SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600H + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600H

30,548 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600H and Intel Arc A570M form a mobile pairing that sits in the 85th combined percentile of all laptop configurations, according to the data. The CPU carries an 82nd percentile ranking against all processors, while the GPU holds an 88th percentile position against all graphics cards. This is a mid-to-upper tier laptop combination, but the absence of measured frame rate data means all gaming expectations must be derived from benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay testing.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Arc A570M's 88th percentile standing, with an OpenCL score of 58,239, places it within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT and 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA P102-100. That level of compute performance suggests the ability to drive competitive titles at 1080p with high refresh rates, though the 75 W TDP and 1,300 MHz boost clock indicate sustained loads will be the limiting factor. The GPU's 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer provide adequate headroom for modern game assets, but the lack of measured FPS data means expectations should be tempered for the most demanding releases.

Streaming: The i5-13600H's 12 cores and 16 threads, with a Passmark multithread score of 23,304, provide enough parallel throughput to handle game capture and encoding overhead simultaneously. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking and a 0.5% lead over the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS in average benchmark score support this use case. The integrated Iris Xe Graphics 80EU can serve as a secondary encoder or display output, offloading some work from the Arc A570M during live broadcasts.

Video Editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12,402 and single-core score of 1,750 indicate strong rendering capability for timeline previews and export tasks. The data compression score of 267,936 in Passmark suggests efficient handling of codec-heavy workloads. The GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 166.4 GTexel/s texture rate accelerate effects, color grading, and GPU-accelerated exports, making this a viable laptop for 1080p and light 4K editing sessions.

3D Rendering: The i5-13600H's 12,402 Cinebench R23 multicore score puts it 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11980HK in average benchmark score, a meaningful result for CPU-bound render engines. The Arc A570M's 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 performance and DirectX 12 Ultimate support enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and compute shading in compatible applications. The GPU's 16 ray tracing cores and 2,048 shading units provide a solid foundation for preview renders, though the 75 W TDP will cap sustained render throughput compared to desktop parts.

Software Development: The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3,631 and integer math score of 78,658 indicate responsive compilation and fast code indexing. The 18 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache reduce latency for frequently accessed code and data structures. The data encryption score of 16,061 and extended instructions score of 15,817 support cryptographic operations and modern instruction set usage, benefiting secure development workflows.

Student and Office Work: The 45 W TDP and 2.80 GHz base clock provide efficient operation for battery-conscious workloads, while the 4.80 GHz boost clock handles bursty tasks like spreadsheet recalculation or document rendering. The Passmark physics score of 1,490 and floating-point math score of 57,618 cover everyday productivity calculations. The laptop class designation and IGP form factor for the GPU mean this configuration fits into portable chassis designed for mixed academic and professional use.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile design with no CPU upgrade path. The i5-13600H uses the Raptor Lake-H architecture on Intel's 10 nm process node, supporting DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes for the primary device, while the Arc A570M connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, creating a bandwidth hierarchy that favors the GPU for graphics workloads.

The GPU's 75 W TDP and IGP slot width indicate it is soldered to the motherboard, ruling out discrete GPU upgrades. The CPU's 45 W TDP combined with the GPU's 75 W TDP suggests the system's power delivery is designed for a total platform budget, though the suggested PSU field is null in the data. Memory upgrades are the most practical path, as the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support allows capacity and speed increases without changing the core components.

A sensible next upgrade for this laptop would be increasing RAM to the maximum supported by the platform, as the CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's 8 GB frame buffer benefit from larger memory pools for multitasking and texture-heavy workloads. Storage upgrades via the PCIe Gen 5 CPU lanes could improve load times and data throughput, but the soldered nature of both processors means the motherboard, display, and chassis ultimately define the system's ceiling.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600H is a 12-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake-H architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It operates at a 2.80 GHz base clock and reaches 4.80 GHz boost, with a 45 W TDP that defines its thermal envelope in mobile chassis. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3, providing substantial on-die storage for frequently accessed data.

Benchmark results show a balanced performer. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12,402 and single-core score of 1,750 indicate strong scaling across threads, while the Passmark multithread score of 23,304 and single-thread score of 3,631 confirm this balance. The data encryption score of 16,061 and find prime numbers score of 87 highlight the CPU's capability in algorithmically intensive tasks, with the latter being a weaker point that suggests modest integer-heavy scientific workloads.

The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking against all processors places it just 0.3% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11980HK in average benchmark score. This positions the i5-13600H as a strong mid-range mobile processor that competes with previous-generation high-end parts and current mid-tier options. The 16 threads support concurrent workloads like gaming with background streaming, while the 4.80 GHz boost clock ensures responsive single-threaded application performance.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh play will find the Arc A570M's 88th percentile GPU score sufficient for competitive titles, with the CPU's 82nd percentile ensuring no processor bottleneck in most scenarios. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth handle modern game assets, though the lack of measured FPS data means resolution scaling should be approached conservatively.

Content creators working with 1080p video or light 4K projects benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12,402 and the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. The data compression score of 267,936 accelerates archive and codec tasks, while the 16 threads handle multitasking between editing, rendering, and preview applications.

Software developers who compile large codebases will appreciate the Passmark integer math score of 78,658 and single-thread score of 3,631. The 18 MB L3 cache and dual-channel memory support reduce build times and improve test suite execution, while the 16 threads allow parallel compilation across multiple projects.

Students and small business users need a laptop that handles office suites, web browsing, and occasional media tasks. The 45 W TDP and 2.80 GHz base clock provide efficient operation, while the integrated Iris Xe Graphics 80EU offers a fallback display output if the Arc GPU is under load. The 82nd CPU percentile ensures this system outpaces most productivity laptops in the same class.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 30,548, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all processors. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T, scores 30,468 for a 0.3% difference, while the Intel Core i9-11980HK scores 30,422 (0.4% behind), the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS scores 30,390 (0.5% behind), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U scores 30,364 (0.6% behind). This tight clustering shows the i5-13600H at the top of its immediate competitive set.

The GPU's OpenCL benchmark score is 58,239, placing it in the 88th percentile of all graphics cards. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58,392 (0.3% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58,085 (0.3% behind), the NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58,528 (0.5% ahead), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657 (0.7% ahead). The GPU is essentially tied with these parts, with deltas under 1% in all cases.

Combined, the CPU and GPU achieve an 85th percentile ranking for laptop configurations, indicating a well-matched pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The CPU's Passmark results show a multithread score of 23,304 and floating-point math score of 57,618, while the GPU's 166.4 GTexel/s texture rate and 83.20 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest balanced rasterization and compute capabilities.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's 88th percentile ranking and its near-tie with the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT in OpenCL score, the Arc A570M should handle 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth support high-resolution textures, while the 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides adequate raw compute for modern game engines. The 1,300 MHz boost clock and 75 W TDP suggest sustained performance will be lower than peak, potentially affecting frame rates in long sessions.

The CPU's 82nd percentile and 16 threads ensure it can feed the GPU in most scenarios, with the 4.80 GHz boost clock handling single-threaded game logic. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,750 indicates strong per-core performance, reducing the likelihood of CPU bottlenecks in GPU-bound scenes. However, the lack of measured FPS data means specific frame rates for esports titles or AAA releases cannot be stated with confidence.

FAQ

Q: Does this laptop configuration support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600H supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, according to the FACT PACK.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-11980HK?

A: The i5-13600H has an average benchmark score of 30,548, which is 0.4% higher than the i9-11980HK's 30,422, placing it slightly ahead despite being a lower-tier processor.

Q: Is the GPU upgradable in this laptop?

A: The Arc A570M has an IGP slot width and a 75 W TDP, indicating it is soldered to the motherboard. The CPU uses a BGA 1744 socket, which is also soldered, so neither component is upgradable.

Q: What DirectX version does the GPU support?

A: The Intel Arc A570M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600H has a launch MSRP of $311.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM?

A: The Arc A570M has an OpenCL score of 58,239, which is 0.3% higher than the RX 5600 OEM's 58,085, making them statistically equivalent in compute performance.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13600H mobile processor with the Intel Arc A570M mobile GPU. The CPU is a 12-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake-H part on Intel's 10 nm process, while the GPU is a DG2-256 chip on TSMC's 6 nm process with 11,500 million transistors and a 269 mm² die size. The pairing achieves an 85th combined percentile ranking, indicating a system that outperforms the majority of laptop configurations.

The CPU's 82nd percentile and the GPU's 88th percentile show a slight GPU advantage in relative performance, meaning the graphics card has more headroom over its peers than the processor does. The 45 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP combine for a 120 W total thermal budget from the two primary processors, which is modest for a laptop and suggests efficient power management is possible. The Arc A570M's 6 nm process and 42.8M / mm² transistor density contribute to its competitive performance per watt.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates a generally balanced pairing with workload-specific bottlenecks. The CPU's 82nd percentile versus the GPU's 88th percentile means the GPU is relatively stronger in compute tasks, so CPU-bound workloads like physics simulation or data compression will hit the processor's ceiling first. The Passmark physics score of 1,490 and find prime numbers score of 87 show the CPU's limits in certain parallel integer workloads.

In gaming, the GPU's 88th percentile and 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest it is the primary driver of frame rates, but the CPU's 16 threads and 4.80 GHz boost clock should keep up in most titles. The lack of measured FPS data prevents precise bottleneck quantification, but the delta between percentiles is small enough that neither component should consistently starve the other. The GPU's 75 W TDP compared to the CPU's 45 W TDP indicates the graphics card has a larger power envelope, aligning with its higher relative performance.

For productivity tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12,402 and the GPU's 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 performance create a complementary workload split. The CPU handles scene management and physics, while the GPU accelerates rendering and effects. The 0.3-0.7% delta between the GPU and its nearest rivals, combined with the CPU's 0.3-0.6% delta from its rivals, shows both components perform at the top of their immediate competitive tiers, minimizing the risk of a significant performance imbalance.