SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600H + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600H

30,548 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13600H + Intel Arc A350M: Database Analysis

This mobile pairing combines Intel's 13th-generation Raptor Lake-H CPU with Intel's entry-level Arc 3 discrete GPU, targeting thin-and-light laptops that need more graphics power than integrated solutions provide. The Core i5-13600H sits in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A350M lands in the 70th percentile among all GPUs, giving the combination a 76th percentile overall standing. The CPU is a 12-core, 16-thread part with a 2.80 GHz base clock and 4.80 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a 4 GB GDDR6 part on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A350M is not built for high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming. With FP32 performance of 3.379 TFLOPS and only 24 ROPs, this GPU will struggle to push high frame rates at demanding settings. The CPU's single-thread score of 1750 in Cinebench R23 and Passmark single-thread score of 3631 indicate it can feed frames quickly, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor long before refresh rate limits are reached. Expect 1080p gaming at medium settings to be the realistic ceiling for smoother gameplay.

Streaming: The 12-core, 16-thread CPU configuration provides enough multi-threaded headroom for encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12402 shows solid parallel processing capability, and Passmark multi-thread score of 23304 confirms this. However, the GPU lacks dedicated tensor cores and its 6 RT cores are minimal, so hardware-accelerated encoding will rely on the CPU's integrated Iris Xe Graphics 80EU or the Arc A350M's limited resources. The 4 GB VRAM may constrain simultaneous game rendering and streaming overlays.

Video editing: The CPU handles 4K video editing workflows competently. Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 5208 and R15 multi-core score of 1249 demonstrate strong rendering performance in timeline operations. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle 1080p timelines smoothly but may choke on complex 4K effects. The 18 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache help keep the CPU fed during export operations. Passmark data compression score of 267936 indicates efficient handling of codec workloads.

3D rendering: This is a CPU-dominated workload for this pairing. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12402 places the processor 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS. The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest for GPU rendering; scenes that rely on CUDA or OptiX acceleration will run poorly since this is an Intel Arc GPU. CPU-based renderers will perform decently for preview-level work, but final-frame rendering on the GPU will be slow.

Software development: The 16 threads and 4.80 GHz boost clock provide responsive compilation times. Passmark integer math score of 78658 and floating-point math score of 57618 indicate strong arithmetic throughput. The 267936 data compression score helps with large repository operations and build artifact handling. The 18 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency in iterative compile-test loops. The CPU's 45 W TDP suggests sustained all-core boost will be limited by laptop cooling, potentially slowing long builds.

Student and office work: This pairing is overqualified for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1750, Passmark single-thread score of 3631) makes everyday tasks feel instant. The Arc A350M's 4 GB VRAM is irrelevant for office workloads, but the GPU's presence means the CPU's integrated Iris Xe Graphics 80EU can be reserved for display output, potentially extending battery life. The 10 nm Intel process node keeps power reasonable for all-day academic use.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². It uses the DG2-128 chip from Intel's Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation for Arc 3 Mobile. The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, with base and boost clocks of 1150 MHz and 2200 MHz respectively. Memory is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus running at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed, producing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU's pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance sits at 3.379 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 6.758 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio. The 6 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing support, but their low count means ray-traced effects will be limited to light use. The GPU has no listed tensor cores, so AI-accelerated features like DLSS equivalents will not perform as well as on NVIDIA hardware. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring modern game compatibility.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and Vulkan score of 24747 place the GPU in the 70th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rival comparison shows it performing 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 590 and 0.5% behind the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, while leading the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT by 0.8% and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 by 1.5%. This places the A350M in the performance range of older desktop mid-range GPUs, which is notable for a 25 W mobile part. The GPU's TDP of 25 W and IGP slot width indicate it is designed for thin laptops where power and space are constrained.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i5-13600H achieves an average benchmark score of 30548, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its Cinebench scores are 1249 (R15 multi-core), 176 (R15 single-core), 5208 (R20 multi-core), 735 (R20 single-core), 12402 (R23 multi-core), and 1750 (R23 single-core). Passmark results include 267936 for data compression, 16061 for data encryption, 15817 for extended instructions, 87 for finding prime numbers, 57618 for floating-point math, 78658 for integer math, 23304 for multi-thread, 1490 for physics, 29570 for random string sorting, and 3631 for single-thread.

The nearest CPU rivals show tight competition. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T scores 30468 (0.3% behind the 13600H), the Intel Core i9-11980HK scores 30422 (0.4% behind), the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS scores 30390 (0.5% behind), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U scores 30364 (0.6% behind). This means the 13600H leads all four rivals by less than 1%, making these CPUs effectively interchangeable in real-world performance. The 13600H's advantage comes from its 12 cores and 16 threads at a 4.80 GHz boost clock, which delivers strong single-thread and multi-thread results.

The Arc A350M's average GPU benchmark score is 24647, placing it in the 70th percentile. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and Vulkan score of 24747 show consistent performance across different API workloads. The GPU's nearest rivals are clustered similarly: the AMD Radeon RX 590 scores 24744 (0.4% ahead), NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile scores 24763 (0.5% ahead), AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT scores 24442 (0.8% behind), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 scores 24277 (1.5% behind). The combined system percentile of 76 reflects that the CPU is stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its own peers.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance: the CPU performs at the 82nd percentile while the GPU sits at the 70th percentile. This means the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads like gaming and GPU rendering. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12402 versus the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance illustrates this gap—the CPU can process game logic and physics far faster than the GPU can render frames.

In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data encryption (Passmark score of 16061), and physics calculations (Passmark score of 1490), the 13600H will stretch its legs. The 16 threads and 45 W TDP provide ample headroom for multi-threaded productivity tasks. However, in gaming, the GPU's 112.0 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM will create bottlenecks at higher resolutions and texture quality settings. The 64-bit memory bus is particularly limiting for bandwidth-hungry modern game engines.

The FPS scaling picture, while unmeasured for this exact pairing, can be inferred from the GPU's position relative to the RX 590 and GTX 1630. Those GPUs historically deliver playable 1080p performance at medium settings in most titles, so the A350M should fall in that range. The CPU's single-thread performance (1750 in Cinebench R23) ensures it won't bottleneck the GPU at 1080p, but at lower resolutions or with esports titles, the GPU will saturate before the CPU reaches its limits.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 70th percentile standing and its proximity to the RX 590 (0.4% behind) and GTX 1630 (1.5% ahead) suggest 1080p gaming at medium to high settings is feasible for esports titles and older games, while newer AAA games will require low settings to maintain playable frame rates.

The CPU's 4.80 GHz boost clock and 3631 Passmark single-thread score indicate it can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios like competitive shooters. However, the GPU's 24 ROPs and 52.80 GPixel/s pixel rate will cap fill-rate-heavy scenes. The 4 GB VRAM will require texture quality reductions in modern games that exceed this capacity at 1080p. The 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p but will cause stuttering in games that stream large textures. For 1440p, the GPU will be severely limited, and 4K gaming is not realistic with this configuration.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need a capable CPU for productivity and light gaming in a laptop form factor. Students and office workers who run spreadsheets, documents, and web applications will find the 13600H's single-thread performance (3631 Passmark) more than sufficient, while the Arc A350M provides occasional light gaming capability. Content creators working with 1080p video will appreciate the CPU's multi-threaded rendering (12402 Cinebench R23) and the GPU's hardware acceleration for effects.

Small business workstations that run accounting software, database applications, and moderate multitasking will benefit from the 16 threads and 267936 Passmark data compression score. Software developers compiling code will see responsive build times from the 78658 integer math score. Gamers at 1080p who prioritize esports titles over AAA graphics will find this pairing workable, though they should expect to lower settings in demanding games. The 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus make this unsuitable for high-resolution texture packs or VR workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the processor cannot be upgraded independently. The system supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, allowing for memory speed upgrades if the laptop has accessible SODIMM slots. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so the GPU interface is not a bottleneck. The 45 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP suggest a modest total system power draw, so the included PSU should have adequate headroom.

A sensible next upgrade would be more system memory, as dual-channel DDR5 can improve both CPU and iGPU performance. The Arc A350M's 4 GB VRAM is the most limiting factor, but the GPU is soldered or otherwise not upgradeable in most laptop designs. The platform's production status for the GPU is listed as end-of-life, so driver support and optimization are unlikely to improve significantly. Users seeking better gaming performance would need a new laptop with a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU itself remains competitive with newer parts like the Core Ultra 5 225T (0.3% behind).

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i5-13600H compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS?

A: The 13600H has an average benchmark score of 30548, which is 0.5% higher than the Ryzen 5 7640HS's 30390. The 13600H's 12 cores and 16 threads with a 4.80 GHz boost clock give it a slight edge in multi-threaded workloads, though the difference is within run-to-run variance.

Q: Is the Arc A350M better than the GTX 1630?

A: Yes, but barely. The A350M's average GPU benchmark score is 24647, which is 1.5% higher than the GTX 1630's 24277. The A350M also has twice the VRAM (4 GB vs 4 GB, though both are 4 GB) and supports newer APIs like DirectX 12 Ultimate.

Q: Can this laptop handle 4K video editing?

A: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12402 and 16 threads can handle 4K timeline editing and export, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit complex effects and color grading. Export times will be CPU-bound and acceptable for occasional use.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and what does it mean for cooling?

A: The CPU has a 45 W TDP. In a thin laptop, this means sustained all-core workloads will generate significant heat, and the boost clock of 4.80 GHz may not be maintained for long periods. Users should expect some thermal throttling under heavy multi-threaded loads.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A350M has 6 RT cores, but their low count means ray-traced performance will be weak. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes ray tracing, but users should expect low frame rates with RT enabled even at 1080p.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and is it enough?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is enough for 1080p gaming at medium settings, but modern AAA games may exceed 4 GB VRAM at high texture quality, causing performance drops.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The choice of memory type will depend on the laptop's motherboard design, with DDR5 offering higher bandwidth for CPU-intensive tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600H is a 12-core, 16-thread processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node (Raptor Lake architecture, codename Raptor Lake-H). It has a base clock of 2.80 GHz and boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 45 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration and provides 8 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The integrated Iris Xe Graphics 80EU handles display output when the discrete GPU is not needed. The CPU was released on 2023-01-03 with a launch MSRP of $311 and remains in active production.

Benchmark results show a balanced performer. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12402 and single-core score of 1750 indicate strong scaling from 2.80 GHz to 4.80 GHz. Passmark multi-thread score of 23304 and single-thread score of 3631 confirm this. Data encryption (16061), extended instructions (15817), and random string sorting (29570) scores show the CPU handles diverse workloads efficiently. The physics score of 1490 suggests adequate performance for simulation tasks, while floating-point math (57618) and integer math (78658) scores indicate solid arithmetic throughput.

The CPU's nearest rivals—Core Ultra 5 225T, Core i9-11980HK, Ryzen 5 7640HS, and Ryzen 7 7736U—all score within 0.6% of the 13600H. This clustering means the 13600H's real-world advantage comes from its specific feature set: 12 cores at a 4.80 GHz boost, 18 MB L3 cache, and PCIe Gen 5 support. The 45 W TDP is standard for mobile H-series parts, balancing performance with thermal constraints. For users who need a laptop CPU that excels in both single-threaded responsiveness and multi-threaded productivity, the 13600H delivers a competitive package that remains relevant even as newer parts like the Core Ultra 5 225T arrive.