SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

98%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

79,842 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis — Intel Core i5-13600

The Intel Core i5-13600 sits in the 88th percentile of all CPUs tracked in the database, placing it comfortably above the median but short of the top-tier halo parts. That positioning is earned through a hybrid configuration of 14 cores and 20 threads, built on the Raptor Lake architecture at Intel's 10 nm process. The die measures 215 mm², and the cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 pool. This is a desktop part, locked (multiplierUnlocked is false), and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory support as a notable inclusion for workstation-oriented builds.

The benchmark scores tell a story of a CPU that is far stronger in multi-threaded workloads than its single-thread numbers might suggest. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 26620 dwarfs the single-core result of 3758, a ratio that indicates excellent scaling across the 14 cores. The R20 numbers echo this: 11180 multi-core versus 1578 single-core. Even in R15, the pattern holds with 2683 multi-core and 378 single-core. PassMark results reinforce the multi-threaded strength — the multithread score of 31725 is the second-highest PassMark figure for this CPU, trailing only the data compression score of 383972. Integer math hits 111044, floating-point math reaches 81892, and random string sorting manages 42040. These are not just abstract numbers; they translate into tangible performance for compilation, rendering, and data processing.

What is striking is the comparison to its nearest rivals. The i5-13600's average benchmark score of 44240 is within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (44309) and the Intel Core i9-13950HX (44342), and within 0.5% of the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (44466). The Ryzen 5 7500X3D leads this group by only 0.7% (44573). In other words, this mid-range desktop chip is trading blows with a top-end mobile HX processor and a newer AMD AI-focused part. The delta percentages are all under one percent, meaning the i5-13600 is essentially neck-and-neck with these rivals in aggregate performance, despite being positioned in a lower tier of Intel's 13th-gen stack.

For real workloads, the data implies a processor that can handle heavy parallel tasks without breaking a sweat. The PassMark physics score of 1782 and the find prime numbers score of 109 are lower, but those are niche single-threaded or latency-sensitive tests. Data encryption at 22182 and extended instructions at 23045 show solid cryptographic and SIMD throughput. The single-thread PassMark score of 4049 (duplicated as both passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread) indicates that everyday responsiveness is not neglected. The base clock of 2.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz provide a wide dynamic range, letting the chip idle efficiently and burst to high frequencies when a single core needs to shine.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i5-13600 compare to its closest rival in the database?

A: The i5-13600's average benchmark score of 44240 is 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (44309) and 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i9-13950HX (44342). The gap to the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H is 0.5%, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D leads by 0.7%. These are negligible differences in real-world terms.

Q: What is the strongest workload for this CPU?

A: Multi-threaded tasks are clearly the i5-13600's strength. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 is over seven times the single-core score of 3758, and the PassMark multithread score of 31725 is among the highest for this chip. Data compression at 383972 and integer math at 111044 are also standout results.

Q: Does the i5-13600 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the FACT PACK indicates eccMemory is true. This is a feature typically associated with workstation or server platforms, and its presence on a mainstream desktop CPU makes it suitable for error-sensitive compute tasks, though it requires a motherboard that supports ECC.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of this CPU?

A: The launch MSRP is $255. The production status is listed as Active, so it remains a current product as of the data snapshot.

Q: What socket does the i5-13600 use and what memory does it support?

A: It uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, which provides a fallback display output if no discrete GPU is installed.

Q: How does the i5-13600's single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread performance in PassMark?

A: The PassMark single-thread score is 4049, while the multithread score is 31725. That is a nearly 8x difference, showing that the chip scales exceptionally well across its 14 cores, but single-core performance is still competitive for everyday tasks.

GPU Analysis — NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

The GeForce RTX 5090 is a monster of a GPU, and the data confirms it without any ambiguity. It sits in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 79842. The chip is GB202, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture at TSMC's 5 nm process, with a die size of 750 mm² and 92,200 million transistors. That density works out to 122.9 million transistors per square millimeter, a figure that speaks to the complexity of the design.

Memory is where the RTX 5090 separates itself from almost everything else. It packs 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s. The memory clock is listed at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective transfer. The shading units number 21760, with 680 TMUs and 176 ROPs. Ray tracing hardware is present in the form of 170 RT cores, and there are 680 tensor cores for AI workloads. The FP32 throughput is 104.8 TFLOPS, and FP16 is also 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1), indicating that the GPU does not halve its rate for half-precision work — a useful trait for AI inference and training.

The benchmark scores reflect this raw power. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the score is 18355. GeekBench OpenCL hits 334370, and Vulkan reaches 376728. PassMark G3D is 39650, while the GPU compute score is 26756. The older DirectX tests are less impressive — DirectX 10 at 226, DirectX 11 at 341, DirectX 12 at 185, and DirectX 9 at 395 — but these are legacy APIs that do not stress the modern architecture. The G2D score of 1413 is also modest, as expected for a compute-focused card.

The nearest rivals in the database are curious. The Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (79605) is 0.3% behind, and the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (79396) is 0.6% behind. The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (78940) trails by 1.1%, and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X (80959) actually leads by 1.4%. None of these are modern gaming GPUs — they are datacenter or professional parts. This suggests the RTX 5090's aggregate benchmark score is being compared against a set of compute-oriented cards, not its actual gaming peers, which makes the percentile position of 92 more about raw compute than gaming-specific performance.

For rendering, the pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s imply that the card can fill frames at exceptional speed. The 32 GB VRAM is not just for gaming at high resolutions; it is a buffer for large 3D scenes, AI model weights, and video editing timelines. The power envelope is substantial — the TDP is 575 W, with a suggested PSU of 950 W and a single 16-pin connector. This is a card that demands a serious power supply and a case with good airflow.

Who Should Build It

The combination of a mid-range 14-core CPU and a top-tier 32 GB GPU targets a specific user: someone who needs maximum GPU throughput but does not necessarily require the fastest CPU available. The data shows the CPU is in the 88th percentile and the GPU in the 92nd, with a combined percentile of 90. This is a desktop build, and it is not balanced in the traditional sense — the GPU is clearly the dominant component.

Gamers at 4K resolution would benefit most, as the RTX 5090's massive bandwidth and compute power are designed to push high frame rates at demanding resolutions, while the i5-13600's 20 threads ensure that background tasks and game logic do not bottleneck. Content creators working with 8K video or complex 3D scenes will use the 32 GB VRAM heavily. Developers building AI models or running large data processing jobs will find the tensor cores and FP16 throughput of 104.8 TFLOPS useful, and the CPU's ECC support adds reliability for long compute runs.

Students and small business workstations would be over-served by this pairing, but for a professional who needs a single machine for both heavy GPU compute and general productivity, the i5-13600 provides enough multi-threaded grunt (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 26620) without the expense of a higher-tier CPU that would sit idle in GPU-bound tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The i5-13600 and RTX 5090 are not a matched pair in terms of tier. The CPU is a mainstream part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a 575 W behemoth. In GPU-bound workloads — which most gaming and rendering tasks are — the RTX 5090 will be the limiting factor, and the CPU will have headroom to spare. The PassMark multithread score of 31725 is high enough that the CPU is unlikely to stall the GPU in most scenarios.

However, in CPU-bound tasks, the balance shifts. The single-thread PassMark score of 4049 is decent but not elite, and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3758 is similarly mid-pack. If a game or application relies heavily on a single thread, the i5-13600 could become the bottleneck, preventing the RTX 5090 from reaching its full frame rate potential. The percentile gap — 88 for the CPU versus 92 for the GPU — suggests that the GPU is the stronger component in this pairing.

Power delivery is another consideration. The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest, but the GPU's 575 W TDP and the suggested PSU of 950 W mean the system will draw substantial power under load. The dual-channel memory bus could also be a bottleneck in memory-intensive tasks, as the CPU only has 24 MB of L3 cache to work with, and the DDR4/DDR5 support means the user must choose a memory type that matches the motherboard.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows in the FACT PACK for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The dataIsMeasured field is false, and measuredFpsUltraByGame is empty. All FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not observed results.

Given the RTX 5090's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18355 and its 32 GB VRAM, this pairing should be capable of running any game at ultra settings at 4K resolution with high frame rates. The i5-13600's 20 threads and 5.00 GHz boost clock should handle game logic and physics without issue in most titles. However, for esports titles that rely heavily on single-core performance, the CPU's single-thread scores (Cinebench R23 single-core of 3758, PassMark single-thread of 4049) may cap frame rates below what the GPU could theoretically deliver. At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor, while at 4K, the GPU will dominate the workload and the CPU bottleneck will be less pronounced.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1440p or 4K, the RTX 5090's compute power (104.8 TFLOPS FP32) and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth should sustain high frame rates on demanding titles at ultra settings. The i5-13600's 14 cores provide enough thread throughput for modern game engines, but single-thread-sensitive titles may see lower frame rates than a higher-tier CPU would allow.

Streaming: The GPU's tensor cores (680) can handle encoding offload, and the CPU's data compression score of 383972 indicates strong throughput for handling stream encoding and game logic simultaneously. The 20 threads are sufficient for a game plus encoding workload.

Video editing: The 32 GB VRAM is ideal for large timelines and 8K footage, and the GPU's pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s will accelerate effects and color grading. The CPU's multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 26620 will help with export and rendering tasks, though it is not the fastest available.

3D rendering: The GPU's FP16 throughput of 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1) makes it well-suited for render engines that use half-precision, and the 32 GB VRAM can hold large scenes. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 31725 assists with scene preparation and physics simulation.

Software development: Compilation is a multi-threaded task, and the i5-13600's 20 threads with an integer math score of 111044 will handle large codebases efficiently. The GPU is largely unused here, but the ECC memory support (if enabled) adds stability for long build processes.

Student and office work: This pairing is massively over-powered for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU's single-thread PassMark score of 4049 ensures snappy responsiveness, but the GPU's 575 W TDP makes this an impractical choice for a standard office machine.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-13600 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake part with a 65 W TDP, and the GPU is a 32 GB Blackwell 2.0 flagship with a 575 W TDP. The combined percentile is 90, placing this system in the top 10% of all tracked builds. However, the pair is unbalanced: the GPU is in the 92nd percentile while the CPU is in the 88th, meaning the CPU is the weaker link in most workloads. The launch MSRP of the CPU is $255 and the GPU is $1,999, but this build is about raw performance, not cost efficiency.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 44240, with a percentile rank of 88 among all CPUs. Its best individual results are the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 and the PassMark data compression score of 383972. The GPU's average benchmark score is 79842, with a percentile rank of 92 among all GPUs. Its standout results are the GeekBench Vulkan score of 376728 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18355.

The combined picture is one of a system that dramatically favors GPU compute over CPU throughput. The delta between the CPU and its nearest rivals — all under 1% — suggests that the i5-13600 is well-matched against much more expensive processors in aggregate performance. The GPU's nearest rivals are professional and datacenter cards, indicating that the RTX 5090's benchmark profile is more about raw compute than gaming-specific metrics. Together, they form a system that excels at GPU-heavy tasks but is not optimized for CPU-limited workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i5-13600 uses Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for 12th and 13th generation Intel Core processors. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, so the motherboard choice will dictate which memory type is used. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which matches the RTX 5090's PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface. The GPU's suggested PSU is 950 W, and the CPU's TDP is 65 W, so a power supply in that range is necessary to handle the combined load.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU fails or is removed. The production status of both components is Active, meaning they are currently available. The next sensible upgrade path would be to a higher-tier CPU on the same socket, such as an i7 or i9 from the 13th generation, to better match the GPU's performance ceiling. However, the data shows that the i5-13600 is within 0.7% of the top rivals in its benchmark class, so the upgrade would yield diminishing returns unless the workload is specifically CPU-bound. Alternatively, moving to a newer platform with DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 5 would future-proof the system, but the current setup is already well-equipped for most tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

GPU Analysis — NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds