPU stands out: it places in the 86th percentile among all CPUs, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of desktop and mobile processors. The average benchmark score of 38,261 is remarkably close to its nearest rivals, with the AMD Ryzen 7 250 scoring 38,221 (0.1% lower) and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H scoring 38,312 (0.1% higher). This places the i5-13600HX in a dead heat with processors from newer generations, making it a compelling choice for multi-threaded workloads despite its 2023 release date.

The GPU, Intel Arc A370M, is a more modest performer. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 29,676 and Vulkan score is 28,673, with an average benchmark score of 29,175. This places it in the 74th percentile among all GPUs, which is respectable for an entry-level discrete part but far from enthusiast territory. The nearest GPU rivals are interesting: the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH scores 29,197 (0.1% higher), the AMD FirePro W8000 scores 29,211 (0.1% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 470 scores 28,996 (0.6% lower), and notably the AMD Radeon RX 6800M scores 28,874 (1% lower). The last comparison is surprising — the data shows the Arc A370M outperforming the RX 6800M in these specific compute benchmarks, though this does not necessarily translate to gaming FPS.

The combined picture is one of significant CPU-led capability. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking dwarfs the GPU's 74th percentile, meaning the processor will rarely be the bottleneck in gaming or productivity tasks. The system-level combined percentile is 80, reflecting the GPU's drag on the overall score. Benchmark results indicate that for CPU-bound workloads like compilation, rendering, and data processing, this system punches far above its class; for GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming, the Arc A370M will be the limiting factor.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A370M's 74th percentile GPU ranking and 4 GB VRAM indicate it can handle esports titles and older games at high frame rates, but modern AAA games at ultra settings will likely fall short of 144 Hz targets. The CPU's strong single-core performance (3,306 in R23) ensures frame pacing is not CPU-limited, so the GPU will be the primary constraint. Users should expect playable but not extreme refresh rates at 1080p.

Streaming: This configuration is well-suited for streaming due to the CPU's 20 threads and strong multi-core scores. The 23,422 R23 multi-core score provides ample headroom for encoding while gaming, and Intel's Quick Sync via the integrated GPU or the Arc's dedicated media engines can offload encoding tasks. The data shows the CPU can handle simultaneous gaming and encoding without significant frame drops.

Video editing: The combination of a powerful CPU and a GPU with 4 GB GDDR6 memory and 112 GB/s bandwidth is capable for 1080p video editing. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 28,280 and data compression score of 328,686 indicate fast timeline scrubbing and export times. The GPU's 8 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support enable hardware-accelerated effects, though 4K editing with heavy effects may strain the 4 GB VRAM.

3D rendering: This is a strong scenario for the CPU, which excels in render workloads. The 23,422 R23 multi-core score places it in the 86th percentile, meaning it outperforms most CPUs in rendering tasks. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides some acceleration for GPU-based renderers, but the CPU will be the primary workhorse; users rendering with CPU-based engines will see excellent performance.

Software development: The 14 cores and 20 threads make this an excellent development machine. The PassMark integer math score of 97,126 and extended instructions score of 19,720 indicate fast compilation and code execution. The data shows strong parallel build performance, and the single-thread score of 3,684 ensures responsive IDEs and quick single-threaded tasks.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for basic productivity, but the headroom means it will remain responsive for years. The CPU's 86th percentile and the GPU's 74th percentile ensure smooth multitasking, and the DDR4/DDR5 support allows memory upgrades. The 4 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for office applications, and the integrated UHD 770 provides an efficient idle state.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a mobile professional or student who needs serious CPU performance for productivity, content creation, or development, with gaming as a secondary consideration. Gamers at 1080p with settings tuned to medium or high will find the Arc A370M adequate, especially for esports titles where the CPU's single-thread performance ensures high frame rates. Users at 1440p or 4K should look elsewhere, as the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will severely limit performance at those resolutions.

Content creators who work in video editing, 3D rendering, or software development will benefit most from this CPU-GPU pairing. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking means it can handle complex multi-threaded tasks that would bottleneck lesser processors, and the GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 support provide modern API compatibility for creative applications. Students in engineering or computer science programs will appreciate the CPU's compile times and simulation performance, while the GPU handles CAD and light 3D modeling.

Small business workstations that run virtualization, database management, or data analysis will find the 20 threads and ECC memory support particularly valuable. The PassMark data encryption score of 19,289 and random string sorting score of 36,783 indicate strong performance for security and data manipulation tasks. The 55 W CPU TDP means this can fit in a slim laptop chassis, making it suitable for mobile workers who need workstation-class CPU performance without the bulk of a desktop replacement.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX variant. It has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 55 W TDP. The architecture uses a hybrid design, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact P-core/E-core split; the 14 cores and 20 threads suggest a mix of performance and efficiency cores common in this generation. The process node is 10 nm from Intel, and the die size is 257 mm².

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache is critical for gaming and productivity, as it reduces memory latency and improves multi-threaded scaling. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, which is flexible for laptop manufacturers, and ECC memory support is a notable feature that is rare in mobile processors. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes provides future-proofing for high-speed storage, though the integrated GPU and discrete GPU share the available bandwidth.

The benchmark scores tell a clear story: this CPU is a multi-threaded monster. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,422 is exceptional for a 55 W part, and the PassMark multithread score of 28,280 reinforces this. The single-thread score of 3,306 in R23 and 3,684 in PassMark is strong but not class-leading, which is expected for a mobile part. The data compression score of 328,686 and floating-point math score of 70,618 indicate excellent performance for data-heavy and scientific workloads. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking means it outperforms 86% of all CPUs in the database, which is remarkable for a mobile processor.

The nearest rivals are all newer or higher-tier parts: the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (0.1% lower), Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (0.1% higher), Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (0.2% higher), and Intel Core 9 270H (0.2% lower). This clustering within 0.2% means the i5-13600HX is effectively performance-equivalent to these newer processors, making it a smart choice for buyers who do not need the latest platform features. The launch MSRP is $284, which was competitive at release, though the data does not support current pricing discussions.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The Arc A370M's GPU benchmark scores (29,676 OpenCL, 28,673 Vulkan) and 74th percentile ranking suggest it is capable of 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in most titles. The 4 GB GDDR6 memory with 112 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p textures but will limit games that require more than 4 GB of VRAM at high settings.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, or League of Legends, the CPU's strong single-core performance (3,306 in R23) and the GPU's 1,024 shading units should deliver 100+ FPS at 1080p with competitive settings. These games are CPU-bound, and the i5-13600HX has ample headroom. For older AAA titles from 2018-2020, the Arc A370M should achieve 60+ FPS at 1080p medium settings, as its FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS is comparable to desktop GPUs from that era.

For modern AAA games released after 2022, the estimates are more conservative. The 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will be the primary bottlenecks, causing stuttering or texture pop-in at high settings. Users should expect 30-50 FPS at 1080p low-to-medium settings in titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield, with upscaling technologies like XeSS (supported via DirectX 12 Ultimate) providing a performance boost. The GPU's 8 RT cores support ray tracing, but the raw performance is too low for real-time ray tracing at playable frame rates in most games.

The CPU's gaming performance is excellent and will not bottleneck the GPU in any title. The 24 MB L3 cache and high boost clock ensure that even CPU-intensive games like simulation or strategy titles will run smoothly. The data suggests that this system is best for gamers who prioritize CPU-heavy genres (strategy, simulation, MMOs) or esports, rather than those seeking high-fidelity AAA experiences.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a significant imbalance between CPU and GPU performance, with the CPU at the 86th percentile and the GPU at the 74th percentile. This means the GPU is the clear bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads, while the CPU has substantial headroom. In gaming, the Arc A370M will limit frame rates in most titles, with the CPU rarely breaking a sweat. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will cause performance degradation at higher resolutions or texture settings, while the CPU's 14 cores and 24 MB cache will remain underutilized.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts. For tasks like video editing or 3D rendering that use both CPU and GPU, the CPU will dominate, with the GPU providing acceleration for effects or rendering passes. The data shows the CPU's multi-threaded scores are exceptional, so users will not experience CPU bottlenecks in these scenarios. However, GPU-accelerated tasks like machine learning inference or ray-traced rendering will be limited by the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 RT cores.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, suggests that lowering resolution or graphics settings will yield significant gains because the GPU is the limiting factor. At 1080p low settings, the GPU can stretch its legs, and the CPU's high single-thread performance ensures frame pacing remains stable. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM will become a hard ceiling, and performance will drop disproportionately. The system is well-balanced for CPU-bound workloads and poorly balanced for GPU-bound workloads, which is a common trade-off in laptops where CPU performance is prioritized for productivity.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 23,422 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, and its average benchmark score of 38,261 is within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (38,221, 0.1% lower), Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (38,312, 0.1% higher), Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (38,194, 0.2% higher), and Intel Core 9 270H (38,335, 0.2% lower).

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600HX supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile processor and makes it suitable for data-integrity-sensitive workloads like database management or financial analysis.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Is ray tracing supported on this GPU?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A370M has 8 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing. However, the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance means ray tracing will only be playable at low resolutions or with upscaling.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance?

A: The CPU scores 3,306 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 3,684 in PassMark single-thread, placing it in the 86th percentile among all CPUs and ensuring responsive performance in single-threaded applications.

Q: What is the combined system percentile ranking?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 80, meaning it outperforms 80% of all laptop configurations in the database.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: Yes, the CPU has an unlocked multiplier, though this is less relevant in a laptop where thermal and power limits are constrained by the chassis design.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is an entry-level discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm². The GPU has a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

The memory subsystem is the GPU's main weakness: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is adequate for 1080p gaming at moderate settings but severely limits high-resolution or high-texture workloads. The GPU has 8 ray tracing cores, which is a modest count, and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU's compute capabilities. The TDP is 35 W, making it power-efficient, and it is described as an IGP (integrated GPU) in terms of slot width, meaning it is designed for thin laptops.

The GPU's benchmark scores are 29,676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28,673 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average of 29,175, placing it in the 74th percentile. The nearest rivals are closely matched: the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29,197, 0.1% higher), AMD FirePro W8000 (29,211, 0.1% higher), AMD Radeon RX 470 (28,996, 0.6% lower), and AMD Radeon RX 6800M (28,874, 1% lower). The last comparison is noteworthy — the Arc A370M outperforms the RX 6800M in these specific compute benchmarks, though this is likely due to driver optimizations or benchmark-specific workloads rather than overall gaming superiority.

For rendering and compute, the GPU's FP32 and FP16 performance indicate it can handle light 3D rendering, video encode/decode, and AI inference tasks. The 4 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for large models or textures, but the 112 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p frame buffers. The GPU's end-of-life production status means it is no longer being manufactured, but the architecture is mature and drivers are stable, making it a reliable choice for budget-conscious users. The data shows a GPU that is competent for its class, with the CPU doing the heavy lifting in most workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600HX + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600HX

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds