SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

117,088 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600 paired with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation represents a desktop configuration that combines a high-core-count mainstream processor with a professional-grade workstation graphics card. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and not empirical game testing data.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU pairing in the FACT PACK, all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the component benchmark scores. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 124812 places it in the 95th percentile of all GPUs, suggesting strong raw compute capability that should translate to high frame rates in most titles. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3758 indicates excellent per-thread performance, which is critical for gaming frame pacing and minimum frame rates.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation’s FP32 throughput of 19.17 TFLOPS provides substantial headroom for 1440p and 4K gaming, though the card’s 70 W TDP and 160-bit memory bus with 280.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance at very high resolutions compared to broader-bus gaming cards. The 20 GB GDDR6 VRAM is exceptionally generous for gaming, allowing maximum texture quality settings without capacity concerns in current titles. For esports and competitive games at 1080p, the CPU’s single-core performance should drive very high frame rates, while the GPU’s 6144 shading units handle the rendering workload efficiently.

At 1440p with ultra settings, the combination should deliver smooth gameplay in most modern titles, with the GPU becoming the primary bottleneck in graphically intensive scenes. At 4K, the memory bandwidth of 280.0 GB/s may constrain performance in the most demanding games, but the 20 GB VRAM capacity prevents texture streaming issues. The absence of measured FPS data means these are educated estimates from the benchmark scores, not verified results.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced pairing for mixed workloads, with the CPU’s 88th percentile rank closely matching the GPU’s 95th percentile position. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 31725 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26620 demonstrate strong multi-threaded capability that can feed the GPU in gaming scenarios. However, the GPU’s compute throughput is significantly ahead in parallel workloads, as shown by the Geekbench OpenCL score of 124812, which is approximately 2.8 times the GPU’s nearest rival delta of the RTX A5500 Mobile.

In gaming, the CPU’s single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3758) is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU at standard refresh rates. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4049 further confirms this. The bottleneck shifts to the GPU at higher resolutions where the 280.0 GB/s memory bandwidth becomes the limiting factor. For productivity applications, the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads handle compilation and encoding tasks, while the GPU accelerates rendering and compute workloads.

The combined percentile of 92 suggests that neither component dramatically outperforms the other, creating a system where the workload determines the active bottleneck. The CPU’s L3 cache of 24 MB shared helps maintain data throughput, while the GPU’s 192 tensor cores accelerate AI workloads independently of CPU involvement.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for modern storage and expansion cards. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the GPU’s interface uses the older standard.

The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 70 W TDP combine for a modest total power draw, and the suggested PSU rating of 250 W provides ample headroom for the entire system. This low power requirement means the existing platform can support the components without PSU upgrades in most desktop cases. The GPU’s dual-slot design and 168 mm length allow installation in compact chassis, though the lack of power connectors indicates it draws all power from the PCIe slot.

A sensible next upgrade would be adding DDR5 memory if the motherboard supports it, as the CPU’s dual-channel memory bus can benefit from the higher bandwidth of DDR5 compared to DDR4. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU also support next-generation NVMe storage for faster load times. The platform’s active production status ensures ongoing BIOS support, and the ECC memory capability adds reliability for workstation use cases.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3758 and PassMark single-thread score of 4049 indicate strong per-core performance that can sustain high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. The GPU’s 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provides sufficient rendering power for 144Hz displays in most titles, though the 160-bit memory bus may limit performance at 4K high-refresh.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26620, handle simultaneous game encoding and streaming workloads without significant frame drops. The GPU’s 192 tensor cores can also accelerate encoding tasks, offloading work from the CPU.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 383972 and integer math score of 111044 demonstrate strong processing power for video codecs and effects. The GPU’s 20 GB VRAM and 280.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate timeline rendering and export tasks, with the Geekbench OpenCL score of 124812 confirming compute capability.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 48 RT cores and 6144 shading units provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing and rasterization for 3D workloads. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 11180 handles scene preparation and physics simulation, while the GPU renders final frames.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 31725 supports parallel compilation and build processes, while the 20 threads allow efficient multitasking across IDEs and containers. The GPU accelerates code profiling and machine learning workloads through its 192 tensor cores.

Student and office work: The CPU’s integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output for everyday tasks, while the discrete GPU offers headroom for design and engineering coursework. The 65 W CPU TDP and 70 W GPU TDP keep power consumption low for dorm rooms and small offices.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 features 14 cores and 20 threads, combining performance cores and efficiency cores in a hybrid architecture built on Raptor Lake. The base clock of 2.70 GHz boosts to 5.00 GHz, delivering strong single-thread performance as shown by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3758. The 24 MB shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache provide substantial data storage for frequently accessed information.

The 10 nm process node and 215 mm² die size produce a 65 W TDP, making this a power-efficient processor for desktop systems. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation applications. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display capabilities when the discrete GPU is not needed.

The PassMark scores show balanced performance across different workload types: integer math at 111044, floating point math at 81892, and data encryption at 22182. The extended instructions score of 23045 indicates solid support for modern instruction sets, while the find prime numbers score of 109 reflects the efficiency core performance. The avgBenchmarkScore of 44240 places the CPU in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, with the nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385, scoring 44309 (just 0.2% higher).

FAQ

Q: Does this configuration support DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the GPU memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 160-bit bus width and 280.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Can the CPU handle multi-threaded workloads?

A: Yes, the CPU has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26620 and a PassMark multithread score of 31725.

Q: What PCIe version does the CPU support?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Q: Is ECC memory supported?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation and data integrity workloads.

Q: What is the power draw of the GPU?

A: The GPU has a 70 W TDP and requires no power connectors, drawing power from the PCIe slot, with a suggested PSU of 250 W.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 48 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, providing hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets gamers who prioritize professional-grade rendering quality at 1440p and are willing to accept the GPU’s workstation-oriented design. The 20 GB VRAM supports high-resolution texture packs and future game releases, while the CPU’s single-core performance ensures responsive gameplay. Content creators working with 4K video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the combination of the CPU’s 14 cores and the GPU’s 6144 shading units, with the 192 tensor cores accelerating AI-based effects.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 31725 and the 20 threads for parallel build tasks. Students in engineering and design programs can use the system for CAD and simulation workloads, where the GPU’s compute capability and ECC memory support (via the CPU) add reliability. Small business workstations requiring professional graphics validation, as indicated by the GPU’s workstation generation, will find the dual-slot design and 168 mm length suitable for compact chassis.

The low power requirements (65 W CPU and 70 W GPU) make this build suitable for environments where heat and noise are concerns. The lack of GPU power connectors simplifies installation in small form factor cases, while the 250 W suggested PSU leaves room for additional storage and peripherals.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-13600, a 14-core Raptor Lake processor, with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, a workstation-focused GPU from the Ada Lovelace architecture. The combined percentile of 92 places this configuration in the top tier of systems, with the CPU at the 88th percentile and the GPU at the 95th percentile of their respective categories. The CPU’s avgBenchmarkScore of 44240 and the GPU’s avgBenchmarkScore of 117088 indicate strong overall performance.

The build is designed for professional and high-end consumer use, with the GPU’s 20 GB VRAM and 48 RT cores providing workstation-level capability. The CPU’s support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory allows flexibility in system configuration, while the 65 W TDP keeps power consumption reasonable. The GPU’s 168 mm length and dual-slot design make it compatible with a wide range of desktop cases, and the absence of power connectors simplifies installation.

This pairing sits above typical gaming systems due to the GPU’s workstation positioning, yet remains accessible for enthusiasts due to the CPU’s mainstream pricing (launch MSRP $255). The configuration represents a balance of CPU compute and GPU rendering power, suitable for mixed workloads spanning gaming, content creation, and professional applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results show a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26620 and single-core score of 3758, placing it at the 88th percentile of all CPUs. The PassMark scores further detail the performance profile: multithread at 31725, single-thread at 4049, integer math at 111044, and floating point math at 81892. The avgBenchmarkScore of 44240 sits just 0.2% below the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (44309) and 0.7% below the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44573), indicating very close competition with these rivals.

The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 124812 and Vulkan score of 109364 place it at the 95th percentile of all GPUs. The avgBenchmarkScore of 117088 is 1.6% below the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 (118976) and 0.3% below the NVIDIA GB10 (117393), but 2.4% above the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB (114395) and 2.8% above the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile (113944). The combined picture shows a system where the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, while the CPU remains competitive within its segment.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is built on the AD104 chip using a 5 nm process from TSMC, with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The GPU features 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines, producing a pixel rate of 99.84 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 299.5 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput of 19.17 TFLOPS matches the FP16 throughput, indicating non-doubled compute for AI workloads.

The 20 GB of GDDR6 memory operates at 1750 MHz with a 14 Gbps effective data rate, delivering 280.0 GB/s bandwidth over a 160-bit bus. The 48 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing, while the 192 tensor cores accelerate AI and deep learning tasks. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

The clock speeds are conservative at a 720 MHz base and 1560 MHz boost, reflecting the SFF (small form factor) design’s 70 W TDP. The dual-slot cooler and 168 mm length make this a compact card, while the lack of power connectors means the 250 W suggested PSU only needs to supply the CPU and system components. The Geekbench scores indicate that the GPU outperforms the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB by 2.4% and the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile by 2.8%, despite the workstation-oriented design, making this a capable rendering card for professional workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds