SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600 paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a desktop configuration that combines a high-core-count modern processor with a workstation-oriented graphics card from the Turing generation. The database records no measured frame rate data for this specific combination, so all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile among all processors, while the GPU falls at the 61st percentile among all graphics cards, giving this pairing a combined percentile of 75. This gap in relative standing already hints at where the performance balance lies.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this configuration is a mixed proposition. The CPU delivers excellent single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3758 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4049, which are strong enough to feed high frame rates in most titles. The GPU, however, with a Passmark G3D score of 15117 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873, sits in the 61st percentile, meaning it will often be the factor that limits how high the frame rate can go. At 1080p the CPU can push high frame rates, but the GPU will hold back the absolute maximum refresh rates in demanding titles.

Streaming and broadcast workloads benefit from the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 and Passmark multi-thread score of 31725 give the i5-13600 plenty of headroom for software encoding alongside a game. The GPU lacks the dedicated video encoding hardware found in newer consumer cards, so CPU-based x264 encoding is the practical path, and the processor has the computational reserves to handle it.

Video editing presents a balanced workload. The CPU's multi-core strength, shown by the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11180, handles timeline operations and export rendering well. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 416.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth are sufficient for working with high-resolution footage and applying effects, though the Passmark GPU compute score of 6176 is modest by modern standards. Effects-heavy projects that rely on GPU acceleration will see the Quadro become the constraint.

3D rendering favors the CPU heavily. The i5-13600 delivers strong results in CPU-based renderers, with a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2683 and a Passmark integer math score of 111044. The Quadro RTX 4000 does support ray tracing with 36 RT cores, so GPU-accelerated renderers will function, but the 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 14.24 TFLOPS FP16 performance are not class-leading. CPU rendering will likely complete faster than GPU rendering in most scenes.

Software development benefits from both components. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads speed up compilation, with Passmark data compression scoring 383972 and extended instructions scoring 23045 indicating strong throughput in code-heavy tasks. The GPU provides solid OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4 support, useful for graphics programming and testing DirectX 12 Ultimate workloads, even if its raw compute is limited.

Student and office work is where this pairing is overqualified. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 4049 ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the GPU's capabilities far exceed what spreadsheets, document editing, and web browsing require. The 65 W TDP of the CPU keeps the system reasonably efficient for sustained office workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows the GPU as the limiting factor in most demanding workloads. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile while the GPU holds only the 61st percentile, a 27-point gap that indicates the processor has substantially more headroom than the graphics card. In gaming, this means the Quadro RTX 4000 will cap frame rates well below what the i5-13600 could otherwise feed. The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385, Intel Core i9-13950HX, and AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, all with average scores between 44309 and 44573, placing the i5-13600 within 0.7 percent of these much pricier or newer parts.

For CPU-bound workloads like compilation, rendering, and data processing, the balance flips. The GPU's compute capabilities are not needed, and the i5-13600 can operate at its full potential. The Passmark physics score of 1782 and floating point math score of 81892 indicate the processor handles physics simulations and scientific calculations without GPU assistance. In these tasks the GPU sits largely idle, and the CPU becomes the sole determinant of performance.

The bottleneck shifts depending on the workload type. In gaming at higher resolutions, the GPU becomes even more dominant as the limiting factor, since the rendering load increases while the CPU's frame-feeding requirements stay constant. In creative applications that use GPU acceleration, such as effects rendering or AI inference with the 288 tensor cores, the Quadro's modest compute score of 6176 will throttle performance. The CPU's Passmark data encryption score of 22182 and find prime numbers score of 109 show it handles security and mathematical workloads efficiently, tasks where the GPU contributes nothing.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is built on the Turing architecture using the TU104 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 12 nm process. The die contains 13,600 million transistors across 545 mm², giving a transistor density of 25.0 million per square millimeter. This is a professional workstation card with 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines. The memory subsystem uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth at an effective speed of 13 Gbps.

Clock speeds are modest by modern standards, with a base of 1005 MHz and a boost of 1545 MHz. The pixel rate reaches 98.88 GPixel/s and the texture rate hits 222.5 GTexel/s. Compute throughput is rated at 7.119 TFLOPS for FP32 and 14.24 TFLOPS for FP16 using a 2:1 ratio. The card includes 36 RT cores for hardware ray tracing and 288 tensor cores for AI acceleration, making it capable of running DirectX 12 Ultimate workloads with the 12_2 feature level.

Benchmark results show a mixed picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 places the card in the lower portion of modern GPUs, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540 and Vulkan score of 78844 indicate reasonable compute throughput for its generation. Passmark results are more revealing of its age: DirectX 9 scores 205, DirectX 10 scores 108, DirectX 11 scores 128, and DirectX 12 drops to 52. The Passmark G3D score of 15117 and GPU compute score of 6176 put the card at the 61st percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon HD 7790, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, and AMD Radeon 780M, all within 1.4 percent of its average score.

For rendering workloads, the 8 GB VRAM is a real limitation. Modern scenes with high-resolution textures can exceed this capacity, causing the card to fall back to slower memory handling. The 416.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and moderate 1440p work, but 4K texture sets will strain the memory subsystem. The 36 RT cores provide ray tracing acceleration, but the overall compute throughput caps the complexity of scenes that can be rendered in real time.

Who Should Build It

The primary audience for this pairing is professionals who need workstation-grade graphics features alongside strong CPU performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 supports 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C outputs, making it suitable for multi-monitor CAD workstations, scientific visualization, and engineering applications that require certified drivers. The single-slot design and 160 W TDP allow it to fit into compact workstation chassis, and the 450 W suggested PSU keeps system power requirements modest.

Gamers targeting 1080p at medium to high settings are the realistic gaming audience. The CPU's 88th percentile standing ensures no CPU bottleneck at this resolution, while the GPU's 61st percentile means frame rates will be playable but not extreme. Gamers at 1440p or 4K should look elsewhere, as the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates at these resolutions in demanding titles.

Content creators working in video editing and 2D design will find the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads valuable for export and rendering, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM handles 1080p and 1440p timelines. Developers building applications that use CUDA, OpenCL, or Vulkan can leverage the 288 tensor cores and 36 RT cores for testing machine learning and ray tracing code, even if the performance is not competitive with newer hardware.

Students in engineering or computer science programs benefit from the CPU's compilation speed and the GPU's broad API support. Small business workstations running office software, accounting tools, and light CAD will perform with substantial headroom. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and the 160 W TDP of the GPU keep heat output manageable, allowing for quieter cooling solutions in office environments.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The configuration holds a combined percentile of 75, with the CPU at the 88th percentile among all CPUs and the GPU at the 61st percentile among all GPUs.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the Quadro RTX 4000 provide?

A: The GPU delivers 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth through 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, running at an effective speed of 13 Gbps.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-13600 support error-correcting memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation builds where data integrity is critical. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configurations.

Q: What ray tracing hardware does the Quadro RTX 4000 include?

A: The GPU features 36 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and 288 tensor cores for AI workloads, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate with the 12_2 feature level.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The i5-13600 has an average benchmark score of 44240, which is 0.2 percent behind the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 at 44309, 0.2 percent behind the Intel Core i9-13950HX at 44342, 0.5 percent behind the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H at 44466, and 0.7 percent behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D at 44573.

Q: What is the production status of the Quadro RTX 4000?

A: The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with a release date of November 2018. Its predecessor is Quadro Volta and its successor is Workstation Ampere.

Q: What is the power draw of each component?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 160 W TDP. The system requires a suggested PSU of 450 W.

Gaming Performance

No measured frame rate data exists in the database for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The following estimates are derived from the individual benchmark scores of each component. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, shown by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3758 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4049, indicates it can sustain high frame rates without becoming a bottleneck. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 15117 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1873 suggest it is the limiting factor.

At 1080p in light esports titles, the CPU should allow frame rates in the high range, limited primarily by the GPU's DirectX 11 score of 128. Older games that do not stress modern GPU features will run comfortably. In demanding AAA titles at 1080p with ultra settings, frame rates will drop to the playable but not high range, as the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 52 indicates limited modern API performance.

At 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth become more significant constraints. Frame rates will be lower than at 1080p, and texture-heavy scenes may exceed VRAM capacity. At 4K, the GPU is not suitable for high-refresh gaming, and even 60 FPS targets will be difficult to maintain in most modern titles. The CPU would not be the limiting factor at any of these resolutions; the GPU consistently caps performance.

The Passmark DirectX 9 score of 205 and DirectX 10 score of 108 suggest that older games, particularly those from the early 2010s, will run well. DirectX 11 games will see moderate performance, while DirectX 12 titles will show the card's age. The 36 RT cores enable ray tracing effects in supported games, but the 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limits the quality settings that can be used alongside ray tracing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 is a Raptor Lake-S desktop processor built on Intel's 10 nm process. It has 14 cores and 20 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores to handle both heavy multi-threaded workloads and lightly threaded tasks. The base clock is 2.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and the CPU has a 65 W TDP. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache configuration helps with workloads that benefit from large working sets, such as databases and compilation. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and ECC memory is supported, which is important for workstation reliability.

Benchmark results show strong all-around performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 and single-core score of 3758 both exceed what most desktop CPUs achieve. The Passmark multi-thread score of 31725 and single-thread score of 4049 confirm the CPU's balanced capabilities. Data-oriented workloads show particularly strong results: data compression scores 383972, data encryption scores 22182, and extended instructions score 23045.

The average benchmark score of 44240 places the CPU at the 88th percentile, with nearest rivals all within 0.7 percent. This puts the i5-13600 in the same performance class as the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385, Intel Core i9-13950HX, and AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, despite typically being a lower-tier product in the Core lineup. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output, useful for troubleshooting or systems without a discrete GPU.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13600 with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000. The CPU was released in January 2023 with a launch MSRP of $255, while the GPU was released in November 2018 with a launch MSRP of 899 USD. The combination represents a modern processor paired with an older professional graphics card, creating a system with strong CPU throughput but dated GPU capabilities.

The combined percentile of 75 reflects the gap between the two components. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking makes it a high-end processor by any measure, while the GPU's 61st percentile places it in the mid-range of graphics cards. This asymmetry defines the system's character: it is a capable workstation for CPU-intensive tasks, but only a moderate gaming machine.

The build targets users who need the CPU's 14 cores, 20 threads, and 24 MB of L3 cache for productivity work, while also requiring the Quadro's professional features such as ECC memory support, certified drivers, and multi-display outputs. The total system power requirement is modest, with the CPU at 65 W TDP, the GPU at 160 W TDP, and a 450 W suggested PSU.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13600 delivers strong benchmark results across all tested workloads. In Cinebench, the CPU scores 2683 in R15 multi-core, 378 in R15 single-core, 11180 in R20 multi-core, 1578 in R20 single-core, 26620 in R23 multi-core, and 3758 in R23 single-core. Passmark results include data compression at 383972, data encryption at 22182, extended instructions at 23045, floating point math at 81892, integer math at 111044, multi-thread at 31725, physics at 1782, random string sorting at 42040, and single-thread at 4049.

The average benchmark score for the CPU is 44240, placing it at the 88th percentile among all processors. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 with an average score of 44309, the Intel Core i9-13950HX with 44342, the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H with 44466, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D with 44573. The i5-13600 trails these parts by between 0.2 and 0.7 percent, a narrow margin that shows it competes with much more expensive processors.

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 shows more modest results. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 it scores 1873, in Geekbench OpenCL it scores 74540, and in Geekbench Vulkan it scores 78844. Passmark scores are 108 for DirectX 10, 128 for DirectX 11, 52 for DirectX 12, 205 for DirectX 9, 846 for G2D, 15117 for G3D, and 6176 for GPU compute.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 17789, placing it at the 61st percentile among all graphics cards. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon HD 7790 with 17666, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 with 17639, the AMD Radeon 780M with 17588, and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 with 17551. The Quadro leads these parts by between 0.7 and 1.4 percent, a slim margin that shows it performs similarly to the RTX 4060 in aggregate scoring despite being several generations older.

When viewed together, the CPU and GPU present a clear performance hierarchy. The processor operates at a level comparable to flagship laptop CPUs and high-end desktop parts, while the graphics card performs at the level of a mid-range modern GPU. This means the system excels at CPU-bound tasks such as compilation, rendering, data processing, and office productivity, while GPU-bound tasks such as high-refresh gaming and GPU-accelerated effects will be limited by the older graphics hardware.