SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600H + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600H

30,548 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600H is a 12-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-H variant. It uses a 10 nm process and is designed for the Intel BGA 1744 socket. The CPU operates with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and can boost up to 4.80 GHz, with a 45 W TDP that positions it for performance-oriented laptops rather than ultra-portables. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache, which is substantial for a mobile i5 and helps with latency-sensitive workloads.

Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, giving system builders flexibility depending on the laptop platform. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes from the processor itself, which is forward-looking for storage and discrete GPU connectivity, though the actual bandwidth utilization depends on the laptop's implementation. Integrated graphics come in the form of Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units, providing a fallback display output and basic acceleration when the discrete GPU is idle or unavailable.

Benchmark results place this chip in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, which is a strong showing for a mobile part. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 12402 points indicates that the hybrid core arrangement—likely a mix of performance and efficiency cores typical of Raptor Lake-H—delivers competitive threaded throughput. The single-core score of 1750 points in the same test is equally important, as it reflects responsiveness in everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. Cinebench R20 results show 5208 multi-core and 735 single-core, while R15 shows 1249 multi-core and 176 single-core, following the expected scaling pattern across benchmark revisions.

PassMark results add depth to the performance picture. The multi-thread score of 23304 and single-thread score of 3631 indicate balanced capabilities. Data compression scores hit 267936, data encryption reaches 16061, and extended instructions score 15817. Floating-point math scores 57618, integer math scores 78658, and random string sorting scores 29570. Physics processing scores 1490, and prime number finding scores 87. These numbers collectively suggest a processor that handles a wide variety of computational tasks with above-average efficiency for a mobile chip.

The average benchmark score of 30548 places the i5-13600H in close competition with several notable rivals. It leads the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T by 0.3%, the Intel Core i9-11980HK by 0.4%, the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS by 0.5%, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U by 0.6%. These deltas are small, meaning the i5-13600H sits at the top of a tightly-packed cluster of capable processors. The i9-11980HK comparison is particularly telling: a newer mid-range i5 essentially matches an older flagship i9 in aggregate performance, which speaks to the efficiency gains of Raptor Lake.

# Gaming Performance

This FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core i5-13600H paired with the Intel Arc A550M. There is no measuredFpsUltraByGame data, and no pairRankByFps value exists. As such, all gaming frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU individually, not from direct testing of this specific combination. Treat these as directional guidance rather than definitive performance measurements.

The GPU's benchmark scores provide a reasonable foundation for estimating gaming capability. The Intel Arc A550M scores 49894 in Geekbench OpenCL and 49580 in Geekbench Vulkan, placing it in the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The average benchmark score of 49737 puts it in the same performance tier as the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (which scores 49957, a 0.4% difference) and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001, 0.5% difference). It trails the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT by 2.4% but leads the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT by 2.6%. These are desktop-class comparisons, which is remarkable for a mobile GPU with a 60 W TDP.

For gaming at 1080p ultra settings, the Arc A550M's performance level suggests it can handle most modern titles at playable frame rates, though the lack of measured data means the exact numbers remain uncertain. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate capacity for current game assets, though texture-heavy titles may approach the memory limit at higher resolutions. The GPU's 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units deliver a fill rate of 131.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s, which are respectable for a mobile part.

The CPU side is not a bottleneck for gaming in most scenarios. The single-core performance in Cinebench R23 (1750 points) and PassMark (3631 points) indicates strong per-thread capability, which is what most game engines rely on for frame pacing and physics. The 12-core, 16-thread configuration provides ample headroom for background tasks while gaming, such as Discord, streaming software, or web browsers. Given the CPU's 82nd percentile ranking and the GPU's 86th percentile ranking, the pairing appears balanced for 1080p gaming, with the GPU likely being the primary determinant of frame rates in graphically intensive scenes.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A550M's 86th percentile GPU score and the i5-13600H's strong single-core performance (1750 in Cinebench R23) suggest the pair can drive high-refresh gaming at 1080p in less demanding titles, though esports titles with lower graphical demands are more likely to hit 144 Hz or higher. The GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 131.2 GPixel/s pixel rate support this assessment.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and 18 MB of shared L3 cache provide enough resource headroom for encoding overhead while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 23304 indicates that simultaneous gaming and streaming is feasible, though the lack of a dedicated encoder specification for the Arc A550M means relying on CPU-based encoding is the safer assumption.

Video editing: The multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 12402 and the PassMark floating-point score of 57618 point to solid video processing capability. The GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS of FP16 compute (2:1 ratio) supports hardware-accelerated effects and rendering in compatible software, and the 8 GB VRAM can hold moderate video timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU's 12 cores and 16 threads provide respectable CPU-based rendering throughput, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12402 serving as a reference point. The GPU's Vulkan score of 49580 and OpenCL score of 49894 indicate it can accelerate GPU-accelerated renderers, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity.

Software development: The PassMark data encryption score of 16061 and extended instructions score of 15817 suggest strong performance for compilation and cryptographic workloads. The single-thread score of 3631 helps with build times that depend on a few fast threads, and the 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently.

Student and office work: The i5-13600H's single-core performance (1750 in Cinebench R23) ensures snappy responsiveness in word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The integrated Iris Xe Graphics 80EU provides a fallback for display output, and the CPU's 82nd percentile ranking means it handles typical productivity multitasking without strain.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced pairing for most workloads, but the bottleneck shifts depending on the task. In gaming scenarios, the GPU is the more likely limiting factor. The Arc A550M sits at the 86th percentile among GPUs, while the CPU is at the 82nd percentile among CPUs. The GPU's nearest rivals include desktop cards like the Radeon RX 6800 XT, which it leads by 2.6%, and the RX 6900 XT, which it trails by 2.4%. This level of GPU performance is substantial, but the absence of measured FPS data means the exact frame rate ceiling is unknown. The CPU's single-core advantage (1750 in Cinebench R23) is unlikely to bottleneck the GPU in most games, given the GPU's mid-range positioning.

In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the i5-13600H becomes the primary driver. Its 12-core, 16-thread configuration and 18 MB of L3 cache provide strong multi-threaded throughput, but the 45 W TDP imposes power limits that may cause clock throttling under sustained load. The PassMark multi-thread score of 23304 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12402 reflect this capability, but the GPU's role in such tasks is secondary unless the software leverages GPU acceleration.

The FPS scaling picture is theoretical since no measured FPS data exists. However, based on the benchmark scores, the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking relative to all GPUs, combined with the CPU's 82nd percentile ranking, suggests that neither component drastically outclasses the other. In GPU-heavy scenes at high resolutions, the Arc A550M will be the limiter; in CPU-heavy scenes with many physics objects or AI agents, the i5-13600H will be the limiter. The 8 GB VRAM may also become a bottleneck in texture-heavy games at 1440p or higher, as the memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s is modest by modern standards.

# Benchmark Performance

The i5-13600H achieves an average benchmark score of 30548, placing it in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly grouped: the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T scores 30468 (0.3% behind), the Intel Core i9-11980HK scores 30422 (0.4% behind), the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS scores 30390 (0.5% behind), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U scores 30364 (0.6% behind). This cluster of scores spans less than one percent, meaning the i5-13600H is effectively at parity with these alternatives, with a slight edge in aggregate performance.

The Arc A550M GPU scores 49894 in Geekbench OpenCL and 49580 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 49737. This places it in the 86th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957, 0.4% behind), the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001, 0.5% behind), the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50951, 2.4% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477, 2.6% ahead). The GPU's performance is within a narrow band of several desktop cards, which is notable for a mobile part.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 84, indicating that the overall system performance sits comfortably above the median of all tested builds. The CPU's 82nd percentile and the GPU's 86th percentile are closely aligned, meaning neither component drags the other down significantly. The average benchmark scores differ by a small margin (30548 for CPU vs 49737 for GPU), but these are from different benchmark suites and are not directly comparable. The combined picture is one of a balanced mid-range-to-upper-mid-range laptop configuration that competes favorably with much older desktop hardware.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets laptop buyers who need solid multi-threaded CPU performance and above-average GPU capability in a mobile form factor. The build class is explicitly "laptop," meaning this is not a desktop configuration. The 84th combined percentile suggests it sits above the typical gaming and productivity laptop, making it suitable for users who want one machine for both work and play.

Gamers at 1080p resolution are the primary audience. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking and the CPU's strong single-core performance (1750 in Cinebench R23) indicate the pair can handle modern titles at high settings, though the lack of measured FPS data means buyers should temper expectations for the most demanding games. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p gaming but may require texture quality reductions at higher resolutions.

Content creators working with video or 3D rendering will find the CPU's 12 cores and 16 threads useful for encoding and compilation tasks. The PassMark multi-thread score of 23304 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12402 support this. The GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS of FP16 compute provides acceleration in compatible rendering software, and the 8 GB VRAM handles moderate-sized projects.

Software developers benefit from the CPU's balanced performance. The PassMark data encryption score of 16061 and extended instructions score of 15817 indicate strong handling of cryptographic operations and SIMD-heavy code. The single-thread score of 3631 ensures fast compile times for smaller modules, while the 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently.

Students and office workers get a capable machine for everyday tasks. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking across typical productivity applications, and the integrated Iris Xe Graphics provides a backup display output. The GPU, while overkill for office work, offers headroom for light gaming or media editing during downtime.

Small business workstations that need occasional GPU acceleration for tasks like CAD or video editing will find this pairing adequate. The 45 W CPU TDP and 60 W GPU TDP suggest reasonable battery life for a performance laptop, though the lack of measured power data makes exact endurance unclear.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The die contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². The GPU has a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Compute resources include 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The GPU has 16 ray tracing cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though tensor cores are not specified. Pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 8.397 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance is 16.79 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The GPU's TDP is 60 W, and it connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning they vary by laptop implementation.

The API support is comprehensive: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with modern game engines and graphics features like mesh shaders and variable rate shading. The 86th percentile ranking among all GPUs is strong for a mobile part, and the benchmark scores of 49894 in OpenCL and 49580 in Vulkan indicate robust compute and graphics performance.

The nearest rival comparisons are striking because they involve desktop GPUs. The A550M essentially matches the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (0.4% difference) and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (0.5% difference), and it leads the Radeon RX 6800 XT by 2.6%. This suggests that the A550M, despite its 60 W TDP and mobile form factor, delivers desktop-class performance in certain workloads. The 2.4% deficit to the RX 6900 XT is minor, placing the A550M within striking distance of a flagship desktop card from the previous generation.

For rendering workloads, the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and moderate 1440p content creation. The FP16 performance of 16.79 TFLOPS is particularly useful for AI-accelerated effects in video editing software, though the lack of tensor cores means dedicated AI workloads may not see the same gains as NVIDIA-based systems. The ray tracing cores enable hardware acceleration in supported games, though the 16 RT cores are modest in number and the 60 W power limit constrains sustained performance.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13600H with the Intel Arc A550M in a laptop form factor. The CPU is a 12-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake-H processor with a 45 W TDP, and the GPU is an Xe-HPG architecture part with a 60 W TDP. The combined percentile of 84 places this configuration in the upper tier of tested systems, indicating strong overall performance for a mobile platform.

The CPU's 82nd percentile and the GPU's 86th percentile are closely matched, suggesting the pairing is well-balanced rather than one component severely limiting the other. The CPU leads its nearest rivals by small margins (0.3% to 0.6%), while the GPU trades blows with desktop-class competitors. The 18 MB of L3 cache on the CPU and the 8 GB of GDDR6 on the GPU provide sufficient memory resources for most workloads.

The production status of the CPU is active, while the GPU is end-of-life, which may affect long-term driver support and availability. The CPU's launch MSRP is $311, though this is a laptop part and the actual cost is bundled into the system. The GPU has no launch MSRP listed. The overall tier, based on the 84th combined percentile, is upper-mid-range for laptops, suitable for users who need more than basic productivity but do not require flagship-level performance.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13600H compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS?

A: The i5-13600H has an average benchmark score of 30548, which is 0.5% higher than the Ryzen 5 7640HS's score of 30390. This places the i5 in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, with the Ryzen slightly behind in aggregate performance.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A550M competitive with desktop GPUs?

A: The A550M scores 49737 on average, which is within 0.5% of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001) and 2.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477). It trails the RX 6900 XT by 2.4%, placing it in desktop-class territory despite being a mobile part.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this laptop build?

A: The combined percentile for the i5-13600H and Arc A550M pairing is 84, meaning it performs better than 84% of tested systems. The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile and the GPU at the 86th percentile individually.

Q: How much VRAM does the Arc A550M have, and is it enough?

A: The Arc A550M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p workloads, though texture-heavy games at high resolutions may approach the memory limit.

Q: What ray tracing capabilities does the Arc A550M have?

A: The GPU includes 16 ray tracing cores as part of the Xe-HPG architecture. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing features, though the 60 W TDP limits sustained ray tracing performance.

Q: Does the i5-13600H support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the i5-13600H supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The actual memory type depends on the laptop manufacturer's implementation.

Q: What is the production status of the CPU and GPU in this build?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600H CPU is marked as active in production, while the Intel Arc A550M GPU is marked as end-of-life. This means the CPU is still available, but the GPU may be phased out in favor of newer models.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600H + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600H

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds